Local Purity Distillation in Quantum Systems: Exploring the Complementarity Between Purity and Entanglement

Ray Ganardi1,2, Piotr Masajada3, Moein Naseri1, and Alexander Streltsov3

1Centre for Quantum Optical Technologies, Centre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Banacha 2c, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
2School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 21 Nanyang Link, Singapore, 637371
3Institute of Fundamental Technological Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Pawińskiego 5B, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland

Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.

Abstract

Quantum thermodynamics and quantum entanglement represent two pivotal quantum resource theories with significant relevance in quantum information science. Despite their importance, the intricate relationship between these two theories is still not fully understood. Here, we investigate the interplay between entanglement and thermodynamics, particularly in the context of local cooling processes. We introduce and develop the framework of Gibbs-preserving local operations and classical communication. Within this framework, we explore strategies enabling remote parties to effectively cool their local systems to the ground state. Our analysis is centered on scenarios where only a single copy of a quantum state is accessible, with the ideal performance defined by the highest possible fidelity to the ground state achievable under these constraints. We focus on systems with fully degenerate local Hamiltonians, where local cooling aligns with the extraction of local purity. In this context, we establish a powerful link between the efficiency of local purity extraction and the degree of entanglement present in the system, a concept we define as $\textit{purity-entanglement complementarity}$. Moreover, we demonstrate that in many pertinent scenarios, the optimal performance can be precisely determined through semidefinite programming techniques. Our findings open doors to various practical applications, including techniques for entanglement detection and estimation. We demonstrate this by evaluating the amount of entanglement for a class of bound entangled states.

► BibTeX data

► References

[1] E. Chitambar and G. Gour, Quantum resource theories, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 025001 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.91.025001

[2] R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.81.865

[3] F. G. S. L. Brandão, M. Horodecki, J. Oppenheim, J. M. Renes, and R. W. Spekkens, Resource Theory of Quantum States Out of Thermal Equilibrium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 250404 (2013).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.111.250404

[4] M. Horodecki and J. Oppenheim, Fundamental limitations for quantum and nanoscale thermodynamics, Nature Communications 4, 2059 (2013).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​ncomms3059

[5] V. Vedral, M. B. Plenio, M. A. Rippin, and P. L. Knight, Quantifying Entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2275 (1997).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.78.2275

[6] M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and J. Oppenheim, Reversible transformations from pure to mixed states and the unique measure of information, Phys. Rev. A 67, 062104 (2003).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.67.062104

[7] G. Gour, M. P. Müller, V. Narasimhachar, R. W. Spekkens, and N. Yunger Halpern, The resource theory of informational nonequilibrium in thermodynamics, Physics Reports 583, 1 (2015).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.physrep.2015.04.003

[8] A. Streltsov, H. Kampermann, S. Wölk, M. Gessner, and D. Bruß, Maximal coherence and the resource theory of purity, New Journal of Physics 20, 053058 (2018).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​aac484

[9] T.-C. Wei and P. M. Goldbart, Geometric measure of entanglement and applications to bipartite and multipartite quantum states, Phys. Rev. A 68, 042307 (2003).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.68.042307

[10] A. Streltsov, H. Kampermann, and D. Bruß, Linking a distance measure of entanglement to its convex roof, New Journal of Physics 12, 123004 (2010).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​12/​12/​123004

[11] P. Faist, J. Oppenheim, and R. Renner, Gibbs-preserving maps outperform thermal operations in the quantum regime, New J. Phys. 17, 043003 (2015).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​17/​4/​043003

[12] J. Oppenheim, M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Thermodynamical Approach to Quantifying Quantum Correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 180402 (2002).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.89.180402

[13] M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, R. Horodecki, J. Oppenheim, A. Sen(De), U. Sen, and B. Synak-Radtke, Local versus nonlocal information in quantum-information theory: Formalism and phenomena, Phys. Rev. A 71, 062307 (2005).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.71.062307

[14] B. Morris, L. Lami, and G. Adesso, Assisted Work Distillation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 130601 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.122.130601

[15] S. Chakraborty, A. Nema, and F. Buscemi, One-shot purity distillation with local noisy operations and one-way classical communication, arXiv:2208.05628 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.48550/​arXiv.2208.05628
arXiv:2208.05628

[16] V. Narasimhachar and G. Gour, Resource theory under conditioned thermal operations, Phys. Rev. A 95, 012313 (2017).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.95.012313

[17] M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions, Phys. Lett. A 223, 1 (1996).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​S0375-9601(96)00706-2

[18] A. Shimony, Degree of Entanglement, Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 755, 675 (1995).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1111/​j.1749-6632.1995.tb39008.x

[19] H. Barnum and N. Linden, Monotones and invariants for multi-particle quantum states, J. Phys. A 34, 6787 (2001).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​0305-4470/​34/​35/​305

[20] O. Biham, M. A. Nielsen, and T. J. Osborne, Entanglement monotone derived from Grover's algorithm, Phys. Rev. A 65, 062312 (2002).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.65.062312

[21] V. Vedral and M. B. Plenio, Entanglement measures and purification procedures, Phys. Rev. A 57, 1619 (1998).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.57.1619

[22] D. Shapira, Y. Shimoni, and O. Biham, Groverian measure of entanglement for mixed states, Phys. Rev. A 73, 044301 (2006).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.73.044301

[23] E. Jung, M.-R. Hwang, H. Kim, M.-S. Kim, D. Park, J.-W. Son, and S. Tamaryan, Reduced state uniquely defines the Groverian measure of the original pure state, Phys. Rev. A 77, 062317 (2008).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.77.062317

[24] A. Streltsov, H. Kampermann, and D. Bruß, Simple algorithm for computing the geometric measure of entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 84, 022323 (2011).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.84.022323

[25] J. Eisert, P. Hyllus, O. Gühne, and M. Curty, Complete hierarchies of efficient approximations to problems in entanglement theory, Physical Review A 70, 062317 (2004).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​physreva.70.062317

[26] F. G. Brandão, M. Christandl, and J. Yard, A Quasipolynomial-Time Algorithm for the Quantum Separability Problem, in Proceedings of the Forty-Third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC '11 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2011) pp. 343–352.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1145/​1993636.1993683

[27] Y. Shi and X. Wu, Epsilon-Net Method for Optimizations over Separable States, in Automata, Languages, and Programming, edited by A. Czumaj, K. Mehlhorn, A. Pitts, and R. Wattenhofer (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012) pp. 798–809.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​978-3-642-31594-7_67

[28] T.-C. Wei and S. Severini, Matrix permanent and quantum entanglement of permutation invariant states, Journal of Mathematical Physics 51, 092203 (2010).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1063/​1.3464263

[29] R. Orús and T.-C. Wei, Visualizing elusive phase transitions with geometric entanglement, Phys. Rev. B 82, 155120 (2010).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​physrevb.82.155120

[30] Z. Zhang, Y. Dai, Y.-L. Dong, and C. Zhang, Numerical and analytical results for geometric measure of coherence and geometric measure of entanglement, Scientific Reports 10, 12122 (2020).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41598-020-68979-z

[31] A. W. Harrow, A. Natarajan, and X. Wu, An improved semidefinite programming hierarchy for testing entanglement, Communications in Mathematical Physics 352 (2017).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s00220-017-2859-0

[32] B. Hua, G.-Y. Ni, and M.-S. Zhang, Computing Geometric Measure of Entanglement for Symmetric Pure States via the Jacobian SDP Relaxation Technique, Journal of the Operations Research Society of China 5, 111 (2016).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s40305-016-0135-1

[33] A. C. Doherty, P. A. Parrilo, and F. M. Spedalieri, Detecting multipartite entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 71, 032333 (2005).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​physreva.71.032333

[34] P. Teng, Accurate calculation of the geometric measure of entanglement for multipartite quantum states, Quantum Information Processing 16, 181 (2017).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s11128-017-1633-8

[35] M. Demianowicz and R. Augusiak, Entanglement of genuinely entangled subspaces and states: Exact, approximate, and numerical results, Phys. Rev. A 100, 062318 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.100.062318

[36] Y. Dai, Y. Dong, Z. Xu, W. You, C. Zhang, and O. Gühne, Experimentally Accessible Lower Bounds for Genuine Multipartite Entanglement and Coherence Measures, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 054022 (2020).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevApplied.13.054022

[37] H. Zhu, L. Chen, and M. Hayashi, Additivity and non-additivity of multipartite entanglement measures, New Journal of Physics 12, 083002 (2010).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​12/​8/​083002

[38] E. Schrödinger, Probability relations between separated systems, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 32, 446 (1936).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1017/​S0305004100019137

[39] L. P. Hughston, R. Jozsa, and W. K. Wootters, A complete classification of quantum ensembles having a given density matrix, Phys. Lett. A 183, 14 (1993).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​0375-9601(93)90880-9

[40] P. Horodecki, Separability criterion and inseparable mixed states with positive partial transposition, Phys. Lett. A 232, 333 (1997).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​S0375-9601(97)00416-7

Cited by

[1] Piotr Masajada, Marco Fellous-Asiani, and Alexander Streltsov, "Optimizing entanglement distribution via noisy quantum channels", Physical Review A 113 5, 052414 (2026).

[2] Karol Horodecki, Marek Winczewski, Leonard Sikorski, Paweł Mazurek, Mikołaj Czechlewski, and Raja Yehia, "Quantification of the energy consumption of entanglement distribution", arXiv:2507.23108, (2025).

The above citations are from Crossref's cited-by service (last updated successfully 2026-08-12 06:11:30) and SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2026-08-11 13:56:18). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.

Could not fetch ADS cited-by data during last attempt 2026-08-12 06:11:30: Cannot retrieve data from ADS due to rate limitations.