Genuine multipartite entanglement of quantum states in the multiple-copy scenario

Carlos Palazuelos1,2 and Julio I. de Vicente3

1Departamento de Análisis Matemático y Matemática Aplicada, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
2Instituto de Ciencias Matemáticas, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
3Departamento de Matemáticas, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, E-28911, Leganés (Madrid), Spain

Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.

Abstract

Genuine multipartite entanglement (GME) is considered a powerful form of entanglement since it corresponds to those states that are not biseparable, i.e. a mixture of partially separable states across different bipartitions of the parties. In this work we study this phenomenon in the multiple-copy regime, where many perfect copies of a given state can be produced and controlled. In this scenario the above definition leads to subtle intricacies as biseparable states can be GME-activatable, i.e. several copies of a biseparable state can display GME. We show that the set of GME-activatable states admits a simple characterization: a state is GME-activatable if and only if it is not partially separable across one bipartition of the parties. This leads to the second question of whether there is a general upper bound in the number of copies that needs to be considered in order to observe the activation of GME, which we answer in the negative. In particular, by providing an explicit construction, we prove that for any number of parties and any number $k\in\mathbb{N}$ there exist GME-activatable multipartite states of fixed (i.e. independent of $k$) local dimensions such that $k$ copies of them remain biseparable.

► BibTeX data

► References

[1] V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Nature Photonics 5, 222 (2011).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​nphoton.2011.35

[2] G. Tóth and I. Apellaniz, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 424006 (2014).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1751-8113/​47/​42/​424006

[3] G. Murta, F. Grasselli, H. Kampermann, and D. Bruß, Adv. Quantum Technol. 3, 2000025 (2020).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1002/​qute.202000025

[4] R. Raussendorf and H. J. Briegel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188 (2001).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.86.5188

[5] O. Gühne and G. Tóth, Phys. Rep. 474, 1 (2009).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.physrep.2009.02.004

[6] N. Friis, G. Vitagliano, M. Malik, and M. Huber, Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 72 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s42254-018-0003-5

[7] L. Gurvits, J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 69, 448 (2004).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.jcss.2004.06.003

[8] W. Dür, G. Vidal, and J.I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A 62, 062314 (2000).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.62.062314

[9] F. Verstraete, J. Dehaene, B. De Moor, and H. Verschelde, Phys. Rev. A, 65, 052112 (2002).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.65.052112

[10] E. Briand, J.-G. Luque, J.-Y. Thibon, F. Verstraete, J. Math. Phys. 45, 4855 (2004).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1063/​1.1809255

[11] J. I. de Vicente, C. Spee, and B. Kraus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 110502 (2013).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.111.110502

[12] C. Spee, J. I. de Vicente, and B. Kraus, J. Math. Phys. 57, 052201 (2016).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1063/​1.4946895

[13] D. Sauerwein, N. R. Wallach, G. Gour, and B. Kraus, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031020 (2018).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.8.031020

[14] M. Seevinck and J. Uffink, Phys. Rev. A 65, 012107 (2001).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.65.012107

[15] N. Friis, O. Marty, C. Maier, C. Hempel, M. Holzäpfel, P. Jurcevic, M. B. Plenio, M. Huber, C. Roos, R. Blatt, and B. Lanyon, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021012 (2018).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.8.021012

[16] P. Hyllus, W. Laskowski, R. Krischek, C. Schwemmer, W. Wieczorek, H. Weinfurter, L. Pezzé, and A. Smerzi, Phys. Rev. A 85, 022321 (2012).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.85.022321

[17] G. Tóth, Phys. Rev. A 85, 022322 (2012).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.85.022322

[18] S. Das, S. Bäuml, M. Winczewski, and K. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041016 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.11.041016

[19] M. Huber and M. Plesch, Phys. Rev. A 83, 062321 (2011).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.83.062321

[20] G. Carrara, H. Kampermann, D. Bruß, and G. Murta, Phys. Rev. Research 3, 013264 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevResearch.3.013264

[21] D. Cavalcanti, M. L. Almeida, V. Scarani, and A. Acin, Nat. Commun. 2, 184 (2011).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​ncomms1193

[22] P. Contreras-Tejada, C. Palazuelos, and J. I. de Vicente, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 040501 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.126.040501

[23] C. Palazuelos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 190401 (2012).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.109.190401

[24] G. Smith and J. Yard, Science 321, 1812 (2008).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1126/​science.1162242

[25] M. Navascues, E. Wolfe, D. Rosset, and A. Pozas-Kerstjens, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 240505 (2020).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.125.240505

[26] H. Yamasaki, S. Morelli, M. Miethlinger, J. Bavaresco, N. Friis, and M. Huber, Quantum 6, 695 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2022-04-25-695

[27] T. Kraft, C. Ritz, N. Brunner, M. Huber, and O. Gühne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 060502 (2018).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.120.060502

[28] V. Vedral, M. B. Plenio, M. A. Rippin, and P. L. Knight, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2275 (1997).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.78.2275

[29] S. Beigi and P. W. Shor, J. Math. Phys. 51, 042202 (2010).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1063/​1.3364793

[30] M. Horodecki and P Horodecki, Phys. Rev. A 59, 4206 (1999).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.59.4206

[31] L. Gurvits and H. Barnum, Phys. Rev. A 66, 062311 (2002).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.66.062311

[32] R. Schneider. Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition, 2013.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1017/​CBO9781139003858

[33] P. Contreras-Tejada, C. Palazuelos, and J. I. de Vicente, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 220501 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.128.220501

[34] K. Azuma, S. Bäuml, T. Coopmans, D. Elkouss, and B. Li, AVS Quantum Sci. 3, 014101 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1116/​5.0024062

[35] G. Vardoyan, S. Guha, P. Nain, and D. Towsley, ACM SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev. 47, 27 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1145/​3374888.3374899

Cited by

[1] Minjin Choi, Jeonghyeon Shin, Gunho Lee, and Eunok Bae, "Investigating controlled teleportation capability of quantum states with respect to k -separability", Physical Review A 109 6, 062403 (2024).

[2] Marcin Płodzień, Jan Chwedeńczuk, Maciej Lewenstein, and Grzegorz Rajchel-Mieldzioć, "Entanglement classification and non- k -separability certification via Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger-class fidelity", Physical Review A 110 3, 032428 (2024).

[3] Paweł Horodecki, Łukasz Rudnicki, and Karol Życzkowski, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics 135 (2025) ISBN:9780323957069.

[4] Marcel Seelbach Benkner, Jens Siewert, Otfried Gühne, and Gael Sentís, "Characterizing generalized axisymmetric quantum states in d×d systems", Physical Review A 106 2, 022415 (2022).

[5] Yi-Xuan Wang, Zhen-Peng Xu, and Otfried Gühne, "Quantum LOSR networks cannot generate graph states with high fidelity", npj Quantum Information 10 1, 11 (2024).

[6] Szymon Łukaszyk, "On the quantum separability of qubit registers", Frontiers in Quantum Science and Technology 5, 1754112 (2026).

[7] Róbert Trényi, Árpád Lukács, Paweł Horodecki, Ryszard Horodecki, Tamás Vértesi, and Géza Tóth, "Activation of metrologically useful genuine multipartite entanglement", New Journal of Physics 26 2, 023034 (2024).

[8] Rui Zhang, Yue-Yang Fei, Zhenhuan Liu, Xingjian Zhang, Xu-Fei Yin, Yingqiu Mao, Li Li, Nai-Le Liu, Otfried Gühne, Xiongfeng Ma, Yu-Ao Chen, and Jian-Wei Pan, "Entanglement Superactivation in Multiphoton Distillation Networks", Physical Review Letters 136 12, 120801 (2026).

[9] Ray Ganardi, Tulja Varun Kondra, and Alexander Streltsov, "Catalytic and Asymptotic Equivalence for Quantum Entanglement", Physical Review Letters 133 25, 250201 (2024).

[10] Lucas Friedrich, Marcos L. W. Basso, Alberto B. P. Junior, Joab M. Varela, Leandro Morais, Rafael Chaves, and Jonas Maziero, "Variational quantum algorithm for entanglement quantification", Physical Review A 112 5, 052452 (2025).

[11] Swati Choudhary, Ujjwal Sen, and Saronath Halder, "Protocols for sharing genuine multipartite entanglement by employing copies of biseparable states", Physical Review A 114 1, 012463 (2026).

[12] Kohdai Kuroiwa, Ryuji Takagi, Gerardo Adesso, and Hayata Yamasaki, "Every Quantum Helps: Operational Advantage of Quantum Resources beyond Convexity", Physical Review Letters 132 15, 150201 (2024).

[13] Zeyang Lu, Chan Li, Gang Wang, and Zhu Cao, "Multipartite steering verification with imprecise measurements", Physical Review A 112 4, 042435 (2025).

[14] Julien Pinske and Klaus Mølmer, "Censorship of quantum resources against quantum catalysis", Physical Review A 113 2, 022430 (2026).

[15] Robert Stárek, Tim Gollerthan, Olga Leskovjanová, Michael Meth, Peter Tirler, Nicolai Friis, Martin Ringbauer, and Ladislav Mišta, "Experimental Verification of Multicopy Activation of Genuine Multipartite Entanglement", Physical Review Letters 136 16, 160201 (2026).

[16] Daipengwei Bao, Min Liu, Yangwei Ou, Qingshan Xu, Qin Li, and Xiaoqing Tan, "Eigenvalue-based quantum state verification of three-qubit W class states", Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 639, 129681 (2024).

[17] Xian Shi, "Erasing, converting, and communicating: The power of resource-nongenerating operations", Physical Review A 113 4, 042441 (2026).

[18] Zhenhuan Liu, Tobias Haug, Qi Ye, Zi-Wen Liu, and Ingo Roth, "Triangle Criterion: A Mixed-State Magic Criterion with Applications in Distillation and Detection", PRX Quantum 7 3, 033016 (2026).

[19] Kohdai Kuroiwa, Ryuji Takagi, Gerardo Adesso, and Hayata Yamasaki, "Robustness- and weight-based resource measures without convexity restriction: Multicopy witness and operational advantage in static and dynamical quantum resource theories", Physical Review A 109 4, 042403 (2024).

[20] Klára Baksová, Olga Leskovjanová, Ladislav Mišta Jr., Elizabeth Agudelo, and Nicolai Friis, "Multi-copy activation of genuine multipartite entanglement in continuous-variable systems", Quantum 9, 1699 (2025).

[21] Aitor Balmaseda and Julio I. de Vicente, "Distillation of multipartite entangled states for arbitrary subsets of parties in noisy quantum networks of increasing size", Physical Review A 112 3, 032436 (2025).

[22] Nicky Kai Hong Li, Xi Dai, Manuel H. Muñoz-Arias, Kevin Reuer, Marcus Huber, and Nicolai Friis, "Detecting genuine multipartite entanglement in multi-qubit devices with restricted measurements", Nature Communications 17 1, 1707 (2026).

[23] Jonathan Schluck, Gláucia Murta, Hermann Kampermann, Dagmar Bruß, and Nikolai Wyderka, "Continuity of robustness measures in quantum resource theories", Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 56 25, 255303 (2023).

[24] Robin Y. Wen, Gilles Parez, Liuke Lyu, William Witczak-Krempa, and Achim Kempf, "Separable ellipsoids around multipartite states", Physical Review A 112 1, 012426 (2025).

[25] Szymon Łukaszyk, "On the quantum separability of qubit registers", arXiv:2601.15364, (2026).

[26] Olga Leskovjanová, Klára Baksová, Jan Provazník, Ladislav Mišta, and Nicolai Friis, "On the existence of fully inseparable biseparable Gaussian states", arXiv:2605.28404, (2026).

The above citations are from Crossref's cited-by service (last updated successfully 2026-08-10 12:19:03) and SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2026-08-10 12:19:05). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.