Re-uploading quantum data: a universal function approximator for quantum inputs
1NextQuantum and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
2Department of Statistics and Data Science, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
3Department of Applied Statistics, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
4Department of Quantum Information, Yonsei University, Incheon 21983, Republic of Korea
| Published: | 2026-10-29, volume 10, page 2256 |
| Editor: | Diego García-Martín |
| Eprint: | arXiv:2509.18530v7 |
| Doi: | https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2026-10-29-2256 |
| Citation: | Quantum 10, 2256 (2026). |
Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.
Abstract
Quantum data re-uploading has proved powerful for classical inputs, where repeatedly encoding features into a small circuit yields universal function approximation. Extending this idea to quantum inputs remains underexplored, as the information contained in a quantum state is not directly accessible in classical form. We propose and analyze a quantum data re-uploading architecture in which a qubit interacts sequentially with fresh copies of an arbitrary input state. The circuit can approximate any bounded continuous function using only one ancilla qubit and single-qubit measurements, provided that sufficiently many copies of the input state and, in general, sufficiently many layers are available. By alternating entangling unitaries with mid-circuit resets of the input register, the architecture realizes a discrete cascade of completely positive and trace-preserving maps, analogous to collision models in open quantum system dynamics. Our framework provides a space-efficient and expressive approach to designing quantum machine learning models that operate directly on quantum data.
Popular summary
► BibTeX data
► References
[1] Maria Schuld, Ilya Sinayskiy, and Francesco Petruccione. ``An introduction to quantum machine learning''. Contemporary Physics 56, 172–185 (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1080/00107514.2014.964942
[2] Jacob Biamonte, Peter Wittek, Nicola Pancotti, Patrick Rebentrost, Nathan Wiebe, and Seth Lloyd. ``Quantum machine learning''. Nature 549, 195–202 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23474
[3] Nikolaj Moll, Panagiotis Barkoutsos, Lev S Bishop, Jerry M Chow, Andrew Cross, Daniel J Egger, Stefan Filipp, Andreas Fuhrer, Jay M Gambetta, Marc Ganzhorn, et al. ``Quantum optimization using variational algorithms on near-term quantum devices''. Quantum Science and Technology 3, 030503 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/aab822
[4] Hsin-Yuan Huang, Michael Broughton, Masoud Mohseni, Ryan Babbush, Sergio Boixo, Hartmut Neven, and Jarrod R McClean. ``Power of data in quantum machine learning''. Nature Communications 12, 2631 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22539-9
[5] Yunchao Liu, Srinivasan Arunachalam, and Kristan Temme. ``A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learning''. Nature Physics 17, 1013–1017 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01287-z
[6] Aram W Harrow, Avinatan Hassidim, and Seth Lloyd. ``Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations''. Physical Review Letters 103, 150502 (2009).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.150502
[7] Seth Lloyd, Masoud Mohseni, and Patrick Rebentrost. ``Quantum algorithms for supervised and unsupervised machine learning''. arXiv preprint arXiv:1307.0411 (2013).
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1307.0411
arXiv:1307.0411
[8] Seth Lloyd, Masoud Mohseni, and Patrick Rebentrost. ``Quantum principal component analysis''. Nature Physics 10, 631–633 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3029
[9] Marcello Benedetti, Erika Lloyd, Stefan Sack, and Mattia Fiorentini. ``Parameterized quantum circuits as machine learning models''. Quantum Science and Technology 4, 043001 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ab4eb5
[10] Maria Schuld, Ville Bergholm, Christian Gogolin, Josh Izaac, and Nathan Killoran. ``Evaluating analytic gradients on quantum hardware''. Physical Review A 99, 032331 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.032331
[11] Maria Schuld and Nathan Killoran. ``Quantum machine learning in feature Hilbert spaces''. Physical Review Letters 122, 040504 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.040504
[12] Sukin Sim, Peter D Johnson, and Alán Aspuru-Guzik. ``Expressibility and entangling capability of parameterized quantum circuits for hybrid quantum-classical algorithms''. Advanced Quantum Technologies 2, 1900070 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.201900070
[13] Carsten Blank, Daniel K Park, June-Koo Kevin Rhee, and Francesco Petruccione. ``Quantum classifier with tailored quantum kernel''. npj Quantum Information 6, 41 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-020-0272-6
[14] Marco Cerezo, Andrew Arrasmith, Ryan Babbush, Simon C Benjamin, Suguru Endo, Keisuke Fujii, Jarrod R McClean, Kosuke Mitarai, Xiao Yuan, Lukasz Cincio, et al. ``Variational quantum algorithms''. Nature Reviews Physics 3, 625–644 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00348-9
[15] Maria Schuld and Francesco Petruccione. ``Quantum models as kernel methods''. In Machine Learning with Quantum Computers. Pages 217–245. Springer (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83098-4_6
[16] Sofiene Jerbi, Lukas J Fiderer, Hendrik Poulsen Nautrup, Jonas M Kübler, Hans J Briegel, and Vedran Dunjko. ``Quantum machine learning beyond kernel methods''. Nature Communications 14, 517 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36159-y
[17] Matthias C Caro, Elies Gil-Fuster, Johannes Jakob Meyer, Jens Eisert, and Ryan Sweke. ``Encoding-dependent generalization bounds for parametrized quantum circuits''. Quantum 5, 582 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2021-11-17-582
[18] Maria Schuld, Ryan Sweke, and Johannes Jakob Meyer. ``Effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum-machine-learning models''. Physical Review A 103, 032430 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.032430
[19] Maria Schuld. ``Supervised quantum machine learning models are kernel methods''. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.11020 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2101.11020
arXiv:2101.11020
[20] Guangxi Li, Ruilin Ye, Xuanqiang Zhao, and Xin Wang. ``Concentration of data encoding in parameterized quantum circuits''. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35, 19456–19469 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.52202/068431-1414
[21] Shunsuke Daimon and Yu-ichiro Matsushita. ``Quantum circuit generation for amplitude encoding using a transformer decoder''. Physical Review Applied 22, L041001 (2024).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.22.L041001
[22] Javier Gonzalez-Conde, Thomas W Watts, Pablo Rodriguez-Grasa, and Mikel Sanz. ``Efficient quantum amplitude encoding of polynomial functions''. Quantum 8, 1297 (2024).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2024-03-21-1297
[23] Tak Hur, Israel F Araujo, and Daniel K Park. ``Neural quantum embedding: Pushing the limits of quantum supervised learning''. Physical Review A 110, 022411 (2024).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.110.022411
[24] Ben Jaderberg, Antonio A Gentile, Youssef Achari Berrada, Elvira Shishenina, and Vincent E Elfving. ``Let quantum neural networks choose their own frequencies''. Physical Review A 109, 042421 (2024).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.109.042421
[25] Minati Rath and Hema Date. ``Quantum data encoding: A comparative analysis of classical-to-quantum mapping techniques and their impact on machine learning accuracy''. EPJ Quantum Technology 11, 72 (2024).
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-024-00285-3
[26] Hongfeng Liu, Tak Hur, Shitao Zhang, Liangyu Che, Xinyue Long, Xiangyu Wang, Keyi Huang, Yu-ang Fan, Yuxuan Zheng, Yufang Feng, et al. ``Neural quantum embedding via deterministic quantum computation with one qubit''. Physical Review Letters 135, 080603 (2025).
https://doi.org/10.1103/y8wr-yml4
[27] Adrián Pérez-Salinas, Alba Cervera-Lierta, Elies Gil-Fuster, and José I Latorre. ``Data re-uploading for a universal quantum classifier''. Quantum 4, 226 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-02-06-226
[28] Adrián Pérez-Salinas, David López-Núñez, Artur García-Sáez, Pol Forn-Díaz, and José I Latorre. ``One qubit as a universal approximant''. Physical Review A 104, 012405 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.104.012405
[29] Yujin Kim and Daniel K. Park. ``Expressivity of deterministic quantum computation with one qubit''. Physical Review A 111, 022429 (2025).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.111.022429
[30] Guang Hao Low and Isaac L Chuang. ``Optimal Hamiltonian simulation by quantum signal processing''. Physical Review Letters 118, 010501 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.010501
[31] John M Martyn, Zane M Rossi, Andrew K Tan, and Isaac L Chuang. ``Grand unification of quantum algorithms''. PRX Quantum 2, 040203 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.040203
[32] Zane M Rossi and Isaac L Chuang. ``Multivariable quantum signal processing (M-QSP): prophecies of the two-headed oracle''. Quantum 6, 811 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2022-09-20-811
[33] Danial Motlagh and Nathan Wiebe. ``Generalized quantum signal processing''. PRX Quantum 5, 020368 (2024).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.020368
[34] Jonas Kübler, Simon Buchholz, and Bernhard Schölkopf. ``The inductive bias of quantum kernels''. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34, 12661–12673 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.03747
[35] Marco Cerezo, Guillaume Verdon, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Lukasz Cincio, and Patrick J Coles. ``Challenges and opportunities in quantum machine learning''. Nature Computational Science 2, 567–576 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-022-00311-3
[36] Hsin-Yuan Huang, Michael Broughton, Jordan Cotler, Sitan Chen, Jerry Li, Masoud Mohseni, Hartmut Neven, Ryan Babbush, Richard Kueng, John Preskill, et al. ``Quantum advantage in learning from experiments''. Science 376, 1182–1186 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn7293
[37] Artur K Ekert, Carolina Moura Alves, Daniel KL Oi, Michał Horodecki, Paweł Horodecki, and Leong Chuan Kwek. ``Direct estimations of linear and nonlinear functionals of a quantum state''. Physical Review Letters 88, 217901 (2002).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.217901
[38] Todd A. Brun. ``Measurimg polynomial functions of states''. Quantum Information & Computation 4, 401–408 (2004).
https://doi.org/10.26421/QIC4.5-6
[39] Hongshun Yao, Yingjian Liu, Tengxiang Lin, and Xin Wang. ``Sample-efficient estimation of nonlinear quantum state functions''. Communications Physics (2026).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-026-02710-8
[40] Ludmila Botelho, Adam Glos, Akash Kundu, Jarosław Adam Miszczak, Özlem Salehi, and Zoltán Zimborás. ``Error mitigation for variational quantum algorithms through mid-circuit measurements''. Physical Review A 105, 022441 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.105.022441
[41] Sebastian Brandhofer, Ilia Polian, and Kevin Krsulich. ``Optimal qubit reuse for near-term quantum computers''. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE). Volume 1, pages 859–869. IEEE (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1109/QCE57702.2023.00100
[42] Matthew DeCross, Eli Chertkov, Megan Kohagen, and Michael Foss-Feig. ``Qubit-reuse compilation with mid-circuit measurement and reset''. Physical Review X 13, 041057 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041057
[43] Daiwei Zhu, Gregory D Kahanamoku-Meyer, Laura Lewis, Crystal Noel, Or Katz, Bahaa Harraz, Qingfeng Wang, Andrew Risinger, Lei Feng, Debopriyo Biswas, et al. ``Interactive cryptographic proofs of quantumness using mid-circuit measurements''. Nature Physics 19, 1725–1731 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-023-02162-9
[44] Emanuel Knill and Raymond Laflamme. ``Power of one bit of quantum information''. Physical Review Letters 81, 5672 (1998).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5672
[45] Dan Shepherd. ``Computation with unitaries and one pure qubit''. arXiv preprint quant-ph/0608132 (2006).
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0608132
arXiv:quant-ph/0608132
[46] Lars Hörmander. ``The analysis of linear partial differential operators I: Distribution theory and Fourier analysis''. Springer. (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61497-2
[47] Adrián Pérez-Salinas, Mahtab Yaghubi Rad, Alice Barthe, and Vedran Dunjko. ``Universal approximation of continuous functions with minimal quantum circuits''. Physical Review Research 7, 043282 (2025).
https://doi.org/10.1103/t49h-jmty
[48] Kosuke Mitarai, Makoto Negoro, Masahiro Kitagawa, and Keisuke Fujii. ``Quantum circuit learning''. Physical Review A 98, 032309 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.032309
[49] Hyunho Cha. ``Code repository''. https://github.com/HyunHoCha/reupload (2026).
https://github.com/HyunHoCha/reupload
[50] Michael A Nielsen and Isaac L Chuang. ``Quantum Computation and Quantum Information''. Cambridge University Press. (2010).
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976667
[51] Antonio Anna Mele. ``Introduction to Haar measure tools in quantum information: A beginner's tutorial''. Quantum 8, 1340 (2024).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2024-05-08-1340
[52] Jarrod R McClean, Sergio Boixo, Vadim N Smelyanskiy, Ryan Babbush, and Hartmut Neven. ``Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes''. Nature Communications 9, 4812 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07090-4
[53] Adriano Barenco, André Berthiaume, David Deutsch, Artur Ekert, Richard Jozsa, and Chiara Macchiavello. ``Stabilization of quantum computations by symmetrization''. SIAM Journal on Computing 26, 1541–1557 (1997).
https://doi.org/10.1137/S0097539796302452
[54] Harry Buhrman, Richard Cleve, John Watrous, and Ronald De Wolf. ``Quantum fingerprinting''. Physical Review Letters 87, 167902 (2001).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.167902
[55] Robert R Tucci. ``An introduction to Cartan's KAK decomposition for QC programmers''. arXiv preprint quant-ph/0507171 (2005).
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0507171
arXiv:quant-ph/0507171
[56] David Wierichs, Maxwell West, Roy T Forestano, M Cerezo, and Nathan Killoran. ``Recursive Cartan decompositions for unitary synthesis''. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.19014 (2025).
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.19014
arXiv:2503.19014
Cited by
Could not fetch Crossref cited-by data during last attempt 2026-10-29 13:20:43: Could not fetch cited-by data for 10.22331/q-2026-10-29-2256 from Crossref. This is normal if the DOI was registered recently. On SAO/NASA ADS no data on citing works was found (last attempt 2026-10-29 13:20:44).
This Paper is published in Quantum under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. Copyright remains with the original copyright holders such as the authors or their institutions.