Ultrastrong coupling, nonselective measurement and quantum Zeno dynamics

Stefano Marcantoni1 and Marco Merkli2

1Laboratoire J. A. Dieudonné (LJAD), Université Côte d'Azur, Parc Valrose, 06108 Nice, France
2Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, A1C 5S7 Canada

Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.

Abstract

We study the dynamics of an open quantum system linearly coupled to a bosonic reservoir. We show that, in the ultrastrong coupling limit, the system undergoes a nonselective measurement and then evolves unitarily according to an effective Zeno Hamiltonian. This dynamical process is largely independent of the reservoir state. We examine the entanglement breaking effect of the ultrastrong coupling on the system. We also derive the evolution equation for systems in contact with several reservoirs when one coupling is ultrastrong. The effective system dynamics displays a rich structure and, contrarily to the single reservoir case, it is generally non-Markovian. Our approach is based on a Dyson series expansion, in which we can take the ultrastrong limit termwise, and a subsequent resummation of the series. Our derivation is mathematically rigorous and uncomplicated.

We study the dynamics of a small quantum system strongly interacting with an infinite reservoir. We show that the reservoir effectively acts as a measuring apparatus, performing repeated measurements on the system with a frequency that is larger for large coupling. In the limit of infinite coupling the dynamics is strongly constrained, and in some cases it is completely frozen. This effect is usually called the quantum Zeno effect, in analogy with the paradox of the motionless arrow proposed by the ancient philosopher Zeno. We can extend our results to the case of a small system interacting with many reservoirs when one of the couplings is much stronger than the others. In this case, the strongly coupled reservoir produces a Zeno effect on the system and the other reservoirs together, so that the dynamics of the small system alone can still be quite complex.

► BibTeX data

► References

[1] N. Anto-Sztrikacs, A. Nazir, and D. Segal: Effective-Hamiltonian Theory of Open Quantum Systems at Strong Coupling, PRX Quantum 4, 020307 (2023).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PRXQuantum.4.020307

[2] N. Anto-Sztrikacs, B. Min, M. Brenes, and D. Segal: Effective Hamiltonian theory: An approximation to the equilibrium state of open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B 108, 115437 (2023).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevB.108.115437

[3] O. Bratteli, D.W. Robinson: Operator Algebras and Quantum Statistical Mechanics 1,2, Texts and Monographs in Physics, Springer Verlag 2002.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​978-3-662-02520-8

[4] D. Burgarth, P. Facchi, H. Nakazato, S. Pascazio, and K. Yuasa: Generalized adiabatic theorem and strong-coupling limits, Quantum 3, 152 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2019-06-12-152

[5] D. Burgarth, P. Facchi, G. Gramegna, and K. Yuasa: One bound to rule them all: from Adiabatic to Zeno, Quantum 6, 737 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2022-06-14-737

[6] J.D. Cresser and J. Anders: Weak and Ultrastrong Coupling Limits of the Quantum Mean Force Gibbs State, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 250601 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.127.250601

[7] T. N. Dam, J. Schach-Møller: Asymptotics in Spin-Boson Type Models, Commun. Math. Phys. 374, 1389-1415, (2020).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s00220-020-03685-5

[8] E.B. Davies: Markovian Master Equations, Commun. Math. Phys. 39, 9-110 (1974).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​BF01608389

[9] E.B. Davies: Markovian Master Equations, II, Math. Ann. 219, 147-158 (1976).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​BF01351898

[10] P. Exner, T. Ichinose: Note on a Product Formula Related to Quantum Zeno Dynamics, Ann. Henri Poincaré 22, 1669–1697 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s00023-020-01014-z

[11] P. Facchi, S. Pascazio: Quantum Zeno dynamics: mathematical and physical aspects, J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 41 493001 (2008).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1751-8113/​41/​49/​493001

[12] P. Facchi and S. Pascazio: Spontaneous emission and lifetime modification caused by an intense electromagnetic field, Phys. Rev. A 62, 023804 (2000).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.62.023804

[13] P. Facchi, V. Gorini, G. Marmo, S. Pascazio, E.C.G. Sudarshan: Quantum Zeno dynamics, Phys. Lett. A 275, 12-19 (2000).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​S0375-9601(00)00566-1

[14] P. Facchi, S. Pascazio: Deviations from exponential law and Van Hove’s $\lambda^2t$ limit, Physica A 271, 133-146 (1999).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​S0378-4371(99)00209-5

[15] T. Förster: Zwischenmolekulare Energiewanderung und Fluoreszenz, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 437, 55 (1948).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1002/​andp.19484370105

[16] M. Frasca: Quantum Zeno effect and non-relativistic strong matter–radiation interaction, Phys. Lett. A 298, 213-218 (2002).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​S0375-9601(02)00444-9

[17] K. Goyal and R. Kawai: Steady state thermodynamics of two qubits strongly coupled to bosonic environments, Phys. Rev. Research 1, 033018 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevResearch.1.033018

[18] P. Haikka, T. H. Johnson, and S. Maniscalco: Non-Markovianity of local dephasing channels and time-invariant discord, Phys. Rev. A 87, 010103(R) (2013).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.87.010103

[19] R.A. Marcus: On the Theory of Oxidation-Reduction Reactions Involving Electron Transfer I, J. Chem. Phys. 24, no.5, 966-978 (1956).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1063/​1.1742723

[20] D. Lonigro: Generalized spin-boson models with non-normalizable form factors, J. Math. Phys. 63, 072105 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1063/​5.0085576

[21] D. Lonigro: Self-Adjointness of a Class of Multi-Spin–Boson Models with Ultraviolet Divergences, Mathematical Physics, Analysis and Geometry 26:15 (2023).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s11040-023-09457-6

[22] V. May and O. Kühn: Charge and Energy Transfer Dynamics in Molecular Systems, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2011.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1002/​9783527633791

[23] M. Merkli, G.P. Berman, R.T. Sayre, S. Gnanakaran, M. Könenberg, A.I. Nesterov, H. Song: Dynamics of a Chlorophyll Dimer in Collective and Local Thermal Environments, J. Math. Chem. 54(4), 866-917 (2016).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s10910-016-0593-z

[24] M. Merkli, I.M. Sigal, G. Berman: Resonance theory of decoherence and thermalization, Annals of Physics 323, 373-412 (2008).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.aop.2007.04.013

[25] M. Merkli: The ideal quantum gas, in Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1880, 183-233 (2006).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​3-540-33922-1_5

[26] M. Könenberg, M. Merkli, H. Song: Ergodicity of the spin-boson model for arbitrary coupling strength, Commun. Math. Phys. 336, Issue 1, 261-285 (2014).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s00220-014-2242-3

[27] M. Merkli: Quantum Markovian master equations: Resonance theory shows validity for all time scales, Ann. Phys. 412, 16799 (29pp) (2020).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.aop.2019.167996

[28] M. Merkli: Dynamics of Open Quantum Systems I, Oscillation and Decay, Quantum 6, 615 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2022-01-03-615

[29] M. Merkli: Dynamics of Open Quantum Systems II, Markovian Approximation, Quantum 6, 616 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.22331/​q-2022-01-03-616

[30] M. Merkli: Correlation decay and Markovianity in open systems, Ann. H. Poincaré 24, 751–782 (2023).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s00023-022-01226-5

[31] H. J. D. Miller, J. Anders: Entropy production and time asymmetry in the presence of strong interactions, Phys. Rev. E 95, 062123 (2017).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevE.95.062123

[32] B. Misra, E.C.G. Sudarshan: The Zeno's paradox in quantum theory, J. Math. Phys. 18(4) 756-763 (1977).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1063/​1.523304

[33] T. Möbus and C. Rouzé: Optimal Convergence Rate in the Quantum Zeno Effect for Open Quantum Systems in Infinite Dimensions, Ann. Henri Poincaré 24, 1617–1659 (2023).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s00023-022-01241-6

[34] E. Mihokova, S. Pascazio, L.S. Schulman: Hindered decay: Quantum Zeno effect through electromagnetic field domination, Phys. Rev. A 56(1) (1997).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.56.25

[35] C. Presilla, R. Onorfio, U. Tambini: Measurement Quantum Mechanics and Experiments on Quantum Zeno Effect, Ann. Phys. 248, 95-121 (1996).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1006/​aphy.1996.0052

[36] A. Rivas: Refined weak-coupling limit: Coherence, entanglement, and non-Markovianity, Phys. Rev. A 95, 042104, 10pp (2017).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.95.042104

[37] A. Rivas, A.D.K. Plato, S. F. Huelga, M. B. Plenio: Markovian master equations: a critical study, New J. Phys. 12 113032, 38pp, (2010).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​12/​11/​113032

[38] A. Rivas: Strong Coupling Thermodynamics of Open Quantum Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 160601 (2020).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.124.160601

[39] R. Salzmann: Quantitative Quantum Zeno and Strong Damping Limits in Strong Topology, arXiv:2409.06469.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.48550/​arXiv.2409.06469
arXiv:2409.06469

[40] D. Segal, D. R. Reichman: Zeno and anti-Zeno effects in spin-bath models, Phys. Rev. A 76, 012109 (2007).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.76.012109

[41] P. Strasberg, G. Schaller, N. Lambert, T. Brandes: Nonequilibrium thermodynamics in the strong coupling and non-Markovian regime based on a reaction coordinate mapping, New J. Phys. 18, 073007 (2016).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​18/​7/​073007

[42] A. Trushechkin: Quantum master equations and steady states for the ultrastrong-coupling limit and the strong-decoherence limit, Phys. Rev. A 106, 042209 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.106.042209

[43] A. Trushechkin, M. Merkli, J.D. Cresser, J. Anders: Open quantum system dynamics and the mean force Gibbs state, AVS Quantum Sci. 4, 012301 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1116/​5.0073853

[44] L. Van Hove: Quantum-mechanical perturbations giving rise to a statistical transport equation, Physica 21, Issue 1-5, 517-540 (1955).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​S0031-8914(54)92646-4

[45] V.A. Zagrebnov, H. Neidhardt, T. Ichinose: Trotter-Kato product formulae, Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, volume 296, 2024.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​978-3-031-56720-9

Cited by

[1] Sakil Khan and Bijay Kumar Agarwalla, "Emergence of distinct relaxation behavior and the quantum regression theorem in the ultrastrong-coupling limit", Physical Review A 113 1, L010203 (2026).

[2] Michele Fantechi and Marco Merkli, "Bosonization of Noise Effects in Nonlocal Quantum Dynamics", Physical Review Letters 136 6, 060402 (2026).

[3] Alessandro Prositto, Carlos Ramon-Escandell, and Dvira Segal, "Collisional model with dissipative and dephasing baths: nonadditive effects at strong coupling", New Journal of Physics 28 1, 014502 (2026).

[4] Nirmalendu Acharyya, Martin Richter, and Benjamin P. Fingerhut, "Coherent dynamics of the spin-boson model in the ultra-strong coupling regime", The Journal of Chemical Physics 165 4, 044114 (2026).

The above citations are from Crossref's cited-by service (last updated successfully 2026-08-09 04:55:21) and SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2026-08-07 12:04:18). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.

Could not fetch ADS cited-by data during last attempt 2026-08-09 04:55:21: Cannot retrieve data from ADS due to rate limitations.