Characterization of solvable spin models via graph invariants

Adrian Chapman and Steven T. Flammia

Centre for Engineered Quantum Systems, School of Physics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.

Abstract

Exactly solvable models are essential in physics. For many-body spin-$\mathbf{\sf{1}/{2}}$ systems, an important class of such models consists of those that can be mapped to free fermions hopping on a graph. We provide a complete characterization of models which can be solved this way. Specifically, we reduce the problem of recognizing such spin models to the graph-theoretic problem of recognizing line graphs, which has been solved optimally. A corollary of our result is a complete set of constant-sized commutation structures that constitute the obstructions to a free-fermion solution. We find that symmetries are tightly constrained in these models. Pauli symmetries correspond to either: (i) cycles on the fermion hopping graph, (ii) the fermion parity operator, or (iii) logically encoded qubits. Clifford symmetries within one of these symmetry sectors, with three exceptions, must be symmetries of the free-fermion model itself. We demonstrate how several exact free-fermion solutions from the literature fit into our formalism and give an explicit example of a new model previously unknown to be solvable by free fermions.

An important situation in theoretical physics, called a duality, occurs when the behaviors of two physical systems perfectly coincide. A physical system is any isolated section of the universe, such as a collection of gas particles in a box, or vibrational waves traveling along a guitar string. A duality between two systems allows physicists to talk about the physics of one system in terms of the other system. Systems which are related in this way can be surprisingly different, and finding dualities is often a key step to understanding the behaviors of both. In the scenarios where one system looks very complicated, the other system can be very simple, and vice versa. By thinking in terms of the simpler system, physicists can bypass a great deal of complexity to understand the more complicated one.

In this work, we examine a certain class of dualites between two systems: quantum spin lattices and noninteracting fermions. A spin lattice consists of many interacting compass needles, or spins, arranged in some structure. Each spin feels the competing, or “frustrating”, influence from many different nearby spins, making the behavior of this model appear very complicated. A noninteracting fermion system consists of particles hopping between sites in a similarly discrete arrangement. Because the particles are fermions, they cannot occupy the same site, but they otherwise do not influence each other. In contrast to the spin model, the noninteracting nature of the fermion model makes it much simpler to work with. By considering the precise frustration structure of the spin model as a kind of network, we apply tools from network theory to find collections of spins which behave like emergent fermions, allowing us to extract the behavior of these complicated models in terms of the simpler noninteracting fermions. Though these types of dualities have been explored in the past, we developed a new framework to systematically find them. We expect these results to lead to the design of new quantum materials for the development of a quantum computer.

► BibTeX data

► References

[1] E. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, Annals of Physics 16, 407 (1961).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​0003-4916(61)90115-4

[2] P. Jordan and E. Wigner, Zeitschrift für Physik 47, 631 (1928).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​BF01331938

[3] E. Fradkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 322 (1989).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.63.322

[4] Y. R. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 43, 3786 (1991).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevB.43.3786

[5] L. Huerta and J. Zanelli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3622 (1993).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.71.3622

[6] C. D. Batista and G. Ortiz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1082 (2001).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.86.1082

[7] F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2005, P09012 (2005).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1742-5468/​2005/​09/​p09012

[8] Z. Nussinov, G. Ortiz, and E. Cobanera, Phys. Rev. B 86, 085415 (2012).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevB.86.085415

[9] Y.-A. Chen, A. Kapustin, and DJ. Radičević, Annals of Physics 393, 234 (2018).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.aop.2018.03.024

[10] S. Backens, A. Shnirman, and Y. Makhlin, Scientific reports 9, 2598 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41598-018-38128-8

[11] N. Tantivasadakarn, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2002.11345 (2020), arXiv:2002.11345 [cond-mat.str-el].
arXiv:2002.11345

[12] A. Kitaev, Annals of Physics 321, 2 (2006).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.aop.2005.10.005

[13] E. Knill, ArXiv e-prints (2001), arXiv:quant-ph/​0108033.
arXiv:arXiv:quant-ph/0108033

[14] B. M. Terhal and D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032325 (2002).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.65.032325

[15] M. Van Den Nest, Quantum Info. Comput. 11, 784 (2011).
http:/​/​dl.acm.org/​citation.cfm?id=2230936.2230941

[16] D. J. Brod, Phys. Rev. A 93, 062332 (2016).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.93.062332

[17] R. Jozsa and A. Miyake, Proc. R. Soc. A 464, 3089 (2008).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1098/​rspa.2008.0189

[18] D. J. Brod and E. F. Galvão, Phys. Rev. A 84, 022310 (2011).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.84.022310

[19] S. Bravyi, Phys. Rev. A 73, 042313 (2006).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.73.042313

[20] M. Hebenstreit, R. Jozsa, B. Kraus, S. Strelchuk, and M. Yoganathan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 080503 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.123.080503

[21] D. J. Brod and A. M. Childs, Quant. Info. Comput. 14, 901 (2014).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.26421/​qic14.11-12

[22] L. G. Valiant, SIAM Journal on Computing 31, 1229 (2002).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1137/​S0097539700377025

[23] J.-Y. Cai and V. Choudhary, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Theory and Applications of Models of Computation, TAMC'06 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006) pp. 248–261.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​11750321_24

[24] J. Cai, V. Choudhary, and P. Lu, in Twenty-Second Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC'07) (2007) pp. 305–318.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1109/​CCC.2007.22

[25] L. G. Valiant, SIAM Journal on Computing 37, 1565 (2008).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1137/​070682575

[26] C. H. Papadimitriou, in Encyclopedia of Computer Science (John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK, 1994) pp. 260–265.
http:/​/​dl.acm.org/​citation.cfm?id=1074100.1074233

[27] P. Kasteleyn, Physica 27, 1209 (1961).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​0031-8914(61)90063-5

[28] H. N. V. Temperley and M. E. Fisher, Philosophical Magazine 6, 1061 (1961).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1080/​14786436108243366

[29] M. Planat and M. Saniga, Quant. Inf. Comput. 8, 127 (2008), arXiv:quant-ph/​0701211 [quant-ph].
arXiv:quant-ph/0701211

[30] A. Jena, S. Genin, and M. Mosca, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1907.07859 (2019), arXiv:1907.07859 [quant-ph].
arXiv:1907.07859

[31] V. Verteletskyi, T.-C. Yen, and A. F. Izmaylov, The Journal of Chemical Physics 152, 124114 (2020).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1063/​1.5141458

[32] A. Zhao, A. Tranter, W. M. Kirby, S. F. Ung, A. Miyake, and P. Love, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1908.08067 (2019), arXiv:1908.08067 [quant-ph].
arXiv:1908.08067

[33] A. F. Izmaylov, T.-C. Yen, R. A. Lang, and V. Verteletskyi, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 16, 190 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1021/​acs.jctc.9b00791

[34] T.-C. Yen, V. Verteletskyi, and A. F. Izmaylov, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 16, 2400 (2020).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1021/​acs.jctc.0c00008

[35] P. Gokhale, O. Angiuli, Y. Ding, K. Gui, T. Tomesh, M. Suchara, M. Martonosi, and F. T. Chong, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1907.13623 (2019), arXiv:1907.13623 [quant-ph].
arXiv:1907.13623

[36] O. Crawford, B. van Straaten, D. Wang, T. Parks, E. Campbell, and S. Brierley, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1908.06942 (2019), arXiv:1908.06942 [quant-ph].
arXiv:1908.06942

[37] X. Bonet-Monroig, R. Babbush, and T. E. O'Brien, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1908.05628 (2019), arXiv:1908.05628 [quant-ph].
arXiv:1908.05628

[38] N. D. Roussopoulos, Information Processing Letters 2, 108 (1973).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​0020-0190(73)90029-x

[39] P. G. H. Lehot, J. ACM 21, 569 (1974).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1145/​321850.321853

[40] D. G. Degiorgi and K. Simon, in Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1995) pp. 37–48.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​3-540-60618-1_64

[41] A. J. Kollár, M. Fitzpatrick, and A. A. Houck, Nature 571, 45 (2019a).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41586-019-1348-3

[42] A. J. Kollár, M. Fitzpatrick, P. Sarnak, and A. A. Houck, Communications in Mathematical Physics , online only (2019b).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s00220-019-03645-8

[43] I. Boettcher, P. Bienias, R. Belyansky, A. J. Kollár, and A. V. Gorshkov, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1910.12318 (2019), arXiv:1910.12318 [quant-ph].
arXiv:1910.12318

[44] T. Jochym-O'Connor, S. Roberts, S. Bartlett, and J. Preskill, ``Frustrated hexagonal gauge 3d color code,'' (2019), 5th International Conference on Quantum Error Correction (QEC 2019).
https:/​/​www.iopconferences.org/​iop/​frontend/​reg/​absViewDocumentFE.csp?documentID=28672&eventID=1264

[45] H. Whitney, American Journal of Mathematics 54, 150 (1932).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.2307/​2371086

[46] D. M. Goodmanson, American Journal of Physics 64, 870 (1996).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1119/​1.18113

[47] L. W. Beineke, Journal of Combinatorial Theory 9, 129 (1970).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​s0021-9800(70)80019-9

[48] Ľ. Šoltés, Discrete Mathematics 132, 391 (1994).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​0012-365x(92)00577-e

[49] Y. Yang, J. Lin, and C. Wang, Discrete Mathematics 252, 287 (2002).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​S0012-365X(01)00459-9

[50] P. Erdős, A. W. Goodman, and L. Pósa, Canadian Journal of Mathematics 18, 106 (1966).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.4153/​CJM-1966-014-3

[51] F. Harary, Graph Theory, Addison Wesley series in mathematics (Addison-Wesley, 1971).
https:/​/​books.google.com.au/​books?id=q8OWtwEACAAJ

[52] J. Krausz, Matematikai és Fizikai Lapok 50 (1943).
http:/​/​real-j.mtak.hu/​7300/​

[53] A. Bednarek, Discrete Mathematics 56, 83 (1985).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​0012-365x(85)90196-7

[54] M. Suchara, S. Bravyi, and B. Terhal, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 44, 155301 (2011).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1751-8113/​44/​15/​155301

[55] H. Bombín, New Journal of Physics 18, 043038 (2016).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​18/​4/​043038

[56] H. Bombín, Phys. Rev. X 5, 031043 (2015).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.5.031043

[57] A. Kubica and M. E. Beverland, Phys. Rev. A 91, 032330 (2015).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.91.032330

[58] H. Bombín, New Journal of Physics 17, 083002 (2015).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​17/​8/​083002

[59] B. J. Brown, N. H. Nickerson, and D. E. Browne, Nature Communications 7, 12302 (2016).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​ncomms12302

[60] A. Y. Kitaev, Physics-Uspekhi 44, 131 (2001).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1070/​1063-7869/​44/​10s/​s29

[61] J. Klassen and B. M. Terhal, Quantum 3, 139 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2019-05-06-139

[62] P. Fendley, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 52, 335002 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1751-8121/​ab305d

[63] S. B. Bravyi and A. Y. Kitaev, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) 298, 210 (2002).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1006/​aphy.2002.6254

[64] J. T. Seeley, M. J. Richard, and P. J. Love, The Journal of Chemical Physics 137, 224109 (2012).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1063/​1.4768229

[65] K. Setia, S. Bravyi, A. Mezzacapo, and J. D. Whitfield, Phys. Rev. Research 1, 033033 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevResearch.1.033033

[66] R. C. Ball, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 176407 (2005).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.95.176407

[67] S. Bravyi, J. M. Gambetta, A. Mezzacapo, and K. Temme, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1701.08213 (2017), arXiv:1701.08213 [quant-ph].
arXiv:1701.08213

[68] M. Steudtner and S. Wehner, New Journal of Physics 20, 063010 (2018).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​aac54f

[69] Z. Jiang, J. McClean, R. Babbush, and H. Neven, Phys. Rev. Applied 12, 064041 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevApplied.12.064041

[70] V. Havlíček, M. Troyer, and J. D. Whitfield, Phys. Rev. A 95, 032332 (2017).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.95.032332

[71] Z. Jiang, A. Kalev, W. Mruczkiewicz, and H. Neven, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1910.10746 (2019), arXiv:1910.10746 [quant-ph].
arXiv:1910.10746

[72] S. Bravyi and D. Gosset, Communications in Mathematical Physics 356, 451 (2017).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s00220-017-2976-9

[73] S. Bravyi, D. Browne, P. Calpin, E. Campbell, D. Gosset, and M. Howard, Quantum 3, 181 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2019-09-02-181

Cited by

[1] Zhiyuan Wang and Kaden R. A. Hazzard, "Particle exchange statistics beyond fermions and bosons", Nature 637 8045, 314 (2025).

[2] Smik Patel, Praveen Jayakumar, Tzu-Ching Yen, and Artur F. Izmaylov, "Quantum Measurement for Quantum Chemistry on a Quantum Computer", Chemical Reviews 125 16, 7490 (2025).

[3] Masahiro Ogura, Yukihisa Imamura, Naruhiko Kameyama, Kazuhiko Minami, and Masatoshi Sato, "Geometric criterion for solvability of lattice spin systems", Physical Review B 102 24, 245118 (2020).

[4] Efekan Kökcü, Daan Camps, Lindsay Bassman Oftelie, J. K. Freericks, Wibe A. de Jong, Roel Van Beeumen, and Alexander F. Kemper, "Algebraic compression of quantum circuits for Hamiltonian evolution", Physical Review A 105 3, 032420 (2022).

[5] Michael Zurel, Lawrence Z. Cohen, and Robert Raussendorf, "Simulation of quantum computation with magic states via Jordan-Wigner transformations", Physical Review A 112 4, 042602 (2025).

[6] Logan E Hillberry, Lorenzo Piroli, Eric Vernier, Nicole Yunger Halpern, Tomaž Prosen, and Lincoln D Carr, "Integrability of Goldilocks quantum cellular automata", Quantum Science and Technology 11 2, 025040 (2026).

[7] Zhehao Zhang, Yabo Li, and Tsung-Cheng Lu, "Non-onsite symmetry breaking: Topological phase coexistence and criticality", Physical Review B 113 12, 125123 (2026).

[8] Nick G. Jones and Noah Linden, "Integrable spin chains and the Clifford group", Journal of Mathematical Physics 63 10, 101901 (2022).

[9] Paul Fendley and Balázs Pozsgay, "Free fermions beyond Jordan and Wigner", SciPost Physics 16 4, 102 (2024).

[10] Dennis F. Salinel and Kristian Hauser A. Villegas, "Bosonization in R -paraparticle Luttinger models", Physical Review B 113 24, 245425 (2026).

[11] Matteo Ippoliti, Michael J. Gullans, Sarang Gopalakrishnan, David A. Huse, and Vedika Khemani, "Entanglement Phase Transitions in Measurement-Only Dynamics", Physical Review X 11 1, 011030 (2021).

[12] Andrew M Projansky, Jason Necaise, and James D Whitfield, "Gaussianity and simulability of Cliffords and matchgates", Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 58 19, 195302 (2025).

[13] Efekan Kökcü, Roeland Wiersema, Alexander F. Kemper, and Bojko N. Bakalov, "Classification of dynamical Lie algebras generated by spin interactions on undirected graphs", Journal of Mathematical Physics 67 5, 052205 (2026).

[14] Rodolfo Carobene, Andrea Giachero, Stefano Barison, and Jannes Nys, "Local fermion-to-qudit mappings: A practical recipe for four-level systems", Physical Review A 112 3, 032619 (2025).

[15] Sumiran Pujari, "Solvable embedding mechanism for one-dimensional spinless and Majorana fermions in higher-dimensional spin- 12 magnets", Physical Review B 111 21, 214421 (2025).

[16] Zhen-Peng Xu, René Schwonnek, and Andreas Winter, "Bounding the Joint Numerical Range of Pauli Strings by Graph Parameters", PRX Quantum 5 2, 020318 (2024).

[17] Ryan L. Mann, Samuel J. Elman, David R. Wood, and Adrian Chapman, "A graph-theoretic framework for free-parafermion solvability", Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 481 2312, 20240671 (2025).

[18] Jannis Ruh and Samuel J. Elman, "Expanding the class of free fermions via twin-collapse methods", Physical Review A 113 2, 022456 (2026).

[19] Artur F Izmaylov and Tzu-Ching Yen, "How to define quantum mean-field solvable Hamiltonians using Lie algebras", Quantum Science and Technology 6 4, 044006 (2021).

[20] Smik Patel and Artur F. Izmaylov, "Exactly solvable Hamiltonian fragments obtained from a direct sum of Lie algebras", The Journal of Chemical Physics 160 19, 194107 (2024).

[21] Sujay Kazi, Martín Larocca, Marco Farinati, Patrick J. Coles, M. Cerezo, and Robert Zeier, "Analyzing the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm: Ansätze, Symmetries, and Lie Algebras", PRX Quantum 6 4, 040345 (2025).

[22] Francisco C. Alcaraz, Rodrigo A. Pimenta, and Jesko Sirker, "Ising analogs of quantum spin chains with multispin interactions", Physical Review B 107 23, 235136 (2023).

[23] Przemyslaw Bienias, Igor Boettcher, Ron Belyansky, Alicia J. Kollár, and Alexey V. Gorshkov, "Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics in Hyperbolic Space: From Photon Bound States to Frustrated Spin Models", Physical Review Letters 128 1, 013601 (2022).

[24] Gabriel Waite, Karl Lin, Samuel J. Elman, and Michael J. Bremner, "Physically motivated guiding states for local Hamiltonians", Physical Review A 114 1, 012431 (2026).

[25] Kohei Fukai, István Vona, and Balázs Pozsgay, "A free fermions in disguise model with claws", SciPost Physics 21 1, 011 (2026).

[26] Owidiusz Makuta, Błażej Kuzaka, and Remigiusz Augusiak, "Frustration graph formalism for qudit observables", Quantum Science and Technology 11 2, 025009 (2026).

[27] István Vona, Márton Mestyán, and Balázs Pozsgay, "Exact real-time dynamics with free fermions in disguise", Physical Review B 111 14, 144306 (2025).

[28] Dávid Szász-Schagrin, Daniele Cristani, Lorenzo Piroli, and Eric Vernier, "Construction and simulability of quantum circuits with free fermions in disguise", Quantum Science and Technology 11 1, 015044 (2026).

[29] Maria Chudnovsky, Alex Scott, Paul Seymour, and Sophie Spirkl, "A note on simplicial cliques", Discrete Mathematics 344 9, 112470 (2021).

[30] Adithya Sriram, Tibor Rakovszky, Vedika Khemani, and Matteo Ippoliti, "Topology, criticality, and dynamically generated qubits in a stochastic measurement-only Kitaev model", Physical Review B 108 9, 094304 (2023).

[31] Yuan Miao, "Generalised Onsager Algebra in Quantum Lattice Models", SciPost Physics 13 3, 070 (2022).

[32] Zhiyuan Wang and Kaden R. A. Hazzard, "Topological correlations in three-dimensional classical Ising models: An exact solution with a continuous phase transition", Physical Review Research 5 1, 013086 (2023).

[33] Martín Larocca, Supanut Thanasilp, Samson Wang, Kunal Sharma, Jacob Biamonte, Patrick J. Coles, Lukasz Cincio, Jarrod R. McClean, Zoë Holmes, and M. Cerezo, "Barren plateaus in variational quantum computing", Nature Reviews Physics 7 4, 174 (2025).

[34] Kohei Fukai and Balázs Pozsgay, "Quantum circuits with free fermions in disguise", Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 58 17, 175202 (2025).

[35] Raditya Weda Bomantara, Sen Mu, and Jiangbin Gong, "Topological and dynamical features of periodically driven spin ladders", Physical Review B 103 23, 235404 (2021).

[36] Andrew M. Projansky, Joshuah T. Heath, and James D. Whitfield, "Entanglement spectrum of matchgate circuits with universal and non-universal resources", Quantum 8, 1432 (2024).

[37] Kazuhiko Minami, "Onsager algebra and algebraic generalization of Jordan-Wigner transformation", Nuclear Physics B 973, 115599 (2021).

[38] Bart van Voorden, Matteo Marcuzzi, Kareljan Schoutens, and Jiří Minář, "Disorder enhanced quantum many-body scars in Hilbert hypercubes", Physical Review B 103 22, L220301 (2021).

[39] Eric Vernier and Lorenzo Piroli, "The Hilbert-space structure of free fermions in disguise", Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2026 1, 013101 (2026).

[40] Henrik Wilming and Tobias J. Osborne, "Quantized and maximum entanglement from sublattice symmetry", Physical Review A 107 2, 022418 (2023).

[41] Samuel J. Elman, Adrian Chapman, and Steven T. Flammia, "Free Fermions Behind the Disguise", Communications in Mathematical Physics 388 2, 969 (2021).

[42] Efekan Kökcü, Thomas Steckmann, Yan Wang, J. K. Freericks, Eugene F. Dumitrescu, and Alexander F. Kemper, "Fixed Depth Hamiltonian Simulation via Cartan Decomposition", Physical Review Letters 129 7, 070501 (2022).

[43] Adrian Chapman, Steven T. Flammia, and Alicia J. Kollár, "Free-Fermion Subsystem Codes", PRX Quantum 3 3, 030321 (2022).

[44] Adrian Chapman, Samuel J. Elman, and Ryan L. Mann, "A Unified Graph-Theoretic Framework for Free-Fermion Solvability", arXiv:2305.15625, (2023).

[45] Zhao Zhang, "Integrable Massless and Massive Fermions", arXiv:2603.11172, (2026).

[46] Victor V. Albert and Philippe Faist, "Handbook of Error-Correcting Codes", arXiv:2606.11484, (2026).

[47] András Grabarits and Adolfo del Campo, "Universal Defect Statistics in Counterdiabatic Quantum Critical Dynamics", arXiv:2503.22212, (2025).

[48] Jarrod R. McClean, Matthew P. Harrigan, Masoud Mohseni, Nicholas C. Rubin, Zhang Jiang, Sergio Boixo, Vadim N. Smelyanskiy, Ryan Babbush, and Hartmut Neven, "Low-Depth Mechanisms for Quantum Optimization", PRX Quantum 2 3, 030312 (2021).

[49] Kohei Fukai, Balázs Pozsgay, and István Vona, "Solving models with generalized free fermions I: Algebras and eigenstates", arXiv:2602.03431, (2026).

[50] Masahiro Ogura and Masatoshi Sato, "Exactly Solvable Spin Tri-Junctions", arXiv:2212.08891, (2022).

The above citations are from Crossref's cited-by service (last updated successfully 2026-08-10 08:50:56) and SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2026-08-09 20:36:16). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.

Could not fetch ADS cited-by data during last attempt 2026-08-10 08:50:56: Cannot retrieve data from ADS due to rate limitations.