A Counterexample to the Optimality Conjecture in Convex Quantum Channel Optimization
School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
State Key Laboratory of Mathematical Sciences, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences
| Published: | 2026-10-28, volume 10, page 2253 |
| Editor: | Jordi Tura |
| Eprint: | arXiv:2512.22863v3 |
| Doi: | https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2026-10-28-2253 |
| Citation: | Quantum 10, 2253 (2026). |
Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.
Abstract
This paper presents a counterexample to the optimality conjecture for the trace distance based optimal state transformation problem proposed by Coutts et al. [Quantum 5, 448 (2021)]. The conjecture posits that for the trace distance based optimal state transformation problem, applying the sign function to the error matrix uniquely determines a dual certificate for every optimal solution. By constructing a counterexample in 2-dimensional Hilbert spaces, we disprove this conjecture.
► BibTeX data
► References
[1] A. S. Holevo. ``Statistical decision theory for quantum systems''. J. Multivariate Anal. 3, 337–394 (1973).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-259X(73)90028-6
[2] Horace P. Yuen, Robert S. Kennedy, and Melvin Lax. ``Optimum testing of multiple hypotheses in quantum detection theory''. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory IT-21, 125–134 (1975).
https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.1975.1055351
[3] Yonina C. Eldar, Alexandre Megretski, and George C. Verghese. ``Designing optimal quantum detectors via semidefinite programming''. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 49, 1007–1012 (2003).
https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2003.809510
[4] Shuyang Ling. ``Solving orthogonal group synchronization via convex and low-rank optimization: tightness and landscape analysis''. Math. Program. 200, 589–628 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-022-01896-3
[5] Shuyang Ling, Ruitu Xu, and Afonso S. Bandeira. ``On the landscape of synchronization networks: a perspective from nonconvex optimization''. SIAM J. Optim. 29, 1879–1907 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1137/18M1217644
[6] Jie Wang and Liangbing Hu. ``Solving low-rank semidefinite programs via manifold optimization''. J. Sci. Comput. 104, 33 (2025).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-025-02952-8
[7] Bryan Coutts, Mark Girard, and John Watrous. ``Certifying optimality for convex quantum channel optimization problems''. Quantum 5, 448 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2021-05-01-448
[8] Karin Gatermann and Pablo A. Parrilo. ``Symmetry groups, semidefinite programs, and sums of squares''. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 192, 95–128 (2004).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpaa.2003.12.011
[9] Cordian Riener, Thorsten Theobald, Lina Jansson Andrén, and Jean B. Lasserre. ``Exploiting symmetries in SDP-relaxations for polynomial optimization''. Math. Oper. Res. 38, 122–141 (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.1120.0558
Cited by
Could not fetch Crossref cited-by data during last attempt 2026-10-28 14:25:27: Could not fetch cited-by data for 10.22331/q-2026-10-28-2253 from Crossref. This is normal if the DOI was registered recently. On SAO/NASA ADS no data on citing works was found (last attempt 2026-10-28 14:25:28).
This Paper is published in Quantum under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. Copyright remains with the original copyright holders such as the authors or their institutions.