An Improved Sample Complexity Lower Bound for (Fidelity) Quantum State Tomography

Henry Yuen

doi:10.22331/q-2023-01-03-890

An Improved Sample Complexity Lower Bound for (Fidelity) Quantum State Tomography

Henry Yuen

Columbia University

Published:	2023-01-03, volume 7, page 890
Eprint:	arXiv:2206.11185v2
Doi:	https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-01-03-890
Citation:	Quantum 7, 890 (2023).

Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.

Abstract

We show that $\Omega(rd/\epsilon)$ copies of an unknown rank-$r$, dimension-$d$ quantum mixed state are necessary in order to learn a classical description with $1 – \epsilon$ fidelity. This improves upon the tomography lower bounds obtained by Haah, et al. and Wright (when closeness is measured with respect to the fidelity function).

Featured image: Quantum state tomography.

Popular summary

This paper presents a sharper lower bound on the number of copies of a quantum state needed to learn a classical description of it.

► BibTeX data

@article{Yuen2023improvedsample,
  doi = {10.22331/q-2023-01-03-890},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-01-03-890},
  title = {An {I}mproved {S}ample {C}omplexity {L}ower {B}ound for ({F}idelity) {Q}uantum {S}tate {T}omography},
  author = {Yuen, Henry},
  journal = {{Quantum}},
  issn = {2521-327X},
  publisher = {{Verein zur F{\"{o}}rderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften}},
  volume = {7},
  pages = {890},
  month = jan,
  year = {2023}
}

► References

[1] Dagmar Bruß and Chiara Macchiavello. Optimal state estimation for $d$-dimensional quantum systems. Physics Letters A, 253 (5-6): 249–251, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(99)00099-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(99)00099-7

[2] Jeongwan Haah, Aram W Harrow, Zhengfeng Ji, Xiaodi Wu, and Nengkun Yu. Sample-optimal tomography of quantum states. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 63 (9): 5628–5641, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1145/2897518.2897585.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2897518.2897585

[3] Michael Keyl and Reinhard F Werner. Optimal cloning of pure states, testing single clones. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 40 (7): 3283–3299, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.532887.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.532887

[4] Ryan O'Donnell and John Wright. Efficient quantum tomography. In Proceedings of the forty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 899–912, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1145/2897518.2897544.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2897518.2897544

[5] Reinhard F Werner. Optimal cloning of pure states. Physical Review A, 58 (3): 1827, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.58.1827.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.58.1827

[6] Andreas Winter. Coding theorem and strong converse for quantum channels. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 45 (7): 2481–2485, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.796385.
https://doi.org/10.1109/18.796385

[7] John Wright. How to learn a quantum state. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 2016.

Cited by

[1] Anurag Anshu and Srinivasan Arunachalam, "A survey on the complexity of learning quantum states", Nature Reviews Physics 6 1, 59 (2023).

[2] Xinbiao Wang, Yuxuan Du, Zhuozhuo Tu, Yong Luo, Xiao Yuan, and Dacheng Tao, "Transition role of entangled data in quantum machine learning", Nature Communications 15 1, 3716 (2024).

[3] Subhadeep Mondal and Amit Kumar Dutta, "A modified least squares-based tomography with density matrix perturbation and linear entropy consideration along with performance analysis", New Journal of Physics 25 8, 083051 (2023).

[4] Rafael Wagner, Zohar Schwartzman-Nowik, Ismael L Paiva, Amit Te’eni, Antonio Ruiz-Molero, Rui Soares Barbosa, Eliahu Cohen, and Ernesto F Galvão, "Quantum circuits for measuring weak values, Kirkwood–Dirac quasiprobability distributions, and state spectra", Quantum Science and Technology 9 1, 015030 (2024).

[5] Ziv Goldfeld, Dhrumil Patel, Sreejith Sreekumar, and Mark M. Wilde, "Quantum neural estimation of entropies", Physical Review A 109 3, 032431 (2024).

[6] Yi Shen and Lin Chen, "Additivity of states uniquely determined by marginals", Physical Review A 108 6, 062418 (2023).

[7] Alexander M. Dalzell, Sam McArdle, Mario Berta, Przemyslaw Bienias, Chi-Fang Chen, András Gilyén, Connor T. Hann, Michael J. Kastoryano, Emil T. Khabiboulline, Aleksander Kubica, Grant Salton, Samson Wang, and Fernando G. S. L. Brandão, "Quantum algorithms: A survey of applications and end-to-end complexities", arXiv:2310.03011, (2023).

[8] Nic Ezzell, Elliott M. Ball, Aliza U. Siddiqui, Mark M. Wilde, Andrew T. Sornborger, Patrick J. Coles, and Zoë Holmes, "Quantum mixed state compiling", Quantum Science and Technology 8 3, 035001 (2023).

[9] Srinivasan Arunachalam, Sergey Bravyi, Arkopal Dutt, and Theodore J. Yoder, "Optimal algorithms for learning quantum phase states", arXiv:2208.07851, (2022).

[10] Joran van Apeldoorn, Arjan Cornelissen, András Gilyén, and Giacomo Nannicini, "Quantum tomography using state-preparation unitaries", arXiv:2207.08800, (2022).

[11] Ming-Chien Hsu, En-Jui Kuo, Wei-Hsuan Yu, Jian-Feng Cai, and Min-Hsiu Hsieh, "Quantum state tomography via non-convex Riemannian gradient descent", arXiv:2210.04717, (2022).

The above citations are from Crossref's cited-by service (last updated successfully 2024-05-15 14:55:30) and SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2024-05-15 14:55:31). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.

This Paper is published in Quantum under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. Copyright remains with the original copyright holders such as the authors or their institutions.