Emergent quantum state designs and biunitarity in dual-unitary circuit dynamics

Pieter W. Claeys; Austen Lamacraft

doi:10.22331/q-2022-06-15-738

Emergent quantum state designs and biunitarity in dual-unitary circuit dynamics

Pieter W. Claeys^1,2 and Austen Lamacraft²

¹Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, 01187 Dresden, Germany
²TCM Group, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK

Published:	2022-06-15, volume 6, page 738
Eprint:	arXiv:2202.12306v2
Doi:	https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2022-06-15-738
Citation:	Quantum 6, 738 (2022).

Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.

Abstract

Recent works have investigated the emergence of a new kind of random matrix behaviour in unitary dynamics following a quantum quench. Starting from a time-evolved state, an ensemble of pure states supported on a small subsystem can be generated by performing projective measurements on the remainder of the system, leading to a $\textit{projected ensemble}$. In chaotic quantum systems it was conjectured that such projected ensembles become indistinguishable from the uniform Haar-random ensemble and lead to a $\textit{quantum state design}$. Exact results were recently presented by Ho and Choi [Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 060601 (2022)] for the kicked Ising model at the self-dual point. We provide an alternative construction that can be extended to general chaotic dual-unitary circuits with solvable initial states and measurements, highlighting the role of the underlying dual-unitarity and further showing how dual-unitary circuit models exhibit both exact solvability and random matrix behaviour. Building on results from biunitary connections, we show how complex Hadamard matrices and unitary error bases both lead to solvable measurement schemes.

Featured image: Schematic illustration of a quantum circuit for which measurements on the observed subsystem B return random states on the unobserved subsystem A.

Popular summary

Recent demonstrations of quantum supremacy have been based on preparing random quantum states. In these experiments randomness was introduced by choosing experimental parameters using ordinary (pseudo-)random number generators. Recently, an alternative approach was suggested: by measuring a part of a large quantum system, the uncertainty inherent in the quantum measurement process itself could be used to generate a random quantum state in the unobserved part of the system.

For this approach to work the state must have a high degree of entanglement between the two subsystems. On the other hand, feasible experimental realisations must be local: formed by operations on neighbouring qubits, for example. In this paper we show that a recently introduced family of quantum circuits made from dual-unitary gates provides precisely the necessary ingredients to build arbitrarily random quantum states by the method of partial measurements. Besides potential applications to benchmarking of quantum computers, our results provide a detailed view of the quantum chaotic properties of the wavefunctions of an extended system.

► BibTeX data

@article{Claeys2022emergentquantum,
  doi = {10.22331/q-2022-06-15-738},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2022-06-15-738},
  title = {Emergent quantum state designs and biunitarity in dual-unitary circuit dynamics},
  author = {Claeys, Pieter W. and Lamacraft, Austen},
  journal = {{Quantum}},
  issn = {2521-327X},
  publisher = {{Verein zur F{\"{o}}rderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften}},
  volume = {6},
  pages = {738},
  month = jun,
  year = {2022}
}

► References

[1] L. D'Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, Adv. Phys. 65, 239 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1080/00018732.2016.1198134

[2] H.-J. Stöckmann, Quantum Chaos: An Introduction (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999).
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511524622

[3] F. Haake, Quantum Signatures of Chaos, Springer Series in Synergetics, Vol. 54 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05428-0

[4] M. Akila, D. Waltner, B. Gutkin, and T. Guhr, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49, 375101 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/49/37/375101

[5] B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. Prosen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 264101 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.264101

[6] B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. Prosen, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021033 (2019a).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.021033

[7] S. Gopalakrishnan and A. Lamacraft, Phys. Rev. B 100, 064309 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.064309

[8] B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. Prosen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 210601 (2019b).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.210601

[9] S. A. Rather, S. Aravinda, and A. Lakshminarayan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 070501 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.070501

[10] B. Gutkin, P. Braun, M. Akila, D. Waltner, and T. Guhr, Phys. Rev. B 102, 174307 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.174307

[11] S. Aravinda, S. A. Rather, and A. Lakshminarayan, Phys. Rev. Research 3, 043034 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.043034

[12] P. W. Claeys and A. Lamacraft, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 100603 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.100603

[13] T. Prosen, Chaos 31, 093101 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0056970

[14] S. Singh and I. Nechita, arXiv:2112.11123 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ac7017
arXiv:2112.11123v1

[15] M. Borsi and B. Pozsgay, arXiv:2201.07768 (2022).
arXiv:2201.07768

[16] P. W. Claeys and A. Lamacraft, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033032 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033032

[17] B. Bertini and L. Piroli, Phys. Rev. B 102, 064305 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.064305

[18] R. Suzuki, K. Mitarai, and K. Fujii, Quantum 6, 631 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2022-01-24-631

[19] L. Piroli, B. Bertini, J. I. Cirac, and T. Prosen, Phys. Rev. B 101, 094304 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.094304

[20] B. Jonnadula, P. Mandayam, K. Życzkowski, and A. Lakshminarayan, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 043126 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043126

[21] I. Reid and B. Bertini, Phys. Rev. B 104, 014301 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.014301

[22] P. Kos, B. Bertini, and T. Prosen, Phys. Rev. X 11, 011022 (2021a).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.011022

[23] A. Lerose, M. Sonner, and D. A. Abanin, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021040 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021040

[24] G. Giudice, G. Giudici, M. Sonner, J. Thoenniss, A. Lerose, D. A. Abanin, and L. Piroli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 220401 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.220401

[25] A. Lerose, M. Sonner, and D. A. Abanin, arXiv:2201.04150 (2022).
arXiv:2201.04150

[26] A. Zabalo, M. Gullans, J. Wilson, R. Vasseur, A. Ludwig, S. Gopalakrishnan, D. A. Huse, and J. Pixley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 050602 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.050602

[27] E. Chertkov, J. Bohnet, D. Francois, J. Gaebler, D. Gresh, A. Hankin, K. Lee, R. Tobey, D. Hayes, B. Neyenhuis, R. Stutz, A. C. Potter, and M. Foss-Feig, arXiv:2105.09324 (2021).
arXiv:2105.09324

[28] X. Mi, P. Roushan, C. Quintana, S. Mandrà, J. Marshall, C. Neill, F. Arute, K. Arya, J. Atalaya, R. Babbush, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, J. Basso, A. Bengtsson, S. Boixo, A. Bourassa, M. Broughton, B. B. Buckley, D. A. Buell, B. Burkett, N. Bushnell, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, R. Collins, W. Courtney, S. Demura, A. R. Derk, A. Dunsworth, D. Eppens, C. Erickson, E. Farhi, A. G. Fowler, B. Foxen, C. Gidney, M. Giustina, J. A. Gross, M. P. Harrigan, S. D. Harrington, J. Hilton, A. Ho, S. Hong, T. Huang, W. J. Huggins, L. B. Ioffe, S. V. Isakov, E. Jeffrey, Z. Jiang, C. Jones, D. Kafri, J. Kelly, S. Kim, A. Kitaev, P. V. Klimov, A. N. Korotkov, F. Kostritsa, D. Landhuis, P. Laptev, E. Lucero, O. Martin, J. R. McClean, T. McCourt, M. McEwen, A. Megrant, K. C. Miao, M. Mohseni, S. Montazeri, W. Mruczkiewicz, J. Mutus, O. Naaman, M. Neeley, M. Newman, M. Y. Niu, T. E. O’Brien, A. Opremcak, E. Ostby, B. Pato, A. Petukhov, N. Redd, N. C. Rubin, D. Sank, K. J. Satzinger, V. Shvarts, D. Strain, M. Szalay, M. D. Trevithick, B. Villalonga, T. White, Z. J. Yao, P. Yeh, A. Zalcman, H. Neven, I. Aleiner, K. Kechedzhi, V. Smelyanskiy, and Y. Chen, Science (2021), 10.1126/science.abg5029.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg5029

[29] B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. Prosen, Commun. Math. Phys. 387, 597 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-021-04139-2

[30] P. Kos, B. Bertini, and T. Prosen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 190601 (2021b).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.190601

[31] F. Fritzsch and T. Prosen, Phys. Rev. E 103, 062133 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.103.062133

[32] J. S. Cotler, D. K. Mark, H.-Y. Huang, F. Hernandez, J. Choi, A. L. Shaw, M. Endres, and S. Choi, arXiv:2103.03536 (2021).
arXiv:2103.03536

[33] J. Choi, A. L. Shaw, I. S. Madjarov, X. Xie, J. P. Covey, J. S. Cotler, D. K. Mark, H.-Y. Huang, A. Kale, H. Pichler, F. G. S. L. Brandão, S. Choi, and M. Endres, arXiv:2103.03535 (2021).
arXiv:2103.03535

[34] W. W. Ho and S. Choi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 060601 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.060601

[35] D. Gross, K. Audenaert, and J. Eisert, J. Math. Phys. 48, 052104 (2007).
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2716992

[36] A. Ambainis and J. Emerson, in Twenty-Second Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC'07) (2007) pp. 129–140, iSSN: 1093-0159.
https://doi.org/10.1109/CCC.2007.26

[37] D. A. Roberts and B. Yoshida, J. High Energ. Phys. 2017, 121 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2017)121

[38] H. Wilming and I. Roth, arXiv:2202.01669 (2022).
arXiv:2202.01669

[39] D. J. Reutter and J. Vicary, Higher Structures 3, 109 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1609.07775

[40] A. Chandran and C. R. Laumann, Phys. Rev. B 92, 024301 (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.024301

[41] A. Nahum, J. Ruhman, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031016 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.7.031016

[42] V. Khemani, A. Vishwanath, and D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031057 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031057

[43] C. von Keyserlingk, T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann, and S. Sondhi, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021013 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.021013

[44] A. Nahum, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021014 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.021014

[45] A. Chan, A. De Luca, and J. Chalker, Phys. Rev. X 8, 041019 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.041019

[46] T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann, and C. von Keyserlingk, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031058 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031058

[47] T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann, and C. von Keyserlingk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 250602 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.250602

[48] T. Zhou and A. Nahum, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031066 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.10.031066

[49] S. Garratt and J. Chalker, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021051 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021051

[50] J. Bensa and M. Žnidarič, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031019 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.031019

[51] R. Orús, Ann. Phys. 349, 117 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2014.06.013

[52] B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. Prosen, SciPost Phys. 8, 067 (2020a).
https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.8.4.067

[53] D. Weingarten, J. Math. Phys. 19, 999 (1978).
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.523807

[54] B. Collins, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2003, 953 (2003).
https://doi.org/10.1155/S107379280320917X

[55] B. Collins and P. Śniady, Commun. Math. Phys. 264, 773 (2006).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-006-1554-3

[56] B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. Prosen, SciPost Phy. 8, 068 (2020b).
https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.8.4.068

[57] Z. Webb, QIC 16, 1379 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.26421/QIC16.15-16-8

[58] E. Knill, Non-binary unitary error bases and quantum codes, Tech. Rep. LA-UR-96-2717 (Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States), 1996).
https://doi.org/10.2172/373768

[59] P. Shor, in Proceedings of 37th Conference on Foundations of Computer Science (1996) pp. 56–65, iSSN: 0272-5428.
https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1996.548464

[60] R. F. Werner, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34, 7081 (2001).
https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/332

[61] J. Hauschild and F. Pollmann, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 005 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.5

[62] Y. Li, X. Chen, and M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 98, 205136 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.205136

[63] B. Skinner, J. Ruhman, and A. Nahum, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031009 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031009

[64] A. Chan, R. M. Nandkishore, M. Pretko, and G. Smith, Phys. Rev. B 99, 224307 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.224307

[65] M. J. Gullans and D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. X 10, 041020 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.10.041020

[66] M. Ippoliti and W. W. Ho, arXiv:2204.13657 (2022).
arXiv:2204.13657

Cited by

[1] Shao-Kai Jian and Yuzhen Zhang, "Subsystem complexity and measurements in holography", Journal of High Energy Physics 2024 5, 241 (2024).

[2] Pieter W Claeys and Austen Lamacraft, "Operator dynamics and entanglement in space-time dual Hadamard lattices", Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 57 40, 405301 (2024).

[3] Alessandro Foligno, Pavel Kos, and Bruno Bertini, "Quantum Information Spreading in Generalized Dual-Unitary Circuits", Physical Review Letters 132 25, 250402 (2024).

[4] Pieter W. Claeys, Marius Henry, Jamie Vicary, and Austen Lamacraft, "Exact dynamics in dual-unitary quantum circuits with projective measurements", Physical Review Research 4 4, 043212 (2022).

[5] Maxime Lucas, Lorenzo Piroli, Jacopo De Nardis, and Andrea De Luca, "Generalized deep thermalization for free fermions", Physical Review A 107 3, 032215 (2023).

[6] Philippe Suchsland, Roderich Moessner, and Pieter W. Claeys, "Krylov complexity and Trotter transitions in unitary circuit dynamics", Physical Review B 111 1, 014309 (2025).

[7] Grace M. Sommers, David A. Huse, and Michael J. Gullans, "Crystalline Quantum Circuits", PRX Quantum 4 3, 030313 (2023).

[8] Pieter W. Claeys and Giuseppe De Tomasi, "Fock-Space Delocalization and the Emergence of the Porter-Thomas Distribution from Dual-Unitary Dynamics", Physical Review Letters 134 5, 050405 (2025).

[9] Jonathon Riddell, Curt von Keyserlingk, Tomaž Prosen, and Bruno Bertini, "Structural stability hypothesis of dual unitary quantum chaos", Physical Review Research 6 3, 033226 (2024).

[10] Chang Liu, Qi Camm Huang, and Wen Wei Ho, "Deep Thermalization in Gaussian Continuous-Variable Quantum Systems", Physical Review Letters 133 26, 260401 (2024).

[11] Matteo Ippoliti and Wen Wei Ho, "Dynamical Purification and the Emergence of Quantum State Designs from the Projected Ensemble", PRX Quantum 4 3, 030322 (2023).

[12] Nicolas Loizeau, Berislav Buča, and Dries Sels, "Opening Krylov Space to Access All-Time Dynamics via Dynamical Symmetries", Physical Review Letters 135 20, 200401 (2025).

[13] Sreemayee Aditya, Xhek Turkeshi, and Piotr Sierant, "Growth and spreading of quantum resources under random circuit dynamics", Physical Review Research 8 3, 033062 (2026).

[14] Xi-Dan Hu and Dan-Bo Zhang, "Exact correlation functions for dual-unitary quantum circuits with exceptional points", Physical Review B 111 2, 024301 (2025).

[15] David T. Stephen, Wen Wei Ho, Tzu-Chieh Wei, Robert Raussendorf, and Ruben Verresen, "Universal Measurement-Based Quantum Computation in a One-Dimensional Architecture Enabled by Dual-Unitary Circuits", Physical Review Letters 132 25, 250601 (2024).

[16] Michael Alexander Rampp, Suhail A. Rather, and Pieter W. Claeys, "Geometric constructions of generalized dual-unitary circuits from biunitarity", SciPost Physics 18 6, 182 (2025).

[17] Michael A. Rampp, Roderich Moessner, and Pieter W. Claeys, "From Dual Unitarity to Generic Quantum Operator Spreading", Physical Review Letters 130 13, 130402 (2023).

[18] Felix Fritzsch, Tomaž Prosen, and Silvia Pappalardi, "Microcanonical free cumulants in lattice systems", Physical Review B 111 5, 054303 (2025).

[19] Martin Seltmann and Berislav Buča, "UniqueNESS: graph theory approach to the uniqueness of non-equilibrium stationary states of the Lindblad master equation", Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 59 16, 165203 (2026).

[20] G. J. Sreejith and Sandipan Manna, "Signatures of quantum chaos and complexity in the Ising model on random graphs", Physical Review B 113 21, 214322 (2026).

[21] Matteo Ippoliti and Wen Wei Ho, "Solvable model of deep thermalization with distinct design times", Quantum 6, 886 (2022).

[22] Suhail Ahmad Rather, "Construction of perfect tensors using biunimodular vectors", Quantum 8, 1528 (2024).

[23] Tom Holden-Dye, Lluis Masanes, and Arijeet Pal, "Fundamental charges for dual-unitary circuits", Quantum 9, 1615 (2025).

[24] Saúl Pilatowsky-Cameo, Ceren B. Dag, Wen Wei Ho, and Soonwon Choi, "Complete Hilbert-Space Ergodicity in Quantum Dynamics of Generalized Fibonacci Drives", Physical Review Letters 131 25, 250401 (2023).

[25] Xie-Hang Yu, Wen Wei Ho, and Pavel Kos, "Mixed State Deep Thermalization", Physical Review Letters 135 26, 260402 (2025).

[26] Bruno Bertini, Pieter W. Claeys, and Tomaž Prosen, "Exactly solvable quantum many-body dynamics from space-time duality", Reviews of Modern Physics 98 2, 025001 (2026).

[27] Rui-An Chang, Harshank Shrotriya, Wen Wei Ho, and Matteo Ippoliti, "Deep Thermalization under Charge-Conserving Quantum Dynamics", PRX Quantum 6 2, 020343 (2025).

[28] Haifeng Tang, Shreya Vardhan, and Jinzhao Wang, "Estimating time in quantum chaotic systems and black holes", SciPost Physics 19 4, 095 (2025).

[29] Saúl Pilatowsky-Cameo, Iman Marvian, Soonwon Choi, and Wen Wei Ho, "Hilbert-Space Ergodicity in Driven Quantum Systems: Obstructions and Designs", Physical Review X 14 4, 041059 (2024).

[30] Wai-Keong Mok, Tobias Haug, Adam L. Shaw, Manuel Endres, and John Preskill, "Optimal Conversion from Classical to Quantum Randomness via Quantum Chaos", Physical Review Letters 134 18, 180403 (2025).

[31] Max McGinley, Wen Wei Ho, and Daniel Malz, "Measurement-Induced Entanglement and Complexity in Random Constant-Depth 2D Quantum Circuits", Physical Review X 15 2, 021059 (2025).

[32] Max McGinley and Michele Fava, "Shadow Tomography from Emergent State Designs in Analog Quantum Simulators", Physical Review Letters 131 16, 160601 (2023).

[33] Michele Fava, Jorge Kurchan, and Silvia Pappalardi, "Designs via Free Probability", Physical Review X 15 1, 011031 (2025).

[34] Harshank Shrotriya and Wen Wei Ho, "Nonlocality of deep thermalization", SciPost Physics 18 3, 107 (2025).

[35] Mircea Bejan, Benjamin Béri, and Max McGinley, "Matchgate Circuits Deeply Thermalize", Physical Review Letters 135 2, 020401 (2025).

[36] Matteo Ippoliti, "Classical shadows based on locally-entangled measurements", Quantum 8, 1293 (2024).

[37] Samuel J. Garratt and Ehud Altman, "Probing Postmeasurement Entanglement without Postselection", PRX Quantum 5 3, 030311 (2024).

[38] Alessandro Foligno and Bruno Bertini, "Growth of entanglement of generic states under dual-unitary dynamics", Physical Review B 107 17, 174311 (2023).

[39] Silvia Pappalardi, Felix Fritzsch, and Tomaž Prosen, "Full Eigenstate Thermalization via Free Cumulants in Quantum Lattice Systems", Physical Review Letters 134 14, 140404 (2025).

[40] Arman Sauliere, Beatrice Magni, Guglielmo Lami, Xhek Turkeshi, and Jacopo De Nardis, "Universality in the anticoncentration of chaotic quantum circuits", Physical Review B 112 13, 134312 (2025).

[41] Michael A. Rampp, Suhail A. Rather, and Pieter W. Claeys, "Entanglement membrane in exactly solvable lattice models", Physical Review Research 6 3, 033271 (2024).

[42] Alessio Paviglianiti, Xhek Turkeshi, Marco Schirò, and Alessandro Silva, "Enhanced Entanglement in the Measurement-Altered Quantum Ising Chain", Quantum 8, 1576 (2024).

[43] Amos Chan and Andrea De Luca, "Projected state ensemble of a generic model of many-body quantum chaos", Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 57 40, 405001 (2024).

[44] Felix Fritzsch, Maximilian F. I. Kieler, and Arnd Bäcker, "Eigenstate Correlations in Dual-Unitary Quantum Circuits: Partial Spectral Form Factor", Quantum 9, 1709 (2025).

[45] Pieter W Claeys, Austen Lamacraft, and Jamie Vicary, "From dual-unitary to biunitary: a 2-categorical model for exactly-solvable many-body quantum dynamics", Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 57 33, 335301 (2024).

[46] Alexey Milekhin and Sara Murciano, "Observable-projected ensembles", Quantum 9, 1888 (2025).

[47] Naga Dileep Varikuti and Soumik Bandyopadhyay, "Unraveling the emergence of quantum state designs in systems with symmetry", Quantum 8, 1456 (2024).

[48] Jiangtian Yao and Pieter W. Claeys, "Temporal entanglement barriers in dual-unitary Clifford circuits with measurements", Physical Review Research 6 4, 043077 (2024).

[49] Guglielmo Lami, Jacopo De Nardis, and Xhek Turkeshi, "Anticoncentration and State Design of Random Tensor Networks", Physical Review Letters 134 1, 010401 (2025).

[50] Felix Fritzsch and Tomaž Prosen, "Boundary chaos: Spectral form factor", SciPost Physics 17 5, 142 (2024).

[51] Felix Fritzsch and Pieter W. Claeys, "Free Probability in a Minimal Quantum Circuit Model", Physical Review X 16 3, 031027 (2026).

[52] Daniel K. Mark, Federica Surace, Andreas Elben, Adam L. Shaw, Joonhee Choi, Gil Refael, Manuel Endres, and Soonwon Choi, "Maximum Entropy Principle in Deep Thermalization and in Hilbert-Space Ergodicity", Physical Review X 14 4, 041051 (2024).

[53] Berislav Buča, "Unified Theory of Local Quantum Many-Body Dynamics: Eigenoperator Thermalization Theorems", Physical Review X 13 3, 031013 (2023).

[54] Hyaline Junhe Chen and Jonah Kudler-Flam, "Free independence and the noncrossing partition lattice in dual-unitary quantum circuits", Physical Review B 111 1, 014311 (2025).

[55] Kai Klocke and Michael Buchhold, "Majorana Loop Models for Measurement-Only Quantum Circuits", Physical Review X 13 4, 041028 (2023).

[56] Minh C. Tran, Daniel K. Mark, Wen Wei Ho, and Soonwon Choi, "Measuring Arbitrary Physical Properties in Analog Quantum Simulation", Physical Review X 13 1, 011049 (2023).

[57] Mao Tian Tan and Tomaž Prosen, "Logarithmic growth of operator entanglement in a clean nonintegrable circuit", Physical Review B 113 22, 224316 (2026).

[58] Pieter W. Claeys, "Universality in quantum snapshots", Quantum Views 7, 71 (2023).

[59] Oliver Breach, Benedikt Placke, Pieter W. Claeys, and S.A. Parameswaran, "Solvable Quantum Circuits in Tree+1 Dimensions", PRX Quantum 6 4, 040316 (2025).

[60] Hugo Lóio, Andrea De Luca, Jacopo De Nardis, and Xhek Turkeshi, "Purification timescales in monitored fermions", Physical Review B 108 2, L020306 (2023).

[61] Saptarshi Mandal, Pieter W. Claeys, and Sthitadhi Roy, "Partial projected ensembles and spatiotemporal structure of information scrambling", Physical Review B 113 2, 024303 (2026).

[62] Michael A. Rampp and Pieter W. Claeys, "Hayden-Preskill recovery in chaotic and integrable unitary circuit dynamics", Quantum 8, 1434 (2024).

[63] Pavel Kos and Georgios Styliaris, "Circuits of space and time quantum channels", Quantum 7, 1020 (2023).

[64] Elisa Vallini and Silvia Pappalardi, "Long-time Freeness in the Kicked Top", Quantum 10, 2129 (2026).

[65] Max McGinley, "Postselection-Free Learning of Measurement-Induced Quantum Dynamics", PRX Quantum 5 2, 020347 (2024).

[66] Márton Mestyán, Balázs Pozsgay, and Ian M. Wanless, "Multi-directional unitarity and maximal entanglement in spatially symmetric quantum states", SciPost Physics 16 1, 010 (2024).

[67] Xie-Hang Yu, Zhiyuan Wang, and Pavel Kos, "Hierarchical generalization of dual unitarity", Quantum 8, 1260 (2024).

[68] Chang Liu, Matteo Ippoliti, and Wen Wei Ho, "Coherence-Induced Deep Thermalization Transition in Random Permutation Quantum Dynamics", Physical Review Letters 136 10, 100404 (2026).

[69] Suhail Ahmad Rather, S. Aravinda, and Arul Lakshminarayan, "Construction and Local Equivalence of Dual-Unitary Operators: From Dynamical Maps to Quantum Combinatorial Designs", PRX Quantum 3 4, 040331 (2022).

[70] Kabir Khanna and Romain Vasseur, "Universal Statistics of Measurement-Induced Entanglement in Tomonaga-Luttinger liquids", arXiv:2512.13809, (2025).

[71] Pratik Nandy, "Unitary $k$-designs without Hamiltonian quenches", arXiv:2607.20640, (2026).

The above citations are from Crossref's cited-by service (last updated successfully 2026-08-07 05:26:12) and SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2026-08-06 15:45:10). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.

Could not fetch ADS cited-by data during last attempt 2026-08-07 05:26:12: Cannot retrieve data from ADS due to rate limitations.

This Paper is published in Quantum under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. Copyright remains with the original copyright holders such as the authors or their institutions.