Theory of variational quantum simulation

Xiao Yuan1, Suguru Endo1, Qi Zhao2, Ying Li3, and Simon C. Benjamin1

1Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, United Kingdom
2Center for Quantum Information, Institute for Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
3Graduate School of China Academy of Engineering Physics, Beijing 100193, China

Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.

Abstract

The variational method is a versatile tool for classical simulation of a variety of quantum systems. Great efforts have recently been devoted to its extension to quantum computing for efficiently solving static many-body problems and simulating real and imaginary time dynamics. In this work, we first review the conventional variational principles, including the Rayleigh-Ritz method for solving static problems, and the Dirac and Frenkel variational principle, the McLachlan's variational principle, and the time-dependent variational principle, for simulating real time dynamics. We focus on the simulation of dynamics and discuss the connections of the three variational principles. Previous works mainly focus on the unitary evolution of pure states. In this work, we introduce variational quantum simulation of mixed states under general stochastic evolution. We show how the results can be reduced to the pure state case with a correction term that takes accounts of global phase alignment. For variational simulation of imaginary time evolution, we also extend it to the mixed state scenario and discuss variational Gibbs state preparation. We further elaborate on the design of ansatz that is compatible with post-selection measurement and the implementation of the generalised variational algorithms with quantum circuits. Our work completes the theory of variational quantum simulation of general real and imaginary time evolution and it is applicable to near-term quantum hardware.

Universal quantum computers will eventually solve various classically intractable problems, but the exciting challenge is to demonstrate the first real quantum advantage as soon as possible -- with NISQ (for Noisy Intermediate Scaled Quantum) devices. In this regime, we may only be able to manipulate hundreds or thousands of qubits and the operations will be imperfect (or 'noisy'). With such a limited noisy quantum computer, it is unclear how to demonstrate any quantum advantage in any practical task.

This work solves this problem by exploring hybrid algorithms that only solve the core challenging problem with the quantum hardware and the higher level problem with a classical computer. This can be called the quantum coprocessor model: the quantum device handles only the bits that the conventional computer cannot. By considering different variational principles, we show how to simulate real and imaginary time dynamics of closed and open systems. Our work can thus be applied for solving static problems or simulating the dynamics of chemistry and general many-body physics with near-term quantum computers. These are tasks that, until recently, would have been thought to need a full scale fault-tolerant quantum computer in the more distant future.

► BibTeX data

► References

[1] Roger Balian and Marcel Veneroni. Static and dynamic variational principles for expectation values of observables. Annals of Physics, 187 (1): 29 – 78, 1988. ISSN 0003-4916. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​0003-4916(88)90280-1. URL http:/​/​www.sciencedirect.com/​science/​article/​pii/​0003491688902801.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​0003-4916(88)90280-1
http:/​/​www.sciencedirect.com/​science/​article/​pii/​0003491688902801

[2] Víctor M. Pérez-García, Humberto Michinel, J. I. Cirac, M. Lewenstein, and P. Zoller. Dynamics of bose-einstein condensates: Variational solutions of the gross-pitaevskii equations. Phys. Rev. A, 56: 1424–1432, Aug 1997. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.56.1424. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.56.1424.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.56.1424

[3] Franco Dalfovo, Stefano Giorgini, Lev P. Pitaevskii, and Sandro Stringari. Theory of bose-einstein condensation in trapped gases. Rev. Mod. Phys., 71: 463–512, Apr 1999. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.71.463. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.71.463.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.71.463

[4] Jutho Haegeman, J. Ignacio Cirac, Tobias J. Osborne, Iztok Pižorn, Henri Verschelde, and Frank Verstraete. Time-dependent variational principle for quantum lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett., 107: 070601, Aug 2011. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.107.070601. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.107.070601.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.107.070601

[5] F. Verstraete, J. J. García-Ripoll, and J. I. Cirac. Matrix product density operators: Simulation of finite-temperature and dissipative systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 93: 207204, Nov 2004. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.93.207204. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.93.207204.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.93.207204

[6] Tao Shi, Eugene Demler, and J. Ignacio Cirac. Variational study of fermionic and bosonic systems with non-gaussian states: Theory and applications. Annals of Physics, 390: 245 – 302, 2018. ISSN 0003-4916. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.aop.2017.11.014. URL http:/​/​www.sciencedirect.com/​science/​article/​pii/​S0003491617303251.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.aop.2017.11.014
http:/​/​www.sciencedirect.com/​science/​article/​pii/​S0003491617303251

[7] Laurens Vanderstraeten, Jutho Haegeman, and Frank Verstraete. Tangent-space methods for uniform matrix product states. SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes, page 7, 2019. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.21468/​SciPostPhysLectNotes.7. URL https:/​/​scipost.org/​10.21468/​SciPostPhysLectNotes.7.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.21468/​SciPostPhysLectNotes.7

[8] Hans Feldmeier and Jürgen Schnack. Molecular dynamics for fermions. Rev. Mod. Phys., 72: 655–688, Jul 2000. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.72.655. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.72.655.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.72.655

[9] A. Szabo and N.S. Ostlund. Modern Quantum Chemistry: Introduction to Advanced Electronic Structure Theory. Dover Books on Chemistry. Dover Publications, 2012. ISBN 9780486134598. URL https:/​/​books.google.co.uk/​books?id=KQ3DAgAAQBAJ.
https:/​/​books.google.co.uk/​books?id=KQ3DAgAAQBAJ

[10] T. Helgaker, P. Jorgensen, and J. Olsen. Molecular Electronic-Structure Theory. Wiley, 2013. ISBN 9781118531471. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1002/​9781119019572. URL https:/​/​books.google.co.uk/​books?id=APjLWFFxWkQC.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1002/​9781119019572
https:/​/​books.google.co.uk/​books?id=APjLWFFxWkQC

[11] F. Verstraete, V. Murg, and J. I. Cirac. Matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, and variational renormalization group methods for quantum spin systems. Advances in Physics, 57 (2): 143–224, 03 2008. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1080/​14789940801912366. URL https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1080/​14789940801912366.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1080/​14789940801912366

[12] Yuto Ashida, Tao Shi, Mari Carmen Bañuls, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Eugene Demler. Variational principle for quantum impurity systems in and out of equilibrium: Application to kondo problems. Phys. Rev. B, 98: 024103, Jul 2018. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevB.98.024103. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevB.98.024103.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevB.98.024103

[13] R. Jackiw and A. Kerman. Time-dependent variational principle and the effective action. Physics Letters A, 71 (2): 158 – 162, 1979. ISSN 0375-9601. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​0375-9601(79)90151-8. URL http:/​/​www.sciencedirect.com/​science/​article/​pii/​0375960179901518.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​0375-9601(79)90151-8
http:/​/​www.sciencedirect.com/​science/​article/​pii/​0375960179901518

[14] L. Lehtovaara, J. Toivanen, and J. Eloranta. Solution of time-independent schrödinger equation by the imaginary time propagation method. Journal of Computational Physics, 221 (1): 148 – 157, 2007. ISSN 0021-9991. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.jcp.2006.06.006. URL http:/​/​www.sciencedirect.com/​science/​article/​pii/​S0021999106002798.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.jcp.2006.06.006
http:/​/​www.sciencedirect.com/​science/​article/​pii/​S0021999106002798

[15] P Kramer. A review of the time-dependent variational principle. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 99: 012009, feb 2008. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1742-6596/​99/​1/​012009. URL https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1742-6596/​99/​1/​012009

[16] Christina V Kraus and J Ignacio Cirac. Generalized hartree–fock theory for interacting fermions in lattices: numerical methods. New Journal of Physics, 12 (11): 113004, nov 2010. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​12/​11/​113004. URL https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​12/​11/​113004

[17] Aram W. Harrow and Ashley Montanaro. Quantum computational supremacy. Nature, 549: 203 EP –, 09 2017. URL https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​nature23458.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​nature23458

[18] Sergio Boixo, Sergei V. Isakov, Vadim N. Smelyanskiy, Ryan Babbush, Nan Ding, Zhang Jiang, Michael J. Bremner, John M. Martinis, and Hartmut Neven. Characterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices. Nature Physics, 14 (6): 595–600, 2018. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41567-018-0124-x. URL https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41567-018-0124-x.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41567-018-0124-x

[19] C. Neill, P. Roushan, K. Kechedzhi, S. Boixo, S. V. Isakov, V. Smelyanskiy, A. Megrant, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, K. Arya, R. Barends, B. Burkett, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, A. Fowler, B. Foxen, M. Giustina, R. Graff, E. Jeffrey, T. Huang, J. Kelly, P. Klimov, E. Lucero, J. Mutus, M. Neeley, C. Quintana, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, T. C. White, H. Neven, and J. M. Martinis. A blueprint for demonstrating quantum supremacy with superconducting qubits. Science, 360 (6385): 195–199, 2018. ISSN 0036-8075. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1126/​science.aao4309. URL https:/​/​science.sciencemag.org/​content/​360/​6385/​195.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1126/​science.aao4309
https:/​/​science.sciencemag.org/​content/​360/​6385/​195

[20] Richard P. Feynman. Simulating physics with computers. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 21 (6): 467–488, Jun 1982. ISSN 1572-9575. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​BF02650179. URL https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​BF02650179.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​BF02650179

[21] Seth Lloyd. Universal quantum simulators. Science, 273 (5278): 1073–1078, 1996. ISSN 0036-8075. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1126/​science.273.5278.1073. URL http:/​/​science.sciencemag.org/​content/​273/​5278/​1073.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1126/​science.273.5278.1073
http:/​/​science.sciencemag.org/​content/​273/​5278/​1073

[22] Daniel S. Abrams and Seth Lloyd. Simulation of many-body fermi systems on a universal quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett., 79: 2586–2589, Sep 1997. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.79.2586. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.79.2586.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.79.2586

[23] Joe O'Gorman and Earl T. Campbell. Quantum computation with realistic magic-state factories. Phys. Rev. A, 95: 032338, Mar 2017. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.95.032338. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.95.032338.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.95.032338

[24] Earl T. Campbell, Barbara M. Terhal, and Christophe Vuillot. Roads towards fault-tolerant universal quantum computation. Nature, 549: 172 EP –, 09 2017. URL https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​nature23460.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​nature23460

[25] Markus Reiher, Nathan Wiebe, Krysta M. Svore, Dave Wecker, and Matthias Troyer. Elucidating reaction mechanisms on quantum computers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2017. ISSN 0027-8424. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1073/​pnas.1619152114. URL https:/​/​www.pnas.org/​content/​early/​2017/​06/​30/​1619152114.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1073/​pnas.1619152114
https:/​/​www.pnas.org/​content/​early/​2017/​06/​30/​1619152114

[26] James Wooten. Benchmarking of quantum processors with random circuits. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.02736, 2018.
arXiv:1806.02736

[27] John Preskill. Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum, 2: 79, August 2018. ISSN 2521-327X. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2018-08-06-79. URL https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2018-08-06-79.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2018-08-06-79

[28] Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, and Sam Gutmann. A quantum approximate optimization algorithm. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.4028, 2014.
arXiv:1411.4028

[29] Alberto Peruzzo, Jarrod McClean, Peter Shadbolt, Man-Hong Yung, Xiao-Qi Zhou, Peter J. Love, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, and Jeremy L. O'Brien. A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor. Nature Communications, 5: 4213, 07 2014. URL https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​ncomms5213.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​ncomms5213

[30] Ya Wang, Florian Dolde, Jacob Biamonte, Ryan Babbush, Ville Bergholm, Sen Yang, Ingmar Jakobi, Philipp Neumann, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, James D. Whitfield, and Jörg Wrachtrup. Quantum simulation of helium hydride cation in a solid-state spin register. ACS Nano, 9 (8): 7769–7774, 08 2015. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1021/​acsnano.5b01651. URL https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1021/​acsnano.5b01651.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1021/​acsnano.5b01651

[31] P. J. J. O'Malley, R. Babbush, I. D. Kivlichan, J. Romero, J. R. McClean, R. Barends, J. Kelly, P. Roushan, A. Tranter, N. Ding, B. Campbell, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, A. G. Fowler, E. Jeffrey, E. Lucero, A. Megrant, J. Y. Mutus, M. Neeley, C. Neill, C. Quintana, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, T. C. White, P. V. Coveney, P. J. Love, H. Neven, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and J. M. Martinis. Scalable quantum simulation of molecular energies. Phys. Rev. X, 6: 031007, Jul 2016. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.6.031007. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.6.031007.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.6.031007

[32] Yangchao Shen, Xiang Zhang, Shuaining Zhang, Jing-Ning Zhang, Man-Hong Yung, and Kihwan Kim. Quantum implementation of the unitary coupled cluster for simulating molecular electronic structure. Phys. Rev. A, 95: 020501, Feb 2017. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.95.020501. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.95.020501.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.95.020501

[33] Jarrod R McClean, Jonathan Romero, Ryan Babbush, and Alán Aspuru-Guzik. The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms. New Journal of Physics, 18 (2): 023023, feb 2016. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​18/​2/​023023. URL https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​18/​2/​023023

[34] S. Paesani, A. A. Gentile, R. Santagati, J. Wang, N. Wiebe, D. P. Tew, J. L. O'Brien, and M. G. Thompson. Experimental bayesian quantum phase estimation on a silicon photonic chip. Phys. Rev. Lett., 118: 100503, Mar 2017. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.118.100503. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.118.100503.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.118.100503

[35] J. I. Colless, V. V. Ramasesh, D. Dahlen, M. S. Blok, M. E. Kimchi-Schwartz, J. R. McClean, J. Carter, W. A. de Jong, and I. Siddiqi. Computation of molecular spectra on a quantum processor with an error-resilient algorithm. Phys. Rev. X, 8: 011021, Feb 2018a. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.8.011021. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.8.011021.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.8.011021

[36] Raffaele Santagati, Jianwei Wang, Antonio A. Gentile, Stefano Paesani, Nathan Wiebe, Jarrod R. McClean, Sam Morley-Short, Peter J. Shadbolt, Damien Bonneau, Joshua W. Silverstone, David P. Tew, Xiaoqi Zhou, Jeremy L. O’Brien, and Mark G. Thompson. Witnessing eigenstates for quantum simulation of hamiltonian spectra. Science Advances, 4 (1), 2018. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1126/​sciadv.aap9646. URL http:/​/​advances.sciencemag.org/​content/​4/​1/​eaap9646.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1126/​sciadv.aap9646
http:/​/​advances.sciencemag.org/​content/​4/​1/​eaap9646

[37] Abhinav Kandala, Antonio Mezzacapo, Kristan Temme, Maika Takita, Markus Brink, Jerry M. Chow, and Jay M. Gambetta. Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets. Nature, 549: 242 EP –, 09 2017. URL https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​nature23879.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​nature23879

[38] Abhinav Kandala, Kristan Temme, Antonio D. Córcoles, Antonio Mezzacapo, Jerry M. Chow, and Jay M. Gambetta. Error mitigation extends the computational reach of a noisy quantum processor. Nature, 567 (7749): 491–495, 2019. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41586-019-1040-7. URL https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41586-019-1040-7.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41586-019-1040-7

[39] Cornelius Hempel, Christine Maier, Jonathan Romero, Jarrod McClean, Thomas Monz, Heng Shen, Petar Jurcevic, Ben P. Lanyon, Peter Love, Ryan Babbush, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, Rainer Blatt, and Christian F. Roos. Quantum chemistry calculations on a trapped-ion quantum simulator. Phys. Rev. X, 8: 031022, Jul 2018. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.8.031022. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.8.031022.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.8.031022

[40] C. Kokail, C. Maier, R. van Bijnen, T. Brydges, M. K. Joshi, P. Jurcevic, C. A. Muschik, P. Silvi, R. Blatt, C. F. Roos, and P. Zoller. Self-verifying variational quantum simulation of lattice models. Nature, 569 (7756): 355–360, May 2019. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41586-019-1177-4.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41586-019-1177-4

[41] Ying Li and Simon C. Benjamin. Efficient variational quantum simulator incorporating active error minimization. Phys. Rev. X, 7: 021050, Jun 2017. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.7.021050. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.7.021050.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.7.021050

[42] Ken M Nakanishi, Kosuke Mitarai, and Keisuke Fujii. Subspace-search variational quantum eigensolver for excited states. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.09434, 2018.
arXiv:1810.09434

[43] David Poulin, Angie Qarry, Rolando Somma, and Frank Verstraete. Quantum simulation of time-dependent hamiltonians and the convenient illusion of hilbert space. Phys. Rev. Lett., 106: 170501, Apr 2011. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.106.170501. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.106.170501.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.106.170501

[44] I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and Franco Nori. Quantum simulation. Rev. Mod. Phys., 86: 153–185, Mar 2014. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.86.153. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.86.153.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.86.153

[45] S. Kais, K.B. Whaley, A.R. Dinner, and S.A. Rice. Quantum Information and Computation for Chemistry. Advances in Chemical Physics. Wiley, 2014. ISBN 9781118742600. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1002/​9781118742631. URL https:/​/​books.google.co.uk/​books?id=dCXPAgAAQBAJ.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1002/​9781118742631
https:/​/​books.google.co.uk/​books?id=dCXPAgAAQBAJ

[46] Sam McArdle, Suguru Endo, Alan Aspuru-Guzik, Simon Benjamin, and Xiao Yuan. Quantum computational chemistry. arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:1808.10402, Aug 2018.
arXiv:1808.10402

[47] Yudong Cao, Jonathan Romero, Jonathan P. Olson, Matthias Degroote, Peter D. Johnson, Mária Kieferová, Ian D. Kivlichan, Tim Menke, Borja Peropadre, Nicolas P. D. Sawaya, Sukin Sim, Libor Veis, and Alán Aspuru-Guzik. Quantum chemistry in the age of quantum computing. Chemical Reviews, 08 2019. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1021/​acs.chemrev.8b00803. URL https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1021/​acs.chemrev.8b00803.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1021/​acs.chemrev.8b00803

[48] P. A. M. Dirac. Note on exchange phenomena in the thomas atom. In Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, volume 26, pages 376–385. Cambridge University Press, 1930. ISBN 0305-0041. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1017/​S0305004100016108. URL https:/​/​www.cambridge.org/​core/​article/​note-on-exchange-phenomena-in-the-thomas-atom/​6C5FF7297CD96F49A8B8E9E3EA50E412.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1017/​S0305004100016108
https:/​/​www.cambridge.org/​core/​article/​note-on-exchange-phenomena-in-the-thomas-atom/​6C5FF7297CD96F49A8B8E9E3EA50E412

[49] J. Frenkel. Wave mechanics: advanced general theory. Clarendon Press Oxford, 1934.

[50] A.D. McLachlan. A variational solution of the time-dependent schrodinger equation. Molecular Physics, 8 (1): 39–44, 1964. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1080/​00268976400100041.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1080/​00268976400100041

[51] PH Kramer and Marcos Saraceno. Geometry of the time-dependent variational principle in quantum mechanics. Springer, 1981. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​3-540-10579-4.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​3-540-10579-4

[52] J. Broeckhove, L. Lathouwers, E. Kesteloot, and P. Van Leuven. On the equivalence of time-dependent variational principles. Chemical Physics Letters, 149 (5): 547 – 550, 1988. ISSN 0009-2614. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​0009-2614(88)80380-4. URL http:/​/​www.sciencedirect.com/​science/​article/​pii/​0009261488803804.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​0009-2614(88)80380-4
http:/​/​www.sciencedirect.com/​science/​article/​pii/​0009261488803804

[53] Jutho Haegeman, Tobias J. Osborne, and Frank Verstraete. Post-matrix product state methods: To tangent space and beyond. Phys. Rev. B, 88: 075133, Aug 2013. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevB.88.075133. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevB.88.075133.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevB.88.075133

[54] Kentaro Heya, Ken M Nakanishi, Kosuke Mitarai, and Keisuke Fujii. Subspace variational quantum simulator. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.08566, 2019.
arXiv:1904.08566

[55] Sam McArdle, Tyson Jones, Suguru Endo, Ying Li, Simon C. Benjamin, and Xiao Yuan. Variational ansatz-based quantum simulation of imaginary time evolution. npj Quantum Information, 5 (1): 75, 2019a. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41534-019-0187-2. URL https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41534-019-0187-2.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41534-019-0187-2

[56] Tyson Jones, Suguru Endo, Sam McArdle, Xiao Yuan, and Simon C. Benjamin. Variational quantum algorithms for discovering hamiltonian spectra. Phys. Rev. A, 99: 062304, Jun 2019. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.99.062304. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.99.062304.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.99.062304

[57] Ming-Cheng Chen, Ming Gong, Xiao-Si Xu, Xiao Yuan, Jian-Wen Wang, Can Wang, Chong Ying, Jin Lin, Yu Xu, Yulin Wu, Shiyu Wang, Hui Deng, Futian Liang, Cheng-Zhi Peng, Simon C. Benjamin, Xiaobo Zhu, Chao-Yang Lu, and Jian-Wei Pan. Demonstration of Adiabatic Variational Quantum Computing with a Superconducting Quantum Coprocessor. arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:1905.03150, May 2019.
arXiv:1905.03150

[58] Kosuke Mitarai and Keisuke Fujii. Methodology for replacing indirect measurements with direct measurements. Phys. Rev. Research, 1: 013006, Aug 2019. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevResearch.1.013006. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevResearch.1.013006.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevResearch.1.013006

[59] Artur K. Ekert, Carolina Moura Alves, Daniel K. L. Oi, Michał Horodecki, Paweł Horodecki, and L. C. Kwek. Direct estimations of linear and nonlinear functionals of a quantum state. Phys. Rev. Lett., 88: 217901, May 2002. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.88.217901. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.88.217901.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.88.217901

[60] Suguru Endo, Ying Li, Simon Benjamin, and Xiao Yuan. Variational quantum simulation of general processes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.08778, 2018a.
arXiv:1812.08778

[61] J.R. Johansson, P.D. Nation, and Franco Nori. Qutip: An open-source python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems. Computer Physics Communications, 183 (8): 1760 – 1772, 2012. ISSN 0010-4655. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.cpc.2012.02.021. URL http:/​/​www.sciencedirect.com/​science/​article/​pii/​S0010465512000835.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.cpc.2012.02.021
http:/​/​www.sciencedirect.com/​science/​article/​pii/​S0010465512000835

[62] J.R. Johansson, P.D. Nation, and Franco Nori. Qutip 2: A python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems. Computer Physics Communications, 184 (4): 1234 – 1240, 2013. ISSN 0010-4655. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.cpc.2012.11.019. URL http:/​/​www.sciencedirect.com/​science/​article/​pii/​S0010465512003955.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.cpc.2012.11.019
http:/​/​www.sciencedirect.com/​science/​article/​pii/​S0010465512003955

[63] Jarrod R. McClean, Mollie E. Kimchi-Schwartz, Jonathan Carter, and Wibe A. de Jong. Hybrid quantum-classical hierarchy for mitigation of decoherence and determination of excited states. Phys. Rev. A, 95: 042308, Apr 2017. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.95.042308. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.95.042308.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.95.042308

[64] Kristan Temme, Sergey Bravyi, and Jay M. Gambetta. Error mitigation for short-depth quantum circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett., 119: 180509, Nov 2017. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.119.180509. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.119.180509.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.119.180509

[65] Suguru Endo, Simon C. Benjamin, and Ying Li. Practical quantum error mitigation for near-future applications. Phys. Rev. X, 8: 031027, Jul 2018b. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.8.031027. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.8.031027.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.8.031027

[66] J. I. Colless, V. V. Ramasesh, D. Dahlen, M. S. Blok, M. E. Kimchi-Schwartz, J. R. McClean, J. Carter, W. A. de Jong, and I. Siddiqi. Computation of molecular spectra on a quantum processor with an error-resilient algorithm. Phys. Rev. X, 8: 011021, Feb 2018b. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.8.011021. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.8.011021.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.8.011021

[67] Matthew Otten and Stephen K. Gray. Recovering noise-free quantum observables. Phys. Rev. A, 99: 012338, Jan 2019. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.99.012338. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.99.012338.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.99.012338

[68] Sam McArdle, Xiao Yuan, and Simon Benjamin. Error-mitigated digital quantum simulation. Phys. Rev. Lett., 122: 180501, May 2019b. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.122.180501. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.122.180501.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.122.180501

[69] X. Bonet-Monroig, R. Sagastizabal, M. Singh, and T. E. O'Brien. Low-cost error mitigation by symmetry verification. Phys. Rev. A, 98: 062339, Dec 2018. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.98.062339. URL https:/​/​link.aps.org/​doi/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.98.062339.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.98.062339

[70] Jarrod R McClean, Zhang Jiang, Nicholas C Rubin, Ryan Babbush, and Hartmut Neven. Decoding quantum errors with subspace expansions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.05786, 2019.
arXiv:1903.05786

Cited by

[1] Tatiana A. Bespalova and Oleksandr Kyriienko, "Hamiltonian Operator Approximation for Energy Measurement and Ground-State Preparation", PRX Quantum 2 3, 030318 (2021).

[2] Christa Zoufal, Aurélien Lucchi, and Stefan Woerner, "Variational quantum Boltzmann machines", Quantum Machine Intelligence 3 1, 7 (2021).

[3] Chenfeng Cao and Xin Wang, "Noise-Assisted Quantum Autoencoder", Physical Review Applied 15 5, 054012 (2021).

[4] Tianchen Zhao, Giuseppe Carleo, James Stokes, and Shravan Veerapaneni, "Natural evolution strategies and variational Monte Carlo", Machine Learning: Science and Technology 2 2, 02LT01 (2021).

[5] Trevor Keen, Thomas Maier, Steven Johnston, and Pavel Lougovski, "Quantum-classical simulation of two-site dynamical mean-field theory on noisy quantum hardware", Quantum Science and Technology 5 3, 035001 (2020).

[6] Pejman Jouzdani and Stefan Bringuier, "Hybrid Quantum-Classical Eigensolver without Variation or Parametric Gates", Quantum Reports 3 1, 137 (2021).

[7] Yuri Alexeev, Dave Bacon, Kenneth R. Brown, Robert Calderbank, Lincoln D. Carr, Frederic T. Chong, Brian DeMarco, Dirk Englund, Edward Farhi, Bill Fefferman, Alexey V. Gorshkov, Andrew Houck, Jungsang Kim, Shelby Kimmel, Michael Lange, Seth Lloyd, Mikhail D. Lukin, Dmitri Maslov, Peter Maunz, Christopher Monroe, John Preskill, Martin Roetteler, Martin J. Savage, and Jeff Thompson, "Quantum Computer Systems for Scientific Discovery", PRX Quantum 2 1, 017001 (2021).

[8] Nikolay V. Tkachenko, James Sud, Yu Zhang, Sergei Tretiak, Petr M. Anisimov, Andrew T. Arrasmith, Patrick J. Coles, Lukasz Cincio, and Pavel A. Dub, "Correlation-Informed Permutation of Qubits for Reducing Ansatz Depth in the Variational Quantum Eigensolver", PRX Quantum 2 2, 020337 (2021).

[9] Andrey Kardashin, Anastasiia Pervishko, Jacob Biamonte, and Dmitry Yudin, "Numerical hardware-efficient variational quantum simulation of a soliton solution", Physical Review A 104 2, L020402 (2021).

[10] Shi-Yao Hou, Guanru Feng, Zipeng Wu, Hongyang Zou, Wei Shi, Jinfeng Zeng, Chenfeng Cao, Sheng Yu, Zikai Sheng, Xin Rao, Bing Ren, Dawei Lu, Junting Zou, Guoxing Miao, Jingen Xiang, and Bei Zeng, "SpinQ Gemini: a desktop quantum computing platform for education and research", EPJ Quantum Technology 8 1, 20 (2021).

[11] Markus Hauru, Maarten Van Damme, and Jutho Haegeman, "Riemannian optimization of isometric tensor networks", arXiv:2007.03638, SciPost Physics 10 2, 040 (2021).

[12] Tomotaka Kuwahara, Álvaro M. Alhambra, and Anurag Anshu, "Improved Thermal Area Law and Quasilinear Time Algorithm for Quantum Gibbs States", Physical Review X 11 1, 011047 (2021).

[13] Enrico Fontana, Nathan Fitzpatrick, David Muñoz Ramo, Ross Duncan, and Ivan Rungger, "Evaluating the noise resilience of variational quantum algorithms", Physical Review A 104 2, 022403 (2021).

[14] Tobias Haug, Kishor Bharti, and M.S. Kim, "Capacity and Quantum Geometry of Parametrized Quantum Circuits", PRX Quantum 2 4, 040309 (2021).

[15] Yuta Shingu, Yuya Seki, Shohei Watabe, Suguru Endo, Yuichiro Matsuzaki, Shiro Kawabata, Tetsuro Nikuni, and Hideaki Hakoshima, "Boltzmann machine learning with a variational quantum algorithm", Physical Review A 104 3, 032413 (2021).

[16] Dan-Bo Zhang and Tao Yin, "Collective optimization for variational quantum eigensolvers", Physical Review A 101 3, 032311 (2020).

[17] Virginia N. Ciriano-Tejel, Michael A. Fogarty, Simon Schaal, Louis Hutin, Benoit Bertrand, Lisa Ibberson, M. Fernando Gonzalez-Zalba, Jing Li, Yann-Michel Niquet, Maud Vinet, and John J.L. Morton, "Spin Readout of a CMOS Quantum Dot by Gate Reflectometry and Spin-Dependent Tunneling", PRX Quantum 2 1, 010353 (2021).

[18] Suguru Endo, Jinzhao Sun, Ying Li, Simon C. Benjamin, and Xiao Yuan, "Variational Quantum Simulation of General Processes", Physical Review Letters 125 1, 010501 (2020).

[19] Marcello Benedetti, Mattia Fiorentini, and Michael Lubasch, "Hardware-efficient variational quantum algorithms for time evolution", Physical Review Research 3 3, 033083 (2021).

[20] Cristina Cîrstoiu, Zoë Holmes, Joseph Iosue, Lukasz Cincio, Patrick J. Coles, and Andrew Sornborger, "Variational fast forwarding for quantum simulation beyond the coherence time", npj Quantum Information 6 1, 82 (2020).

[21] Chee Kong Lee, Pranay Patil, Shengyu Zhang, and Chang Yu Hsieh, "Neural-network variational quantum algorithm for simulating many-body dynamics", Physical Review Research 3 2, 023095 (2021).

[22] Zoë Holmes, Andrew Arrasmith, Bin Yan, Patrick J. Coles, Andreas Albrecht, and Andrew T. Sornborger, "Barren Plateaus Preclude Learning Scramblers", Physical Review Letters 126 19, 190501 (2021).

[23] Shi-Xin Zhang, Chang-Yu Hsieh, Shengyu Zhang, and Hong Yao, "Neural predictor based quantum architecture search", Machine Learning: Science and Technology 2 4, 045027 (2021).

[24] Bálint Koczor, "Exponential Error Suppression for Near-Term Quantum Devices", Physical Review X 11 3, 031057 (2021).

[25] Kishor Bharti, "Fisher Information: A Crucial Tool for NISQ Research", Quantum Views 5, 61 (2021).

[26] Ming-Cheng Chen, Ming Gong, Xiaosi Xu, Xiao Yuan, Jian-Wen Wang, Can Wang, Chong Ying, Jin Lin, Yu Xu, Yulin Wu, Shiyu Wang, Hui Deng, Futian Liang, Cheng-Zhi Peng, Simon C. Benjamin, Xiaobo Zhu, Chao-Yang Lu, and Jian-Wei Pan, "Demonstration of Adiabatic Variational Quantum Computing with a Superconducting Quantum Coprocessor", Physical Review Letters 125 18, 180501 (2020).

[27] James Stokes, Josh Izaac, Nathan Killoran, and Giuseppe Carleo, "Quantum Natural Gradient", Quantum 4, 269 (2020).

[28] D. Zeuch and N. E. Bonesteel, "Efficient two-qubit pulse sequences beyond CNOT", Physical Review B 102 7, 075311 (2020).

[29] Luca Crippa, Francesco Tacchino, Mario Chizzini, Antonello Aita, Michele Grossi, Alessandro Chiesa, Paolo Santini, Ivano Tavernelli, and Stefano Carretta, "Simulating Static and Dynamic Properties of Magnetic Molecules with Prototype Quantum Computers", Magnetochemistry 7 8, 117 (2021).

[30] Xiaosi Xu, Simon C. Benjamin, and Xiao Yuan, "Variational Circuit Compiler for Quantum Error Correction", Physical Review Applied 15 3, 034068 (2021).

[31] Kunal Sharma, Sumeet Khatri, M Cerezo, and Patrick J Coles, "Noise resilience of variational quantum compiling", New Journal of Physics 22 4, 043006 (2020).

[32] Yong-Xin Yao, Niladri Gomes, Feng Zhang, Cai-Zhuang Wang, Kai-Ming Ho, Thomas Iadecola, and Peter P. Orth, "Adaptive Variational Quantum Dynamics Simulations", PRX Quantum 2 3, 030307 (2021).

[33] M. Cerezo, Andrew Arrasmith, Ryan Babbush, Simon C. Benjamin, Suguru Endo, Keisuke Fujii, Jarrod R. McClean, Kosuke Mitarai, Xiao Yuan, Lukasz Cincio, and Patrick J. Coles, "Variational quantum algorithms", Nature Reviews Physics 3 9, 625 (2021).

[34] Filipe Fontanela, Antoine Jacquier, and Mugad Oumgari, "Short Communication: A Quantum Algorithm for Linear PDEs Arising in Finance", SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics 12 4, SC98 (2021).

[35] Tyler Volkoff and Patrick J Coles, "Large gradients via correlation in random parameterized quantum circuits", Quantum Science and Technology 6 2, 025008 (2021).

[36] Laura Gentini, Alessandro Cuccoli, Stefano Pirandola, Paola Verrucchi, and Leonardo Banchi, "Noise-resilient variational hybrid quantum-classical optimization", Physical Review A 102 5, 052414 (2020).

[37] Xiao Yuan, Jinzhao Sun, Junyu Liu, Qi Zhao, and You Zhou, "Quantum Simulation with Hybrid Tensor Networks", Physical Review Letters 127 4, 040501 (2021).

[38] Kenji Kubo, Yuya O. Nakagawa, Suguru Endo, and Shota Nagayama, "Variational quantum simulations of stochastic differential equations", Physical Review A 103 5, 052425 (2021).

[39] Leonardo Banchi and Gavin E. Crooks, "Measuring Analytic Gradients of General Quantum Evolution with the Stochastic Parameter Shift Rule", Quantum 5, 386 (2021).

[40] Suguru Endo, Iori Kurata, and Yuya O. Nakagawa, "Calculation of the Green's function on near-term quantum computers", Physical Review Research 2 3, 033281 (2020).

[41] Julien Gacon, Christa Zoufal, Giuseppe Carleo, and Stefan Woerner, "Simultaneous Perturbation Stochastic Approximation of the Quantum Fisher Information", Quantum 5, 567 (2021).

[42] C. Monroe, W. C. Campbell, L.-M. Duan, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, P. W. Hess, R. Islam, K. Kim, N. M. Linke, G. Pagano, P. Richerme, C. Senko, and N. Y. Yao, "Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions", Reviews of Modern Physics 93 2, 025001 (2021).

[43] Jonas M. Kübler, Andrew Arrasmith, Lukasz Cincio, and Patrick J. Coles, "An Adaptive Optimizer for Measurement-Frugal Variational Algorithms", Quantum 4, 263 (2020).

[44] Chufan Lyu, Victor Montenegro, and Abolfazl Bayat, "Accelerated variational algorithms for digital quantum simulation of many-body ground states", Quantum 4, 324 (2020).

[45] Suguru Endo, Zhenyu Cai, Simon C. Benjamin, and Xiao Yuan, "Hybrid Quantum-Classical Algorithms and Quantum Error Mitigation", Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 90 3, 032001 (2021).

[46] Bo Peng and Karol Kowalski, "Variational quantum solver employing the PDS energy functional", Quantum 5, 473 (2021).

[47] Chee-Kong Lee, Chang-Yu Hsieh, Shengyu Zhang, and Liang Shi, "Simulation of Condensed-Phase Spectroscopy with Near-Term Digital Quantum Computers", arXiv:2106.10767, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation acs.jctc.1c00849 (2021).

[48] Laszlo Gyongyosi, "Approximation Method for Optimization Problems in Gate-Model Quantum Computers", Chaos, Solitons & Fractals: X 7, 100066 (2021).

[49] Barnaby van Straaten and Bálint Koczor, "Measurement Cost of Metric-Aware Variational Quantum Algorithms", PRX Quantum 2 3, 030324 (2021).

[50] R. Sagastizabal, S. P. Premaratne, B. A. Klaver, M. A. Rol, V. Negîrneac, M. S. Moreira, X. Zou, S. Johri, N. Muthusubramanian, M. Beekman, C. Zachariadis, V. P. Ostroukh, N. Haider, A. Bruno, A. Y. Matsuura, and L. DiCarlo, "Variational preparation of finite-temperature states on a quantum computer", npj Quantum Information 7 1, 130 (2021).

[51] Kishor Bharti and Tobias Haug, "Quantum-assisted simulator", Physical Review A 104 4, 042418 (2021).

[52] Nobuyuki Yoshioka, Yuya O. Nakagawa, Kosuke Mitarai, and Keisuke Fujii, "Variational quantum algorithm for nonequilibrium steady states", Physical Review Research 2 4, 043289 (2020).

[53] Taichi Kosugi and Yu-ichiro Matsushita, "Construction of Green's functions on a quantum computer: Quasiparticle spectra of molecules", Physical Review A 101 1, 012330 (2020).

[54] Shi-Ning Sun, Mario Motta, Ruslan N. Tazhigulov, Adrian T.K. Tan, Garnet Kin-Lic Chan, and Austin J. Minnich, "Quantum Computation of Finite-Temperature Static and Dynamical Properties of Spin Systems Using Quantum Imaginary Time Evolution", PRX Quantum 2 1, 010317 (2021).

[55] Sheng-Jie Li, Jin-Min Liang, Shu-Qian Shen, and Ming Li, "Variational quantum algorithms for trace norms and their applications", Communications in Theoretical Physics 73 10, 105102 (2021).

[56] Stefano Barison, Filippo Vicentini, and Giuseppe Carleo, "An efficient quantum algorithm for the time evolution of parameterized circuits", Quantum 5, 512 (2021).

[57] Kübra Yeter-Aydeniz, George Siopsis, and Raphael C Pooser, "Scattering in the Ising model with the quantum Lanczos algorithm * ", New Journal of Physics 23 4, 043033 (2021).

[58] Huan-Yu Liu, Tai-Ping Sun, Yu-Chun Wu, and Guo-Ping Guo, "Variational Quantum Algorithms for the Steady States of Open Quantum Systems ", Chinese Physics Letters 38 8, 080301 (2021).

[59] Sam McArdle, Tyson Jones, Suguru Endo, Ying Li, Simon C. Benjamin, and Xiao Yuan, "Variational ansatz-based quantum simulation of imaginary time evolution", npj Quantum Information 5, 75 (2019).

[60] M. Cerezo, Kunal Sharma, Andrew Arrasmith, and Patrick J. Coles, "Variational Quantum State Eigensolver", arXiv:2004.01372.

[61] Andrew Arrasmith, Lukasz Cincio, Rolando D. Somma, and Patrick J. Coles, "Operator Sampling for Shot-frugal Optimization in Variational Algorithms", arXiv:2004.06252.

[62] Naoki Yamamoto, "On the natural gradient for variational quantum eigensolver", arXiv:1909.05074.

[63] Ranyiliu Chen, Zhixin Song, Xuanqiang Zhao, and Xin Wang, "Variational Quantum Algorithms for Trace Distance and Fidelity Estimation", arXiv:2012.05768.

[64] Jinfeng Zeng, Chenfeng Cao, Chao Zhang, Pengxiang Xu, and Bei Zeng, "A variational quantum algorithm for Hamiltonian diagonalization", Quantum Science and Technology 6 4, 045009 (2021).

[65] Utkarsh Azad and Harjinder Singh, "Quantum Chemistry Calculations using Energy Derivatives on Quantum Computers", arXiv:2106.06463.

[66] Kian Hwee Lim, Tobias Haug, Leong Chuan Kwek, and Kishor Bharti, "Fast-Forwarding with NISQ Processors without Feedback Loop", arXiv:2104.01931.

[67] Alexander Miessen, Pauline J. Ollitrault, and Ivano Tavernelli, "Quantum algorithms for quantum dynamics: a performance study on the spin-boson model", arXiv:2108.04258.

[68] Yusuke Hama, "Quantum Circuits for Collective Amplitude Damping in Two-Qubit Systems", arXiv:2012.02410.

The above citations are from Crossref's cited-by service (last updated successfully 2021-10-27 07:24:46) and SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2021-10-27 19:30:06). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.

Could not fetch Crossref cited-by data during last attempt 2021-10-27 19:29:59: cURL error 28: Operation timed out after 6000 milliseconds with 65319 bytes received

1 thought on “Theory of variational quantum simulation

  1. Pingback: Theory of variational quantum simulation – Quantum (via Qpute.com) – Quantum Computing