SuperGrad: a differentiable simulator for superconducting processors
1Zhejiang Institute of Modern Physics and Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Micro-nano Quantum Chips and Quantum Control, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
2Zhongguancun Laboratory, Beijing, China
3Quantum Science Center of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao, Shenzhen 518045, China
| Published: | 2025-04-24, volume 9, page 1722 |
| Editor: | Dan Browne |
| Eprint: | arXiv:2406.18155v3 |
| Doi: | https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2025-04-24-1722 |
| Citation: | Quantum 9, 1722 (2025). |
Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.
Abstract
One significant advantage of superconducting processors is their extensive design flexibility, which encompasses various types of qubits and interactions. Given the large number of tunable parameters of a processor, the ability to perform gradient optimization would be highly beneficial. Efficient backpropagation for gradient computation requires a tightly integrated software library, for which no open-source implementation is currently available. In this work, we introduce SuperGrad, a simulator that accelerates the design of superconducting quantum processors by incorporating gradient computation capabilities. SuperGrad offers a user-friendly interface for constructing Hamiltonians and computing both static and dynamic properties of composite systems. This differentiable simulation is valuable for a range of applications, including optimal control, design optimization, and experimental data fitting. In this paper, we demonstrate these applications through examples and code snippets.

Featured image: Sketch of a chain-like fluxonium quantum processor with fluxonium qubits biased at the sweetspot, and multipath coupling is used between neighboring qubit pairs. (a) The fluxonium 3-qubit chain arranged in a frequency pattern is highlighted in the red rectangle. Microwave pulses manipulate the gray qubit via its flux drive. (b) 10-qubit chain-like quantum processor with simultaneous gate control. The fluxonium qubits are periodically arranged in a 3-qubit chain pattern, while their parameters have additional small deviations.
The code is available here.
Popular summary
Intuitively, the gradients contain information about how each parameter should be changed to improve the processors, and this is the idea behind various optimizers based on gradient descent. In general, the multiplicative speedup achieved by using backpropagation to compute the gradients is proportional to the number of parameters. Therefore, for a time-consuming simulation with dozens of parameters, backpropagation can offer a decent multiplicative speedup and potentially a very large absolute speedup.
After the gradients are computed, they can help us perform joint optimization of these parameters, which is beneficial because these parameters can be heavily intertwined in the Hamiltonian. The efficient gradient computation is a result of considering the simulation from constructing superconducting qubits to dynamics as a whole. Our library can be viewed as a combination of previous libraries, such as SCQubits and Qiskit Dynamics. However, since they each focus on a specific part of the simulation, they cannot perform backpropagation of gradients between them.
As a versatile library, SuperGrad is specifically designed for the simulation and optimization of quantum processors. SuperGrad seamlessly integrates the quantum processor device and control optimization within a gradient-based framework. In this work, we show that the Trotterization solver serves as an efficient differentiable time evolution engine. With the help of SuperGrad's components, users can easily simulate their quantum processors, even with novel gate schemes. We want to emphasize that SuperGrad supports a wide range of gate schemes and is not limited to the specific showcases presented in this article. Our SuperGrad library is open source on GitHub, it is continually evolving to meet the escalating demands for simulating larger quantum processors.
► BibTeX data
► References
[1] F. Bao, H. Deng, D. Ding, R. Gao, X. Gao, C. Huang, X. Jiang, H.-S. Ku, Z. Li, X. Ma, X. Ni, J. Qin, Z. Song, H. Sun, C. Tang, T. Wang, F. Wu, T. Xia, W. Yu, F. Zhang, G. Zhang, X. Zhang, J. Zhou, X. Zhu, Y. Shi, J. Chen, H.-H. Zhao, and C. Deng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 010502 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.010502
[2] L. Ding, M. Hays, Y. Sung, B. Kannan, J. An, A. Di Paolo, A. H. Karamlou, T. M. Hazard, K. Azar, D. K. Kim, B. M. Niedzielski, A. Melville, M. E. Schwartz, J. L. Yoder, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, J. A. Grover, K. Serniak, and W. D. Oliver, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031035 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.031035
[3] Y. Sung, L. Ding, J. Braumüller, A. Vepsäläinen, B. Kannan, M. Kjaergaard, A. Greene, G. O. Samach, C. McNally, D. Kim, A. Melville, B. M. Niedzielski, M. E. Schwartz, J. L. Yoder, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021058 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021058
[4] J. Stehlik, D. M. Zajac, D. L. Underwood, T. Phung, J. Blair, S. Carnevale, D. Klaus, G. A. Keefe, A. Carniol, M. Kumph, M. Steffen, and O. E. Dial, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 080505 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.080505
[5] H. Zhang, C. Ding, D. Weiss, Z. Huang, Y. Ma, C. Guinn, S. Sussman, S. P. Chitta, D. Chen, A. A. Houck, J. Koch, and D. I. Schuster, PRX Quantum 5, 020326 (2024).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.020326
[6] R. Acharya, I. Aleiner, R. Allen, T. I. Andersen, M. Ansmann, F. Arute, K. Arya, A. Asfaw, J. Atalaya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, J. Basso, A. Bengtsson, S. Boixo, G. Bortoli, A. Bourassa, J. Bovaird, L. Brill, M. Broughton, B. B. Buckley, D. A. Buell, T. Burger, B. Burkett, N. Bushnell, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, J. Cogan, R. Collins, P. Conner, W. Courtney, A. L. Crook, B. Curtin, D. M. Debroy, A. Del Toro Barba, S. Demura, A. Dunsworth, D. Eppens, C. Erickson, L. Faoro, E. Farhi, R. Fatemi, L. Flores Burgos, E. Forati, A. G. Fowler, B. Foxen, W. Giang, C. Gidney, D. Gilboa, M. Giustina, A. Grajales Dau, J. A. Gross, S. Habegger, M. C. Hamilton, M. P. Harrigan, S. D. Harrington, O. Higgott, J. Hilton, M. Hoffmann, S. Hong, T. Huang, A. Huff, W. J. Huggins, L. B. Ioffe, S. V. Isakov, J. Iveland, E. Jeffrey, Z. Jiang, C. Jones, P. Juhas, D. Kafri, K. Kechedzhi, J. Kelly, T. Khattar, M. Khezri, M. Kieferová, S. Kim, A. Kitaev, P. V. Klimov, A. R. Klots, A. N. Korotkov, F. Kostritsa, J. M. Kreikebaum, D. Landhuis, P. Laptev, K.-M. Lau, L. Laws, J. Lee, K. Lee, B. J. Lester, A. Lill, W. Liu, A. Locharla, E. Lucero, F. D. Malone, J. Marshall, O. Martin, J. R. McClean, T. McCourt, M. McEwen, A. Megrant, B. Meurer Costa, X. Mi, K. C. Miao, M. Mohseni, S. Montazeri, A. Morvan, E. Mount, W. Mruczkiewicz, O. Naaman, M. Neeley, C. Neill, A. Nersisyan, H. Neven, M. Newman, J. H. Ng, A. Nguyen, M. Nguyen, M. Y. Niu, T. E. O'Brien, A. Opremcak, J. Platt, A. Petukhov, R. Potter, L. P. Pryadko, C. Quintana, P. Roushan, N. C. Rubin, N. Saei, D. Sank, K. Sankaragomathi, K. J. Satzinger, H. F. Schurkus, C. Schuster, M. J. Shearn, A. Shorter, V. Shvarts, J. Skruzny, V. Smelyanskiy, W. C. Smith, G. Sterling, D. Strain, M. Szalay, A. Torres, G. Vidal, B. Villalonga, C. Vollgraff Heidweiller, T. White, C. Xing, Z. J. Yao, P. Yeh, J. Yoo, G. Young, A. Zalcman, Y. Zhang, N. Zhu, and Google Quantum AI, Nature 614, 676 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05434-1
[7] Y. Zhao, Y. Ye, H.-L. Huang, Y. Zhang, D. Wu, H. Guan, Q. Zhu, Z. Wei, T. He, S. Cao, F. Chen, T.-H. Chung, H. Deng, D. Fan, M. Gong, C. Guo, S. Guo, L. Han, N. Li, S. Li, Y. Li, F. Liang, J. Lin, H. Qian, H. Rong, H. Su, L. Sun, S. Wang, Y. Wu, Y. Xu, C. Ying, J. Yu, C. Zha, K. Zhang, Y.-H. Huo, C.-Y. Lu, C.-Z. Peng, X. Zhu, and J.-W. Pan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 030501 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.030501
[8] S. Krinner, N. Lacroix, A. Remm, A. Di Paolo, E. Genois, C. Leroux, C. Hellings, S. Lazar, F. Swiadek, J. Herrmann, G. J. Norris, C. K. Andersen, M. Müller, A. Blais, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, Nature 605, 669 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04566-8
[9] I. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Reviews of Modern Physics 86, 153 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.86.153
[10] Q. Zhu, Z.-H. Sun, M. Gong, F. Chen, Y.-R. Zhang, Y. Wu, Y. Ye, C. Zha, S. Li, S. Guo, H. Qian, H.-L. Huang, J. Yu, H. Deng, H. Rong, J. Lin, Y. Xu, L. Sun, C. Guo, N. Li, F. Liang, C.-Z. Peng, H. Fan, X. Zhu, and J.-W. Pan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 160502 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.160502
[11] Google Quantum AI and Collaborators, T. I. Andersen, Y. D. Lensky, K. Kechedzhi, I. K. Drozdov, A. Bengtsson, S. Hong, A. Morvan, X. Mi, A. Opremcak, R. Acharya, R. Allen, M. Ansmann, F. Arute, K. Arya, A. Asfaw, J. Atalaya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, G. Bortoli, A. Bourassa, J. Bovaird, L. Brill, M. Broughton, B. B. Buckley, D. A. Buell, T. Burger, B. Burkett, N. Bushnell, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, D. Chik, C. Chou, J. Cogan, R. Collins, P. Conner, W. Courtney, A. L. Crook, B. Curtin, D. M. Debroy, A. Del Toro Barba, S. Demura, A. Dunsworth, D. Eppens, C. Erickson, L. Faoro, E. Farhi, R. Fatemi, V. S. Ferreira, L. F. Burgos, E. Forati, A. G. Fowler, B. Foxen, W. Giang, C. Gidney, D. Gilboa, M. Giustina, R. Gosula, A. G. Dau, J. A. Gross, S. Habegger, M. C. Hamilton, M. Hansen, M. P. Harrigan, S. D. Harrington, P. Heu, J. Hilton, M. R. Hoffmann, T. Huang, A. Huff, W. J. Huggins, L. B. Ioffe, S. V. Isakov, J. Iveland, E. Jeffrey, Z. Jiang, C. Jones, P. Juhas, D. Kafri, T. Khattar, M. Khezri, M. Kieferová, S. Kim, A. Kitaev, P. V. Klimov, A. R. Klots, A. N. Korotkov, F. Kostritsa, J. M. Kreikebaum, D. Landhuis, P. Laptev, K.-M. Lau, L. Laws, J. Lee, K. W. Lee, B. J. Lester, A. T. Lill, W. Liu, A. Locharla, E. Lucero, F. D. Malone, O. Martin, J. R. McClean, T. McCourt, M. McEwen, K. C. Miao, A. Mieszala, M. Mohseni, S. Montazeri, E. Mount, R. Movassagh, W. Mruczkiewicz, O. Naaman, M. Neeley, C. Neill, A. Nersisyan, M. Newman, J. H. Ng, A. Nguyen, M. Nguyen, M. Y. Niu, T. E. O'Brien, S. Omonije, A. Petukhov, R. Potter, L. P. Pryadko, C. Quintana, C. Rocque, N. C. Rubin, N. Saei, D. Sank, K. Sankaragomathi, K. J. Satzinger, H. F. Schurkus, C. Schuster, M. J. Shearn, A. Shorter, N. Shutty, V. Shvarts, J. Skruzny, W. C. Smith, R. Somma, G. Sterling, D. Strain, M. Szalay, A. Torres, G. Vidal, B. Villalonga, C. V. Heidweiller, T. White, B. W. K. Woo, C. Xing, Z. J. Yao, P. Yeh, J. Yoo, G. Young, A. Zalcman, Y. Zhang, N. Zhu, N. Zobrist, H. Neven, S. Boixo, A. Megrant, J. Kelly, Y. Chen, V. Smelyanskiy, E.-A. Kim, I. Aleiner, and P. Roushan, Nature 618, 264 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05954-4
[12] Y.-H. Shi, R.-Q. Yang, Z. Xiang, Z.-Y. Ge, H. Li, Y.-Y. Wang, K. Huang, Y. Tian, X. Song, D. Zheng, K. Xu, R.-G. Cai, and H. Fan, Nature Communications 14, 3263 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39064-6
[13] Z.-C. Xiang, K. Huang, Y.-R. Zhang, T. Liu, Y.-H. Shi, C.-L. Deng, T. Liu, H. Li, G.-H. Liang, Z.-Y. Mei, H. Yu, G. Xue, Y. Tian, X. Song, Z.-B. Liu, K. Xu, D. Zheng, F. Nori, and H. Fan, Nature Communications 14, 5433 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41230-9
[14] S. Xu, Z.-Z. Sun, K. Wang, L. Xiang, Z. Bao, Z. Zhu, F. Shen, Z. Song, P. Zhang, W. Ren, X. Zhang, H. Dong, J. Deng, J. Chen, Y. Wu, Z. Tan, Y. Gao, F. Jin, X. Zhu, C. Zhang, N. Wang, Y. Zou, J. Zhong, A. Zhang, W. Li, W. Jiang, L.-W. Yu, Y. Yao, Z. Wang, H. Li, Q. Guo, C. Song, H. Wang, and D.-L. Deng, Chinese Physics Letters 40, 060301 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/40/6/060301
[15] D. Ristè, M. P. Da Silva, C. A. Ryan, A. W. Cross, A. D. Córcoles, J. A. Smolin, J. M. Gambetta, J. M. Chow, and B. R. Johnson, npj Quantum Inf. 3, 16 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-017-0017-3
[16] M. Gong, S. Wang, C. Zha, M.-C. Chen, H.-L. Huang, Y. Wu, Q. Zhu, Y. Zhao, S. Li, S. Guo, H. Qian, Y. Ye, F. Chen, C. Ying, J. Yu, D. Fan, D. Wu, H. Su, H. Deng, H. Rong, K. Zhang, S. Cao, J. Lin, Y. Xu, L. Sun, C. Guo, N. Li, F. Liang, V. M. Bastidas, K. Nemoto, W. J. Munro, Y.-H. Huo, C.-Y. Lu, C.-Z. Peng, X. Zhu, and J.-W. Pan, Science 372, 948 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg7812
[17] X. Ni, Z. Wang, R. Chao, and J. Chen, (2024), arXiv:2312.04186 [quant-ph].
arXiv:2312.04186
[18] S. contributors, ``SuperGrad: Differentiable simulator for superconducting quantum processors,'' (2024).
https://github.com/iqubit-org/supergrad
[19] X. Ni, H.-H. Zhao, L. Wang, F. Wu, and J. Chen, npj Quantum Inf. 8, 106 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-022-00614-3
[20] P. Groszkowski and J. Koch, Quantum 5, 583 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2021-11-17-583
[21] D. Puzzuoli, C. J. Wood, D. J. Egger, B. Rosand, and K. Ueda, Journal of Open Source Software 8, 5853 (2023a).
https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05853
[22] F.-M. L. Régent, C. Berdou, Z. Leghtas, J. Guillaud, and M. Mirrahimi, Quantum 7, 1198 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-12-06-1198
[23] C. Chamberland, K. Noh, P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, E. T. Campbell, C. T. Hann, J. Iverson, H. Putterman, T. C. Bohdanowicz, S. T. Flammia, A. Keller, G. Refael, J. Preskill, L. Jiang, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, O. Painter, and F. G. Brandão, PRX Quantum 3, 010329 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.010329
[24] T. Zhao, D. Chen, T. Lyu, and J. Koch, ``Qfit: Interactive parameter fitting for superconducting circuits,'' (2024).
https://github.com/scqubits/qfit
[25] S. Krastanov, S. Zhou, S. T. Flammia, and L. Jiang, Quantum Science and Technology 4, 035003 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ab18d5
[26] J. Bradbury, R. Frostig, P. Hawkins, M. J. Johnson, C. Leary, D. Maclaurin, G. Necula, A. Paszke, J. VanderPlas, S. Wanderman-Milne, and Q. Zhang, ``JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs,'' (2018).
http://github.com/jax-ml/jax
[27] T. Hennigan, T. Cai, T. Norman, L. Martens, and I. Babuschkin, ``Haiku: Sonnet for JAX,'' (2020).
http://github.com/google-deepmind/dm-haiku
[28] H. F. Trotter, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 10, 545 (1959).
https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1959-0108732-6
[29] M. Suzuki, Communications in Mathematical Physics 51, 183 (1976).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01609348
[30] M. Suzuki, Physics Letters A 146, 319 (1990).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(90)90962-N
[31] L. S. Pontryagin, Trudy Mat. Inst. Steklov. 169, 119 (1985).
[32] R. T. Q. Chen, Y. Rubanova, J. Bettencourt, and D. K. Duvenaud, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 31 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2018).
https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2018/file/69386f6bb1dfed68692a24c8686939b9-Paper.pdf
[33] M. Blondel and V. Roulet, (2024), arXiv:2403.14606 [cs.LG].
arXiv:2403.14606
[34] S. Efthymiou, S. Ramos-Calderer, C. Bravo-Prieto, A. Pérez-Salinas, D. García-Martín, A. Garcia-Saez, J. I. Latorre, and S. Carrazza, Quantum Science and Technology 7, 015018 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ac39f5
[35] J. Johansson, P. Nation, and F. Nori, Computer Physics Communications 183, 1760 (2012).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2012.02.021
[36] W. Baur and V. Strassen, Theor. Comput. Sci. 22, 317 (1983).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(83)90110-X
[37] A. Wiltschko and M. J. Johnson, ``The Autodiff Cookbook,'' (2018).
https://github.com/jax-ml/jax/blob/main/docs/notebooks/autodiff_cookbook.ipynb
[38] L. B. Nguyen, G. Koolstra, Y. Kim, A. Morvan, T. Chistolini, S. Singh, K. N. Nesterov, C. Jünger, L. Chen, Z. Pedramrazi, B. K. Mitchell, J. M. Kreikebaum, S. Puri, D. I. Santiago, and I. Siddiqi, PRX Quantum 3, 037001 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.037001
[39] E. Dogan, D. Rosenstock, L. Le Guevel, H. Xiong, R. A. Mencia, A. Somoroff, K. N. Nesterov, M. G. Vavilov, V. E. Manucharyan, and C. Wang, Phys. Rev. Applied 20, 024011 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.20.024011
[40] W.-J. Lin, H. Cho, Y. Chen, M. G. Vavilov, C. Wang, and V. E. Manucharyan, PRX Quantum 6, 010349 (2025).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.6.010349
[41] A. A. Hagberg, D. A. Schult, and P. J. Swart, in Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference (Pasadena, CA USA, 2008) pp. 11 – 15.
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/960616
[42] C. Berke, E. Varvelis, S. Trebst, A. Altland, and D. P. DiVincenzo, Nature Communications 13, 2495 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29940-y
[43] R. H. Byrd, P. Lu, J. Nocedal, and C. Zhu, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 16, 1190 (1995).
https://doi.org/10.1137/0916069
[44] W. Lei, Private communication (2023).
[45] N. Leung, M. Abdelhafez, J. Koch, and D. Schuster, Phys. Rev. A 95, 042318 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.042318
[46] Z. Wang and X. Ni, Zenodo (2024).
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11192761
[47] D. Puzzuoli, S. F. Lin, M. Malekakhlagh, E. Pritchett, B. Rosand, and C. J. Wood, Journal of Computational Physics 489, 112262 (2023b).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2023.112262
[48] J. Heek, A. Levskaya, A. Oliver, M. Ritter, B. Rondepierre, A. Steiner, and M. van Zee, ``Flax: A neural network library and ecosystem for JAX,'' (2023).
http://github.com/google/flax
[49] Y. Xu, J. Chu, J. Yuan, J. Qiu, Y. Zhou, L. Zhang, X. Tan, Y. Yu, S. Liu, J. Li, F. Yan, and D. Yu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 240503 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.240503
[50] G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 070201 (2007).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.070201
[51] D. G. a. Smith and J. Gray, Journal of Open Source Software 3, 753 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00753
[52] J. Gray and S. Kourtis, Quantum 5, 410 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2021-03-15-410
[53] B. O'Gorman, in 14th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2019), Vol. 135 (2019) pp. 10:1–10:19.
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2019.10
[54] S. Kourtis, C. Chamon, E. Mucciolo, and A. Ruckenstein, SciPost Physics 7, 060 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.7.5.060
[55] D. C. McKay, C. J. Wood, S. Sheldon, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, Phys. Rev. A 96, 022330 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.022330
[56] C. Rigetti and M. Devoret, Phys. Rev. B 81, 134507 (2010).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.134507
[57] P. C. de Groot, J. Lisenfeld, R. N. Schouten, S. Ashhab, A. Lupaşcu, C. J. P. M. Harmans, and J. E. Mooij, Nature Physics 6, 763 (2010).
https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1733
[58] J. C. Pommerening and D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A 102, 032623 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.102.032623
[59] M. A. Nielsen, Physics Letters A 303, 249 (2002).
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(02)01272-0
[60] T. F. Havel, Journal of Mathematical Physics 44, 534 (2003).
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1518555
Cited by
[1] A. S. Naumov and V. Yu. Popov, "Reconstruction of a Time-Dependent Quantum Hamiltonian Using Neural Differential Equations", Moscow University Physics Bulletin 81 1, 30 (2026).
[2] A.S. Naumov and V.Yu. Popov, "Reconstruction of a Time-Dependent Quantum Hamiltonian Using Neural Differential Equations", Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta Seriya 3 Fizika Astronomiya 2026-1, 2610103 (2025).
The above citations are from Crossref's cited-by service (last updated successfully 2026-08-09 11:35:36) and SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2026-08-08 16:35:16). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.
Could not fetch ADS cited-by data during last attempt 2026-08-09 11:35:36: Cannot retrieve data from ADS due to rate limitations.
This Paper is published in Quantum under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. Copyright remains with the original copyright holders such as the authors or their institutions.