Systematic construction of stabilizer codes via gauging abelian boundary symmetries
1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, 9000 Gent, Belgium
2University of Vienna, Faculty of Mathematics, Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1, 1090 Vienna, Austria
3Instituto de Física Teórica, UAM/CSIC, C. Nicolás Cabrera 13-15, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain
| Published: | 2025-09-08, volume 9, page 1852 |
| Editor: | Alioscia Hamma |
| Eprint: | arXiv:2410.09044v2 |
| Doi: | https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2025-09-08-1852 |
| Citation: | Quantum 9, 1852 (2025). |
Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.
Abstract
We propose a systematic framework to construct a $(d+1)$-dimensional stabilizer model from an initial generic d-dimensional abelian symmetry. Our approach builds upon the iterative gauging procedure, developed by one of the authors in [J. Garre-Rubio, Nature Commun. 15, 7986 (2024)][12], in which an initial symmetric state is repeatedly gauged to obtain an emergent model in one dimension higher that supports the initial symmetry at its boundary. This method not only enables the construction of emergent states and corresponding commuting stabilizer Hamiltonians of which they are ground states, but it also provides a way to construct gapped boundary conditions for these models that amount to spontaneously breaking part of the boundary symmetry. In a detailed introductory example, we showcase our paradigm by constructing three-dimensional Clifford-deformed surface codes from iteratively gauging a global 0-form symmetry that lives in two dimensions. We then provide a proof of our main result, hereby drawing upon a slight extension of the gauging procedure of Williamson. We additionally provide two more examples in $d=2$ in which different type-I fracton orders emerge from gauging initial linear subsystem and Sierpinski fractal symmetries. En passant, we provide explicit tensor network representations of all of the involved gauging maps and the emergent states.

► BibTeX data
► References
[1] Alexei Kitaev and Liang Kong. ``Models for Gapped Boundaries and Domain Walls''. Commun. Math. Phys. 313, 351–373 (2012). arXiv:1104.5047.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-012-1500-5
arXiv:1104.5047
[2] Liang Kong and Xiao-Gang Wen. ``Braided fusion categories, gravitational anomalies, and the mathematical framework for topological orders in any dimensions'' (2014). arXiv:1405.5858.
arXiv:1405.5858
[3] Liang Kong, Xiao-Gang Wen, and Hao Zheng. ``Boundary-bulk relation in topological orders''. Nucl. Phys. B 922, 62–76 (2017). arXiv:1702.00673.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2017.06.023
arXiv:1702.00673
[4] Xie Chen, Zheng-Cheng Gu, Zheng-Xin Liu, and Xiao-Gang Wen. ``Symmetry protected topological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group''. Phys. Rev. B 87, 155114 (2013). arXiv:1106.4772.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.155114
arXiv:1106.4772
[5] Norbert Schuch, David Pérez-García, and Ignacio Cirac. ``Classifying quantum phases using matrix product states and projected entangled pair states''. Phys. Rev. B 84, 165139 (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.165139
[6] Thomas Schuster, Nathanan Tantivasadakarn, Ashvin Vishwanath, and Norman Y. Yao. ``A holographic view of topological stabilizer codes'' (2023). arXiv:2312.04617.
arXiv:2312.04617
[7] Fabio Apruzzi, Federico Bonetti, Inaki García Etxebarria, Saghar S. Hosseini, and Sakura Schafer-Nameki. ``Symmetry TFTs from String Theory''. Commun. Math. Phys. 402, 895–949 (2023). arXiv:2112.02092.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-023-04737-2
arXiv:2112.02092
[8] Justin Kaidi, Kantaro Ohmori, and Yunqin Zheng. ``Symmetry TFTs for Non-invertible Defects''. Commun. Math. Phys. 404, 1021–1124 (2023). arXiv:2209.11062.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-023-04859-7
arXiv:2209.11062
[9] Yi-Zhuang You, Zhen Bi, Alex Rasmussen, Kevin Slagle, and Cenke Xu. ``Wave Function and Strange Correlator of Short Range Entangled states''. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 247202 (2014). arXiv:1312.0626.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.247202
arXiv:1312.0626
[10] Robijn Vanhove, Matthias Bal, Dominic J. Williamson, Nick Bultinck, Jutho Haegeman, and Frank Verstraete. ``Mapping topological to conformal field theories through strange correlators''. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 177203 (2018). arXiv:1801.05959.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.177203
arXiv:1801.05959
[11] Robijn Vanhove, Laurens Lootens, Hong-Hao Tu, and Frank Verstraete. ``Topological aspects of the critical three-state Potts model''. J. Phys. A 55, 235002 (2022). arXiv:2107.11177.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ac68b1
arXiv:2107.11177
[12] José' Garre-Rubio. ``Emergent (2+1)D topological orders from iterative (1+1)D gauging''. Nature Commun. 15, 7986 (2024). arXiv:2403.07575.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52320-7
arXiv:2403.07575
[13] Jutho Haegeman, Karel Van Acoleyen, Norbert Schuch, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Frank Verstraete. ``Gauging quantum states: from global to local symmetries in many-body systems''. Phys. Rev. X 5, 011024 (2015). arXiv:1407.1025.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.5.011024
arXiv:1407.1025
[14] Dominic J. Williamson. ``Fractal symmetries: Ungauging the cubic code''. Phys. Rev. B 94, 155128 (2016). arXiv:1603.05182.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.155128
arXiv:1603.05182
[15] Eric Huang, Arthur Pesah, Christopher T. Chubb, Michael Vasmer, and Arpit Dua. ``Tailoring Three-Dimensional Topological Codes for Biased Noise''. PRX Quantum 4, 030338 (2023). arXiv:2211.02116.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.030338
arXiv:2211.02116
[16] A. Yu. Kitaev. ``Fault tolerant quantum computation by anyons''. Annals Phys. 303, 2–30 (2003). arXiv:quant-ph/9707021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4916(02)00018-0
arXiv:quant-ph/9707021
[17] Wilbur Shirley, Kevin Slagle, and Xie Chen. ``Twisted foliated fracton phases''. Phys. Rev. B 102, 115103 (2020). arXiv:1907.09048.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.115103
arXiv:1907.09048
[18] Claudio Castelnovo and Claudio Chamon. ``Topological quantum glassiness''. Phil. Mag. 92, 304–323 (2012).
https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2011.609152
[19] Brandon C. Rayhaun and Dominic J. Williamson. ``Higher-form subsystem symmetry breaking: Subdimensional criticality and fracton phase transitions''. SciPost Phys. 15, 017 (2023). arXiv:2112.12735.
https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.1.017
arXiv:2112.12735
[20] Davide Gaiotto, Anton Kapustin, Nathan Seiberg, and Brian Willett. ``Generalized Global Symmetries''. JHEP 02, 172 (2015). arXiv:1412.5148.
https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2015)172
arXiv:1412.5148
[21] Laurens Lootens, Jürgen Fuchs, Jutho Haegeman, Christoph Schweigert, and Frank Verstraete. ``Matrix product operator symmetries and intertwiners in string-nets with domain walls''. SciPost Phys. 10, 053 (2021). arXiv:2008.11187.
https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.10.3.053
arXiv:2008.11187
[22] Clement Delcamp. ``Tensor network approach to electromagnetic duality in (3+1)d topological gauge models''. JHEP 08, 149 (2022). arXiv:2112.08324.
https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2022)149
arXiv:2112.08324
[23] Clement Delcamp and Apoorv Tiwari. ``Higher categorical symmetries and gauging in two-dimensional spin systems''. SciPost Phys. 16, 110 (2024). arXiv:2301.01259.
https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.16.4.110
arXiv:2301.01259
[24] Konstantinos Roumpedakis, Sahand Seifnashri, and Shu-Heng Shao. ``Higher Gauging and Non-invertible Condensation Defects''. Commun. Math. Phys. 401, 3043–3107 (2023). arXiv:2204.02407.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-023-04706-9
arXiv:2204.02407
[25] Ling Lin, Daniel G. Robbins, and Eric Sharpe. ``Decomposition, Condensation Defects, and Fusion''. Fortsch. Phys. 70, 2200130 (2022). arXiv:2208.05982.
https://doi.org/10.1002/prop.202200130
arXiv:2208.05982
[26] Thomas Bartsch, Mathew Bullimore, Andrea E. V. Ferrari, and Jamie Pearson. ``Non-invertible symmetries and higher representation theory I''. SciPost Phys. 17, 015 (2024). arXiv:2208.05993.
https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.17.1.015
arXiv:2208.05993
[27] Lakshya Bhardwaj, Sakura Schafer-Nameki, and Jingxiang Wu. ``Universal Non-Invertible Symmetries''. Fortsch. Phys. 70, 2200143 (2022). arXiv:2208.05973.
https://doi.org/10.1002/prop.202200143
arXiv:2208.05973
[28] Bram Vancraeynest-De Cuiper and Clement Delcamp. ``Twisted gauging and topological sectors in (2+1)d Abelian lattice gauge theories''. SciPost Phys. 19, 054 (2025). arXiv:2501.16301.
https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.19.2.054
arXiv:2501.16301
[29] Xiao-Gang Wen. ``Emergent anomalous higher symmetries from topological order and from dynamical electromagnetic field in condensed matter systems''. Phys. Rev. B 99, 205139 (2019). arXiv:1812.02517.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.205139
arXiv:1812.02517
[30] Heidar Moradi, Ömer M. Aksoy, Jens H. Bardarson, and Apoorv Tiwari. ``Symmetry fractionalization, mixed-anomalies and dualities in quantum spin models with generalized symmetries''. SciPost Phys. 18, 097 (2025).
https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.18.3.097
[31] Juven Wang, Xiao-Gang Wen, and Edward Witten. ``Symmetric Gapped Interfaces of SPT and SET States: Systematic Constructions''. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031048 (2018). arXiv:1705.06728.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031048
arXiv:1705.06728
[32] Hongyu Wang, Yingcheng Li, Yuting Hu, and Yidun Wan. ``Gapped Boundary Theory of the Twisted Gauge Theory Model of Three-Dimensional Topological Orders''. JHEP 10, 114 (2018). arXiv:1807.11083.
https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2018)114
arXiv:1807.11083
[33] Wenjie Ji, Nathanan Tantivasadakarn, and Cenke Xu. ``Boundary states of three dimensional topological order and the deconfined quantum critical point''. SciPost Phys. 15, 231 (2023). arXiv:2212.09754.
https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.6.231
arXiv:2212.09754
[34] Zhu-Xi Luo. ``Gapped boundaries of (3+1)-dimensional topological order''. Phys. Rev. B 107, 125425 (2023). arXiv:2212.09779.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.125425
arXiv:2212.09779
[35] Jiaheng Zhao, Jia-Qi Lou, Zhi-Hao Zhang, Ling-Yan Hung, Liang Kong, and Yin Tian. ``String condensations in $3+1D$ and Lagrangian algebras''. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 27, 583–622 (2023). arXiv:2208.07865.
https://doi.org/10.4310/ATMP.2023.v27.n2.a5
arXiv:2208.07865
[36] Trithep Devakul, Yizhi You, Fiona Burnell, and Shivaji L. Sondhi. ``Fractal Symmetric Phases of Matter''. SciPost Phys. 6, 007 (2019). arXiv:1805.04097.
https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.6.1.007
arXiv:1805.04097
[37] Heitor Casasola, Guilherme Delfino, Yizhi You, Paula F. Bienzobaz, and Pedro R. S. Gomes. ``Fractal Subsystem Symmetries, Anomalies, Boundaries, and Effective Field Theory''. Phys. Rev. B 110, 195105 (2024). arXiv:2406.19275.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.195105
arXiv:2406.19275
[38] Beni Yoshida. ``Exotic topological order in fractal spin liquids''. Phys. Rev. B 88, 125122 (2013). arXiv:1302.6248.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.125122
arXiv:1302.6248
[39] Bram Vancraeynest-De Cuiper and et al. ``To appear'' (2025). arXiv:25XX.XXXXX.
arXiv:25XX.XXXXX
Cited by
[1] Bram Vancraeynest-De Cuiper, José Garre-Rubio, Frank Verstraete, Kevin Vervoort, Dominic J. Williamson, and Laurens Lootens, "From gauging to duality in one-dimensional quantum lattice models", SciPost Physics 20 4, 113 (2026).
[2] Bram Vancraeynest-De Cuiper, Weronika Wiesiolek, and Frank Verstraete, "Les Houches lecture notes on tensor networks", SciPost Physics Lecture Notes 128 (2026).
[3] Bram Vancraeynest-De Cuiper, Weronika Wiesiolek, and Frank Verstraete, "Les Houches Lecture Notes on Tensor Networks", arXiv:2512.24390, (2025).
[4] Clay Cordova, Davi B. Costa, and Po-Shen Hsin, "Non-Invertible Symmetries as Condensation Defects in Finite-Group Gauge Theories", arXiv:2412.16681, (2024).
The above citations are from Crossref's cited-by service (last updated successfully 2026-08-10 11:59:21) and SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2026-08-10 11:59:22). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.
This Paper is published in Quantum under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. Copyright remains with the original copyright holders such as the authors or their institutions.