Barren plateaus in quantum tensor network optimization

Enrique Cervero Martín1,2, Kirill Plekhanov1, and Michael Lubasch1

1Quantinuum, Partnership House, Carlisle Place, London SW1P 1BX, United Kingdom
2Centre for Quantum Technologies, National University of Singapore, 3 Science Drive 2, Singapore 117543

Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.

Abstract

We analyze the barren plateau phenomenon in the variational optimization of quantum circuits inspired by matrix product states (qMPS), tree tensor networks (qTTN), and the multiscale entanglement renormalization ansatz (qMERA). We consider as the cost function the expectation value of a Hamiltonian that is a sum of local terms. For randomly chosen variational parameters we show that the variance of the cost function gradient decreases exponentially with the distance of a Hamiltonian term from the canonical centre in the quantum tensor network. Therefore, as a function of qubit count, for qMPS most gradient variances decrease exponentially and for qTTN as well as qMERA they decrease polynomially. We also show that the calculation of these gradients is exponentially more efficient on a classical computer than on a quantum computer.

Quantum tensor networks (qTNs) are parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) that are inspired by and can have advantages over classical tensor networks. We address the question of whether the variational qTN optimization can suffer from barren plateau problems. We consider PQCs inspired by matrix product states (qMPS), tree tensor networks (qTTN) and the multiscale entanglement renormalization ansatz (qMERA). We show that, for a local cost function, the gradient variance w.r.t. random variational parameters decreases exponentially with the distance from the cost function’s observable to the qTN’s canonical centre. Specifically, for qMPS gradient variances can decrease exponentially with qubit count, while for qTTN and qMERA they decrease polynomially.

► BibTeX data

► References

[1] John Preskill. ``Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond''. Quantum 2, 79 (2018).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2018-08-06-79

[2] Peter W. Shor. ``Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring''. In Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. Pages 124–134. (1994).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1109/​SFCS.1994.365700

[3] Lov K. Grover. ``A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search''. In STOC '96: Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing. Pages 212–219. (1996).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1145/​237814.237866

[4] Frank Arute et al. ``Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor''. Nature 574, 505–510 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41586-019-1666-5

[5] Yulin Wu et al. ``Strong quantum computational advantage using a superconducting quantum processor''. Physical Review Letters 127, 180501 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.127.180501

[6] Marco Cerezo, Andrew Arrasmith, Ryan Babbush, Simon C. Benjamin, Suguru Endo, Keisuke Fujii, Jarrod R. McClean, Kosuke Mitarai, Xiao Yuan, Lukasz Cincio, and Patrick J. Coles. ``Variational quantum algorithms''. Nature Reviews Physics 3, 625–644 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s42254-021-00348-9

[7] Kishor Bharti, Alba Cervera-Lierta, Thi Ha Kyaw, Tobias Haug, Sumner Alperin-Lea, Abhinav Anand, Matthias Degroote, Hermanni Heimonen, Jakob S. Kottmann, Tim Menke, Wai-Keong Mok, Sukin Sim, Leong-Chuan Kwek, and Alán Aspuru-Guzik. ``Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms''. Reviews of Modern Physics 94, 015004 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.94.015004

[8] Jules Tilly, Hongxiang Chen, Shuxiang Cao, Dario Picozzi, Kanav Setia, Ying Li, Edward Grant, Leonard Wossnig, Ivan Rungger, George H. Booth, and Jonathan Tennyson. ``The variational quantum eigensolver: A review of methods and best practices''. Physics Reports 986, 1–128 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.physrep.2022.08.003

[9] Alberto Peruzzo, Jarrod McClean, Peter Shadbolt, Man-Hong Yung, Xiao-Qi Zhou, Peter J. Love, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, and Jeremy L. O'Brien. ``A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor''. Nature Communications 5, 4213 (2014).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​ncomms5213

[10] Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, and Sam Gutmann. ``A quantum approximate optimization algorithm'' (2014). url: doi.org/​10.48550/​arXiv.1411.4028.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.48550/​arXiv.1411.4028

[11] Leo Zhou, Sheng-Tao Wang, Soonwon Choi, Hannes Pichler, and Mikhail D. Lukin. ``Quantum approximate optimization algorithm: Performance, mechanism, and implementation on near-term devices''. Phys. Rev. X 10, 021067 (2020).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.10.021067

[12] David Amaro, Carlo Modica, Matthias Rosenkranz, Mattia Fiorentini, Marcello Benedetti, and Michael Lubasch. ``Filtering variational quantum algorithms for combinatorial optimization''. Quantum Science and Technology 7, 015021 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​2058-9565/​ac3e54

[13] David Amaro, Matthias Rosenkranz, Nathan Fitzpatrick, Koji Hirano, and Mattia Fiorentini. ``A case study of variational quantum algorithms for a job shop scheduling problem''. EPJ Quantum Technology 9, 5 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1140/​epjqt/​s40507-022-00123-4

[14] Marcello Benedetti, Erika Lloyd, Stefan Sack, and Mattia Fiorentini. ``Parameterized quantum circuits as machine learning models''. Quantum Science and Technology 4, 043001 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​2058-9565/​ab4eb5

[15] Maria Schuld, Alex Bocharov, Krysta M. Svore, and Nathan Wiebe. ``Circuit-centric quantum classifiers''. Physical Review A 101, 032308 (2020).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.101.032308

[16] Marcello Benedetti, Brian Coyle, Mattia Fiorentini, Michael Lubasch, and Matthias Rosenkranz. ``Variational inference with a quantum computer''. Physical Review Applied 16, 044057 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevApplied.16.044057

[17] Abhinav Kandala et al. ``Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets''. Nature 549, 242–246 (2017).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​nature23879

[18] Yudong Cao et al. ``Quantum chemistry in the age of quantum computing''. Chemical Reviews 119, 10856–10915 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1021/​acs.chemrev.8b00803

[19] Sam McArdle, Suguru Endo, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, Simon C. Benjamin, and Xiao Yuan. ``Quantum computational chemistry''. Reviews of Modern Physics 92, 015003 (2020).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.92.015003

[20] Bela Bauer, Sergey Bravyi, Mario Motta, and Garnet Kin-Lic Chan. ``Quantum algorithms for quantum chemistry and quantum materials science''. Chemical Reviews 120, 12685–12717 (2020).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1021/​acs.chemrev.9b00829

[21] Kirill Plekhanov, Matthias Rosenkranz, Mattia Fiorentini, and Michael Lubasch. ``Variational quantum amplitude estimation''. Quantum 6, 670 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2022-03-17-670

[22] Dylan Herman, Cody Googin, Xiaoyuan Liu, Alexey Galda, Ilya Safro, Yue Sun, Marco Pistoia, and Yuri Alexeev. ``A survey of quantum computing for finance'' (2022). url: doi.org/​10.48550/​arXiv.2201.02773.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.48550/​arXiv.2201.02773

[23] Michael Lubasch, Jaewoo Joo, Pierre Moinier, Martin Kiffner, and Dieter Jaksch. ``Variational quantum algorithms for nonlinear problems''. Phys. Rev. A 101, 010301 (2020).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.101.010301

[24] Oleksandr Kyriienko, Annie E. Paine, and Vincent E. Elfving. ``Solving nonlinear differential equations with differentiable quantum circuits''. Phys. Rev. A 103, 052416 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.103.052416

[25] Xiao Yuan, Suguru Endo, Qi Zhao, Ying Li, and Simon C. Benjamin. ``Theory of variational quantum simulation''. Quantum 3, 191 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2019-10-07-191

[26] Marcello Benedetti, Mattia Fiorentini, and Michael Lubasch. ``Hardware-efficient variational quantum algorithms for time evolution''. Phys. Rev. Research 3, 033083 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevResearch.3.033083

[27] Lennart Bittel and Martin Kliesch. ``Training variational quantum algorithms is NP-hard''. Physical Review Letters 127, 120502 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.127.120502

[28] Jarrod R. McClean, Sergio Boixo, Vadim N. Smelyanskiy, Ryan Babbush, and Hartmut Neven. ``Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes''. Nature Communications 9, 4812 (2018).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41467-018-07090-4

[29] Marco Cerezo, Akira Sone, Tyler Volkoff, Lukasz Cincio, and Patrick J. Coles. ``Cost function dependent barren plateaus in shallow parametrized quantum circuits''. Nature Communications 12, 1791 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41467-021-21728-w

[30] Arthur Pesah, Marco Cerezo, Samson Wang, Tyler Volkoff, Andrew T. Sornborger, and Patrick J. Coles. ``Absence of Barren Plateaus in Quantum Convolutional Neural Networks''. Physical Review X 11, 041011 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.11.041011

[31] Chen Zhao and Xiao-Shan Gao. ``Analyzing the barren plateau phenomenon in training quantum neural networks with the ZX-calculus''. Quantum 5, 466 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2021-06-04-466

[32] Edward Grant, Leonard Wossnig, Mateusz Ostaszewski, and Marcello Benedetti. ``An initialization strategy for addressing barren plateaus in parametrized quantum circuits''. Quantum 3, 214 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2019-12-09-214

[33] Carlos Ortiz Marrero, Mária Kieferová, and Nathan Wiebe. ``Entanglement induced barren plateaus'' (2020). url: doi.org/​10.48550/​arXiv.2010.15968.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.48550/​arXiv.2010.15968

[34] Joonho Kim and Yaron Oz. ``Entanglement diagnostics for efficient vqa optimization''. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2022, 073101 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1742-5468/​ac7791

[35] Andrea Skolik, Jarrod R. McClean, Masoud Mohseni, Patrick van der Smagt, and Martin Leib. ``Layerwise learning for quantum neural networks''. Quantum Machine Intelligence 3 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s42484-020-00036-4

[36] Stefan H. Sack, Raimel A. Medina, Alexios A. Michailidis, Richard Kueng, and Maksym Serbyn. ``Avoiding Barren Plateaus Using Classical Shadows''. PRX Quantum 3 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​prxquantum.3.020365

[37] Huan-Yu Liu, Tai-Ping Sun, Yu-Chun Wu, Yong-Jian Han, and Guo-Ping Guo. ``Mitigating barren plateaus with transfer-learning-inspired parameter initializations''. New Journal of Physics 25, 013039 (2023).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​acb58e

[38] James Dborin, Fergus Barratt, Vinul Wimalaweera, Lewis Wright, and Andrew G. Green. ``Matrix product state pre-training for quantum machine learning'' (2021). url: doi.org/​10.48550/​arXiv.2106.05742.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.48550/​arXiv.2106.05742

[39] Zidu Liu, Li-Wei Yu, L.-M. Duan, and Dong-Ling Deng. ``Presence and absence of barren plateaus in tensor-network based machine learning''. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 270501 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.129.270501

[40] Kaining Zhang, Min-Hsiu Hsieh, Liu Liu, and Dacheng Tao. ``Gaussian initializations help deep variational quantum circuits escape from the barren plateau'' (2022). url: doi.org/​10.48550/​arXiv.2203.09376.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.48550/​arXiv.2203.09376

[41] Antonio A. Mele, Glen B. Mbeng, Giuseppe E. Santoro, Mario Collura, and Pietro Torta. ``Avoiding barren plateaus via transferability of smooth solutions in a hamiltonian variational ansatz''. Phys. Rev. A 106, L060401 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.106.L060401

[42] Quanlong Wang and Richie Yeung. ``Differentiating and integrating ZX diagrams'' (2022). url: doi.org/​10.48550/​arXiv.2201.13250.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.48550/​arXiv.2201.13250

[43] Bob Coecke and Ross Duncan. ``Interacting Quantum Observables''. In Automata, Languages and Programming. Pages 298–310. (2008).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​978-3-540-70583-3_25

[44] Bob Coecke and Ross Duncan. ``Interacting quantum observables: categorical algebra and diagrammatics''. New Journal of Physics 13, 043016 (2011).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​13/​4/​043016

[45] Ulrich Schollwöck. ``The density-matrix renormalization group''. Reviews of Modern Physics 77, 259–315 (2005).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.77.259

[46] Frank Verstraete, Valentin Murg, and J. Ignacio Cirac. ``Matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, and variational renormalization group methods for quantum spin systems''. Advances in Physics 57, 143–224 (2008).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1080/​14789940801912366

[47] Ulrich Schollwöck. ``The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states''. Annals of Physics 326, 96–192 (2011).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.aop.2010.09.012

[48] Román Orús. ``A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states''. Annals of Physics 349, 117–158 (2014).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.aop.2014.06.013

[49] Román Orús. ``Tensor networks for complex quantum systems''. Nature Reviews Physics 1, 538–550 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s42254-019-0086-7

[50] J. Ignacio Cirac, David Pérez-García, Norbert Schuch, and Frank Verstraete. ``Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems''. Reviews of Modern Physics 93, 045003 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.93.045003

[51] Mari Carmen Bañuls. ``Tensor network algorithms: A route map''. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 14, 173–191 (2023).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1146/​annurev-conmatphys-040721-022705

[52] Eli Chertkov, Justin Bohnet, David Francois, John Gaebler, Dan Gresh, Aaron Hankin, Kenny Lee, David Hayes, Brian Neyenhuis, Russell Stutz, Andrew C. Potter, and Michael Foss-Feig. ``Holographic dynamics simulations with a trapped-ion quantum computer''. Nature Physics 18, 1074–1079 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41567-022-01689-7

[53] Daoheng Niu, Reza Haghshenas, Yuxuan Zhang, Michael Foss-Feig, Garnet Kin-Lic Chan, and Andrew C. Potter. ``Holographic simulation of correlated electrons on a trapped-ion quantum processor''. PRX Quantum 3, 030317 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PRXQuantum.3.030317

[54] Sajant Anand, Johannes Hauschild, Yuxuan Zhang, Andrew C. Potter, and Michael P. Zaletel. ``Holographic quantum simulation of entanglement renormalization circuits'' (2022). url: doi.org/​10.48550/​arXiv.2203.00886.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.48550/​arXiv.2203.00886

[55] Adam Smith, Bernhard Jobst, Andrew G. Green, and Frank Pollmann. ``Crossing a topological phase transition with a quantum computer''. Physical Review Research 4, L022020 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevResearch.4.L022020

[56] Foss-Feig et al. ``Entanglement from Tensor Networks on a Trapped-Ion Quantum Computer''. Physical Review Letters 128, 150504 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.128.150504

[57] Yuxuan Zhang, Shahin Jahanbani, Daoheng Niu, Reza Haghshenas, and Andrew C. Potter. ``Qubit-efficient simulation of thermal states with quantum tensor networks'' (2022). url: doi.org/​10.48550/​arXiv.2205.06299.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.48550/​arXiv.2205.06299

[58] Michael L. Wall, Paraj Titum, Gregory Quiroz, Michael Foss-Feig, and Kaden R. A. Hazzard. ``Tensor-network discriminator architecture for classification of quantum data on quantum computers''. Physical Review A 105, 062439 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.105.062439

[59] Guglielmo Lami, Pietro Torta, Giuseppe E. Santoro, and Mario Collura. ``Quantum annealing for neural network optimization problems: a new approach via tensor network simulations'' (2022). url: doi.org/​10.48550/​arXiv.2208.14468.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.48550/​arXiv.2208.14468

[60] William Huggins, Piyush Patil, Bradley Mitchell, K Birgitta Whaley, and E Miles Stoudenmire. ``Towards quantum machine learning with tensor networks''. Quantum Science and Technology 4, 024001 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​2058-9565/​aaea94

[61] Jin-Guo Liu, Yi-Hong Zhang, Yuan Wan, and Lei Wang. ``Variational quantum eigensolver with fewer qubits''. Physical Review Research 1, 023025 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevResearch.1.023025

[62] Michael Foss-Feig et al. ``Holographic quantum algorithms for simulating correlated spin systems''. Physical Review Research 3, 033002 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevResearch.3.033002

[63] Jack Y. Araz and Michael Spannowsky. ``Classical versus quantum: Comparing tensor-network-based quantum circuits on large hadron collider data''. Phys. Rev. A 106, 062423 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.106.062423

[64] Mark Fannes, Bruno Nachtergaele, and Reinhard. F. Werner. ``Finitely correlated states on quantum spin chains''. Communications in Mathematical Physics 144, 443–490 (1992).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​BF02099178

[65] Christian Schön, Enrique Solano, Frank Verstraete, Jose I. Cirac, and Michael M. Wolf. ``Sequential generation of entangled multiqubit states''. Physical Review Letters 95, 110503 (2005).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.95.110503

[66] David Perez-Garcia, Frank Verstraete, Michael M. Wolf, and J. Ignacio Cirac. ``Matrix product state representations''. Quantum Info. Comput. 7, 401 (2007).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.5555/​2011832.2011833

[67] Ivan V. Oseledets. ``Tensor-train decomposition''. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 33, 2295–2317 (2011).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1137/​090752286

[68] Yaoyun Shi, Luming Duan, and Giufre Vidal. ``Classical simulation of quantum many-body systems with a tree tensor network''. Physical Review A 74, 022320 (2006).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.74.022320

[69] Wolfgang Hackbusch and Stefan Kühn. ``A new scheme for the tensor representation''. Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications 15, 706–722 (2009).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s00041-009-9094-9

[70] Luca Tagliacozzo, Glen Evenbly, and Guifre Vidal. ``Simulation of two-dimensional quantum systems using a tree tensor network that exploits the entropic area law''. Physical Review B 80, 235127 (2009).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevB.80.235127

[71] Guifre Vidal. ``Class of quantum many-body states that can be efficiently simulated''. Physical Review Letters 101, 110501 (2008).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.101.110501

[72] Glen Evenbly and Guifre Vidal. ``Algorithms for entanglement renormalization''. Physical Review B 79 (2009).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​physrevb.79.144108

[73] Iris Cong, Soonwon Choi, and Mikhail D. Lukin. ``Quantum convolutional neural networks''. Nature Physics 15, 1273–1278 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41567-019-0648-8

[74] Kosuke Mitarai, Makoto Negoro, Masahiro Kitagawa, and Keisuke Fujii. ``Quantum circuit learning''. Physical Review A 98, 032309 (2018).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.98.032309

[75] Maria Schuld, Ville Bergholm, Christian Gogolin, Josh Izaac, and Nathan Killoran. ``Evaluating analytic gradients on quantum hardware''. Physical Review A 99, 032331 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.99.032331

[76] Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba. ``Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization'' (2014). url: doi.org/​10.48550/​arXiv.1412.6980.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.48550/​arXiv.1412.6980

[77] Samson Wang, Enrico Fontana, Marco Cerezo, Kunal Sharma, Akira Sone, Lukasz Cincio, and Patrick J. Coles. ``Noise-induced barren plateaus in variational quantum algorithms''. Nature Communications 12, 6961 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41467-021-27045-6

[78] Arthur Pesah, Marco Cerezo, Samson Wang, Tyler Volkoff, Andrew T. Sornborger, and Patrick J. Coles. ``Absence of barren plateaus in quantum convolutional neural networks''. Physical Review X 11, 041011 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.11.041011

[79] Donald E. Knuth. ``The Art of Computer Programming, Volume 2: Seminumerical Algorithms, 3rd Edition''. Addison-Wesley Professional. (1997).

[80] Conor Mc Keever and Michael Lubasch. ``Classically optimized Hamiltonian simulation'' (2022). url: doi.org/​10.48550/​arXiv.2205.11427.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.48550/​arXiv.2205.11427

[81] Refik Mansuroglu, Timo Eckstein, Ludwig Nützel, Samuel A. Wilkinson, and Michael J. Hartmann. ``Variational Hamiltonian simulation for translational invariant systems via classical pre-processing''. Quantum Science and Technology 8, 025006 (2023).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​2058-9565/​acb1d0

Cited by

[1] Refik Mansuroglu, Felix Fischer, and Michael J. Hartmann, "Problem-specific classical optimization of Hamiltonian simulation", Physical Review Research 5 4, 043035 (2023).

[2] Xinglan Zhang, Feng Zhang, Yankun Guo, and Fei Chen, "Variational quantum multidimensional scaling algorithm", Quantum Information Processing 23 3, 77 (2024).

[3] Hans-Martin Rieser, Frank Köster, and Arne Peter Raulf, "Tensor networks for quantum machine learning", Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 479 2275, 20230218 (2023).

[4] Shuo Liu, Shi-Xin Zhang, Shao-Kai Jian, and Hong Yao, "Training variational quantum algorithms with random gate activation", Physical Review Research 5 3, L032040 (2023).

[5] Dheeraj Peddireddy, Utkarsh Priyam, and Vaneet Aggarwal, "Noisy tensor-ring approximation for computing gradients of a variational quantum eigensolver for combinatorial optimization", Physical Review A 108 4, 042429 (2023).

[6] Guglielmo Mazzola, "Quantum computing for chemistry and physics applications from a Monte Carlo perspective", The Journal of Chemical Physics 160 1, 010901 (2024).

[7] Yuta Kikuchi, Conor Mc Keever, Luuk Coopmans, Michael Lubasch, and Marcello Benedetti, "Realization of quantum signal processing on a noisy quantum computer", npj Quantum Information 9 1, 93 (2023).

[8] He-Liang Huang, Xiao-Yue Xu, Chu Guo, Guojing Tian, Shi-Jie Wei, Xiaoming Sun, Wan-Su Bao, and Gui-Lu Long, "Near-term quantum computing techniques: Variational quantum algorithms, error mitigation, circuit compilation, benchmarking and classical simulation", Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy 66 5, 250302 (2023).

[9] Bernhard Jobst, Kevin Shen, Carlos A. Riofrío, Elvira Shishenina, and Frank Pollmann, "Efficient MPS representations and quantum circuits from the Fourier modes of classical image data", arXiv:2311.07666, (2023).

[10] Jack Y. Araz, Sebastian Schenk, and Michael Spannowsky, "Toward a quantum simulation of nonlinear sigma models with a topological term", Physical Review A 107 3, 032619 (2023).

[11] Refik Mansuroglu, Felix Fischer, and Michael J. Hartmann, "Problem specific classical optimization of Hamiltonian simulation", arXiv:2306.07208, (2023).

[12] Tuomas Laakkonen, Konstantinos Meichanetzidis, and John van de Wetering, "A Graphical #SAT Algorithm for Formulae with Small Clause Density", arXiv:2212.08048, (2022).

[13] Zidu Liu, Qi Ye, Li-Wei Yu, L. -M. Duan, and Dong-Ling Deng, "Theory on variational high-dimensional tensor networks", arXiv:2303.17452, (2023).

The above citations are from Crossref's cited-by service (last updated successfully 2024-02-27 19:35:55) and SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2024-02-27 19:35:56). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.