Phase error rate estimation in QKD with imperfect detectors

Devashish Tupkary1, Shlok Nahar1, Pulkit Sinha2, and Norbert Lütkenhaus1

1Institute for Quantum Computing and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 3G1
2Institute for Quantum Computing and School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 3G1

Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.

Abstract

We present a finite-size security proof of the decoy-state BB84 QKD protocol against coherent attacks, using entropic uncertainty relations, for imperfect detectors. We apply this result to the case of detectors with imperfectly characterized basis-efficiency mismatch. Our proof works by obtaining a suitable bound on the phase error rate, without requiring any new modifications to the protocol steps or hardware. It is applicable to imperfectly characterized detectors, and only requires the maximum relative difference in detection efficiencies and dark count rates of the detectors to be characterized. Moreover, our proof allows Eve to choose detector efficiencies and dark count rates in their allowed ranges in each round, thereby addressing an important problem of detector side channels. We prove security in the variable-length framework, where users are allowed to adaptively determine the length of key to be produced, and number of bits to be used for error-correction, based on observations made during the protocol. We quantitatively demonstrate the effect of basis-efficiency mismatch by applying our results to the decoy-state BB84 protocol.

► BibTeX data

► References

[1] Marco Tomamichel and Renato Renner. ``Uncertainty Relation for Smooth Entropies''. Physical Review Letters 106, 110506 (2011).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.106.110506

[2] Marco Tomamichel and Anthony Leverrier. ``A largely self-contained and complete security proof for quantum key distribution''. Quantum 1, 1–38 (2017). arXiv:1506.08458.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2017-07-14-14
arXiv:1506.08458

[3] Marco Tomamichel, Charles Ci Wen Lim, Nicolas Gisin, and Renato Renner. ``Tight finite-key analysis for quantum cryptography''. Nature Communications 3, 634 (2012).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​ncomms1631

[4] Devashish Tupkary, Ernest Y. Z. Tan, Shlok Nahar, Lars Kamin, and Norbert Lütkenhaus. ``QKD security proofs for decoy-state BB84: protocol variations, proof techniques, gaps and limitations'' (2025). arXiv:2502.10340.
arXiv:2502.10340

[5] Masato Koashi. ``Simple security proof of quantum key distribution via uncertainty principle'' (2005). arXiv:quant-ph/​0505108.
arXiv:quant-ph/0505108

[6] M. Koashi. ``Simple security proof of quantum key distribution based on complementarity''. New Journal of Physics 11, 045018 (2009).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​11/​4/​045018

[7] Margarida Pereira, Guillermo Currás-Lorenzo, Álvaro Navarrete, Akihiro Mizutani, Go Kato, Marcos Curty, and Kiyoshi Tamaki. ``Modified BB84 quantum key distribution protocol robust to source imperfections''. Physical Review Research 5, 023065 (2023).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevResearch.5.023065

[8] Kiyoshi Tamaki, Marcos Curty, Go Kato, Hoi-Kwong Lo, and Koji Azuma. ``Loss-tolerant quantum cryptography with imperfect sources''. Physical Review A 90, 052314 (2014).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.90.052314

[9] Guillermo Currás-Lorenzo, Margarida Pereira, Go Kato, Marcos Curty, and Kiyoshi Tamaki. ``Security framework for quantum key distribution with imperfect sources''. Optica Quantum 3, 525 (2025).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1364/​opticaq.569424

[10] Víctor Zapatero, Álvaro Navarrete, and Marcos Curty. ``Implementation security in quantum key distribution''. Advanced Quantum Technologies 8, 2300380 (2025). arXiv:https:/​/​advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/​doi/​pdf/​10.1002/​qute.202300380.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1002/​qute.202300380
arXiv:https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/qute.202300380

[11] Hoi-Kwong Lo, Marcos Curty, and Bing Qi. ``Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution''. Physical Review Letters 108, 130503 (2012). arXiv:1109.1473.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.108.130503
arXiv:1109.1473

[12] L. Lydersen and J. Skaar. ``Security of quantum key distribution with bit and basis dependent detector flaws'' (2010). arXiv:0807.0767.
arXiv:0807.0767

[13] Chi-Hang Fred Fung, Kiyoshi Tamaki, Bing Qi, Hoi-Kwong Lo, and Xiongfeng Ma. ``Security proof of quantum key distribution with detection efficiency mismatch''. Quantum Information and Computation 9, 131–165 (2009). arXiv:0802.3788.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.26421/​QIC9.1-2-8
arXiv:0802.3788

[14] Yanbao Zhang, Patrick J. Coles, Adam Winick, Jie Lin, and Norbert Lütkenhaus. ``Security proof of practical quantum key distribution with detection-efficiency mismatch''. Physical Review Research 3, 013076 (2021). arXiv:2004.04383.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevResearch.3.013076
arXiv:2004.04383

[15] M. K. Bochkov and A. S. Trushechkin. ``Security of quantum key distribution with detection-efficiency mismatch in the single-photon case: Tight bounds''. Physical Review A 99, 032308 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.99.032308

[16] Anton Trushechkin. ``Security of quantum key distribution with detection-efficiency mismatch in the multiphoton case''. Quantum 6, 771 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2022-07-22-771

[17] Ilja Gerhardt, Qin Liu, Antía Lamas-Linares, Johannes Skaar, Christian Kurtsiefer, and Vadim Makarov. ``Full-field implementation of a perfect eavesdropper on a quantum cryptography system''. Nature Communications 2, 349 (2011).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​ncomms1348

[18] Vadim Makarov, Andrey Anisimov, and Johannes Skaar. ``Effects of detector efficiency mismatch on security of quantum cryptosystems''. Physical Review A 74, 022313 (2006). arXiv:quant-ph/​0511032.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.74.022313
arXiv:quant-ph/0511032

[19] Lars Lydersen, Carlos Wiechers, Christoffer Wittmann, Dominique Elser, Johannes Skaar, and Vadim Makarov. ``Hacking commercial quantum cryptography systems by tailored bright illumination''. Nature Photonics 4, 686–689 (2010).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​nphoton.2010.214

[20] Shihan Sajeed, Poompong Chaiwongkhot, Jean-Philippe Bourgoin, Thomas Jennewein, Norbert Lütkenhaus, and Vadim Makarov. ``Security loophole in free-space quantum key distribution due to spatial-mode detector-efficiency mismatch''. Physical Review A 91, 062301 (2015). arXiv:1502.02785.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.91.062301
arXiv:1502.02785

[21] Bing Qi, Chi-Hang Fred Fung, Hoi-Kwong Lo, and Xiongfeng Ma. ``Time-shift attack in practical quantum cryptosystems''. Quantum Info. Comput. 7, 73–82 (2007). arXiv:quant-ph/​0512080.
arXiv:quant-ph/0512080

[22] ETSI. ``Quantum Key Distribution (QKD); Component characterization: characterizing optical components for QKD systems'' (2016).

[23] Toyohiro Tsurumaru. ``Equivalence of three classical algorithms with quantum side information: Privacy amplification, error correction, and data compression''. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 68, 1016–1031 (2022). arXiv:2009.08823.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1109/​TIT.2021.3126160
arXiv:2009.08823

[24] Toyohiro Tsurumaru. ``Leftover hashing from quantum error correction: Unifying the two approaches to the security proof of quantum key distribution''. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 66, 3465–3484 (2020). arXiv:1809.05479.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1109/​TIT.2020.2969656
arXiv:1809.05479

[25] Christopher Portmann and Renato Renner. ``Security in quantum cryptography''. Reviews of Modern Physics 94, 025008 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.94.025008

[26] Michael Ben-Or, Michał Horodecki, Debbie W. Leung, Dominic Mayers, and Jonathan Oppenheim. ``The universal composable security of quantum key distribution''. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Theory of Cryptography. Pages 386–406. TCC'05Berlin, Heidelberg (2005). Springer-Verlag.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​978-3-540-30576-7_21

[27] Devashish Tupkary, Ernest Y.-Z. Tan, and Norbert Lütkenhaus. ``Security proof for variable-length quantum key distribution''. Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023002 (2024).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevResearch.6.023002

[28] Matthias Christandl, Robert König, and Renato Renner. ``Postselection technique for quantum channels with applications to quantum cryptography''. Physical Review Letters 102, 1–4 (2009). arXiv:0809.3019.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.102.020504
arXiv:0809.3019

[29] Shlok Nahar, Devashish Tupkary, Yuming Zhao, Norbert Lütkenhaus, and Ernest Y.-Z. Tan. ``Postselection technique for optical quantum key distribution with improved de finetti reductions''. PRX Quantum 5, 040315 (2024).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PRXQuantum.5.040315

[30] Masahito Hayashi and Toyohiro Tsurumaru. ``Concise and tight security analysis of the Bennett–Brassard 1984 protocol with finite key lengths''. New Journal of Physics 14, 093014 (2012).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​14/​9/​093014

[31] Shun Kawakami. ``Security of Quantum Key Distribution with Weak Coherent Pulses''. PhD thesis. University of Tokyo. (2018). url: https:/​/​repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/​records/​50621.
https:/​/​repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/​records/​50621

[32] Guillermo Currás-Lorenzo, Álvaro Navarrete, Koji Azuma, Go Kato, Marcos Curty, and Mohsen Razavi. ``Tight finite-key security for twin-field quantum key distribution''. npj Quantum Information 7, 1–9 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41534-020-00345-3

[33] Øystein Marøy, Lars Lydersen, and Johannes Skaar. ``Security of quantum key distribution with arbitrary individual imperfections''. Physical Review A 82 (2010).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.82.032337

[34] Alessandro Marcomini, Akihiro Mizutani, Fadri Grünenfelder, Marcos Curty, and Kiyoshi Tamaki. ``Loss-tolerant quantum key distribution with detection efficiency mismatch''. Quantum Science and Technology 10, 035002 (2025).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​2058-9565/​adc8cc

[35] Charles Ci Wen Lim, Marcos Curty, Nino Walenta, Feihu Xu, and Hugo Zbinden. ``Concise security bounds for practical decoy-state quantum key distribution''. Physical Review A 89, 022307 (2014).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.89.022307

[36] Tobias Moroder, Marcos Curty, and Norbert Lütkenhaus. ``Detector decoy quantum key distribution''. New Journal of Physics 11, 045008 (2009).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​11/​4/​045008

[37] Adam Winick, Norbert Lütkenhaus, and Patrick J. Coles. ``Reliable numerical key rates for quantum key distribution''. Quantum 2, 77 (2018). arXiv:1710.05511.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2018-07-26-77
arXiv:1710.05511

[38] Federico Grasselli, Giovanni Chesi, Nathan Walk, Hermann Kampermann, Adam Widomski, Maciej Ogrodnik, Michał Karpiński, Chiara Macchiavello, Dagmar Bruß, and Nikolai Wyderka. ``Quantum key distribution with basis-dependent detection probability''. Phys. Rev. Appl. 23, 044011 (2025).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevApplied.23.044011

[39] Marcos Curty, Maciej Lewenstein, and Norbert Lütkenhaus. ``Entanglement as a Precondition for Secure Quantum Key Distribution''. Physical Review Letters 92, 217903 (2004).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.92.217903

[40] Agnes Ferenczi and Norbert Lütkenhaus. ``Symmetries in Quantum Key Distribution and the Connection between Optimal Attacks and Optimal Cloning''. Physical Review APages 1–19 (2011). arXiv:1112.3396.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.85.052310
arXiv:1112.3396

[41] R. J. Serfling. ``Probability Inequalities for the Sum in Sampling without Replacement''. The Annals of Statistics 2, 39 – 48 (1974).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1214/​aos/​1176342611

[42] Won-Young Hwang. ``Quantum Key Distribution with High Loss: Toward Global Secure Communication''. Physical Review Letters 91, 057901 (2003).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.91.057901

[43] Hoi-Kwong Lo, Xiongfeng Ma, and Kai Chen. ``Decoy State Quantum Key Distribution''. Physical Review Letters 94, 230504 (2005).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.94.230504

[44] Xiongfeng Ma, Bing Qi, Yi Zhao, and Hoi-Kwong Lo. ``Practical decoy state for quantum key distribution''. Physical Review A 72, 012326 (2005).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.72.012326

[45] Masahito Hayashi and Ryota Nakayama. ``Security analysis of the decoy method with the Bennett-Brassard 1984 protocol for finite key lengths''. New Journal of Physics 16, 063009 (2014). arXiv:1302.4139.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​16/​6/​063009
arXiv:1302.4139

[46] Marcos Curty, Feihu Xu, Wei Cui, Charles Ci Wen Lim, Kiyoshi Tamaki, and Hoi-Kwong Lo. ``Finite-key analysis for measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution''. Nature Communications 5, 3732 (2014).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​ncomms4732

[47] Corsin Pfister, Norbert Lütkenhaus, Stephanie Wehner, and Patrick J. Coles. ``Sifting attacks in finite-size quantum key distribution''. New Journal of Physics 18, 053001 (2016). arXiv:1506.07502.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​18/​5/​053001
arXiv:1506.07502

[48] Kiyoshi Tamaki, Hoi-Kwong Lo, Akihiro Mizutani, Go Kato, Charles Ci Wen Lim, Koji Azuma, and Marcos Curty. ``Security of quantum key distribution with iterative sifting''. Quantum Science and Technology 3, 014002 (2018). arXiv:1610.06499.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​2058-9565/​aa89bd
arXiv:1610.06499

[49] Chi-Hang Fred Fung, Xiongfeng Ma, and H. F. Chau. ``Practical issues in quantum-key-distribution postprocessing''. Physical Review A 81, 012318 (2010).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.81.012318

[50] Jerome Wiesemann, Jan Krause, Devashish Tupkary, Norbert Lütkenhaus, Davide Rusca, and Nino Walenta. ``A consolidated and accessible security proof for finite-size decoy-state quantum key distribution'' (2024). arXiv:2405.16578.
arXiv:2405.16578

[51] Davide Rusca, Alberto Boaron, Fadri Grünenfelder, Anthony Martin, and Hugo Zbinden. ``Finite-key analysis on the 1-decoy state QKD protocol'' (2018). arXiv:1801.03443.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1063/​1.5023340
arXiv:1801.03443

[52] Lars Kamin and Norbert Lütkenhaus. ``Improved decoy-state and flag-state squashing methods''. Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043223 (2024).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevResearch.6.043223

[53] Yanbao Zhang and Norbert Lütkenhaus. ``Entanglement verification with detection-efficiency mismatch''. Physical Review A 95, 042319 (2017).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.95.042319

[54] A. R. Dixon, J. F. Dynes, M. Lucamarini, B. Fröhlich, A. W. Sharpe, A. Plews, S. Tam, Z. L. Yuan, Y. Tanizawa, H. Sato, S. Kawamura, M. Fujiwara, M. Sasaki, and A. J. Shields. ``High speed prototype quantum key distribution system and long term field trial''. Opt. Express 23, 7583–7592 (2015).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1364/​OE.23.007583

[55] Shlok Nahar, Devashish Tupkary, and Norbert Lütkenhaus. ``Imperfect detectors for adversarial tasks with applications to quantum key distribution'' (2025). arXiv:2503.06328.
arXiv:2503.06328

[56] Markus Rau, Tobias Vogl, Giacomo Corrielli, Gwenaelle Vest, Lukas Fuchs, Sebastian Nauerth, and Harald Weinfurter. ``Spatial mode side channels in free-space qkd implementations''. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 21, 187–191 (2015).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1109/​JSTQE.2014.2372008

[57] N. Gisin, S. Fasel, B. Kraus, H. Zbinden, and G. Ribordy. ``Trojan-horse attacks on quantum-key-distribution systems''. Physical Review A 73 (2006).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​physreva.73.022320

[58] Ilja Gerhardt, Qin Liu, Antía Lamas-Linares, Johannes Skaar, Christian Kurtsiefer, and Vadim Makarov. ``Full-field implementation of a perfect eavesdropper on a quantum cryptography system''. Nature Communications 2 (2011).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​ncomms1348

[59] Zhiyao Wang, Devashish Tupkary, and Shlok Nahar. ``Phase error estimation for passive detection setups with imperfections and memory effects'' (2025). arXiv:2508.21486.
arXiv:2508.21486

[60] Guillermo Currás-Lorenzo, Margarida Pereira, Shlok Nahar, and Devashish Tupkary. ``Security of quantum key distribution with source and detector imperfections through phase-error estimation'' (2025). arXiv:2507.03549.
arXiv:2507.03549

[61] Akihiro Mizutani, Shun Kawakami, and Go Kato. ``Finite-key security analysis of the decoy-state bb84 qkd with passive measurement''. Quantum Science and Technology 11, 015010 (2025).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​2058-9565/​ae20b9

[62] Marco Tomamichel. ``Quantum Information Processing with Finite Resources''. Volume 5 of SpringerBriefs in Mathematical Physics. Springer International Publishing. Cham (2016).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​978-3-319-21891-5

[63] Marco Tomamichel. ``A Framework for Non-Asymptotic Quantum Information Theory'' (2013). arXiv:1203.2142.
arXiv:1203.2142

[64] Wassily Hoeffding. ``Probability Inequalities for Sums of Bounded Random Variables''. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58, 13–30 (1963).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.2307/​2282952

Cited by

[1] Guillermo Currás-Lorenzo, Margarida Pereira, Shlok Nahar, and Devashish Tupkary, "Security of quantum key distribution with source and detector imperfections through phase-error estimation", npj Quantum Information 12 1, 129 (2026).

[2] Lars Kamin, Devashish Tupkary, and Norbert Lütkenhaus, "Improved finite-size effects in quantum key distribution with applications to decoy-state protocols", Physical Review Research 8 1, 013332 (2026).

[3] Shlok Nahar, Devashish Tupkary, and Norbert Lütkenhaus, "Imperfect detectors for adversarial tasks with applications to quantum key distribution", Quantum 10, 2044 (2026).

[4] Matej Pivoluska and Mateus Araújo, "Tighter asymptotic key rates for intensity-correlated decoy-state quantum key distribution via nonlinear programming", Physical Review A 113 6, 062441 (2026).

[5] Maximilian Tippmann, Jakob Kaltwasser, Maximilian Mengler, Tobias Liebmann, and Thomas Walther, "Practical quantum key distribution networks: a mini-review", The European Physical Journal Special Topics 235 11, 2947 (2026).

[6] Ben J. Taylor, Peter R. Smith, James F. Dynes, Robert I. Woodward, Marco Lucamarini, R. Mark Stevenson, and Andrew J. Shields, "Practical countermeasure against attacks exploiting detection-efficiency mismatch in quantum key distribution", Physical Review Applied 25 5, 054029 (2026).

[7] Georgi Bebrov, "Quantum key distribution based on systematic polar coding", Quantum Information Processing 25 7, 242 (2026).

[8] Hao Dong, Cong Jiang, Di Ma, Chi Zhang, Jia Huang, Hao Li, Li-Xing You, Yang Liu, Xiang-Bin Wang, Qiang Zhang, and Jian-Wei Pan, "Experimental side channel secure quantum key distribution under realistic conditions", Physical Review Research 8 1, 013214 (2026).

[9] Jerome Wiesemann, Jan Krause, Devashish Tupkary, Norbert Lütkenhaus, Davide Rusca, and Nino Walenta, "A consolidated and accessible security proof for finite-size decoy-state quantum key distribution", Quantum 10, 2037 (2026).

[10] Kai-Chi Chang, Murat Can Sarihan, Nicky Kai Hong Li, Florian Kanitschar, Kemal Enes Akyuz, Yujie Chen, Dong-Il Lee, Jin Ho Kang, Alwaleed Aldhafeeri, Andrew Mueller, Matthew D. Shaw, Boris Korzh, Maria Spiropulu, Paul Erker, Marcus Huber, and Chee Wei Wong, "Unlocking the potential of high-dimensional quantum communication with scalable photonic entanglement in time and frequency", Science Advances 12 27, eaee1333 (2026).

[11] Ernest Y.-Z. Tan and Shlok Nahar, "Incorporating Device Characterization into Security Proofs", PRX Quantum 7 2, 020342 (2026).

[12] Patrick Andriolo, Esteban Vasquez, Elizabeth Agudelo, Max Riegler, Matej Pivoluska, and Gláucia Murta, "Quantum Key Distribution with Imperfections: Recent Advances in Security Proofs", Brazilian Journal of Physics 56 4, 157 (2026).

[13] Alessandro Marcomini, Akihiro Mizutani, Fadri Grünenfelder, Marcos Curty, and Kiyoshi Tamaki, "Loss-tolerant quantum key distribution with detection efficiency mismatch", Quantum Science and Technology 10 3, 035002 (2025).

[14] Guillermo Currás-Lorenzo, Margarida Pereira, Go Kato, Marcos Curty, and Kiyoshi Tamaki, "Security framework for quantum key distribution with imperfect sources", arXiv:2305.05930, (2023).

[15] Shlok Nahar, Devashish Tupkary, Yuming Zhao, Norbert Lütkenhaus, and Ernest Y.-Z. Tan, "Postselection Technique for Optical Quantum Key Distribution with Improved de Finetti Reductions", PRX Quantum 5 4, 040315 (2024).

[16] Devashish Tupkary, Ernest Y.-Z. Tan, Shlok Nahar, Lars Kamin, and Norbert Lütkenhaus, "Security proofs for practical QKD: variations, techniques, gaps, and limitations", arXiv:2502.10340, (2025).

[17] Lars Kamin, John Burniston, and Ernest Y.-Z. Tan, "Rényi security framework against coherent attacks applied to decoy-state QKD", arXiv:2504.12248, (2025).

[18] Xoel Sixto, Álvaro Navarrete, Margarida Pereira, Guillermo Currás-Lorenzo, Kiyoshi Tamaki, and Marcos Curty, "Quantum key distribution with imperfectly isolated devices", Quantum Science and Technology 10 3, 035034 (2025).

[19] Lars Kamin, Amir Arqand, Ian George, Norbert Lütkenhaus, and Ernest Y.-Z. Tan, "Finite-Size Analysis of Prepare-and-Measure and Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution via Entropy Accumulation", PRX Quantum 6 2, 020342 (2025).

[20] Guillermo Currás-Lorenzo, Álvaro Navarrete, Javier Núñez-Bon, Margarida Pereira, and Marcos Curty, "Numerical security analysis for quantum key distribution with partial state characterization", Quantum Science and Technology 10 3, 035031 (2025).

[21] Jerome Wiesemann, Fadri Grünenfelder, Ana Blázquez Coído, Nino Walenta, and Davide Rusca, "Evaluation of quantum key distribution systems against injection-locking attacks", APL Photonics 10 6, 066112 (2025).

[22] Federico Grasselli, Giovanni Chesi, Nathan Walk, Hermann Kampermann, Adam Widomski, Maciej Ogrodnik, Michał Karpiński, Chiara Macchiavello, Dagmar Bruß, and Nikolai Wyderka, "Quantum key distribution with basis-dependent detection probability", Physical Review Applied 23 4, 044011 (2025).

[23] Guillermo Currás-Lorenzo, Margarida Pereira, Shlok Nahar, and Devashish Tupkary, "Security of quantum key distribution with source and detector imperfections through phase-error estimation", arXiv:2507.03549, (2025).

[24] Zhiyao Wang, Devashish Tupkary, and Shlok Nahar, "Phase error estimation for passive detection setups with imperfections and memory effects", arXiv:2508.21486, (2025).

[25] Akihiro Mizutani, Toshihiko Sasaki, and Go Kato, "Protocol-level description and self-contained security proof of decoy-state BB84 QKD protocol", arXiv:2504.20417, (2025).

[26] Daniil Trefilov, Xoel Sixto, Víctor Zapatero, Anqi Huang, Marcos Curty, and Vadim Makarov, "Intensity correlations in decoy-state BB84 quantum key distribution systems", arXiv:2411.00709, (2024).

[27] Aleksei Reutov, "Imperfect preparation and Trojan attack on the phase modulator in the decoy-state BB84 protocol", Optics Communications 593, 132175 (2025).

[28] Devashish Tupkary, Shlok Nahar, Amir Arqand, Ernest Y.-Z. Tan, and Norbert Lütkenhaus, "A rigorous and complete security proof of decoy-state BB84 quantum key distribution", arXiv:2601.18035, (2026).

[29] Kai-Chi Chang, Murat Can Sarihan, Nicky Kai Hong Li, Florian Kanitschar, Kemal Enes Akyuz, Yujie Chen, Dong-Il Lee, Jin Ho Kang, Alwaleed Aldhafeeri, Andrew Mueller, Matthew D. Shaw, Boris Korzh, Maria Spiropulu, Paul Erker, Marcus Huber, and Chee Wei Wong, "High-dimensional quantum communication with scalable photonic entanglement in time and frequency", arXiv:2603.18212, (2026).

[30] Álvaro Navarrete, Víctor Zapatero, and Marcos Curty, "Security of practical modulator-free quantum key distribution", npj Quantum Information 11 1, 187 (2025).

[31] Jonas Treplin, Philipp Kleinpaß, and Davide Orsucci, "Finite Size Analysis of Decoy-State BB84 with Advantage Distillation", arXiv:2511.21665, (2025).

[32] Devashish Tupkary, "Rigorous Security Proofs for Practical Quantum Key Distribution", arXiv:2604.21791, (2026).

[33] Zhangdong Ye, "Analytic properties of cross-click operators in passive multi-basis photodetection: monotonicity, exact convergence rates, and dimension reduction for quantum key distribution", arXiv:2607.04186, (2026).

The above citations are from Crossref's cited-by service (last updated successfully 2026-08-17 23:05:16) and SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2026-08-17 23:05:17). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.