Quantum correlations on the no-signaling boundary: self-testing and more

Kai-Siang Chen; Gelo Noel M. Tabia; Chellasamy Jebarathinam; Shiladitya Mal; Jun-Yi Wu; Yeong-Cherng Liang

doi:10.22331/q-2023-07-11-1054

Quantum correlations on the no-signaling boundary: self-testing and more

Kai-Siang Chen¹, Gelo Noel M. Tabia^1,2,3, Chellasamy Jebarathinam^4,5, Shiladitya Mal^1,2, Jun-Yi Wu⁶, and Yeong-Cherng Liang^1,2

¹Department of Physics and Center for Quantum Frontiers of Research & Technology (QFort), National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
²Physics Division, National Center for Theoretical Sciences, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
³Center for Quantum Technology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
⁴Center for Theoretical Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Aleja Lotników 32/46, 02-668 Warsaw, Poland
⁵Department of Physics and Center for Quantum Information Science, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
⁶Department of Physics, Tamkang University, Tamsui, New Taipei 251301, Taiwan

Published:	2023-07-11, volume 7, page 1054
Eprint:	arXiv:2207.13850v3
Doi:	https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-07-11-1054
Citation:	Quantum 7, 1054 (2023).

Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.

Abstract

In device-independent quantum information, correlations between local measurement outcomes observed by spatially separated parties in a Bell test play a fundamental role. Even though it is long-known that the set of correlations allowed in quantum theory lies strictly between the Bell-local set and the no-signaling set, many questions concerning the geometry of the quantum set remain unanswered. Here, we revisit the problem of when the boundary of the quantum set coincides with the no-signaling set in the simplest Bell scenario. In particular, for each Class of these common boundaries containing $k$ zero probabilities, we provide a $(5-k)$-parameter family of quantum strategies realizing these (extremal) correlations. We further prove that self-testing is possible in all nontrivial Classes beyond the known examples of Hardy-type correlations, and provide numerical evidence supporting the robustness of these self-testing results. Candidates of one-parameter families of self-testing correlations from some of these Classes are identified. As a byproduct of our investigation, if the qubit strategies leading to an extremal nonlocal correlation are local-unitarily equivalent, a self-testing statement provably follows. Interestingly, all these self-testing correlations found on the no-signaling boundary are provably non-exposed. An analogous characterization for the set $\mathcal{M}$ of quantum correlations arising from finite-dimensional maximally entangled states is also provided. En route to establishing this last result, we show that all correlations of $\mathcal{M}$ in the simplest Bell scenario are attainable as convex combinations of those achievable using a Bell pair and projective measurements. In turn, we obtain the maximal Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt Bell inequality violation by any maximally entangled two-qudit state and a no-go theorem regarding the self-testing of such states.

Featured image: A two-dimensional projection of the no-signaling set $\mathcal{NS}$, an outer approximation $\tilde{Q}$ of the quantum set, and the local set $\mathcal{L}$ of correlations. All (quantum) correlations having the three zero entries $P(0,0|0,0)=P(1,1|0,0)=P(1,0|1,1)=0$ lie on the vertical line where the horizontal value is zero. Among them, $\vec{P}_{\mathcal{Q}}$ gives the maximal $\mathcal{S}_{\text{CHSH}}$ value and self-tests a quantum strategy.

► BibTeX data

@article{Chen2023quantumcorrelations,
  doi = {10.22331/q-2023-07-11-1054},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-07-11-1054},
  title = {Quantum correlations on the no-signaling boundary: self-testing and more},
  author = {Chen, Kai-Siang and Tabia, Gelo Noel M. and Chellasamy Jebarathinam and Mal, Shiladitya and Wu, Jun-Yi and Liang, Yeong-Cherng},
  journal = {{Quantum}},
  issn = {2521-327X},
  publisher = {{Verein zur F{\"{o}}rderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften}},
  volume = {7},
  pages = {1054},
  month = jul,
  year = {2023}
}

► References

[1] S. Popescu and D. Rohrlich, Found. Phys. 24, 379 (1994).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02058098

[2] G. Brassard, H. Buhrman, N. Linden, A. A. Méthot, A. Tapp, and F. Unger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 250401 (2006).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.250401

[3] M. Navascués and H. Wunderlich, Proc. R. Soc. A 466, 881 (2009).
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2009.0453

[4] M. Pawlowski, T. Paterek, D. Kaszlikowski, V. Scarani, A. Winter, and M. Zukowski, Nature 461, 1101 (2009).
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08400

[5] M. Navascués, Y. Guryanova, M. J. Hoban, and A. Acín, Nat. Commun. 6, 6288 (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7288

[6] J. S. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2004).
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815676

[7] T. Norsen, Am. J. Phys. 79, 1261 (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3630940

[8] J. S. Bell, Physics 1, 195 (1964).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195

[9] N. Brunner, D. Cavalcanti, S. Pironio, V. Scarani, and S. Wehner, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 419 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.86.419

[10] V. Scarani, Acta Physica Slovaca 62, 347 (2012).

[11] A. Acín, N. Brunner, N. Gisin, S. Massar, S. Pironio, and V. Scarani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 230501 (2007).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.230501

[12] R. Colbeck, PhD thesis, arXiv:0911.3814 (2009).
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0911.3814
arXiv:0911.3814

[13] S. Pironio, A. Acín, S. Massar, A. B. d. l. Giroday, D. N. Matsukevich, P. Maunz, S. Olmschenk, D. Hayes, L. Luo, T. A. Manning, and C. Monroe, Nature 464, 1021 (2010).
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09008

[14] R. Gallego, N. Brunner, C. Hadley, and A. Acín, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 230501 (2010).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.230501

[15] J.-D. Bancal, N. Gisin, Y.-C. Liang, and S. Pironio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 250404 (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.250404

[16] T. Moroder, J.-D. Bancal, Y.-C. Liang, M. Hofmann, and O. Gühne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 030501 (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.030501

[17] Y.-C. Liang, D. Rosset, J.-D. Bancal, G. Pütz, T. J. Barnea, and N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 190401 (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.190401

[18] S.-L. Chen, C. Budroni, Y.-C. Liang, and Y.-N. Chen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 240401 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.240401

[19] F. Baccari, D. Cavalcanti, P. Wittek, and A. Acín, Phys. Rev. X 7, 021042 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.7.021042

[20] J.-D. Bancal, N. Sangouard, and P. Sekatski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 250506 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.250506

[21] M. Zwerger, W. Dür, J.-D. Bancal, and P. Sekatski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 060502 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.060502

[22] P. Sekatski, J.-D. Bancal, S. Wagner, and N. Sangouard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 180505 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.180505

[23] S.-L. Chen, C. Budroni, Y.-C. Liang, and Y.-N. Chen, Phys. Rev. A 98, 042127 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.042127

[24] R. Arnon-Friedman and J.-D. Bancal, New J. Phys. 21, 033010 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aafef6

[25] S. Wagner, J.-D. Bancal, N. Sangouard, and P. Sekatski, Quantum 4, 243 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-03-19-243

[26] S.-L. Chen, H.-Y. Ku, W. Zhou, J. Tura, and Y.-N. Chen, Quantum 5, 552 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2021-09-28-552

[27] A. Gočanin, I. Šupić, and B. Dakić, PRX Quantum 3, 010317 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.010317

[28] Y.-C. Liang and Y. Zhang, Entropy 21 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.3390/e21020185

[29] D. Mayers and A. Yao, Quantum Info. Comput. 4, 273 (2004).

[30] I. Šupić and J. Bowles, Quantum 4, 337 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-09-30-337

[31] J. Wang, S. Paesani, Y. Ding, R. Santagati, P. Skrzypczyk, A. Salavrakos, J. Tura, R. Augusiak, L. Mančinska, D. Bacco, D. Bonneau, J. W. Silverstone, Q. Gong, A. Acín, K. Rottwitt, L. K. Oxenløwe, J. L. O'Brien, A. Laing, and M. G. Thompson, Science 360, 285 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar7053

[32] W.-H. Zhang, G. Chen, X.-X. Peng, X.-J. Ye, P. Yin, X.-Y. Xu, J.-S. Xu, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 090402 (2019a).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.090402

[33] W.-H. Zhang, G. Chen, P. Yin, X.-X. Peng, X.-M. Hu, Z.-B. Hou, Z.-Y. Zhou, S. Yu, X.-J. Ye, Z.-Q. Zhou, X.-Y. Xu, J.-S. Tang, J.-S. Xu, Y.-J. Han, B.-H. Liu, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Npj Quantum Inf. 5, 4 (2019b).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-018-0120-0

[34] S. Gómez, A. Mattar, I. Machuca, E. S. Gómez, D. Cavalcanti, O. J. Farías, A. Acín, and G. Lima, Phys. Rev. A 99, 032108 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.032108

[35] J.-D. Bancal, K. Redeker, P. Sekatski, W. Rosenfeld, and N. Sangouard, Quantum 5, 401 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2021-03-02-401

[36] D. Wu, Q. Zhao, C. Wang, L. Huang, Y.-F. Jiang, B. Bai, Y. Zhou, X.-M. Gu, F.-M. Liu, Y.-Q. Mao, Q.-C. Sun, M.-C. Chen, J. Zhang, C.-Z. Peng, X.-B. Zhu, Q. Zhang, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 250401 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.250401

[37] J. Barrett, N. Linden, S. Massar, S. Pironio, S. Popescu, and D. Roberts, Phys. Rev. A 71, 022101 (2005).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.71.022101

[38] P. Horodecki and R. Ramanathan, Nat. Commun. 10, 1701 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09505-2

[39] P. M. Pearle, Phys. Rev. D 2, 1418 (1970).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.2.1418

[40] S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Ann. Phys. 202, 22 (1990).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(90)90339-P

[41] J. Barrett, A. Kent, and S. Pironio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 170409 (2006).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.170409

[42] K. T. Goh, J. Kaniewski, E. Wolfe, T. Vértesi, X. Wu, Y. Cai, Y.-C. Liang, and V. Scarani, Phys. Rev. A 97, 022104 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.022104

[43] R. Colbeck and R. Renner, Nat. Commun. 2, 411 (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1416

[44] R. Colbeck and R. Renner, Nat. Phys. 8, 450 (2012).
https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2300

[45] G. Pütz, D. Rosset, T. J. Barnea, Y.-C. Liang, and N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 190402 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.190402

[46] M. Kessler and R. Arnon-Friedman, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1, 568 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAIT.2020.3012498

[47] L. Hardy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1665 (1993).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1665

[48] R. Ramanathan, M. Horodecki, H. Anwer, S. Pironio, K. Horodecki, M. Grünfeld, S. Muhammad, M. Bourennane, and P. Horodecki, arXiv:1810.11648 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.11648
arXiv:1810.11648

[49] A. Rai, C. Duarte, S. Brito, and R. Chaves, Phys. Rev. A 99, 032106 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.032106

[50] R. Rabelo, L. Y. Zhi, and V. Scarani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 180401 (2012).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.180401

[51] S. Kunkri, S. K. Choudhary, A. Ahanj, and P. Joag, Phys. Rev. A 73, 022346 (2006).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.73.022346

[52] L.-M. Liang and C.-Z. Li, Phys. Lett. A 335, 371 (2005).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2004.12.046

[53] A. Rai, M. Pivoluska, M. Plesch, S. Sasmal, M. Banik, and S. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. A 103, 062219 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.062219

[54] A. Rai, M. Pivoluska, S. Sasmal, M. Banik, S. Ghosh, and M. Plesch, Phys. Rev. A 105, 052227 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.105.052227

[55] J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880

[56] D. Collins and N. Gisin, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37, 1775 (2004).
https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/37/5/021

[57] A. Peres, Found. Phys. 20, 1441 (1990).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883517

[58] Y.-C. Liang, T. Vértesi, and N. Brunner, Phys. Rev. A 83, 022108 (2011a).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.83.022108

[59] T. Vidick and S. Wehner, Phys. Rev. A 83, 052310 (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.83.052310

[60] M. Junge and C. Palazuelos, Commun. Math. Phys. 306, 695 (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-011-1296-8

[61] B. G. Christensen, Y.-C. Liang, N. Brunner, N. Gisin, and P. G. Kwiat, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041052 (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.5.041052

[62] P.-S. Lin, T. Vértesi, and Y.-C. Liang, Quantum 6, 765 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2022-07-14-765

[63] C. Jebarathinam, J.-C. Hung, S.-L. Chen, and Y.-C. Liang, Phys. Rev. Research 1, 033073 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.033073

[64] J. Kaniewski, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033420 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033420

[65] N. Gigena and J. Kaniewski, Phys. Rev. A 106, 012401 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.106.012401

[66] L. Masanes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 050503 (2006).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.050503

[67] T. Franz, F. Furrer, and R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 250502 (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.250502

[68] L. Mančinska and S. Wehner, J. Phys. A: Math. Theo. 47, 424027 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424027

[69] T. Fritz, Found. Phys. 41, 1493 (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-011-9563-2

[70] K. F. Pál and T. Vértesi, Phys. Rev. A 80, 042114 (2009).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.80.042114

[71] J. M. Donohue and E. Wolfe, Phys. Rev. A 92, 062120 (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.062120

[72] Y.-C. Liang, Correlations, Bell Inequality Violation & Quantum Entanglement, Ph.D. thesis, University of Queensland (2008).
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0810.5400

[73] R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 40, 4277 (1989).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.40.4277

[74] Y.-C. Liang, R. W. Spekkens, and H. M. Wiseman, Phys. Rep. 506, 1 (2011b).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2011.05.001

[75] A. Fine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 291 (1982).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.291

[76] Y. Xiang, Chin. Phys. B 20, 060301 (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/20/6/060301

[77] T. H. Yang, T. Vértesi, J.-D. Bancal, V. Scarani, and M. Navascués, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 040401 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.040401

[78] J.-D. Bancal, M. Navascués, V. Scarani, T. Vértesi, and T. H. Yang, Phys. Rev. A 91, 022115 (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.91.022115

[79] T. F. Jordan, Phys. Rev. A 50, 62 (1994).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.50.62

[80] M. T. Quintino, M. Araújo, D. Cavalcanti, M. F. Santos, and M. T. Cunha, J. Phys. A: Math. Theo. 45, 215308 (2012).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/45/21/215308

[81] Y. Wang, X. Wu, and V. Scarani, New J. Phys. 18, 025021 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/2/025021

[82] K.-S. Chen et al., ``Generalizing Hardy's paradox by means of the failure of transitivity of implications,'' (in preparation).

[83] A. Cabello, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032108 (2002).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032108

[84] R. Cleve, P. Hoyer, B. Toner, and J. Watrous, in Proceedings. 19th IEEE Annual Conference on Computational Complexity, 2004. (2004) pp. 236–249.
https://doi.org/10.1109/CCC.2004.1313847

[85] Y.-C. Liang and A. C. Doherty, Phys. Rev. A 75, 042103 (2007).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.75.042103

[86] G. M. D'Ariano, P. L. Presti, and P. Perinotti, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38, 5979 (2005).
https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/38/26/010

[87] W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2245

[88] Y.-C. Liang and A. C. Doherty, Phys. Rev. A 73, 052116 (2006).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.73.052116

[89] J. Kaniewski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 070402 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.070402

[90] T. P. Le, C. Meroni, B. Sturmfels, R. F. Werner, and T. Ziegler, Quantum 7, 947 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-03-16-947

[91] J. Kaniewski, (private communication).

[92] J.-L. Chen, A. Cabello, Z.-P. Xu, H.-Y. Su, C. Wu, and L. C. Kwek, Phys. Rev. A 88, 062116 (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.062116

[93] M. Navascués, S. Pironio, and A. Acín, New J. Phys. 10, 073013 (2008).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/10/7/073013

[94] A. C. Doherty, Y.-C. Liang, B. Toner, and S. Wehner, in 23rd Annu. IEEE Conf. on Comput. Comp, 2008, CCC'08 (Los Alamitos, CA, 2008) pp. 199–210.
https://doi.org/10.1109/CCC.2008.26

[95] S. L. Braunstein, A. Mann, and M. Revzen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3259 (1992).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3259

[96] S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization, 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004).

Cited by

[1] Ranendu Adhikary, Souradeep Sasmal, and Arup Roy, "Self-testing of nonmaximal genuine entangled states using tripartite Hardy relations", Physical Review A 112 2, 022407 (2025).

[2] Pierre Botteron, Anne Broadbent, Reda Chhaibi, Ion Nechita, and Clément Pellegrini, "Algebra of Nonlocal Boxes and the Collapse of Communication Complexity", Quantum 8, 1402 (2024).

[3] Victor Barizien and Jean-Daniel Bancal, "Quantum statistics in the minimal Bell scenario", Nature Physics 21 4, 577 (2025).

[4] Pritam Roy, Subhankar Bera, A. S. Majumdar, and Shiladitya Mal, "Robust certification of quantum instruments through a sequential communication game", Physical Review A 113 2, 022611 (2026).

[5] Kai-Siang Chen, Shiladitya Mal, Gelo Noel M. Tabia, and Yeong-Cherng Liang, "Hardy-type paradoxes for an arbitrary symmetric bipartite Bell scenario", Physical Review A 109 4, 042206 (2024).

[6] Yuan Liu, Ho Yiu Chung, and Ravishankar Ramanathan, "(Almost-)Quantum Bell Inequalities and Device-Independent Applications", Quantum 8, 1489 (2024).

[7] Michael Janas and Michel Janssen, "Broken Arrows: Hardy–Unruh Chains and Quantum Contextuality", Entropy 25 12, 1568 (2023).

[8] Ming Yang, Dongkai Zhang, and Lixiang Chen, "Cabello's nonlocality argument for multisetting high-dimensional systems and its experimental test", Physical Review A 110 1, 012441 (2024).

[9] Zhuo Chen, Fei Shi, and Qi Zhao, "Detecting entanglement and nonlocality with minimum observable length", New Journal of Physics 27 9, 094503 (2025).

[10] Ranendu Adhikary and Mriganka Mandal, "Multipartite Hardy paradox unlocks device-independent key sharing", Physics Letters A 586, 131684 (2026).

[11] Antoni Mikos-Nuszkiewicz and Jędrzej Kaniewski, "Extremal points of the quantum set in the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt scenario: Conjectured analytical solution", Physical Review A 108 1, 012212 (2023).

[12] Gelo Noel M Tabia, Alex Yueh-Ting Shih, Jin-Yuan Zheng, and Yeong-Cherng Liang, "Almost device-independent calibration beyond Born’s rule: Bell tests for cross-talk detection", Quantum Science and Technology 10 3, 035056 (2025).

[13] Lewis Wooltorton, Peter Brown, and Roger Colbeck, "Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution with Arbitrarily Small Nonlocality", Physical Review Letters 132 21, 210802 (2024).

[14] Victor Barizien, Pavel Sekatski, and Jean-Daniel Bancal, "Custom Bell inequalities from formal sums of squares", Quantum 8, 1333 (2024).

[15] Antoni Mikos-Nuszkiewicz and Jędrzej Kaniewski, "Extremal points of the quantum set in the CHSH scenario: conjectured analytical solution", arXiv:2302.10658, (2023).

[16] Yunguang Han, Xin Kuang, Xingyuan Bu, and Yukun Wang, "Device-Independent Self-Testing of the Three-Qubit CCZ Hypergraph State", arXiv:2607.21288, (2026).

The above citations are from Crossref's cited-by service (last updated successfully 2026-08-10 11:02:51) and SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2026-08-09 22:37:11). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.

Could not fetch ADS cited-by data during last attempt 2026-08-10 11:02:51: Cannot retrieve data from ADS due to rate limitations.

This Paper is published in Quantum under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. Copyright remains with the original copyright holders such as the authors or their institutions.