Imaginarity-free quantum multiparameter estimation
1Shinpouin, Mikataharacho, Kita-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 433-8105, Japan
2Quantum Computation Group, National Institute of Informatics, 2-1-2 Hitotsubashi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-8430
| Published: | 2022-03-10, volume 6, page 665 |
| Eprint: | arXiv:2010.15465v3 |
| Doi: | https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2022-03-10-665 |
| Citation: | Quantum 6, 665 (2022). |
Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.
Abstract
Multiparameter quantum estimation is made difficult by the following three obstacles. First, incompatibility among different physical quantities poses a limit on the attainable precision. Second, the ultimate precision is not saturated until you discover the optimal measurement. Third, the optimal measurement may generally depend on the target values of parameters, and thus may be impossible to perform for unknown target states.
We present a method to circumvent these three obstacles. A class of quantum statistical models, which utilizes antiunitary symmetries or, equivalently, real density matrices, offers compatible multiparameter estimations. The symmetries accompany the target-independent optimal measurements for pure-state models. Based on this finding, we propose methods to implement antiunitary symmetries for quantum metrology schemes. We further introduce a function which measures antiunitary asymmetry of quantum statistical models as a potential tool to characterize quantumness of phase transitions.

► BibTeX data
► References
[1] V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 010401 (2006).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.010401
[2] V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Nat. Photon. 5, 222 (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2011.35
[3] R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański, M. Jarzyna, and J. Kołodyński, Prog. Opt. 60, 345 (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.po.2015.02.003
[4] C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002
[5] L. Pezzè, A. Smerzi, M. K. Oberthaler, R. Schmied, and P. Treutlein, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 035005 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.035005
[6] D. Braun, G. Adesso, F. Benatti, R. Floreanini, U. Marzolino, M. W. Mitchell, and S. Pirandola, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 035006 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.035006
[7] S. Pirandola, B. R. Bardhan, T. Gehring, C. Weedbrook, and S. Lloyd, Nat. Photonics 12, 724 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-018-0301-6
[8] I. R. Berchera and I. P. Degiovanni, Metrologia 56, 024001 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/aaf7b2
[9] C. Helstrom, Phys. Lett. A 25, 101 (1967).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(67)90366-0
[10] C. Helstrom, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 14, 234 (1968).
https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1968.1054108
[11] A. S. Holevo, Probabilistic and statistical aspects of quantum theory, Vol. 1 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2011).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-7642-378-9
[12] M. Hayashi, Quantum Information Theory, Graduate Texts in Physics, Springer (Springer, 2017).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49725-8
[13] M. Szczykulska, T. Baumgratz, and A. Datta, Adv. Phys. X 1, 621 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1080/23746149.2016.1230476
[14] F. Albarelli, J. F. Friel, and A. Datta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 200503 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.200503
[15] T. Baumgratz and A. Datta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 030801 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.030801
[16] P. C. Humphreys, M. Barbieri, A. Datta, and I. A. Walmsley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 070403 (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.070403
[17] C. N. Gagatsos, D. Branford, and A. Datta, Phys. Rev. A 94, 042342 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.042342
[18] M. D. Vidrighin, G. Donati, M. G. Genoni, X.-M. Jin, W. S. Kolthammer, M. Kim, A. Datta, M. Barbieri, and I. A. Walmsley, Nat. Commun. 5, 1 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4532
[19] E. Roccia, V. Cimini, M. Sbroscia, I. Gianani, L. Ruggiero, L. Mancino, M. G. Genoni, M. A. Ricci, and M. Barbieri, Optica 5, 1171 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.5.001171
[20] M. Parniak, S. Borówka, K. Boroszko, W. Wasilewski, K. Banaszek, and R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 250503 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.250503
[21] E. Polino, M. Riva, M. Valeri, R. Silvestri, G. Corrielli, A. Crespi, N. Spagnolo, R. Osellame, and F. Sciarrino, Optica 6, 288 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.6.000288
[22] C. W. Helstrom, Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory (Academic Press, 1976).
[23] A. S. Holevo, Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory (North Holland, 1982).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-7642-378-9
[24] P. J. D. Crowley, A. Datta, M. Barbieri, and I. A. Walmsley, Phys. Rev. A 89, 023845 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.89.023845
[25] K. Matsumoto, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35, 3111 (2002).
https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/35/13/307
[26] C. Vaneph, T. Tufarelli, and M. G. Genoni, Quantum Meas. Quantum Metrol. 1, 12 (25 Jun. 2013).
https://doi.org/10.2478/qmetro-2013-0003
[27] J. Suzuki, J. Math. Phys. 57, 042201 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4945086
[28] S. Ragy, M. Jarzyna, and R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański, Phys. Rev. A 94, 052108 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.052108
[29] L. Pezzè, M. A. Ciampini, N. Spagnolo, P. C. Humphreys, A. Datta, I. A. Walmsley, M. Barbieri, F. Sciarrino, and A. Smerzi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 130504 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130504
[30] J. Yang, S. Pang, Y. Zhou, and A. N. Jordan, Phys. Rev. A 100, 032104 (2019a).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.032104
[31] C. Napoli, S. Piano, R. Leach, G. Adesso, and T. Tufarelli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 140505 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.140505
[32] S. Kukita, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 53, 095303 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ab6d3d
[33] F. Belliardo and V. Giovannetti, New J. Phys. 23, 063055 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ac04ca
[34] A. S. Holevo, in Proceedings of the Third Japan — USSR Symposium on Probability Theory, edited by G. Maruyama and J. V. Prokhorov (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1976) pp. 194–222.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0077491
[35] M. Guţă and J. Kahn, Phys. Rev. A 73, 052108 (2006).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.73.052108
[36] M. Hayashi and K. Matsumoto, J. Math. Phys. 49, 102101 (2008).
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2988130
[37] J. Kahn and M. Guţă, Comm. Math. Phys 289, 597 (2009).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-009-0787-3
[38] K. Yamagata, A. Fujiwara, and R. D. Gill, Ann. Stat. 41, 2197 (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1214/13-AOS1147
[39] Y. Yang, G. Chiribella, and M. Hayashi, Comm. Math. Phys. 368, 223 (2019b).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-019-03433-4
[40] M. Bradshaw, S. M. Assad, and P. K. Lam, Phys. Lett. A 381, 2598 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2017.06.024
[41] M. Bradshaw, P. K. Lam, and S. M. Assad, Phys. Rev. A 97, 012106 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.012106
[42] W. Górecki, S. Zhou, L. Jiang, and R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański, Quantum 4, 288 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-07-02-288
[43] A. Carollo, B. Spagnolo, A. A. Dubkov, and D. Valenti, J. Stat. Mech. 2019, 094010 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/ab3ccb
[44] K. Yamagata, J. Math. Phys. 62, 062203 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0047496
[45] J. S. Sidhu, Y. Ouyang, E. T. Campbell, and P. Kok, Phys. Rev. X 11, 011028 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.011028
[46] A. Z. Goldberg, L. L. Sánchez-Soto, and H. Ferretti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 110501 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.110501
[47] M. Tsang, R. Nair, and X.-M. Lu, Phys. Rev. X 6, 031033 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.6.031033
[48] J. Řeháček, Z. Hradil, D. Koutný, J. Grover, A. Krzic, and L. L. Sánchez-Soto, Phys. Rev. A 98, 012103 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.012103
[49] Y. L. Len, arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.07430 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2109.07430
arXiv:2109.07430
[50] J. de Almeida, M. Lewenstein, and M. Skotiniotis, arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.00986 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.00986
arXiv:2110.00986
[51] H. Lee, P. Kok, and J. P. Dowling, J. Mod. Opt. 49, 2325 (2002).
https://doi.org/10.1080/0950034021000011536
[52] V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Science 306, 1330 (2004).
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1104149
[53] N. Gisin and S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 432 (1999).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.432
[54] L. Chang, N. Li, S. Luo, and H. Song, Phys. Rev. A 89, 042110 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.89.042110
[55] A. Carollo, B. Spagnolo, and D. Valenti, Sci. Rep. 8, 1 (2018a).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27362-9
[56] A. Carollo, B. Spagnolo, and D. Valenti, Entropy 20, 485 (2018b).
https://doi.org/10.3390/e20070485
[57] L. Leonforte, D. Valenti, B. Spagnolo, A. A. Dubkov, and A. Carollo, J. Stat. Mech. 2019, 094001 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/ab33f8
[58] F. Bascone, L. Leonforte, D. Valenti, B. Spagnolo, and A. Carollo, J. Stat. Mech. 2019, 094002 (2019a).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/ab35e9
[59] F. Bascone, L. Leonforte, D. Valenti, B. Spagnolo, and A. Carollo, Phys. Rev. B 99, 205155 (2019b).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.205155
[60] A. Hickey and G. Gour, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51, 414009 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aabe9c
[61] K.-D. Wu, T. V. Kondra, S. Rana, C. M. Scandolo, G.-Y. Xiang, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, and A. Streltsov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 090401 (2021a).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.090401
[62] K.-D. Wu, T. V. Kondra, S. Rana, C. M. Scandolo, G.-Y. Xiang, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, and A. Streltsov, Phys. Rev. A 103, 032401 (2021b).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.032401
[63] S. Amari and H. Nagaoka, Methods of Information Geometry, Translations of Mathematical Monographs, Vol. 191 (American Mathematical Society, 2000).
https://doi.org/10.1090/mmono/191
[64] J. Yang, private communication (2021).
[65] A. Uhlmann, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 59, 630301 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-015-5777-1
[66] A. Fujiwara, Phys. Rev. A 65, 012316 (2001).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.012316
[67] J. Casanova, C. Sabín, J. León, I. L. Egusquiza, R. Gerritsma, C. F. Roos, J. J. García-Ripoll, and E. Solano, Phys. Rev. X 1, 021018 (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.1.021018
[68] R. Di Candia, B. Mejia, H. Castillo, J. S. Pedernales, J. Casanova, and E. Solano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 240502 (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.240502
[69] X. Zhang, Y. Shen, J. Zhang, J. Casanova, L. Lamata, E. Solano, M.-H. Yung, J.-N. Zhang, and K. Kim, Nat. Commun. 6, 1 (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8917
[70] M.-C. Chen, D. Wu, Z.-E. Su, X.-D. Cai, X.-L. Wang, T. Yang, L. Li, N.-L. Liu, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 070502 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.070502
[71] J. C. Loredo, M. P. Almeida, R. Di Candia, J. S. Pedernales, J. Casanova, E. Solano, and A. G. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 070503 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.070503
[72] X.-H. Cheng, I. n. Arrazola, J. S. Pedernales, L. Lamata, X. Chen, and E. Solano, Phys. Rev. A 95, 022305 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.022305
[73] K. Matsumoto, A Geometrical Approach to Quantum Estimation Theory, Ph.D. thesis, The University of Tokyo (1997), preprint avairable at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.09667.
https://doi.org/10.11501/3163169
[74] K. Matsumoto, ``A geometrical approach to quantum estimation theory,'' in Asymptotic Theory of Quantum Statistical Inference, edited by M. Hayashi (WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2005) Chap. 20, pp. 305–350.
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812563071_0021
[75] E. C. G. Stueckelberg, Helv. Phys. Acta 33, 458 (1960).
[76] P. J. Lahti and M. J. Maczynski, J. Math. Phys. 28, 1764 (1987).
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.527822
[77] X.-M. Lu and X. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 120503 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.120503
[78] A. Uhlmann, Rep. Math. Phys. 24, 229 (1986).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4877(86)90055-8
[79] S. Massar, Phys. Rev. A 62, 040101(R) (2000).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.62.040101
[80] E. Polino, M. Valeri, N. Spagnolo, and F. Sciarrino, AVS Quantum Sci. 2, 024703 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1116/5.0007577
[81] C. H. Bennett and S. J. Wiesner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2881 (1992).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2881
[82] J. A. Gross and C. M. Caves, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 54, 014001 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/abb9ed
[83] S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3439 (1994).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3439
[84] S. L. Braunstein, C. M. Caves, and G. Milburn, Ann. Phys. 247, 135 (1996).
https://doi.org/10.1006/aphy.1996.0040
[85] N. J. Cerf and S. Iblisdir, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 247903 (2001).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.247903
[86] S. L. Braunstein, S. Ghosh, and S. Severini, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40, 1809 (2007).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/40/8/009
[87] G. Kato, Phys. Rev. A 79, 032315 (2009).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.79.032315
[88] J. Miyazaki, arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.06685 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.06685
arXiv:2005.06685
[89] J.-F. Tang, Z. Hou, J. Shang, H. Zhu, G.-Y. Xiang, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 060502 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.060502
[90] E. Bagan, M. Baig, A. Brey, R. Muñoz Tapia, and R. Tarrach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5230 (2000).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5230
[91] R. Jozsa and J. Schlienz, Phys. Rev. A 62, 012301 (2000).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.62.012301
[92] T. Baumgratz, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140401 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.140401
[93] E. Chitambar and G. Gour, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 030401 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.030401
[94] A. Winter and D. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 120404 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.120404
[95] S. Designolle, R. Uola, K. Luoma, and N. Brunner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 220404 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.220404
[96] A. Chrostowski, R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański, M. Jarzyna, and K. Banaszek, Int. J. Quantum Inf. 15, 1740005 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219749917400056
[97] J. Řeháček, Z. Hradil, B. Stoklasa, M. Paúr, J. Grover, A. Krzic, and L. L. Sánchez-Soto, Phys. Rev. A 96, 062107 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.062107
[98] Z. Yu and S. Prasad, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 180504 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.180504
[99] J. Suzuki, Entropy 21, 703 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.3390/e21070703
Cited by
[1] Mankei Tsang, "Approaching the Ultimate Limit of Quantum Multiparameter Estimation by Many-Body Physics", Physical Review Letters 137 7, 070804 (2026).
[2] Ben Wang, Kaimin Zheng, Qian Xie, Aonan Zhang, Liang Xu, and Lijian Zhang, "Achieving the Multiparameter Quantum Cramér-Rao Bound with Antiunitary Symmetry", Physical Review Letters 133 21, 210801 (2024).
[3] Jian-Hao Wu, Kai-Yu Yuan, Yun-Xiang Tian, Hao-Ran Tan, Yan-Xin Rong, Zhen Shang, Yong-Jian Gu, and Ya Xiao, "Experimental certification of the nonlocal advantages of quantum imaginarity", Physical Review A 114 3, 032439 (2026).
[4] Peihua Tian and Yuan Sun, "Generalized quantum Jensen-Shannon divergence of imaginarity", Physics Letters A 544, 130479 (2025).
[5] Seiseki Akibue, Go Kato, and Seiichiro Tani, "Probabilistic state synthesis based on optimal convex approximation", npj Quantum Information 10 1, 3 (2024).
[6] Ting Zhang, Jinchuan Hou, and Xiaofei Qi, "An Easily Computable Measure of Gaussian Quantum Imaginarity", Annalen der Physik 537 9, e2500171 (2025).
[7] Yu Guo, Jiabo Pan, Yuqin Wang, and Shuanping Du, "Measure of set imaginarity", Physical Review A 114 2, 022453 (2026).
[8] Peng-Fei Wang, Xu-Zheng Lu, Zhi-Hua Guo, and Cheng-Yang Zhang, "Quantum imaginarity measure sensitivity to deimaginarizing maps", Laser Physics Letters 23 5, 055201 (2026).
[9] Linshuai Zhang and Nan Li, "Quantifying imaginarity-generating power of quantum channels via averaging", Annals of Physics 490, 170485 (2026).
[10] Nalan Kandirmaz, "Channel Structure of Joint Two-Parameter Estimation in the Generalized MIC–Kepler System", Physics Letters A 132344 (2026).
[11] Linshuai Zhang and Nan Li, "Can imaginarity be broadcast via real operations?", Communications in Theoretical Physics 76 11, 115104 (2024).
[12] Jin-Min Liang, Satoya Imai, Shuheng Liu, Shao-Ming Fei, Otfried Gühne, and Qiongyi He, "Real randomized measurements for analyzing properties of quantum states", Physical Review A 112 2, 022434 (2025).
[13] Linshuai Zhang and Nan Li, "On imaginarity witnesses", Physics Letters A 530, 130135 (2025).
[14] Peihua Tian and Yuan Sun, "Dynamical imaginarity measures induced by channel divergences", Physical Review A 114 2, 022462 (2026).
[15] Mao Xiao, Duanfeng Liu, and Fei Shi, "Imaginarity of quantum superpositions", Physical Review A 114 3, 032435 (2026).
[16] Naim E. Comar, Danilo Cius, Luis F. Santos, Rafael Wagner, and Bárbara Amaral, "Contextuality in Anomalous Heat Flow", PRX Quantum 6 3, 030359 (2025).
[17] Mao-Sheng Li, Rafael Wagner, and Lin Zhang, "Multistate imaginarity and coherence in qubit systems", Physical Review A 113 1, 012428 (2026).
[18] Bo Zhou, Min Chen, Hongjian Wen, and Huaixin Cao, "Geometric robustness and infidelity of imaginarity", Laser Physics Letters 22 11, 115205 (2025).
[19] Shuangshuang Fu, Tianhui Dong, and Xiaohui Li, "Quantifying the imaginarity of quantum channels", Quantum Information Processing 25 5, 140 (2026).
[20] Andrew E. Deneris, Paolo Braccia, Pablo Bermejo, N. L. Diaz, Antonio A. Mele, and M. Cerezo, "Analyzing the Free States of one Quantum Resource Theory as Resource States of Another", Advanced Quantum Technologies 9 2, e00702 (2026).
[21] Jianwei Xu, "Numerical ranges of Bargmann invariants", Physics Letters A 565, 131091 (2026).
[22] Sudip Chakrabarty, Saheli Mukherjee, Ananda G. Maity, and Bivas Mallick, "Detection of quantum imaginarity using moments and its interferometric realization", APS Open Science 1, 000151 (2026).
[23] Meng-Li Guo, Bo Li, and Shao-Ming Fei, "Geometric-like imaginarity: Quantification and state conversion", Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 68 2, 220311 (2025).
[24] Shuanping Du and Zhaofang Bai, "Quantifying imaginarity in terms of pure-state imaginarity", Physical Review A 111 2, 022405 (2025).
[25] Yink Loong Len, "Multiparameter estimation for qubit states with collective measurements: a case study", New Journal of Physics 24 3, 033037 (2022).
[26] Francisco Delgado, "Symmetries of Quantum Fisher Information as Parameter Estimator for Pauli Channels under Indefinite Causal Order", Symmetry 14 9, 1813 (2022).
[27] Si-Min Wang, Ming-Liang Hu, and Heng Fan, "Off-resonant preservation and generation of imaginarity in distributed scenarios", Physical Review A 113 5, 052457 (2026).
[28] Robbie King, Kianna Wan, and Jarrod R. McClean, "Exponential Learning Advantages with Conjugate States and Minimal Quantum Memory", PRX Quantum 5 4, 040301 (2024).
[29] Dong-Ping Xuan, Zhong-Xi Shen, Wen Zhou, Shao-Ming Fei, and Zhi-Xi Wang, "Quantum-imaginarity-based quantum speed limit", Physical Review A 112 5, 052202 (2025).
[30] Zhi-Wei Wei and Shao-Ming Fei, "Nonlocal advantages of quantum imaginarity", Physical Review A 110 5, 052202 (2024).
[31] Linshuai Zhang and Nan Li, "Quantifying imaginarity via the quantum optimal transport cost", The European Physical Journal Plus 140 7, 669 (2025).
[32] Jisho Miyazaki and Seiseki Akibue, "Non-locality of conjugation symmetry: characterization and examples in quantum network sensing", New Journal of Physics 26 5, 053017 (2024).
[33] Yuhang Xie, Yanjun Chu, and Chenyang Cui, "Erasing imaginarity: Selective imaginarity-breaking channels and non-selective imaginarity-breaking channels", Physics Letters A 582, 131573 (2026).
[34] Minghao Mi, Ben Wang, and Lijian Zhang, "Approaching the Multiparameter Quantum Cramér-Rao Bound via Classical Correlation and Entangling Measurements", Physical Review Letters 135 11, 110804 (2025).
[35] Jianwei Xu, "Bargmann invariants of Gaussian states", Journal of Mathematical Physics 67 5, 052101 (2026).
[36] Zhi-Xiang Jin, Meng-Xin Lai, Bing Yu, and Shao-Ming Fei, "Operational conversion of quantum imaginarity to quantum discord", Annals of Physics 489, 170428 (2026).
[37] Zhihua Guo, Yadi Qiao, Huaixin Cao, and Tsung-Lin Lee, "Imaginarity-assisted minimum error discrimination", Physical Review A 114 4, 042418 (2026).
[38] Yinzhu Wang, Sichen Shang, Runkang Liu, Lihua Hao, Chen Cheng, and Suping Wang, "Quantifying the imaginarity of quantum channels based on the Bures angle", The European Physical Journal Plus 141 3, 216 (2026).
[39] Meng-Li Guo, Nannan Guan, Bo Li, Bin Hu, and Shao-Ming Fei, "Imaginarity as a resource within quantum coherence: Geometric decomposition and operational conversion", Physical Review A 114 1, 012435 (2026).
[40] Nan‐Nan Guan, Meng‐Li Guo, Xue‐Na Zhu, Zhi‐Xiang Jin, and Yan‐Hui Zhou, "A Convex‐Roof Affinity‐Square Measure of Quantum Imaginarity", Advanced Quantum Technologies 9 10, e70513 (2026).
[41] Linshuai Zhang and Nan Li, "Maximum and minimum relative entropies of imaginarity", Quantum Information Processing 24 11, 361 (2025).
[42] Carlos Fernandes, Rafael Wagner, Leonardo Novo, and Ernesto F. Galvão, "Unitary-Invariant Witnesses of Quantum Imaginarity", Physical Review Letters 133 19, 190201 (2024).
[43] Lingyun Ren, Zhihua Guo, Wenhua Wang, and Huaixin Cao, "Characterizing maximally imaginary states", Physics Letters A 553, 130677 (2025).
[44] Lennart Bittel, Francesco Anna Mele, Jens Eisert, and Antonio Anna Mele, "Energy-independent tomography of Gaussian states", arXiv:2508.14979, (2025).
[45] Lijun Peng and Xiao-Ming Lu, "Generalization of Rayleigh's criterion on parameter estimation with incoherent sources", Physical Review A 103 4, 042601 (2021).
[46] Hamza Harraf, Mohamed Amazioug, Amjad Sohail, Mojtaba Mazaheri, and Rachid Ahl Laamara, "Squeezed light and coherent feedback enhanced multiparameter quantum estimation in a double-cavity optomechanics: steady and dynamical states", arXiv:2609.05402, (2026).
[47] Rafael Wagner, "Coherence and contextuality as quantum resources", arXiv:2511.16785, (2025).
[48] E. A. Ramirez Trino and M. A. Rajabpour, "The Pauli Probability Spectrum Carries the Pure-State Quantum Fisher Metric", arXiv:2608.21437, (2026).
[49] Syed Muhammad Ali Hassan, Kostas Blekos, Stefan Kühn, Nikos Kollas, and Karl Jansen, "Imaginarity as a necessary resource for trainability in QAOA", arXiv:2608.05093, (2026).
[50] Zhiqi Liang, Yufan Lin, Yu Guo, and Yuqi Sun, "Imaginarity witness", arXiv:2606.04763, (2026).
[51] Hamza Harraf, Mohamed Amazioug, and Rachid Ahl Laamara, "Controlling multiparameter quantum estimation in exciton-optomechanics system", arXiv:2606.08949, (2026).
[52] G. R. Jin, Z. Y. Zhou, and W. Yang, "Symmetry-Projected Weakly Compatible Multiparameter Quantum Sensing", arXiv:2608.01831, (2026).
[53] Yaohua Li, Fan Yang, and Klaus Mølmer, "Achieving the Quantum Limits with Twin-Field Sensors", arXiv:2609.07517, (2026).
[54] Deep Datta, Sayam Chakraborty, John Drew Wilson, Vaibhav Madhok, and Athreya Shankar, "Quantum-enhanced single and multiparameter metrology in qutrit ensembles by generalized twisting dynamics", arXiv:2608.26630, (2026).
[55] Tariq Aziz, Naeem Akhtar, Dong Wang, and Augusto Smerzi, "Maximal Fisher Budget Forces Blind Directions in Bipartite Collective SU(d) Metrology", arXiv:2607.22195, (2026).
[56] Jiabo Panel, Yu Guo, and Yuqin Wang, "Measure of set coherence", arXiv:2610.34784, (2026).
[57] Yuhang Xie, Yanjun Chu, Yushan Ding, and Shao-Ming Fei, "Imaginarity witnessing enhancement via spectral norms of witnesses", arXiv:2609.00534, (2026).
[58] Hao-Fan Wang and Lin Chen, "Coherence and imaginarity of qubit states under vanishing Bargmann invariants", arXiv:2610.30618, (2026).
The above citations are from Crossref's cited-by service (last updated successfully 2026-11-06 10:52:03) and SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2026-11-05 21:15:03). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.
Could not fetch ADS cited-by data during last attempt 2026-11-06 10:52:03: Cannot retrieve data from ADS due to rate limitations.
This Paper is published in Quantum under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. Copyright remains with the original copyright holders such as the authors or their institutions.