Making quantum simulations of quantum field theories more affordable

This is a Perspective on "Quantum Algorithms for Simulating the Lattice Schwinger Model" by Alexander F. Shaw, Pavel Lougovski, Jesse R. Stryker, and Nathan Wiebe, published in Quantum 4, 306 (2020).

By Lucas Lamata (Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear, Universidad de Sevilla, Apartado 1065, 41080 Sevilla, Spain).

The standard model of particle physics is among the most successful scientific achievements in human history. However, further progress is being hampered by the enormous computing power that is needed to explore beyond what is already known. The reason for this is the exponential explosion in the number of resources needed to simulate large quantum systems.

As Richard Feynman envisioned [1], quantum simulators could be a possible avenue to overcome this limitation. These devices are genuine quantum systems that can simulate other quantum systems in an efficient way. Typically, there are two kinds of quantum simulators being explored, namely, analog quantum simulations, and digital quantum simulations [2]. The former employ a quantum device with similar dynamics to the system being simulated, while the latter makes use of a digital decomposition onto elementary gates [3]. It is worth mentioning that a third avenue is currently under analysis, namely, digital-analog quantum simulations [4], which combine the scalability of the analog and the versatility and universality of the digital quantum simulators.

Quantum field theories and high energy physics have been explored in the past few years in the context of quantum simulations [5] , with several works in theory [6], proposals for implementations [7,8,9,10,11,12], and experimental implementations [13,14]. However, the resources needed for fully scalable quantum simulations of quantum field theories are still too large to be useful.

In this article [15], Alexander Shaw et al. carry out a thorough and rigorous analysis of digital quantum simulations of the Schwinger model, a (1+1)-dimension QED model that exhibits properties, such as confinement, which are typical from a non-Abelian gauge theory such as Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD). They obtain novel and tight bounds of low-order digital expansions such as Trotter decomposition. They discover that the digital quantum simulation of the Schwinger model can be carried out with more efficient resources than what was previously known, with respect to other methods such as, e.g., qubitization. They also analyze useful ways of extracting the measurement information from the quantum simulator, completing an interesting analysis of the full quantum simulation proposal.

This kind of works helps to establish the ultimate limits to digital quantum simulations with controllable quantum platforms, and serves as a benchmark with which to elucidate how far we are from achieving a useful quantum simulation of quantum field theories that provides new knowledge beyond the standard model of particle physics.

► BibTeX data

► References

[1] Richard P Feynman. Simulating physics with computers. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21, 467 (1982). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​BF02650179.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​BF02650179

[2] Seth Lloyd. Universal quantum simulators. Science 273, 1073 (1996). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1126/​science.273.5278.1073.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1126/​science.273.5278.1073

[3] I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and Franco Nori. Quantum simulation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 153 (2014). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.86.153.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.86.153

[4] Lucas Lamata, Adrian Parra-Rodriguez, Mikel Sanz, and Enrique Solano. Digital-Analog Quantum Simulations with Superconducting Circuits. Adv. Phys.: X 3, 1457981 (2018). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1080/​23746149.2018.1457981.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1080/​23746149.2018.1457981

[5] Erez Zohar, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Benni Reznik. Quantum simulations of lattice gauge theories using ultracold atoms in optical lattices. Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 014401 (2016). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​0034-4885/​79/​1/​014401.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​0034-4885/​79/​1/​014401

[6] Stephen P. Jordan, Keith S. M. Lee, and John Preskill. Quantum Algorithms for Quantum Field Theories. Science 336, 1130 (2012), https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1126/​science.1217069.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1126/​science.1217069

[7] Casanova, L. Lamata, I. L. Egusquiza, R. Gerritsma, C. F. Roos, J. J. Garcia-Ripoll, and E. Solano. Quantum Simulation of Quantum Field Theories in Trapped Ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 260501 (2011). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.107.260501.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.107.260501

[8] L. García-Álvarez, J. Casanova, A. Mezzacapo, I. L. Egusquiza, L. Lamata, G. Romero, and E. Solano. Fermion-Fermion Scattering in Quantum Field Theory with Superconducting Circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 070502 (2015). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.114.070502.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.114.070502

[9] J. Ignacio Cirac, Paolo Maraner, and Jiannis K. Pachos. Cold Atom Simulation of Interacting Relativistic Quantum Field Theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 190403 (2010). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.105.190403.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.105.190403

[10] L. Tagliacozzo, A. Celi, A. Zamora, and M. Lewenstein. Optical Abelian lattice gauge theories. Ann. Phys. 330, 160 (2013). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.aop.2012.11.009.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.aop.2012.11.009

[11] Atomic Quantum Simulation of U(N) and SU(N) Non-Abelian Lattice Gauge Theories. D. Banerjee, M. Bögli, M. Dalmonte, E. Rico, P. Stebler, U.-J. Wiese, and P. Zoller. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 125303 (2013). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.110.125303.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.110.125303

[12] A. Mezzacapo, E. Rico, C. Sabín, I. L. Egusquiza, L. Lamata, and E. Solano. Non-Abelian SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theories in Superconducting Circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 240502 (2015). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.115.240502.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.115.240502

[13] Esteban A. Martinez, Christine A. Muschik, Philipp Schindler, Daniel Nigg, Alexander Erhard, Markus Heyl, Philipp Hauke, Marcello Dalmonte, Thomas Monz, Peter Zoller, and Rainer Blatt, Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer. Nature 534, 516 (2016). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​nature18318.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​nature18318

[14] Xiang Zhang, Kuan Zhang, Yangchao Shen, Shuaining Zhang, Jingning Zhang, Man-Hong Yung, Jorge Casanova, Julen S. Pedernales, Lucas Lamata, Enrique Solano, and Kihwan Kim. Experimental quantum simulation of fermion-antifermion scattering via boson exchange in a trapped ion. Nature Commun. 9, 195 (2018). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41467-017-02507-y.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41467-017-02507-y

[15] Alexander F. Shaw, Pavel Lougovski, Jesse Stryker, and, Nathan Wiebe. Quantum Algorithms for Simulating the Lattice Schwinger Model. Quantum. arXiv:2002.11146.
arXiv:2002.11146

Cited by

On Crossref's cited-by service no data on citing works was found (last attempt 2020-10-23 10:13:37). On SAO/NASA ADS no data on citing works was found (last attempt 2020-10-23 10:13:38).