Programmable adiabatic demagnetization for systems with trivial and topological excitations

Anne Matthies1,2, Mark Rudner3, Achim Rosch1, and Erez Berg2

1Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
2Department of Condensed Matter Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 76100, Israel
3Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1560, USA

Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.

Abstract

We propose a simple, robust protocol to prepare a low-energy state of an arbitrary Hamiltonian on a quantum computer or programmable quantum simulator. The protocol is inspired by the adiabatic demagnetization technique, used to cool solid-state systems to extremely low temperatures. A fraction of the qubits (or spins) is used to model a spin bath that is coupled to the system. By an adiabatic ramp down of a simulated Zeeman field acting on the bath spins, energy and entropy are extracted from the system. The bath spins are then measured and reset to the polarized state, and the process is repeated until convergence to a low-energy steady state is achieved. We demonstrate the protocol via application to the quantum Ising model. We study the protocol's performance in the presence of noise and show how the information from the measurement of the bath spins can be used to monitor the cooling process. The performance of the algorithm depends on the nature of the excitations of the system; systems with non-local (topological) excitations are more difficult to cool than those with local excitations. We explore the possible mitigation of this problem by trapping topological excitations.

Complex quantum systems are very difficult to model on classical computers. Thus, one of the most important tasks of future quantum computers will be to simulate quantum systems and solve central problems of quantum chemistry and material sciences. Simulation of quantum systems can help to find new molecules and materials. For a successful quantum simulation one has, first, to model the correct quantum dynamics. Secondly, and even more challenging, the relevant quantum state has to be initialized.
Here, we suggest and test a protocol to prepare low-energy states of complex quantum systems. Low energy states can be reached by cooling a system. We use half of the quantum bits (qubits) to simulate a refrigerator. The refrigerator qubits are initially polarized and subject to a simulated high magnetic field. Coupling the refrigerator qubits to the system qubits and lowering the magnetic field transfers entropy and energy from the system to the refrigerator. At the end, the refrigerator qubits are decoupled from the system, measured and reset to their initial state. This cooling cycle is repeated several times. The main advantage of the protocol is that it is robust against noise and errors existing in all current quantum computers. Furthermore, we show how it can be used to trap topological (non-local) excitations.
By combining ideas of solid-state physics and cooling technologies with quantum algorithms, we present a simple, scalable, and robust technique to prepare low-energy states on present-day quantum devices.

► BibTeX data

► References

[1] Seth Lloyd. ``Universal quantum simulators''. Science 273, 1073–1078 (1996).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1126/​science.273.5278.1073

[2] Markus Reiher, Nathan Wiebe, Krysta M. Svore, Dave Wecker, and Matthias Troyer. ``Elucidating reaction mechanisms on quantum computers''. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, 7555–7560 (2017).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1073/​pnas.1619152114

[3] Yudong Cao, Jonathan Romero, Jonathan P. Olson, Matthias Degroote, Peter D. Johnson, Mária Kieferová, Ian D. Kivlichan, Tim Menke, Borja Peropadre, Nicolas P. D. Sawaya, Sukin Sim, Libor Veis, and Alán Aspuru-Guzik. ``Quantum chemistry in the age of quantum computing''. Chemical Reviews 119, 10856–10915 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1021/​acs.chemrev.8b00803

[4] Sam McArdle, Suguru Endo, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, Simon C. Benjamin, and Xiao Yuan. ``Quantum computational chemistry''. Reviews of Modern Physics 92, 015003 (2020).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​revmodphys.92.015003

[5] Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, and Sam Gutmann. ``A quantum approximate optimization algorithm'' (2014). arXiv:1411.4028.
arXiv:1411.4028

[6] Jacob Biamonte, Peter Wittek, Nicola Pancotti, Patrick Rebentrost, Nathan Wiebe, and Seth Lloyd. ``Quantum machine learning''. Nature 549, 195–202 (2017).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​nature23474

[7] Ashley Montanaro. ``Quantum algorithms: an overview''. npj Quantum Information 2 (2016).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​npjqi.2015.23

[8] Alberto Peruzzo, Jarrod McClean, Peter Shadbolt, Man-Hong Yung, Xiao-Qi Zhou, Peter J. Love, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, and Jeremy L. O'Brien. ``A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor''. Nature Communications 5 (2014).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​ncomms5213

[9] Jarrod R McClean, Jonathan Romero, Ryan Babbush, and Alán Aspuru-Guzik. ``The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms''. New Journal of Physics 18, 023023 (2016).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​18/​2/​023023

[10] M. Cerezo, Andrew Arrasmith, Ryan Babbush, Simon C. Benjamin, Suguru Endo, Keisuke Fujii, Jarrod R. McClean, Kosuke Mitarai, Xiao Yuan, Lukasz Cincio, and Patrick J. Coles. ``Variational quantum algorithms''. Nature Reviews Physics 3, 625–644 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s42254-021-00348-9

[11] Jules Tilly, Hongxiang Chen, Shuxiang Cao, Dario Picozzi, Kanav Setia, Ying Li, Edward Grant, Leonard Wossnig, Ivan Rungger, George H. Booth, and Jonathan Tennyson. ``The variational quantum eigensolver: A review of methods and best practices''. Physics Reports 986, 1–128 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.physrep.2022.08.003

[12] Dmitry A. Fedorov, Bo Peng, Niranjan Govind, and Yuri Alexeev. ``VQE method: a short survey and recent developments''. Materials Theory 6 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1186/​s41313-021-00032-6

[13] Tadashi Kadowaki and Hidetoshi Nishimori. ``Quantum annealing in the transverse ising model''. Phys. Rev. E 58, 5355–5363 (1998).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevE.58.5355

[14] Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, Sam Gutmann, and Michael Sipser. ``Quantum computation by adiabatic evolution'' (2000). arXiv:quant-ph/​0001106.
arXiv:quant-ph/0001106

[15] Andrew M. Childs, Edward Farhi, and John Preskill. ``Robustness of adiabatic quantum computation''. Physical Review A 65, 012322 (2001).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​physreva.65.012322

[16] Alán Aspuru-Guzik and Anthony D. Dutoi and Peter J. Love and Martin Head-Gordon. ``Simulated quantum computation of molecular energies''. Science 309, 1704–1707 (2005).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1126/​science.1113479

[17] Tameem Albash and Daniel A. Lidar. ``Adiabatic quantum computation''. Reviews of Modern Physics 90, 015002 (2018).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​revmodphys.90.015002

[18] Seunghoon Lee, Joonho Lee, Huanchen Zhai, Yu Tong, Alexander M. Dalzell, Ashutosh Kumar, Phillip Helms, Johnnie Gray, Zhi-Hao Cui, Wenyuan Liu, Michael Kastoryano, Ryan Babbush, John Preskill, David R. Reichman, Earl T. Campbell, Edward F. Valeev, Lin Lin, and Garnet Kin-Lic Chan. ``Is there evidence for exponential quantum advantage in quantum chemistry?'' (2022). arXiv:2208.02199.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41467-023-37587-6
arXiv:2208.02199

[19] P. Oscar Boykin, Tal Mor, Vwani Roychowdhury, Farrokh Vatan, and Rutger Vrijen. ``Algorithmic cooling and scalable NMR quantum computers''. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99, 3388–3393 (2002).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1073/​pnas.241641898

[20] David B. Kaplan, Natalie Klco, and Alessandro Roggero. ``Ground states via spectral combing on a quantum computer'' (2017). arXiv:1709.08250.
arXiv:1709.08250

[21] Hefeng Wang. ``Quantum algorithm for preparing the ground state of a system via resonance transition''. Scientific Reports 7 (2017).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41598-017-16396-0

[22] Jia-Jin Feng, Biao Wu, and Frank Wilczek. ``Quantum computing by coherent cooling''. Physical Review A 105, 052601 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​physreva.105.052601

[23] Stefano Polla, Yaroslav Herasymenko, and Thomas E. O'Brien. ``Quantum digital cooling''. Physical Review A 104, 012414 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​physreva.104.012414

[24] Michael P. Zaletel, Adam Kaufman, Dan M. Stamper-Kurn, and Norman Y. Yao. ``Preparation of low entropy correlated many-body states via conformal cooling quenches''. Physical Review Letters 126, 103401 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​physrevlett.126.103401

[25] Mekena Metcalf, Jonathan E. Moussa, Wibe A. de Jong, and Mohan Sarovar. ``Engineered thermalization and cooling of quantum many-body systems''. Physical Review Research 2, 023214 (2020).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​physrevresearch.2.023214

[26] David Rodríguez Pérez. ``Quantum error mitigation and autonomous correction using dissipative engineering and coupling techniques''. Ph.D. thesis, Colorado School of Mines (2021). url: https:/​/​repository.mines.edu/​handle/​11124/​14291.
https:/​/​repository.mines.edu/​handle/​11124/​14291

[27] P. Debye. ``Einige bemerkungen zur magnetisierung bei tiefer temperatur''. Annalen der Physik 386, 1154–1160 (1926).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1002/​andp.19263862517

[28] W. F. Giauque. ``A thermodynamic treatment of certain magnetic effects. a proposed method of producing temperatures considerably below 1° absolute''. Journal of the American Chemical Society 49, 1864–1870 (1927).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1021/​ja01407a003

[29] Haishan Cao. ``Refrigeration below 1 kelvin''. Journal of Low Temperature Physics 204, 175–205 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s10909-021-02606-7

[30] A. T. Jones, C. P. Scheller, J. R. Prance, Y. B. Kalyoncu, D. M. Zumbühl, and R. P. Haley. ``Progress in Cooling Nanoelectronic Devices to Ultra-Low Temperatures''. Journal of Low Temperature Physics 201, 772–802 (2020).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s10909-020-02472-9

[31] See Supplemental Material for details.

[32] T W B Kibble. ``Topology of cosmic domains and strings''. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 9, 1387 (1976).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​0305-4470/​9/​8/​029

[33] W. H. Zurek. ``Cosmological experiments in superfluid helium?''. Nature 317, 505–508 (1985).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​317505a0

[34] S. M. Griffin, M. Lilienblum, K. T. Delaney, Y. Kumagai, M. Fiebig, and N. A. Spaldin. ``Scaling behavior and beyond equilibrium in the hexagonal manganites''. Phys. Rev. X 2, 041022 (2012).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevX.2.041022

[35] Anirban Dutta, Armin Rahmani, and Adolfo del Campo. ``Anti-kibble-zurek behavior in crossing the quantum critical point of a thermally isolated system driven by a noisy control field''. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 080402 (2016).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.117.080402

[36] Jacek Dziarmaga. ``Dynamics of a quantum phase transition: Exact solution of the quantum ising model''. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 245701 (2005).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.95.245701

[37] Wojciech H. Zurek, Uwe Dorner, and Peter Zoller. ``Dynamics of a quantum phase transition''. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 105701 (2005).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.95.105701

[38] Anatoli Polkovnikov. ``Universal adiabatic dynamics in the vicinity of a quantum critical point''. Phys. Rev. B 72, 161201 (2005).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevB.72.161201

[39] Roman Barankov and Anatoli Polkovnikov. ``Optimal nonlinear passage through a quantum critical point''. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 076801 (2008).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.101.076801

[40] Yuki Susa and Hidetoshi Nishimori. ``Variational optimization of the quantum annealing schedule for the lechner-hauke-zoller scheme''. Phys. Rev. A 103, 022619 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.103.022619

[41] Anne Matthies, Mark Rudner, Achim Rosch, and Erez Berg. ``Data for "Programmable adiabatic demagnetization for systems with trivial and topological excitations" [Data set]''. Zenodo (2024).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.5281/​ZENODO.10805566

Cited by

[1] Daniel Alcalde Puente and Matteo Rizzi, "Learning Feedback Mechanisms for Measurement-Based Variational Quantum State Preparation", Quantum 9, 1792 (2025).

[2] Michael J. Kastoryano, Lasse B. Kristensen, Chi-Fang Chen, and Andras Gilyén, "A little bit of self-correction", Quantum 9, 1820 (2025).

[3] Iris Ulčakar and Zala Lenarčič, "Generalized Gibbs ensembles in weakly interacting dissipative systems and digital quantum computers", SciPost Physics 19 3, 068 (2025).

[4] Kazuhiro Seki, Yuta Kikuchi, Tomoya Hayata, and Seiji Yunoki, "Dissipative ground-state preparation of a quantum spin chain on a trapped-ion quantum computer", Physical Review Applied 26 1, 014062 (2026).

[5] Jerome Lloyd, Alexios A. Michailidis, Xiao Mi, Vadim Smelyanskiy, and Dmitry A. Abanin, "Quasiparticle Cooling Algorithms for Quantum Many-Body State Preparation", PRX Quantum 6 1, 010361 (2025).

[6] Daniel Molpeceres, Sirui Lu, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Barbara Kraus, "Quantum algorithms for cooling: A simple case study", Physical Review Research 7 3, 033162 (2025).

[7] Pascal Stadler, Matteo Lodi, Andisheh Khedri, Rolando Reiner, Kirsten Bark, Nicolas Vogt, Michael Marthaler, and Juha Leppäkangas, "Demonstration of system-bath physics on a gate-based quantum computer", Physical Review A 111 2, 022614 (2025).

[8] Eric B. Jones, Cody James Winkleblack, Colin Campbell, Caleb Rotello, Edward D. Dahl, Matthew Reynolds, Peter Graf, and Wesley Jones, "Dynamic, symmetry-preserving, and hardware-adaptable circuits for quantum computing many-body states and correlators of the Anderson impurity model", Physical Review Research 7 2, 023186 (2025).

[9] G. S. Grattan, A. M. Liguori-Schremp, D. Rodriguez Perez, E. Kapit, W. Jones, and P. Graf, "Characterization and thermometry of dissipatively stabilized steady states", Quantum Science and Technology 10 2, 025014 (2025).

[10] Josias Langbehn, George Mouloudakis, Emma King, Raphaël Menu, Igor Gornyi, Giovanna Morigi, Yuval Gefen, and Christiane P. Koch, "Universal cooling of quantum systems via randomized measurements", arXiv:2506.11964, (2025).

[11] Daniel Alcalde Puente, Felix Motzoi, Tommaso Calarco, Giovanna Morigi, and Matteo Rizzi, "Quantum state preparation via engineered ancilla resetting", Quantum 8, 1299 (2024).

[12] Jerome Lloyd, Alexios Michailidis, Xiao Mi, Vadim Smelyanskiy, and Dmitry A. Abanin, "Quasiparticle cooling algorithms for quantum many-body state preparation", arXiv:2404.12175, (2024).

[13] Lucas Marti, Refik Mansuroglu, and Michael J. Hartmann, "Efficient Quantum Cooling Algorithm for Fermionic Systems", Quantum 9, 1635 (2025).

[14] Gilad Kishony, Mark S. Rudner, Achim Rosch, and Erez Berg, "Gauged Cooling of Topological Excitations and Emergent Fermions on Quantum Simulators", Physical Review Letters 134 8, 086503 (2025).

[15] Josias Langbehn, Kyrylo Snizhko, Igor Gornyi, Giovanna Morigi, Yuval Gefen, and Christiane P. Koch, "Dilute Measurement-Induced Cooling into Many-Body Ground States", PRX Quantum 5 3, 030301 (2024).

[16] Gilad Kishony, Mark S. Rudner, and Erez Berg, "Efficiently preparing chiral states via fermionic cooling on bosonic quantum hardware", Communications Physics 8 1, 73 (2025).

[17] Chongyuan Xu, "The application of annealing in quantum cooling protocols", arXiv:2501.05268, (2025).

[18] Jia-Jin Feng and Biao Wu, "Escaping local minima with quantum circuit coherent cooling", Physical Review A 109 3, 032405 (2024).

The above citations are from Crossref's cited-by service (last updated successfully 2026-08-07 23:51:14) and SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2026-08-07 23:51:15). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.