Reliable Entropy Estimation from Observed Statistics for Device-Independent Quantum Cryptography
1Institute for Quantum Information, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
2Institut für Theoretische Physik, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany
| Published: | 2026-10-20, volume 10, page 2238 |
| Editor: | Máté Farkas |
| Eprint: | arXiv:2411.04858v4 |
| Doi: | https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2026-10-20-2238 |
| Citation: | Quantum 10, 2238 (2026). |
Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.
Abstract
We introduce a numerical framework for reliably estimating conditional von Neumann entropies, a central quantity in device-independent quantum cryptography and randomness generation. Our method is based on semidefinite relaxations derived from the Navascués--Pironio--Acín hierarchy and provides entropy bounds directly from observed statistics, assuming only the validity of quantum mechanics. The approach builds on a recent integral representation of entropy and substantially improves efficiency: it requires about half as many support variables as existing methods, while allowing these variables to be chosen projectively, leading to a significant reduction in runtime. These advances enable the practical certification of randomness and security even in noisy conditions, while integrating seamlessly with modern entropy accumulation theorems. Consequently, our framework becomes a versatile tool for quantum cryptographic protocols, broadening the possibilities for secure communication in untrusted environments.
► BibTeX data
► References
[1] Born, M. Quantenmechanik der stoßvorgänge. Zeitschrift für physik 38, 803–827 (1926).
[2] Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A. & Holt, R. A. Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Physical Review Letters 23, 880–884 (1969). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880
[3] Rauch, D. et al. Cosmic bell test using random measurement settings from high-redshift quasars. Physical Review Letters 121 (2018). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.080403.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.080403
[4] Aspect, A., Dalibard, J. & Roger, G. Experimental test of bell’s inequalities using time- varying analyzers. Physical Review Letters 49, 1804–1807 (1982). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1804.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1804
[5] Schmied, R. et al. Bell correlations in a bose-einstein condensate. Science 352, 441–444 (2016). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aad8665.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad8665
[6] Giustina, M. et al. Bell violation using entangled photons without the fair-sampling assumption. Nature 497, 227–230 (2013). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12012.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12012
[7] Zhang, W. et al. A device-independent quantum key distribution system for distant users. Nature 607, 687–691 (2022). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04891-y.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04891-y
[8] Hensen, B. et al. Loophole-free bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres. Nature 526, 682–686 (2015). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature15759.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15759
[9] Renner, R. Security of quantum key distribution. International Journal of Quantum Information 06, 1–127 (2008). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219749908003256.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219749908003256
[10] Acín, A., Gisin, N. & Masanes, L. From bell’s theorem to secure quantum key distribution. Physical Review Letters 97 (2006). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.97.120405.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.97.120405
[11] Acín, A. et al. Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks. Physical Review Letters 98 (2007). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.98.230501.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.98.230501
[12] Arnon-Friedman, R., Renner, R. & Vidick, T. Simple and tight device-independent security proofs. SIAM Journal on Computing 48, 181–225 (2019). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/18m1174726.
https://doi.org/10.1137/18m1174726
[13] Dupuis, F., Fawzi, O. & Renner, R. Entropy accumulation. Communications in Mathematical Physics 379, 867–913 (2020). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-020-03839-5.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-020-03839-5
[14] Metger, T., Fawzi, O., Sutter, D. & Renner, R. Generalised entropy accumulation. In 2022 IEEE 63rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 844–850 (IEEE, 2022). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/FOCS54457.2022.00085.
https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS54457.2022.00085
[15] Liu, W.-Z. et al. Device-independent randomness expansion against quantum side information. Nature Physics 17, 448–451 (2021). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-01147-2.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-01147-2
[16] Liu, W.-Z. et al. Toward a photonic demonstration of device-independent quantum key distribution. Physical Review Letters 129 (2022). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.050502.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.050502
[17] Liu, Y. et al. Experimental twin-field quantum key distribution over 1000 km fiber distance. Physical Review Letters 130 (2023). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.210801.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.210801
[18] Frenkel, P. E. Integral formula for quantum relative entropy implies data processing inequality. Quantum 7, 1102 (2023). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-09-07-1102.
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-09-07-1102
[19] Navascués, M., Pironio, S. & Acín, A. A convergent hierarchy of semidefinite programs characterizing the set of quantum correlations. New Journal of Physics 10, 073013 (2008). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/10/7/073013.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/10/7/073013
[20] Ligthart, L. T., Gachechiladze, M. & Gross, D. A convergent inflation hierarchy for quantum causal structures. Communications in Mathematical Physics 401, 2673–2714 (2023). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-023-04697-7.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-023-04697-7
[21] Tan, E. Y.-Z., Schwonnek, R., Goh, K. T., Primaatmaja, I. W. & Lim, C. C.-W. Computing secure key rates for quantum cryptography with untrusted devices. npj Quantum Information 7 (2021). URL https://doi.org/10.1038.
[22] Brown, P., Fawzi, H. & Fawzi, O. Device-independent lower bounds on the conditional von neumann entropy. Quantum 8, 1445 (2024). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.22331/q-2024-08-27-1445.
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2024-08-27-1445
[23] Pironio, S. et al. Random numbers certified by bell’s theorem. Nature 464, 1021–1024 (2010). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09008.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09008
[24] Rivera-Dean, J., Steffinlongo, A., Parker-Sánchez, N., Acín, A. & Oudot, E. Device-independent quantum key distribution beyond qubits (2024). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00161.
arXiv:2402.00161
[25] Jenčová, A. Recoverability of quantum channels via hypothesis testing. Letters in Mathematical Physics 114 (2024). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11005-024-01775-2.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11005-024-01775-2
[26] Schwonnek, R. et al. Device-independent quantum key distribution with random key basis. Nature Communications 12 (2021). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23147-3.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23147-3
[27] Brunner, N., Cavalcanti, D., Pironio, S., Scarani, V. & Wehner, S. Bell nonlocality. Reviews of Modern Physics 86, 419–478 (2014). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.86.419.
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.86.419
[28] Koßmann, G. & Schwonnek, R. Optimising the relative entropy under semidefinite constraints (2026). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41534-026-01184-4.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-026-01184-4
[29] Tomamichel, M. A framework for non-asymptotic quantum information theory (2013). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1203.2142. 1203.2142.
arXiv:1203.2142
[30] Koßmann, G., Schwonnek, R. & Steinberg, J. Hierarchies for semidefinite optimization in $\mathcal{C}^\star$-algebras (2023). https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.13966.
arXiv:2309.13966
[31] Wittek, P. Algorithm 950: Ncpol2sdpa—sparse semidefinite programming relaxations for polynomial optimization problems of noncommuting variables. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 41, 1–12 (2015). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2699464.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2699464
[32] Bhavsar, R., Ragy, S. & Colbeck, R. Improved device-independent randomness expansion rates using two sided randomness. New Journal of Physics 25, 093035 (2023). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/acf393.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/acf393
[33] Devetak, I. & Winter, A. Distillation of secret key and entanglement from quantum states. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 461, 207–235 (2005). URL https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2004.1372.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2004.1372
[34] Acín, A. et al. Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks. Physical Review Letters 98 (2007). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.230501.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.230501
[35] Brown, P. J., Ragy, S. & Colbeck, R. A framework for quantum-secure device-independent randomness expansion. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 66, 2964–2987 (2020). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2019.2960252.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2019.2960252
[36] Collins, D., Gisin, N., Linden, N., Massar, S. & Popescu, S. Bell inequalities for arbitrarily high-dimensional systems. Physical Review Letters 88 (2002). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.040404.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.040404
[37] Collins, D. & Gisin, N. A relevant two qubit bell inequality inequivalent to the chsh inequality. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 37, 1775–1787 (2004). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/37/5/021.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/37/5/021
[38] Bruß, D. Optimal eavesdropping in quantum cryptography with six states. Physical Review Letters 81, 3018–3021 (1998). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3018.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3018
[39] Pál, K. F. & Vértesi, T. Maximal violation of a bipartite three-setting, two-outcome bell inequality using infinite-dimensional quantum systems. Physical Review A 82 (2010). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.82.022116.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.82.022116
[40] Lin, P.-S., Rosset, D., Zhang, Y., Bancal, J.-D. & Liang, Y.-C. Device-independent point estimation from finite data and its application to device-independent property estimation. Physical Review A 97, 032309 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.032309
[41] Kosaki, H. Relative entropy of states: A variational expression. Journal of Operator Theory 16, 335–348 (1986). URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/24714805.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/24714805
[42] Cervero-Martín, E. & Tomamichel, M. Device independent security of quantum key distribution from monogamy-of-entanglement games. Quantum 9, 1652 (2025). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.22331/q-2025-03-05-1652.
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2025-03-05-1652
[43] Hahn, T. A., Tan, E. Y. Z. & Brown, P. Bounds on petz-rényi divergences and their applications for device-independent cryptography (2024). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.12313.
arXiv:2408.12313
[44] Anthropic. Claude (claude opus 4.8). https://claude.ai (2026). Zugriff am 11. Juni 2026.
https://claude.ai
[45] OpenAI. ChatGPT. https://chat.openai.com (2024). Large language model. Accessed: 2026-06-25.
https://chat.openai.com
Cited by
[1] Gereon Koßmann and René Schwonnek, "Optimising the relative entropy under semidefinite constraints", npj Quantum Information 12 1, 23 (2026).
[2] Patrick Andriolo, Esteban Vasquez, Elizabeth Agudelo, Max Riegler, Matej Pivoluska, and Gláucia Murta, "Quantum Key Distribution with Imperfections: Recent Advances in Security Proofs", Brazilian Journal of Physics 56 4, 157 (2026).
[3] Gereon Koßmann, Mario Berta, and René Schwonnek, "Routed Bell tests with arbitrarily many local parties", arXiv:2510.08405, (2025).
[4] Corentin Lanore, Xavier Valcarce, Jean Etesse, Anthony Martin, and Jean-Daniel Bancal, "Towards Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution with Photonic Devices", arXiv:2601.14373, (2026).
[5] Robert Okula and Piotr Mironowicz, "Device-independent Shannon entropy certification", New Journal of Physics 27 11, 114519 (2025).
[6] Andreas Bluhm, Gereon Koßmann, and René Schwonnek, "Device independent quantum key distribution with robust self-tests", arXiv:2603.28085, (2026).
[7] Lewis Wooltorton, Peter Brown, and Omar Fawzi, "Chain rules for conditional entropies in quantum cryptography: limitations and improvements", arXiv:2605.29787, (2026).
[8] Rutvij Bhavsar, Junguk Moon, and Joonwoo Bae, "Entropy Bounds via Hypothesis Testing and Its Applications to Two-Way Key Distillation in Quantum Cryptography", arXiv:2602.05870, (2026).
[9] Gereon Koßmann, René Schwonnek, Po-Chieh Liu, and Hao-Chung Cheng, "Device-independent Quantum Key Distribution in the commuting operator framework", arXiv:2607.03579, (2026).
The above citations are from SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2026-10-20 12:59:18). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.
Could not fetch Crossref cited-by data during last attempt 2026-10-20 12:59:15: Could not fetch cited-by data for 10.22331/q-2026-10-20-2238 from Crossref. This is normal if the DOI was registered recently.
This Paper is published in Quantum under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. Copyright remains with the original copyright holders such as the authors or their institutions.