Optimal Detection of Rotations about Unknown Axes by Coherent and Anticoherent States

John Martin; Stefan Weigert; Olivier Giraud

doi:10.22331/q-2020-06-22-285

Optimal Detection of Rotations about Unknown Axes by Coherent and Anticoherent States

John Martin¹, Stefan Weigert², and Olivier Giraud³

¹Institut de Physique Nucléaire, Atomique et de Spectroscopie, CESAM, University of Liège, B-4000 Liège, Belgium
²Department of Mathematics, University of York, UK-York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
³Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, LPTMS, 91405 Orsay, France

Published:	2020-06-22, volume 4, page 285
Eprint:	arXiv:1909.08355v2
Doi:	https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-06-22-285
Citation:	Quantum 4, 285 (2020).

Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.

Abstract

Coherent and anticoherent states of spin systems up to spin $j=2$ are known to be optimal in order to detect rotations by a known angle but unknown rotation axis. These optimal quantum rotosensors are characterized by minimal fidelity, given by the overlap of a state before and after a rotation, averaged over all directions in space. We calculate a closed-form expression for the average fidelity in terms of anticoherent measures, valid for arbitrary values of the quantum number $j$. We identify optimal rotosensors (i) for arbitrary rotation angles in the case of spin quantum numbers up to $j=7/2$ and (ii) for small rotation angles in the case of spin quantum numbers up to $j=5$. The closed-form expression we derive allows us to explain the central role of anticoherence measures in the problem of optimal detection of rotation angles for arbitrary values of $j$.

Popular summary

Advances in measurement techniques have often led to progress in physics. Over time, metrology developed as a subject of its own, especially in the context of defining standard units for physical quantities. Quantum theory provides new perspectives on measurements but also new challenges. The currently emerging quantum technologies require ever better control of microscopic systems and, hence, measurements which are as accurate as possible. In this paper, we are interested to determine whether a quantum system has undergone a rotation by a known angle about an unknown axis. The states optimally suited for this task are called "optimal quantum rotosensors". They are characterized by minimal fidelity, given by the overlap of a state before and after a rotation, averaged over all directions in space. The closed-form expression we derive for the fidelity and numerical computations allow us to explain the central role of a specific class of quantum states in this problem which are known as "anticoherent" states.

► BibTeX data

@article{Martin2020optimaldetectionof,
  doi = {10.22331/q-2020-06-22-285},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-06-22-285},
  title = {Optimal {D}etection of {R}otations about {U}nknown {A}xes by {C}oherent and {A}nticoherent {S}tates},
  author = {Martin, John and Weigert, Stefan and Giraud, Olivier},
  journal = {{Quantum}},
  issn = {2521-327X},
  publisher = {{Verein zur F{\"{o}}rderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften}},
  volume = {4},
  pages = {285},
  month = jun,
  year = {2020}
}

► References

[1] W. Heisenberg, Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik, Z. Phys. 43, 172 (1927).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01397280

[2] V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, L. Maccone, Advances in quantum metrology, Nature Photonics 5, 222 (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2011.35

[3] P. Busch, P. Lahti, J.-P. Pellonpää, K. Ylinen: Quantum Measurement, Springer 2016.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43389-9

[4] W. Nawrocki, Introduction to Quantum Metrology, Springer Nature 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15669-9

[5] A. Peres and P. F. Scudo, Transmission of a Cartesian Frame by a Quantum System, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 167901 (2001).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.167901

[6] H. Hakoshima and Y. Matsuzaki, Efficient detection of inhomogeneous magnetic fields from the single spin with Dicke states, arXiv:2003.12524.
arXiv:2003.12524

[7] C. R. Rao, Information and the accuracy attainable in the estimation of statistical parameters, Bulletin of the Calcutta Mathematical Society 37, 81 (1945).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0919-5_16

[8] H. Cramér, Mathematical Methods of Statistics (PMS-9), Princeton University Press 1946.
https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691005478/mathematical-methods-of-statistics-pms-9-volume-9

[9] C. W. Helstrom, Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory, volume 123 of Mathematics in Science and Engineering, Elsevier (1976).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01007479

[10] M. Hübner, Explicit computation of the Bures distance for density matrices, Phys. Lett. A 163, 239 (1992).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(92)91004-B

[11] M. Hübner, Computation of Uhlmann’s parallel transport for density matrices and the Bures metric on three-dimensional Hilbert space, Phys. Lett. A 179, 226 (1993).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(93)90668-P

[12] P. Kolenderski and R. Demkowicz-Dobrzanski, Optimal state for keeping reference frames aligned and the Platonic solids, Phys. Rev. A 78, 052333 (2008).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.78.052333

[13] A. Z. Goldberg and D. F. V. James, Quantum-limited Euler angle measurements using anticoherent states, Phys. Rev. A 98, 032113 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.032113

[14] Y. Mo and G. Chiribella, Quantum-enhanced learning of rotations about an unknown direction, New J. Phys. 21, 113003 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab4d9a

[15] C. Chryssomalakos and H. Hernández-Coronado, Optimal quantum rotosensors, Phys. Rev. A 95, 052125 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.052125

[16] F. T. Arecchi, E. Courtens, R. Gilmore, and H. Thomas, Atomic Coherent States in Quantum Optics, Phys. Rev. A 6, 2211 (1972).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.6.2211

[17] J. Zimba, ``Anticoherent” Spin States via the Majorana Representation, Electr. J. Theor. Phys. 3, 143 (2006).
http://www.ejtp.com/articles/ejtpv3i10p143.pdf

[18] F. Bouchard, P. de la Hoz, G. Björk, R. W. Boyd, M. Grassl, Z. Hradil, E. Karimi, A. B. Klimov, G. Leuchs, J. Rehacek, and L. L. Sánchez-Soto, Quantum metrology at the limit with extremal Majorana constellations, Optica 4, 1429 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.4.001429

[19] T. Chalopin, C. Bouazza, A. Evrard, V. Makhalov, D. Dreon, J. Dalibard, L. A. Sidorenkov, and S. Nascimbene, Quantum-enhanced sensing using non-classical spin states of a highly magnetic atom, Nature Communications 9, 4955 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07433-1

[20] D. Baguette and J. Martin, Anticoherence measures for pure spin states, Phys. Rev. A 96, 032304 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.032304

[21] L. C. Biedenharn and J. D. Louck, Angular Momentum in Quantum Physics, Cambridge University Press 1984.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511759888

[22] I. Bengtsson and K. Życzkowski, Geometry of Quantum States : An Introduction to Quantum Entanglement, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139207010

[23] B. Coecke, A Representation for a Spin-S Entity as a Compound System in $\mathbb{R}^3$ Consisting of 2S Individual Spin-1/2 Entities, Foundations of Physics 28, 1347 (1998).
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018878927186

[24] O. Giraud, D. Braun, D. Baguette, T. Bastin, and J. Martin, Tensor representation of spin states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 080401 (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.080401

[25] S. Weinberg, Feynman Rules for Any Spin, Phys. Rev. 133, B1318 (1964).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.133.B1318

[26] D. Baguette, T. Bastin, and J. Martin, Multiqubit symmetric states with maximally mixed one-qubit reductions, Phys. Rev. A 90, 032314 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.90.032314

[27] O. Giraud, P. Braun, and D. Braun, Quantifying Quantumness and the Quest for Queens of Quantum, New J. Phys. 12, 063005 (2010).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/12/6/063005

[28] G. Björk, A. B. Klimov, P. de la Hoz, M. Grassl, G. Leuchs, L. L. Sánchez-Soto, Extremal quantum states and their Majorana constellations, Phys. Rev. A 92, 031801(R) (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.031801

[29] G. Björk, M. Grassl, P. de la Hoz, G. Leuchs and L. L. Sánchez-Soto, Stars of the quantum Universe: extremal constellations on the Poincaré sphere, Phys. Scr. 90, 108008 (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/90/10/108008

[30] P. Delsarte, J. M. Goethals, J. J. Seidel, Spherical codes and designs, Geometriae Dedicata 6, 363 (1977).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03187604

[31] R. H. Hardin and N. J. A. Sloane, McLaren's Improved Snub Cube and Other New Spherical Designs in Three Dimensions, Discrete and Computational Geometry 15, 429 (1996).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02711518

[32] R. E. Schwartz, The Five-Electron Case of Thomson’s Problem, Experimental Mathematics 22, 157 (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1080/10586458.2013.766570

[33] D. Baguette, F. Damanet, O. Giraud, and J. Martin, Anticoherence of spin states with point-group symmetries, Phys. Rev. A 92, 052333 (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.052333

[34] See e.g. http://polarization.markus-grassl.de/, http://www.oq.ulg.ac.be and Refs. Bag17,Bjo15.
http://polarization.markus-grassl.de/

[35] J. S. Sidhu and P. Kok, A Geometric Perspective on Quantum Parameter Estimation, AVS Quantum Science 2, 014701 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1116/1.5119961

[36] D. A. Varshalovich, A. N. Moskalev, V. K. Khersonskii, Quantum Theory Of Angular Momentum, World Scientific (1988).
https://doi.org/10.1142/0270

Cited by

[1] Aaron Z. Goldberg, Progress in Optics 67, 185 (2022) ISBN:9780323989053.

[2] Aaron Z Goldberg, Andrei B Klimov, Gerd Leuchs, and Luis L Sánchez-Soto, "Rotation sensing at the ultimate limit", Journal of Physics: Photonics 3 2, 022008 (2021).

[3] Luke Anastassiou, Jason F. Ralph, Simon Maskell, and Pieter Kok, "Bayesian estimation for Bell state rotations", AVS Quantum Science 5 2, 024402 (2023).

[4] Aaron Z. Goldberg, Andrei B. Klimov, Markus Grassl, Gerd Leuchs, and Luis L. Sánchez-Soto, "Extremal quantum states", AVS Quantum Science 2 4, 044701 (2020).

[5] Dylan Durieux and Willi-Hans Steeb, "Spin coherent states, Bell states, spin Hamilton operators, entanglement, Husimi distribution, uncertainty relation and Bell inequality", Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A 76 12, 1125 (2021).

[6] Aaron Z. Goldberg, Pablo de la Hoz, Gunnar Björk, Andrei B. Klimov, Markus Grassl, Gerd Leuchs, and Luis L. Sánchez-Soto, "Quantum concepts in optical polarization", Advances in Optics and Photonics 13 1, 1 (2021).

[7] Naeem Akhtar, Barry C. Sanders, and Carlos Navarrete-Benlloch, "Sub-Planck structures: Analogies between the Heisenberg-Weyl and SU(2) groups", Physical Review A 103 5, 053711 (2021).

[8] Jérôme Denis and John Martin, "Extreme depolarization for any spin", Physical Review Research 4 1, 013178 (2022).

[9] Daniel Basilewitsch, Haidong Yuan, and Christiane P. Koch, "Optimally controlled quantum discrimination and estimation", Physical Review Research 2 3, 033396 (2020).

[10] Chryssomalis Chryssomalakos, Louis Hanotel, Edgar Guzmán-González, Daniel Braun, Eduardo Serrano-Ensástiga, and Karol Życzkowski, "Symmetric multiqudit states: Stars, entanglement, and rotosensors", Physical Review A 104 1, 012407 (2021).

The above citations are from Crossref's cited-by service (last updated successfully 2023-06-05 15:26:02) and SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2023-06-05 15:26:03). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.

This Paper is published in Quantum under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. Copyright remains with the original copyright holders such as the authors or their institutions.