Matrix-product unitaries: Beyond quantum cellular automata
1Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics, Hans-Kopfermann-Str. 1, Garching 85748, Germany
2Munich Center for Quantum Science and Technology (MCQST), Schellingstr. 4, 80799 München, Germany
3Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
4Departamento de Análisis Matemático, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
5Instituto de Ciencias Matemáticas (CSIC-UAM-UC3M-UCM), 28049 Madrid, Spain
| Published: | 2025-02-25, volume 9, page 1645 |
| Editor: | Thomas Elliott |
| Eprint: | arXiv:2406.10195v3 |
| Doi: | https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2025-02-25-1645 |
| Citation: | Quantum 9, 1645 (2025). |
Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.
Abstract
Matrix-product unitaries (MPU) are 1D tensor networks describing time evolution and unitary symmetries of quantum systems, while their action on states by construction preserves the entanglement area law. MPU which are formed by a single repeated tensor are known to coincide with 1D quantum cellular automata (QCA), i.e., unitaries with an exact light cone. However, this correspondence breaks down for MPU with open boundary conditions, even if the resulting operator is translation-invariant. Such unitaries can turn short- to long-range correlations and thus alter the underlying phase of matter. Here we make the first steps towards a theory of MPU with uniform bulk but arbitrary boundary. In particular, we study the structure of a subclass with a direct-sum form which maximally violates the QCA property. We also consider the general case of MPU formed by site-dependent (nonuniform) tensors and show a correspondence between MPU and locally maximally entanglable states.

Featured image: A unitary matrix-product operator. This work explores their structure and correlations.
Popular summary
► BibTeX data
► References
[1] Román Orús. ``Tensor networks for complex quantum systems''. Nature Reviews Physics 1, 538–550 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-019-0086-7
[2] J. Ignacio Cirac, David Pérez-García, Norbert Schuch, and Frank Verstraete. ``Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems''. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 045003 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.93.045003
[3] Mark Fannes, Bruno Nachtergaele, and Reinhard F Werner. ``Finitely correlated states on quantum spin chains''. Communications in mathematical physics 144, 443–490 (1992).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02099178
[4] F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac. ``Matrix product states represent ground states faithfully''. Phys. Rev. B 73, 094423 (2006).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.094423
[5] Matthew B Hastings. ``An area law for one-dimensional quantum systems''. Journal of statistical mechanics: Theory and experiment 2007, P08024 (2007).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2007/08/P08024
[6] Guifré Vidal. ``Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations''. Physical review letters 91, 147902 (2003).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.147902
[7] D Pérez-García, F Verstraete, MM Wolf, and J. Ignacio Cirac. ``Matrix product state representations''. Quantum Inf. Comp. 7, 401–430 (2007).
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0608197
arXiv:quant-ph/0608197
[8] Christian Schön, Enrique Solano, Frank Verstraete, J Ignacio Cirac, and Michael M Wolf. ``Sequential generation of entangled multiqubit states''. Physical review letters 95, 110503 (2005).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.110503
[9] J Ignacio Cirac, David Perez-Garcia, Norbert Schuch, and Frank Verstraete. ``Matrix product density operators: Renormalization fixed points and boundary theories''. Ann. Phys. 378, 100–149 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2016.12.030
[10] Xie Chen, Zheng-Cheng Gu, and Xiao-Gang Wen. ``Classification of gapped symmetric phases in one-dimensional spin systems''. Phys. Rev. B 83, 035107 (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.035107
[11] Norbert Schuch, David Pérez-García, and Ignacio Cirac. ``Classifying quantum phases using matrix product states and projected entangled pair states''. Phys. Rev. B 84, 165139 (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.165139
[12] F. Verstraete, J. I. Cirac, J. I. Latorre, E. Rico, and M. M. Wolf. ``Renormalization-group transformations on quantum states''. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 140601 (2005).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.140601
[13] Daniel Malz, Georgios Styliaris, Zhi-Yuan Wei, and J Ignacio Cirac. ``Preparation of matrix product states with log-depth quantum circuits''. Physical Review Letters 132, 040404 (2024).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.040404
[14] J Ignacio Cirac, David Perez-Garcia, Norbert Schuch, and Frank Verstraete. ``Matrix product unitaries: Structure, symmetries, and topological invariants''. Journal of Statistical Mechanics (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/aa7e55
[15] M. Burak Şahinoğlu, Sujeet K. Shukla, Feng Bi, and Xie Chen. ``Matrix product representation of locality preserving unitaries''. Phys. Rev. B 98, 245122 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.245122
[16] Lorenzo Piroli, Alex Turzillo, Sujeet K Shukla, and J Ignacio Cirac. ``Fermionic quantum cellular automata and generalized matrix-product unitaries''. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2021, 013107 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/abd30f
[17] Terry Farrelly. ``A review of quantum cellular automata''. Quantum 4, 368 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-11-30-368
[18] Pablo Arrighi, Vincent Nesme, and Reinhard Werner. ``Unitarity plus causality implies localizability''. J. Comp. Syst. Sciences 77, 372–378 (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss.2010.05.004
[19] Benjamin Schumacher and Reinhard F Werner. ``Reversible quantum cellular automata'' (2004). arXiv:0405174.
arXiv:quant-ph/0405174
[20] David Gross, Vincent Nesme, Holger Vogts, and Reinhard F Werner. ``Index theory of one dimensional quantum walks and cellular automata''. Comm. Math. Phys. 310, 419–454 (2012).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-012-1423-1
[21] Zongping Gong, Lorenzo Piroli, and J Ignacio Cirac. ``Topological lower bound on quantum chaos by entanglement growth''. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 160601 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.160601
[22] Zongping Gong, Christoph Sünderhauf, Norbert Schuch, and J. Ignacio Cirac. ``Classification of matrix-product unitaries with symmetries''. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 100402 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.100402
[23] Michael A Nielsen and Isaac Chuang. ``Quantum computation and quantum information''. Cambridge University Press. (2002).
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976667
[24] C. Kruszynska and B. Kraus. ``Local entanglability and multipartite entanglement''. Phys. Rev. A 79, 052304 (2009).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.79.052304
[25] Lorenzo Piroli and J. Ignacio Cirac. ``Quantum cellular automata, tensor networks, and area laws''. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 190402 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.190402
[26] W. Dür, G. Vidal, and J. I. Cirac. ``Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways''. Phys. Rev. A 62, 062314 (2000).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.62.062314
[27] Mateusz Michałek and Yaroslav Shitov. ``Quantum version of Wielandt’s inequality revisited''. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 65, 5239–5242 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2019.2897772
[28] Balázs Pozsgay and Ian M Wanless. ``Tensor network decompositions for absolutely maximally entangled states''. Quantum 8, 1339 (2024).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2024-05-08-1339
[29] Marta Florido-Llinas et al. to appear.
[30] Manfred Droste, Werner Kuich, and Heiko Vogler. ``Handbook of weighted automata''. Springer. (2009).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01492-5
[31] Barbara Kraus and J. Ignacio Cirac. ``Optimal creation of entanglement using a two-qubit gate''. Phys. Rev. A 63, 062309 (2001).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.63.062309
[32] W Dür, Gustavo Vidal, and J Ignacio Cirac. ``Optimal conversion of nonlocal unitary operations''. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 057901 (2002).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.057901
[33] Caroline de Groot, Alex Turzillo, and Norbert Schuch. ``Symmetry protected topological order in open quantum systems''. Quantum 6, 856 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2022-11-10-856
[34] Roger A Horn and Charles R Johnson. ``Matrix analysis''. Cambridge university press. (2012).
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139020411
[35] Mary Beth Ruskai, Stanislaw Szarek, and Elisabeth Werner. ``An analysis of completely-positive trace-preserving maps on $M_2$''. Linear algebra and its applications 347, 159–187 (2002).
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3795(01)00547-X
Cited by
[1] Erickson Tjoa and J. Ignacio Cirac, "Continuous matrix-product operators for quantum fields", Physical Review Research 8 2, L022013 (2026).
[2] Georgios Styliaris, Rahul Trivedi, and J. Ignacio Cirac, "Quantum Circuits for Matrix-Product Unitaries", Physical Review Letters 135 26, 260602 (2025).
[3] Faidon Andreadakis and Paolo Zanardi, "Exact link between nonlocal nonstabilizerness and operator entanglement", Physical Review A 113 1, L010404 (2026).
[4] Sujeet K. Shukla, "A simple and general equation for matrix product unitary generation", Journal of Mathematical Physics 66 10, 101901 (2025).
[5] Augustin Vanrietvelde, Octave Mestoudjian, and Pablo Arrighi, "Causal Decompositions of 1D Quantum Cellular Automata", arXiv:2506.22219, (2025).
The above citations are from Crossref's cited-by service (last updated successfully 2026-08-12 21:05:03) and SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2026-08-12 21:05:05). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.
This Paper is published in Quantum under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. Copyright remains with the original copyright holders such as the authors or their institutions.