Quantum measurement is a basic tool to manifest intrinsic quantum effects from fundamental tests to quantum information applications. While a measurement is typically performed to gain information on a quantum state, its role in quantum technology is indeed manifold. For instance, quantum measurement is a crucial process element in measurement-based quantum computation. It is also used to detect and correct errors thereby protecting quantum information in error-correcting frameworks. It is therefore important to fully characterize the roles of quantum measurement encompassing information gain, state disturbance and reversibility, together with their fundamental relations. Numerous efforts have been made to obtain the trade-off between information gain and state disturbance, which becomes a practical basis for secure information processing. However, a complete information balance is necessary to include the reversibility of quantum measurement, which constitutes an integral part of practical quantum information processing. We here establish all pairs of trade-off relations involving information gain, disturbance, and reversibility, and crucially the one among all of them together. By doing so, we show that the reversibility plays a vital role in completing the information balance. Remarkably, our result can be interpreted as an information-conservation law of quantum measurement in a nontrivial form. We completely identify the conditions for optimal measurements that satisfy the conservation for each tradeoff relation with their potential applications. Our work can provide a useful guideline for designing a quantum measurement in accordance with the aims of quantum information processors.
 M. T. Quintino, T. Vértesi, and N. Brunner, Joint Measurability, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering, and Bell Nonlocality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 160402 (2014).
 R. Uola, T. Moroder, and O. Gühne, Joint Measurability of Generalized Measurements Implies Classicality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 160403 (2014).
 C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and einstein-podolsky-rosen channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).
 C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing, 175 (1984).
 C. A. Fuchs and A. Peres, Quantum-state disturbance versus information gain: Uncertainty relations for quantum information, Phys. Rev. A 53, 2038 (1996).
 F. Buscemi, M. Hayashi, and M. Horodecki, Global information balance in quantum measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 210504 (2008).
 M. Berta, J. M. Renes, and M. M. Wilde, Identifying the information gain of a quantum measurement, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 60, 7987 (2014).
 Y.-S. Kim, J.-C. Lee, O. Kwon, and Y.-H. Kim, Protecting entanglement from decoherence using weak measurement and quantum measurement reversal, Nature Physics 8, 117 (2012).
 N. Katz, M. Neeley, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bialczak, M. Hofheinz, E. Lucero, A. O'Connell, H. Wang, A. N. Cleland, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Korotkov, Reversal of the weak measurement of a quantum state in a superconducting phase qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 200401 (2008).
 P. Schindler, T. Monz, D. Nigg, J. T. Barreiro, E. A. Martinez, M. F. Brandl, M. Chwalla, M. Hennrich, and R. Blatt, Undoing a Quantum Measurement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 070403 (2013).
 J.-C. Lee, Y.-C. Jeong, Y.-S. Kim, and Y.-H. Kim, Experimental demonstration of decoherence suppression via quantum measurement reversal, Optics Express 19, 16309 (2011).
 Y. W. Cheong and S.-W. Lee, Balance between information gain and reversibility in weak measurement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 150402 (2012).
 H.-T. Lim, Y.-S. Ra, K.-H. Hong, S.-W. Lee, and Y.-H. Kim, Fundamental bounds in measurements for estimating quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 020504 (2014).
 G. Chen, Y. Zou, X.-Y. Xu, J.-S. Tang, Y.-L. Li, J.-S. Xu, Y.-J. Han, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, H.-Q. Ni, Y. Yu, M.-F. Li, G.-W. Zha, Z.-C. Niu, and Y. Kedem, Experimental Test of the State Estimation-Reversal Tradeoff Relation in General Quantum Measurements, Phys. Rev. X 4, 021043 (2014).
 M. Junge, R. Renner, D. Sutter, M. M. Wilde, and A. Winter, Universal recovery maps and approximate sufficiency of quantum relative entropy, Annales Henri Poincare 19, 2955 (2018).
 F. Sciarrino, M. Ricci, F. De Martini, R. Filip, and L. Mišta, Jr., Realization of a minimal disturbance quantum measurement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 020408 (2006).
 F. Buscemi, S. Das, and M. M. Wilde, Approximate reversibility in the context of entropy gain, information gain, and complete positivity, Phys. Rev. A 93, 062314 (2016).
 T. Sagawa and M. Ueda, Second law of thermodynamics with discrete quantum feedback control, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 080403 (2008).
 Dong-Gil Im, Chung-Hyun Lee, Yosep Kim, Hyunchul Nha, M. S. Kim, Seung-Woo Lee, and Yoon-Ho Kim, "Optimal teleportation via noisy quantum channels without additional qubit resources", npj Quantum Information 7 1, 86 (2021).
 Seongjin Hong, Yong-Su Kim, Young-Wook Cho, Jaewan Kim, Seung-Woo Lee, and Hyang-Tag Lim, "Demonstration of Complete Information Trade-Off in Quantum Measurement", Physical Review Letters 128 5, 050401 (2022).
 Yuan Sun, Nan Li, and Shunlong Luo, "Fidelity-disturbance-entropy tradeoff in quantum channels", Physical Review A 105 6, 062458 (2022).
 Huarui Xing, Shuming Cheng, and Lijun Liu, 2021 40th Chinese Control Conference (CCC) 6347 (2021) ISBN:978-9-8815-6380-4.
 Sajede Harraz, Shuang Cong, and Juan J. Nieto, "Comparison of quantum state protection against decoherence via weak measurement, a survey", International Journal of Quantum Information 20 04, 2250007 (2022).
 Shuming Cheng, Lijun Liu, Travis J. Baker, and Michael J. W. Hall, "Recycling qubits for the generation of Bell nonlocality between independent sequential observers", Physical Review A 105 2, 022411 (2022).
The above citations are from Crossref's cited-by service (last updated successfully 2022-07-01 19:20:34). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.
On SAO/NASA ADS no data on citing works was found (last attempt 2022-07-01 19:20:34).
This Paper is published in Quantum under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. Copyright remains with the original copyright holders such as the authors or their institutions.