Author feedback
Two months go, we asked authors for feedback on their experience with Quantum. Without further delay, here are the raw results. We will write a follow-up with our conclusions in the …
Improving the peer-review workflow at Quantum
After two years of operation, around 250 submissions and over 100 published articles, it is time to refresh the editorial board, and to consolidate the peer-review process at Quantum. Here …
Quantum discussed during YQIS conference
Lídia del Rio gave a talk on the core values, the mission, the internal structure, and the making-of of Quantum during the International Conference for Young Quantum Information Scientists 2016 …
Coordinating editors
Given the high number of excellent applications, the Editorial Board of Quantum can be as broad as we had hoped for. This ensures that editors need only handle submissions in …
Sharing the love
On the last day of the call for editors, we would like to share some of the support messages that applicants have been sending us. Thank you for believing in …
Should Quantum be selective?
We were amazed by the detailed and lively discussion on various aspects of Quantum happening over at /r/quantumjournal. We would like to thank all participants for their time and over …
Community feedback
Last week we published the editorial policies of Quantum and opened the call for editors. In the first few days, we already received over twenty applications (and keep receiving more), …
FAQ
Word of Quantum went viral on social media, with enthusiastic discussions popping up in different threads. We are delighted at all the interested that truly open publishing is generating in …