Detecting crosstalk errors in quantum information processors
Quantum Performance Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185 and Livermore, CA 94550
| Published: | 2020-09-11, volume 4, page 321 |
| Eprint: | arXiv:1908.09855v3 |
| Doi: | https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-09-11-321 |
| Citation: | Quantum 4, 321 (2020). |
Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.
Abstract
Crosstalk occurs in most quantum computing systems with more than one qubit. It can cause a variety of correlated and nonlocal $\textit{crosstalk errors}$ that can be especially harmful to fault-tolerant quantum error correction, which generally relies on errors being local and relatively predictable. Mitigating crosstalk errors requires understanding, modeling, and detecting them. In this paper, we introduce a comprehensive framework for crosstalk errors and a protocol for detecting and localizing them. We give a rigorous definition of crosstalk errors that captures a wide range of disparate physical phenomena that have been called ``crosstalk'', and a concrete model for crosstalk-free quantum processors. Errors that violate this model are crosstalk errors. Next, we give an equivalent but purely operational (model-independent) definition of crosstalk errors. Using this definition, we construct a protocol for detecting a large class of crosstalk errors in a multi-qubit processor by finding conditional dependencies between observed experimental probabilities. It is highly efficient, in the sense that the number of unique experiments required scales at most cubically, and very often quadratically, with the number of qubits. We demonstrate the protocol using simulations of 2-qubit and 6-qubit processors.
Popular summary
► BibTeX data
► References
[1] PyGSTi. A python implementation of Gate Set Tomography. URL: http://www.pygsti.info/.
http://www.pygsti.info/
[2] IBM Qiskit/ibmq-device-information/tenerife, 2019. URL: https://github.com/Qiskit/ibmq-device-information/tree/master/backends/tenerife/V1.
https://github.com/Qiskit/ibmq-device-information/tree/master/backends/tenerife/V1
[3] Carole Addis, Francesco Ciccarello, Michele Cascio, G Massimo Palma, and Sabrina Maniscalco. Dynamical decoupling efficiency versus quantum non-markovianity. New Journal of Physics, 17(12):123004, 2015. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/12/123004.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/17/12/123004
[4] D Bacciu, T A Etchells, P J G Lisboa, and J Whittaker. Efficient identification of independence networks using mutual information. Computational Statistics, 28:621, 2013. doi:10.1007/s00180-012-0320-6.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-012-0320-6
[5] Robert Beals, Harry Buhrman, Richard Cleve, Michele Mosca, and Ronald de Wolf. Quantum lower bounds by polynomials. Journal of the ACM, 48(4):778–797, July 2001. doi:10.1145/502090.502097.
https://doi.org/10.1145/502090.502097
[6] R. C. Bialczak, M. Ansmann, M. Hofheinz, E. Lucero, M. Neeley, A. D. O'Connell, D. Sank, H. Wang, J. Wenner, M. Steffen, A. N. Cleland, and J. M. Martinis. Quantum process tomography of a universal entangling gate implemented with Josephson phase qubits. Nature Physics, 6(6):409–413, 2010. doi:10.1038/nphys1639.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1639
[7] Robin Blume-Kohout, John King Gamble, Erik Nielsen, Kenneth Rudinger, Jonathan Mizrahi, Kevin Fortier, and Peter Maunz. Demonstration of qubit operations below a rigorous fault tolerance threshold with gate set tomography. Nature Communications, 8:1, 2017. doi:10.1038/ncomms14485.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14485
[8] Heinz-Peter Breuer, Elsi-Mari Laine, and Jyrki Piilo. Measure for the degree of non-markovian behavior of quantum processes in open systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 103:210401, 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.210401.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.210401
[9] Caslav Brukner. Quantum causality. Nature Physics, 10(4):259–263, 2014. doi:10.1038/nphys2930.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2930
[10] Donovan Buterakos, Robert E. Throckmorton, and S. Das Sarma. Crosstalk error correction through dynamical decoupling of single-qubit gates in capacitively coupled singlet-triplet semiconductor spin qubits. Physical Review B, 97(4):045431, January 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.97.045431.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.045431
[11] Yanzhu Chen, Maziar Farahzad, Shinjae Yoo, and Tzu-Chieh Wei. Detector tomography on IBM quantum computers and mitigation of an imperfect measurement. Physical Review A, 100(5):052315, November 2019. Publisher: American Physical Society. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.100.052315.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.052315
[12] W. A. Coish and Daniel Loss. Hyperfine interaction in a quantum dot: Non-markovian electron spin dynamics. Phys. Rev. B, 70:195340, 2004. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.70.195340.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.70.195340
[13] Diego Colombo and Marloes H Maathuis. Order-Independent Constraint-Based Causal Structure Learning. J. Machine Learning Research, 15:3921, 2014. URL: http://jmlr.org/papers/volume15/colombo14a/colombo14a.pdf. https://arxiv.org/abs/1211.3295.
arXiv:1211.3295
http://jmlr.org/papers/volume15/colombo14a/colombo14a.pdf
[14] Christoph Dankert, Richard Cleve, Joseph Emerson, and Etera Livine. Exact and approximate unitary 2-designs and their application to fidelity estimation. Physical Review A, 80(1):012304, 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.80.012304.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.80.012304
[15] E. B. Davies and J. T. Lewis. An operational approach to quantum probability. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 17(3):239–260, 1970. doi:10.1007/BF01647093.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01647093
[16] S. Debnath, N. M. Linke, C. Figgatt, K. A. Landsman, K. Wright, and C. Monroe. Demonstration of a small programmable quantum computer with atomic qubits. Nature, 536(7614):63–66, August 2016. doi:10.1038/nature18648.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18648
[17] Alexander Erhard, Joel J. Wallman, Lukas Postler, Michael Meth, Roman Stricker, Esteban A. Martinez, Philipp Schindler, Thomas Monz, Joseph Emerson, and Rainer Blatt. Characterizing large-scale quantum computers via cycle benchmarking. Nature Communications, 10(1):5347, 2019. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13068-7.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13068-7
[18] Jay M. Gambetta, A D Córcoles, S T Merkel, B R Johnson, John A Smolin, Jerry M Chow, Colm A Ryan, Chad Rigetti, S Poletto, Thomas A Ohki, Mark B Ketchen, and M Steffen. Characterization of Addressability by Simultaneous Randomized Benchmarking. Physical Review Letters, 109(24):240504–5, 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.240504.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.240504
[19] Ming Gong, Ming-Cheng Chen, Yarui Zheng, Shiyu Wang, Chen Zha, Hui Deng, Zhiguang Yan, Hao Rong, Yulin Wu, Shaowei Li, Fusheng Chen, Youwei Zhao, Futian Liang, Jin Lin, Yu Xu, Cheng Guo, Lihua Sun, Anthony D. Castellano, Haohua Wang, Chengzhi Peng, Chao-Yang Lu, Xiaobo Zhu, and Jian-Wei Pan. Genuine 12-Qubit Entanglement on a Superconducting Quantum Processor. Physical Review Letters, 122(11):110501, 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.110501.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.110501
[20] D. Gross, K. Audenaert, and J. Eisert. Evenly distributed unitaries: On the structure of unitary designs. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 48(5):052104, 2007. doi:10.1063/1.2716992.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2716992
[21] Vojtech Havlicek, Antonio D. Corcoles, Kristan Temme, Aram W. Harrow, Abhinav Kandala, Jerry M. Chow, and Jay M. Gambetta. Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces. Nature, 567(7747):209–212, 2019. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0980-2.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0980-2
[22] Patrick Hayden, Debbie Leung, and Graeme Smith. Multiparty data hiding of quantum information. Physical Review A, 71(6):062339, 2005. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.71.062339.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.71.062339
[23] Johannes Heinsoo, Christian Kraglund Andersen, Ants Remm, Sebastian Krinner, Theodore Walter, Yves Salathe, Simone Gasparinetti, Jean-Claude Besse, Anton Potocnik, Andreas Wallraff, and Christopher Eichler. Rapid High-fidelity Multiplexed Readout of Superconducting Qubits. Physical Review Applied, 10(3), 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.034040.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.034040
[24] Miguel A Hernan, David Clayton, and Niels Keiding. The Simpson's paradox unraveled. International Journal of Epidemiology, 40(3):780–785, 2011. doi:10.1093/ije/dyr041.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyr041
[25] Markus Kalisch and Peter Bühlmann. Estimating High-Dimensional Directed Acyclic Graphs with the PC-Algorithm. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 8(Mar):613–636, January 2007. URL: http://www.jmlr.org/papers/v8/kalisch07a.html.
http://www.jmlr.org/papers/v8/kalisch07a.html
[26] Anna Klimova, Caroline Uhler, and Tamás Rudas. Faithfulness and learning hypergraphs from discrete distributions. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 87:57–72, 2015. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2015.01.017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2015.01.017
[27] D Koller and N Friedman. Probabilistic Graphical Models. MIT Press, 2009.
[28] Timo J.T. Koski and John Noble. A Review of Bayesian Networks and Structure Learning. Mathematica Applicanda, 40(1):51–103, 2012. doi:10.14708/ma.v40i1.278.
https://doi.org/10.14708/ma.v40i1.278
[29] T D Ladd, F Jelezko, R Laflamme, Y Nakamura, C Monroe, and J L O'Brien. Quantum computers. Nature, 464:45, 2010. doi:10.1038/nature08812.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08812
[30] Thuc Duy Le, Tao Hoang, Jiuyong Li, Lin Liu, Huawen Liu, and Shu Hu. A Fast PC Algorithm for High Dimensional Causal Discovery with Multi-Core PCs. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 16(5):1483–1495, 2019. doi:10.1109/TCBB.2016.2591526.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TCBB.2016.2591526
[31] Junning Li and Z Jane Wang. Controlling the False Discovery Rate of the Association/Causality Structure Learned with the PC Algorithm. J. Machine Learning Research, 10:475, 2009. URL: http://www.jmlr.org/papers/v10/li09a.html.
http://www.jmlr.org/papers/v10/li09a.html
[32] Li Li, Michael J.W. Hall, and Howard M. Wiseman. Concepts of quantum non-markovianity: A hierarchy. Physics Reports, 759:1 – 51, 2018. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.07.001.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.07.001
[33] David Lopez-Paz, Krikamol Muandet, Bernhard Schölkopf, and Ilya Tolstikhin. Towards a learning theory of cause-effect inference. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning - Volume 37, ICML'15, pages 1452–1461, 2015. URL: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3045118.3045273.
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3045118.3045273
[34] Ruichao Ma, Brendan Saxberg, Clai Owens, Nelson Leung, Yao Lu, Jonathan Simon, and David I. Schuster. A dissipatively stabilized Mott insulator of photons. Nature, 566(7742):51, February 2019. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0897-9.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0897-9
[35] Filip B. Maciejewski, Zoltán Zimborás, and Michał Oszmaniec. Mitigation of readout noise in near-term quantum devices by classical post-processing based on detector tomography. Quantum, 4:257, April 2020. doi:10.22331/q-2020-04-24-257.
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-04-24-257
[36] Rupak Majumdar and Filip Niksic. Why is random testing effective for partition tolerance bugs? Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, 2(POPL):1–24, January 2018. doi:10.1145/3158134.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3158134
[37] S. Mavadia, C. L. Edmunds, C. Hempel, H. Ball, F. Roy, T. M. Stace, and M. J. Biercuk. Experimental quantum verification in the presence of temporally correlated noise. npj Quantum Information, 4(1):7, 2018. doi:10.1038/s41534-017-0052-0.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-017-0052-0
[38] F Mazda. Telecommunications Engineer's Reference Book. Elsevier, 1993. doi:10.1016/C2013-0-06529-2.
https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-06529-2
[39] David C. McKay, Sarah Sheldon, John A. Smolin, Jerry M. Chow, and Jay M. Gambetta. Three-Qubit Randomized Benchmarking. Physical Review Letters, 122(20):200502, 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.200502.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.200502
[40] Jovana Mitrovic, Dino Sejdinovic, and Yee Whye Teh. Causal inference via kernel deviance measures. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS'18, pages 6986–6994, 2018. URL: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3327757.3327802.
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3327757.3327802
[41] Richard E Neapolitan. Learning Bayesian Networks. Prentice Hall, 2004.
[42] Matthew Neeley, Radoslaw C. Bialczak, M. Lenander, E. Lucero, Matteo Mariantoni, A. D. O'Connell, D. Sank, H. Wang, M. Weides, J. Wenner, Y. Yin, T. Yamamoto, A. N. Cleland, and John M. Martinis. Generation of three-qubit entangled states using superconducting phase qubits. Nature, 467(7315):570–573, 2010. doi:10.1038/nature09418.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09418
[43] C. Neill, P. Roushan, K. Kechedzhi, S. Boixo, S. V. Isakov, V. Smelyanskiy, A. Megrant, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, K. Arya, R. Barends, B. Burkett, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, A. Fowler, B. Foxen, M. Giustina, R. Graff, E. Jeffrey, T. Huang, J. Kelly, P. Klimov, E. Lucero, J. Mutus, M. Neeley, C. Quintana, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, T. C. White, H. Neven, and J. M. Martinis. A blueprint for demonstrating quantum supremacy with superconducting qubits. Science, 360(6385):195–199, April 2018. doi:10.1126/science.aao4309.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao4309
[44] C. Piltz, T. Sriarunothai, A.F. Varon, and C. Wunderlich. A trapped-ion-based quantum byte with $10^{-5}$ next-neighbour cross-talk. Nature Communications, 5(1):4679, December 2014. doi:10.1038/ncomms5679.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5679
[45] John Preskill. Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum, 2:79, 2018. doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79.
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79
[46] Timothy Proctor, Melissa Revelle, Erik Nielsen, Kenneth Rudinger, Daniel Lobser, Peter Maunz, Robin Blume-Kohout, and Kevin Young. Detecting, tracking, and eliminating drift in quantum information processors. July 2019. arXiv: 1907.13608. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.13608.
arXiv:1907.13608
[47] Timothy Proctor, Kenneth Rudinger, Kevin Young, Mohan Sarovar, and Robin Blume-Kohout. What Randomized Benchmarking Actually Measures. Physical Review Letters, 119(13), 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130502.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130502
[48] Timothy J. Proctor, Arnaud Carignan-Dugas, Kenneth Rudinger, Erik Nielsen, Robin Blume-Kohout, and Kevin Young. Direct Randomized Benchmarking for Multiqubit Devices. Physical Review Letters, 123(3):030503, 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.030503.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.030503
[49] Matthew Reagor, Christopher B. Osborn, Nikolas Tezak, Alexa Staley, Guenevere Prawiroatmodjo, Michael Scheer, Nasser Alidoust, Eyob A. Sete, Nicolas Didier, Marcus P. da Silva, Ezer Acala, Joel Angeles, Andrew Bestwick, Maxwell Block, Benjamin Bloom, Adam Bradley, Catvu Bui, Shane Caldwell, Lauren Capelluto, Rick Chilcott, Jeff Cordova, Genya Crossman, Michael Curtis, Saniya Deshpande, Tristan El Bouayadi, Daniel Girshovich, Sabrina Hong, Alex Hudson, Peter Karalekas, Kat Kuang, Michael Lenihan, Riccardo Manenti, Thomas Manning, Jayss Marshall, Yuvraj Mohan, William O'Brien, Johannes Otterbach, Alexander Papageorge, Jean-Philip Paquette, Michael Pelstring, Anthony Polloreno, Vijay Rawat, Colm A. Ryan, Russ Renzas, Nick Rubin, Damon Russel, Michael Rust, Diego Scarabelli, Michael Selvanayagam, Rodney Sinclair, Robert Smith, Mark Suska, Ting-Wai To, Mehrnoosh Vahidpour, Nagesh Vodrahalli, Tyler Whyland, Kamal Yadav, William Zeng, and Chad T. Rigetti. Demonstration of universal parametric entangling gates on a multi-qubit lattice. Science Advances, 4(2):eaao3603, 2018. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aao3603.
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao3603
[50] Kenneth Rudinger, Timothy Proctor, Dylan Langharst, Mohan Sarovar, Kevin Young, and Robin Blume-Kohout. Probing Context-Dependent Errors in Quantum Processors. Physical Review X, 9(2):021045, 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.9.021045.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.021045
[51] Sarah Sheldon, Easwar Magesan, Jerry M Chow, and Jay M. Gambetta. Procedure for systematically tuning up cross-talk in the cross-resonance gate. Phys. Rev. A, 93(6):060302, 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.93.060302.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.060302
[52] Peter Spirtes. Introduction to Causal Inference. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11:1643, 2010. URL: http://www.jmlr.org/papers/v11/spirtes10a.html.
http://www.jmlr.org/papers/v11/spirtes10a.html
[53] Peter Spirtes and Clark Glymour. An Algorithm for Fast Recovery of Sparse Causal Graphs. Social Science Computer Review, 9(1):67, 1991. doi:10.1177/089443939100900106.
https://doi.org/10.1177/089443939100900106
[54] Peter Spirtes, Clark N. Glymour, and Richard Scheines. Causation, prediction, and search. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 2nd ed edition, 2000.
[55] Peter Spirtes and Kun Zhang. Causal discovery and inference: concepts and recent methodological advances. Applied Informatics, 3:3, 2016. doi:10.1186/s40535-016-0018-x.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40535-016-0018-x
[56] Eric V. Strobl, Peter L. Spirtes, and Shyam Visweswaran. Estimating and Controlling the False Discovery Rate of the PC Algorithm Using Edge-specific P-Values. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 10(5):1–37, 2019. doi:10.1145/3351342.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3351342
[57] L. M. K. Vandersypen and I. L. Chuang. NMR techniques for quantum control and computation. Reviews of Modern Physics, 76(4):1037–1069, January 2005. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.76.1037.
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.76.1037
[58] Andrzej Veitia, Marcus P. da Silva, Robin Blume-Kohout, and Steven J. van Enk. Macroscopic instructions vs microscopic operations. 2017. arXiv: 1708.08173. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1708.08173.
arXiv:1708.08173
[59] Joel J Wallman and Steven T Flammia. Randomized benchmarking with confidence. New Journal of Physics, 16(10):103032, 2014. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/10/103032.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/10/103032
[60] Adam Winick, Joel J. Wallman, and Joseph Emerson. Phenomenological measure of quantum non-markovianity. 2019. arXiv:1901.00267. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1901.00267.
arXiv:1901.00267
[61] Christopher J Wood and Robert W Spekkens. The lesson of causal discovery algorithms for quantum correlations: causal explanations of Bell-inequality violations require fine-tuning. New Journal of Physics, 17(3):033002, 2015. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/3/033002.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/17/3/033002
Cited by
[1] Sebastian Brandhofer, Simon Devitt, and Ilia Polian, 2021 IEEE European Test Symposium (ETS) 1 (2021) ISBN:978-1-6654-1849-2.
[2] Charles H. Baldwin, Karl Mayer, Natalie C. Brown, Ciarán Ryan-Anderson, and David Hayes, "Re-examining the quantum volume test: Ideal distributions, compiler optimizations, confidence intervals, and scalable resource estimations", Quantum 6, 707 (2022).
[3] Muhammad Ahsan, Syed Abbas Zilqurnain Naqvi, and Haider Anwer, "Quantum circuit engineering for correcting coherent noise", Physical Review A 105 2, 022428 (2022).
[4] Thomas Ayral, François-Marie Le Régent, Zain Saleem, Yuri Alexeev, and Martin Suchara, "Quantum Divide and Compute: Exploring the Effect of Different Noise Sources", SN Computer Science 2 3, 132 (2021).
[5] Erik Nielsen, Kenneth Rudinger, Timothy Proctor, Kevin Young, and Robin Blume-Kohout, "Efficient flexible characterization of quantum processors with nested error models", New Journal of Physics 23 9, 093020 (2021).
[6] Pedro Parrado-Rodríguez, Ciarán Ryan-Anderson, Alejandro Bermudez, and Markus Müller, "Crosstalk Suppression for Fault-tolerant Quantum Error Correction with Trapped Ions", Quantum 5, 487 (2021).
[7] Benjamin A. Cordier, Nicolas P. D. Sawaya, Gian Giacomo Guerreschi, and Shannon K. McWeeney, "Biology and medicine in the landscape of quantum advantages", Journal of The Royal Society Interface 19 196, 20220541 (2022).
[8] Haowei Deng, Yuxiang Peng, Michael Hicks, and Xiaodi Wu, "Automating NISQ Application Design with Meta Quantum Circuits with Constraints (MQCC)", ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing 3579369 (2023).
[9] David Quiroga, Prasanna Date, and Raphael Pooser, 2021 International Conference on Rebooting Computing (ICRC) 56 (2021) ISBN:978-1-6654-2332-8.
[10] Sanjay Deshpande, Chuanqi Xu, Theodoros Trochatos, Yongshan Ding, and Jakub Szefer, 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Hardware Oriented Security and Trust (HOST) 37 (2022) ISBN:978-1-6654-8532-6.
[11] Timothy Proctor, Kenneth Rudinger, Kevin Young, Erik Nielsen, and Robin Blume-Kohout, "Measuring the capabilities of quantum computers", Nature Physics 18 1, 75 (2022).
[12] Bruno Murta, Pedro M. Q. Cruz, and J. Fernández-Rossier, "Preparing valence-bond-solid states on noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers", Physical Review Research 5 1, 013190 (2023).
[13] Seungchan Seo and Joonwoo Bae, "Measurement Crosstalk Errors in Cloud-Based Quantum Computing", IEEE Internet Computing 26 1, 26 (2022).
[14] Lingling Lao, Alexander Korotkov, Zhang Jiang, Wojciech Mruczkiewicz, Thomas E O'Brien, and Dan E Browne, "Software mitigation of coherent two-qubit gate errors", Quantum Science and Technology 7 2, 025021 (2022).
[15] G.A.L. White, F.A. Pollock, L.C.L. Hollenberg, K. Modi, and C.D. Hill, "Non-Markovian Quantum Process Tomography", PRX Quantum 3 2, 020344 (2022).
[16] Abdullah Ash-Saki, Mahabubul Alam, and Swaroop Ghosh, Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design 25 (2020) ISBN:9781450370530.
[17] Pedro Figueroa-Romero, Kavan Modi, and Min-Hsiu Hsieh, "Towards a general framework of Randomized Benchmarking incorporating non-Markovian Noise", Quantum 6, 868 (2022).
[18] David Quiroga, Prasanna Date, and Raphael Pooser, 2021 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) 481 (2021) ISBN:978-1-6654-1691-7.
[19] A. E. Russo, K. M. Rudinger, B. C. A. Morrison, and A. D. Baczewski, "Evaluating Energy Differences on a Quantum Computer with Robust Phase Estimation", Physical Review Letters 126 21, 210501 (2021).
[20] Peng Duan, Zi-Feng Chen, Qi Zhou, Wei-Cheng Kong, Hai-Feng Zhang, and Guo-Ping Guo, "Mitigating Crosstalk-Induced Qubit Readout Error with Shallow-Neural-Network Discrimination", Physical Review Applied 16 2, 024063 (2021).
[21] Adam Winick, Joel J. Wallman, and Joseph Emerson, "Simulating and Mitigating Crosstalk", Physical Review Letters 126 23, 230502 (2021).
[22] Dominik Hangleiter, "Crosstalk diagnosis for the next generation of quantum processors", Quantum Views 4, 46 (2020).
[23] James Sud, Jeffrey Marshall, Zhihui Wang, Eleanor Rieffel, and Filip A. Wudarski, "Dual-map framework for noise characterization of quantum computers", Physical Review A 106 1, 012606 (2022).
[24] Ruixia Wang, Peng Zhao, Yirong Jin, and Haifeng Yu, "Control and mitigation of microwave crosstalk effect with superconducting qubits", Applied Physics Letters 121 15, 152602 (2022).
[25] Marco Cattaneo, Gian Luca Giorgi, Roberta Zambrini, and Sabrina Maniscalco, "A Brief Journey through Collision Models for Multipartite Open Quantum Dynamics", Open Systems & Information Dynamics 29 03, 2250015 (2022).
[26] Haimeng Zhang, Bibek Pokharel, E.M. Levenson-Falk, and Daniel Lidar, "Predicting Non-Markovian Superconducting-Qubit Dynamics from Tomographic Reconstruction", Physical Review Applied 17 5, 054018 (2022).
[27] Yubao Liu, Lin Li, and Yiqiu Ma, "On the remote entanglement of MW qubits using hybrid Rydberg systems", Physics Letters A 440, 128142 (2022).
[28] Sheikh Parvez Mandal, Ahana Ghoshal, Chirag Srivastava, and Ujjwal Sen, "Invariance of success probability in Grover's quantum search under local noise with memory", Physical Review A 107 2, 022427 (2023).
[29] Gregory A. L. White, "Gate set tomography is not just hyperaccurate, it’s a different way of thinking", Quantum Views 5, 60 (2021).
[30] Xi Cao, Yu-xi Liu, and Re-Bing Wu, "Identification of time-varying signals in quantum systems", Physical Review A 103 2, 022612 (2021).
[31] Kenneth Rudinger, Craig W. Hogle, Ravi K. Naik, Akel Hashim, Daniel Lobser, David I. Santiago, Matthew D. Grace, Erik Nielsen, Timothy Proctor, Stefan Seritan, Susan M. Clark, Robin Blume-Kohout, Irfan Siddiqi, and Kevin C. Young, "Experimental Characterization of Crosstalk Errors with Simultaneous Gate Set Tomography", PRX Quantum 2 4, 040338 (2021).
[32] Siyuan Niu and Aida Todri-Sanial, "Enabling Multi-programming Mechanism for Quantum Computing in the NISQ Era", Quantum 7, 925 (2023).
[33] Gary J. Mooney, Gregory A. L. White, Charles D. Hill, and Lloyd C. L. Hollenberg, "Whole‐Device Entanglement in a 65‐Qubit Superconducting Quantum Computer", Advanced Quantum Technologies 4 10, 2100061 (2021).
[34] Andy J. Goldschmidt, Jonathan L. DuBois, Steven L. Brunton, and J. Nathan Kutz, "Model predictive control for robust quantum state preparation", Quantum 6, 837 (2022).
[35] Peng Zhao, Kehuan Linghu, Zhiyuan Li, Peng Xu, Ruixia Wang, Guangming Xue, Yirong Jin, and Haifeng Yu, "Quantum Crosstalk Analysis for Simultaneous Gate Operations on Superconducting Qubits", PRX Quantum 3 2, 020301 (2022).
[36] Lei Xie, Jidong Zhai, ZhenXing Zhang, Jonathan Allcock, Shengyu Zhang, and Yi-Cong Zheng, Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems 499 (2022) ISBN:9781450392051.
[37] Kübra Yeter-Aydeniz, Zachary Parks, Aadithya Nair Thekkiniyedath, Erik Gustafson, Alexander F. Kemper, Raphael C. Pooser, Yannick Meurice, and Patrick Dreher, "Measuring qubit stability in a gate-based NISQ hardware processor", Quantum Information Processing 22 2, 96 (2023).
[38] Marie Salm, Johanna Barzen, Frank Leymann, and Benjamin Weder, Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Architectures and Paradigms for Engineering Quantum Software 10 (2020) ISBN:9781450381000.
[39] Yao Song, Junning Li, Yong-Ju Hai, Qihao Guo, and Xiu-Hao Deng, "Optimizing quantum control pulses with complex constraints and few variables through autodifferentiation", Physical Review A 105 1, 012616 (2022).
[40] Erik Gustafson, Burt Holzman, James Kowalkowski, Henry Lamm, Andy C. Y. Li, Gabriel Perdue, Sergei V. Isakov, Orion Martin, Ross Thomson, Jackson Beall, Martin Ganahl, Guifre Vidal, and Evan Peters, 2021 IEEE/ACM Second International Workshop on Quantum Computing Software (QCS) 72 (2021) ISBN:978-1-7281-8674-0.
[41] Poulami Das, Eric Kessler, and Yunong Shi, 2023 IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA) 787 (2023) ISBN:978-1-6654-7652-2.
[42] Yvonne Y. Gao, M. Adriaan Rol, Steven Touzard, and Chen Wang, "Practical Guide for Building Superconducting Quantum Devices", PRX Quantum 2 4, 040202 (2021).
[43] Seungchan Seo, Jiheon Seong, and Joonwoo Bae, "Correlations in Noisy Measurements", Open Systems & Information Dynamics 29 02, 2250009 (2022).
[44] Marco Cattaneo, Matteo A.C. Rossi, Guillermo García-Pérez, Roberta Zambrini, and Sabrina Maniscalco, "Quantum Simulation of Dissipative Collective Effects on Noisy Quantum Computers", PRX Quantum 4 1, 010324 (2023).
[45] G. A. L. White, C. D. Hill, F. A. Pollock, L. C. L. Hollenberg, and K. Modi, "Demonstration of non-Markovian process characterisation and control on a quantum processor", Nature Communications 11 1, 6301 (2020).
[46] Erik Nielsen, John King Gamble, Kenneth Rudinger, Travis Scholten, Kevin Young, and Robin Blume-Kohout, "Gate Set Tomography", Quantum 5, 557 (2021).
[47] Matthew Girling, Cristina Cîrstoiu, and David Jennings, "Estimation of correlations and nonseparability in quantum channels via unitarity benchmarking", Physical Review Research 4 2, 023041 (2022).
[48] Stephen D. Erickson, Jenny J. Wu, Pan-Yu Hou, Daniel C. Cole, Shawn Geller, Alex Kwiatkowski, Scott Glancy, Emanuel Knill, Daniel H. Slichter, Andrew C. Wilson, and Dietrich Leibfried, "High-Fidelity Indirect Readout of Trapped-Ion Hyperfine Qubits", Physical Review Letters 128 16, 160503 (2022).
[49] Long B. Nguyen, Gerwin Koolstra, Yosep Kim, Alexis Morvan, Trevor Chistolini, Shraddha Singh, Konstantin N. Nesterov, Christian Jünger, Larry Chen, Zahra Pedramrazi, Bradley K. Mitchell, John Mark Kreikebaum, Shruti Puri, David I. Santiago, and Irfan Siddiqi, "Blueprint for a High-Performance Fluxonium Quantum Processor", PRX Quantum 3 3, 037001 (2022).
[50] Abdullah Ash Saki, Mahabubul Alam, Koustubh Phalak, Aakarshitha Suresh, Rasit Onur Topaloglu, and Swaroop Ghosh, 2021 IEEE European Test Symposium (ETS) 1 (2021) ISBN:978-1-6654-1849-2.
[51] Giovanni De Micheli, Jie-Hong R. Jiang, Robert Rand, Kaitlin Smith, and Mathias Soeken, "Advances in Quantum Computation and Quantum Technologies: A Design Automation Perspective", IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems 12 3, 584 (2022).
[52] Nikita Acharya, Miroslav Urbanek, Wibe A. De Jong, and Samah Mohamed Saeed, "Test Points for Online Monitoring of Quantum Circuits", ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems 18 1, 1 (2022).
[53] Lukasz Cincio, Kenneth Rudinger, Mohan Sarovar, and Patrick J. Coles, "Machine Learning of Noise-Resilient Quantum Circuits", PRX Quantum 2 1, 010324 (2021).
[54] Yudai Suzuki, Qi Gao, Ken C. Pradel, Kenji Yasuoka, and Naoki Yamamoto, "Natural quantum reservoir computing for temporal information processing", Scientific Reports 12 1, 1353 (2022).
[55] Maxime A. Tremblay, Nicolas Delfosse, and Michael E. Beverland, "Constant-Overhead Quantum Error Correction with Thin Planar Connectivity", Physical Review Letters 129 5, 050504 (2022).
[56] Lennart Maximilian Seifert, Konstantin Beyer, Kimmo Luoma, and Walter T. Strunz, "Quantum steering on IBM quantum processors", Physical Review A 105 4, 042413 (2022).
[57] Jeremy Flannery, Roland Matt, Luca Huber, Robin Oswald, Kaizhao Wang, and Jonathan Home, 2022 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) 816 (2022) ISBN:978-1-6654-9113-6.
[58] Carsten Blank, Daniel K. Park, June-Koo Kevin Rhee, and Francesco Petruccione, "Quantum classifier with tailored quantum kernel", npj Quantum Information 6, 41 (2020).
[59] S. Krinner, S. Lazar, A. Remm, C. K. Andersen, N. Lacroix, G. J. Norris, C. Hellings, M. Gabureac, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, "Benchmarking Coherent Errors in Controlled-Phase Gates due to Spectator Qubits", Physical Review Applied 14 2, 024042 (2020).
[60] Erik Nielsen, Kenneth Rudinger, Timothy Proctor, Antonio Russo, Kevin Young, and Robin Blume-Kohout, "Probing quantum processor performance with pyGSTi", Quantum Science and Technology 5 4, 044002 (2020).
[61] Sihao Huang, Benjamin Lienhard, Greg Calusine, Antti Vepsäläinen, Jochen Braumüller, David K. Kim, Alexander J. Melville, Bethany M. Niedzielski, Jonilyn L. Yoder, Bharath Kannan, Terry P. Orlando, Simon Gustavsson, and William D. Oliver, "Microwave Package Design for Superconducting Quantum Processors", PRX Quantum 2 2, 020306 (2021).
[62] David C. McKay, Andrew W. Cross, Christopher J. Wood, and Jay M. Gambetta, "Correlated Randomized Benchmarking", arXiv:2003.02354, (2020).
[63] Lukasz Cincio, Kenneth Rudinger, Mohan Sarovar, and Patrick J. Coles, "Machine learning of noise-resilient quantum circuits", arXiv:2007.01210, (2020).
[64] Timothy Proctor, Kenneth Rudinger, Kevin Young, Erik Nielsen, and Robin Blume-Kohout, "Measuring the Capabilities of Quantum Computers", arXiv:2008.11294, (2020).
[65] Salonik Resch and Ulya R. Karpuzcu, "Benchmarking Quantum Computers and the Impact of Quantum Noise", arXiv:1912.00546, (2019).
[66] Thomas Wagner, Hermann Kampermann, Dagmar Bruß, and Martin Kliesch, "Learning logical quantum noise in quantum error correction", arXiv:2209.09267, (2022).
[67] Robin Harper, Wenjun Yu, and Steven T. Flammia, "Fast Estimation of Sparse Quantum Noise", arXiv:2007.07901, (2020).
[68] Kevin Slagle, "Testing Quantum Mechanics using Noisy Quantum Computers", arXiv:2108.02201, (2021).
[69] Dominik Hangleiter, "Sampling and the complexity of nature", arXiv:2012.07905, (2020).
[70] Siyuan Niu and Aida Todri-Sanial, "Enabling Multi-programming Mechanism for Quantum Computing in the NISQ Era", arXiv:2102.05321, (2021).
[71] Thibaut Lacroix, Brendon W. Lovett, and Alex W. Chin, "From Non-Markovian Dissipation to Spatiotemporal Control of Quantum Nanodevices", arXiv:2205.11247, (2022).
[72] Raoul Heese, Thore Gerlach, Sascha Mücke, Sabine Müller, Matthias Jakobs, and Nico Piatkowski, "Explaining Quantum Circuits with Shapley Values: Towards Explainable Quantum Machine Learning", arXiv:2301.09138, (2023).
The above citations are from Crossref's cited-by service (last updated successfully 2023-03-31 12:29:37) and SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2023-03-31 12:29:39). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.
This Paper is published in Quantum under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. Copyright remains with the original copyright holders such as the authors or their institutions.
Pingback: Perspective in Quantum Views by Dominik Hangleiter "Crosstalk diagnosis for the next generation of quantum processors"