A resource efficient approach for quantum and classical simulations of gauge theories in particle physics

Jan F. Haase; Luca Dellantonio; Alessio Celi; Danny Paulson; Angus Kan; Karl Jansen; Christine A. Muschik

doi:10.22331/q-2021-02-04-393

A resource efficient approach for quantum and classical simulations of gauge theories in particle physics

Jan F. Haase^1,2, Luca Dellantonio^1,2, Alessio Celi^3,4, Danny Paulson^1,2, Angus Kan^1,2, Karl Jansen⁵, and Christine A. Muschik^1,2,6

¹Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada, N2L 3G1
²Institute for Quantum Computing, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada, N2L 3G1
³Departament de Física, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, E-08193 Bellaterra, Spain
⁴Center for Quantum Physics, Faculty of Mathematics, Computer Science and Physics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck A-6020, Austria
⁵NIC, DESY, Platanenallee 6, D-15738 Zeuthen, Germany
⁶Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Waterloo, ON, Canada, N2L 2Y5

Published:	2021-02-04, volume 5, page 393
Eprint:	arXiv:2006.14160v3
Doi:	https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2021-02-04-393
Citation:	Quantum 5, 393 (2021).

Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.

Abstract

Gauge theories establish the standard model of particle physics, and lattice gauge theory (LGT) calculations employing Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods have been pivotal in our understanding of fundamental interactions. The present limitations of MCMC techniques may be overcome by Hamiltonian-based simulations on classical or quantum devices, which further provide the potential to address questions that lay beyond the capabilities of the current approaches. However, for continuous gauge groups, Hamiltonian-based formulations involve infinite-dimensional gauge degrees of freedom that can solely be handled by truncation. Current truncation schemes require dramatically increasing computational resources at small values of the bare couplings, where magnetic field effects become important. Such limitation precludes one from `taking the continuous limit' while working with finite resources. To overcome this limitation, we provide a resource-efficient protocol to simulate LGTs with continuous gauge groups in the Hamiltonian formulation. Our new method allows for calculations at arbitrary values of the bare coupling and lattice spacing. The approach consists of the combination of a Hilbert space truncation with a regularization of the gauge group, which permits an efficient description of the magnetically-dominated regime. We focus here on Abelian gauge theories and use $2+1$ dimensional quantum electrodynamics as a benchmark example to demonstrate this efficient framework to achieve the continuum limit in LGTs. This possibility is a key requirement to make quantitative predictions at the field theory level and offers the long-term perspective to utilise quantum simulations to compute physically meaningful quantities in regimes that are precluded to quantum Monte Carlo.

Popular summary

Gauge theories are at the basis of the standard model, which describes fundamental particle interactions and thus the universe surrounding us. Besides other things, these theories tell us why particles bind together in nuclei to eventually form atoms and how they interact with each other. To mention a famous example where gauge theories have played a key role is the discovery of the Higgs boson which is responsible for the mass of the fundamental particles.
While the standard model, which is built on gauge theories,has already pushed the boundary of our knowledge, many open questions remain since their simulation is notoriously difficult in certain parameter regimes which are, however, important to understand physical phenomena such as the matter antimatter asymmetry of CP violation. Standard methods encounter problems that cannot or are extremely hardly be solved by using classical computing approaches — though quantum algorithms and hence quantum computers qualify as excellent candidates to drive another wave of innovations in particle physics.

In this work, we show how the gauge fields of a lattice gauge theory can be efficiently simulated. Generally, an exact description of the system requires an infinite amount of degrees of freedom, which practically cannot be taken into account. Therefore, any numerical method needs to apply a cutoff to these degrees of freedom, which in turn reduces the accuracy of the simulation. We provide a novel protocol leading to a cutoff, that allows for an efficient implementation of the problem. Importantly, it is applicable in both, quantum algorithms as well as classical simulation techniques. Furthermore, we provide the tools to estimate the error of the simulation if compared to the exact result from the untruncated theory. Our protocol is flexible and can be optimized for the available resources, for example the number of qubits in a quantum computer or the available memory in a classical machine.

As an application, we consider quantum electrodynamics in two spatial and one temporal dimensions as a benchmarking example. For intermediate values of the coupling – the most difficult regime – we reduce the required number of quantum states by one order of magnitude.
Our method will play an important role in the simulation of lattice gauge theories, whether they are quantum or classical and hence opens a path towards simulations of underlying models of the standard model of high energy physics, providing the possibility to address so far unanswered fundamental questions.

► BibTeX data

@article{Haase2021resourceefficient,
  doi = {10.22331/q-2021-02-04-393},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2021-02-04-393},
  title = {A resource efficient approach for quantum and classical simulations of gauge theories in particle physics},
  author = {Haase, Jan F. and Dellantonio, Luca and Celi, Alessio and Paulson, Danny and Kan, Angus and Jansen, Karl and Muschik, Christine A.},
  journal = {{Quantum}},
  issn = {2521-327X},
  publisher = {{Verein zur F{\"{o}}rderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften}},
  volume = {5},
  pages = {393},
  month = feb,
  year = {2021}
}

► References

[1] W. N. Cottingham and D. A. Greenwood, An Introduction to the Standard Model of Particle Physics, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791406

[2] G. Altarelli, Collider Physics within the Standard Model, 1st ed., Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 937 (Springer International Publishing, 2017).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51920-3

[3] M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An introduction to quantum field theory (CRC press, 2018).

[4] G. Altarelli, Frascati Phys. Ser. 58, 102 (2014).
arXiv:1407.2122

[5] M. J. Veltman, Facts and Mysteries in Elementary Particle Physics (World Scientific, 2018).
https://doi.org/10.1142/10904

[6] T. DeGrand and C. E. Detar, Lattice methods for quantum chromodynamics (World Scientific, 2006).
https://doi.org/10.1142/6065

[7] H. J. Rothe, Lattice Gauge Theories (World Scientific, 1992).
https://doi.org/10.1142/8229

[8] C. Gattringer and C. B. Lang, Quantum chromodynamics on the lattice, Vol. 788 (Springer, Berlin, 2010).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01850-3

[9] K. G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2445 (1974).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2445

[10] S. Durr et al., Science 322, 1224 (2008).
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1163233

[11] M. Constantinou, PoS CD15, 009 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.22323/1.253.0009

[12] A. Prokudin, K. Cichy, and M. Constantinou, Advances in High Energy Physics 2019, 3036904 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3036904

[13] H. B. Meyer and H. Wittig, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 104, 46 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.09.001

[14] A. Juttner, PoS LATTICE 2015, 006 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.22323/1.251.0006

[15] M. Troyer and U.-J. Wiese, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 170201 (2005).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.170201

[16] M. C. Bañuls and K. Cichy, Rept. Prog. Phys. 83, 024401 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ab6311

[17] M. C. Bañuls, K. Cichy, J. I. Cirac, K. Jansen, and S. Kühn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 071601 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.071601

[18] T. Sugihara, J. High Energy Phys. 2005, 022 (2005).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2005/07/022

[19] L. Tagliacozzo, A. Celi, and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. X 4, 041024 (2014).

[20] E. Rico, T. Pichler, M. Dalmonte, P. Zoller, and S. Montangero, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 201601 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.201601

[21] E. Zohar, M. Burrello, T. B. Wahl, and J. I. Cirac, Annals of Physics 363, 385 (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2015.10.009

[22] J. Haegeman, K. Van Acoleyen, N. Schuch, J. I. Cirac, and F. Verstraete, Phys. Rev. X 5, 011024 (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.5.011024

[23] T. Pichler, M. Dalmonte, E. Rico, P. Zoller, and S. Montangero, Phys. Rev. X 6, 011023 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.6.011023

[24] E. Zohar and M. Burrello, New Journal of Physics 18, 043008 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/4/043008

[25] P. Silvi, E. Rico, M. Dalmonte, F. Tschirsich, and S. Montangero, Quantum 1, 9 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2017-04-25-9

[26] M. C. Bañuls, K. Cichy, J. I. Cirac, K. Jansen, and S. Kühn, PoS LATTICE2018, 022 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.22323/1.334.0022

[27] G. Magnifico, D. Vodola, E. Ercolessi, S. P. Kumar, M. Müller, and A. Bermudez, Phys. Rev. B 100, 115152 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.115152

[28] T. Chanda, J. Zakrzewski, M. Lewenstein, and L. Tagliacozzo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 180602 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.180602

[29] F. Tschirsich, S. Montangero, and M. Dalmonte, SciPost Phys. 6, 28 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.6.3.028

[30] T. Felser, P. Silvi, M. Collura, and S. Montangero, Phys. Rev. X 10, 041040 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.10.041040

[31] D. Paulson, L. Dellantonio, J. F. Haase, A. Celi, A. Kan, A. Jena, C. Kokail, R. van Bijnen, K. Jansen, P. Zoller, and C. A. Muschik, (2020), arXiv:2008.09252 [quant-ph].
arXiv:2008.09252

[32] T. Byrnes and Y. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. A 73, 022328 (2006).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.73.022328

[33] J. Preskill, arXiv:1811.10085.
arXiv:1811.10085

[34] M. C. Bañuls, R. Blatt, J. Catani, A. Celi, J. I. Cirac, M. Dalmonte, L. Fallani, K. Jansen, M. Lewenstein, S. Montangero, et al., The European physical journal D 74, 1 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2020-100571-8

[35] M. C. Bañuls and K. Cichy, Rep. Prog. Phys. 83, 024401 (2020).

[36] W. P. Schleich, K. S. Ranade, C. Anton, M. Arndt, M. Aspelmeyer, et al., Appl. Phys. B 122, 130 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-016-6353-8

[37] A. Acín, I. Bloch, H. Buhrman, T. Calarco, C. Eichler, et al., New J. Phys. 20, 080201 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aad1ea

[38] E. A. Martinez, C. A. Muschik, P. Schindler, D. Nigg, A. Erhard, et al., Nature 534, 516 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18318

[39] N. Klco, E. F. Dumitrescu, A. J. McCaskey, T. D. Morris, R. C. Pooser, et al., Phys. Rev. A 98, 032331 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.032331

[40] C. Kokail, C. Maier, R. van Bijnen, T. Brydges, M. K. Joshi, et al., Nature 569, 355 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1177-4

[41] A. Mil, T. V. Zache, A. Hegde, A. Xia, R. P. Bhatt, et al., Science 367, 1128 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz5312

[42] B. Yang, H. Sun, R. Ott, H.-Y. Wang, T. V. Zache, J. C. Halimeh, Z.-S. Yuan, P. Hauke, and J.-W. Pan, Nature 587, 392 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2910-8

[43] C. Schweizer, F. Grusdt, M. Berngruber, L. Barbiero, E. Demler, et al., Nat. Phys. 15, 1168 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0649-7

[44] F. Görg, K. Sandholzer, J. Minguzzi, R. Desbuquois, M. Messer, et al., Nat. Phys. 15, 1161 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0615-4

[45] H. Weimer, M. Müller, I. Lesanovsky, P. Zoller, and H. P. Büchler, Nature Physics 6, 382 (2010).
https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1614

[46] E. Zohar, J. I. Cirac, and B. Reznik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 125302 (2012).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.125302

[47] L. Tagliacozzo, A. Celi, A. Zamora, and M. Lewenstein, Annals of Physics 330, 160 (2013a).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2012.11.009

[48] L. Tagliacozzo, A. Celi, P. Orland, M. W. Mitchell, and M. Lewenstein, Nat. Com. 4, 2615 (2013b).
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3615

[49] A. W. Glaetzle, M. Dalmonte, R. Nath, I. Rousochatzakis, R. Moessner, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. X 4, 041037 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.4.041037

[50] O. Dutta, L. Tagliacozzo, M. Lewenstein, and J. Zakrzewski, Phys. Rev. A 95, 053608 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.053608

[51] E. Zohar, A. Farace, B. Reznik, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 070501 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.070501

[52] D. C. Hackett, K. Howe, C. Hughes, W. Jay, E. T. Neil, and J. N. Simone, Phys. Rev. A 99, 062341 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.062341

[53] H. Lamm, S. Lawrence, and Y. Yamauchi (NuQS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 100, 034518 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034518

[54] A. Celi, B. Vermersch, O. Viyuela, H. Pichler, M. D. Lukin, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021057 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.10.021057

[55] I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 153 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.86.153

[56] J. Preskill, Quantum 2, 79 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79

[57] D. Horn, Phys. Lett. B 100, 149 (1981).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(81)90763-2

[58] P. Orland and D. Rohrlich, Nucl. Phys. B 338, 647 (1990).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(90)90646-U

[59] S. Chandrasekharan and U.-J. Wiese, Nucl. Phys. B 492, 455 (1997).
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(97)80041-7

[60] D. S. Rokhsar and S. A. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2376 (1988).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2376

[61] R. Moessner, S. L. Sondhi, and E. Fradkin, Phys. Rev. B 65, 024504 (2001).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.024504

[62] E. Fradkin, Field theories of condensed matter physics (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139015509

[63] S. Sachdev, Philos. T. R. Soc. A 374, 20150248 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0248

[64] R. Brower, S. Chandrasekharan, and U.-J. Wiese, Phys. Rev. D 60, 094502 (1999).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.60.094502

[65] E. Zohar, J. I. Cirac, and B. Reznik, Phys. Rev. A 88, 023617 (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.023617

[66] S. Kühn, J. I. Cirac, and M.-C. Bañuls, Phys. Rev. A 90, 042305 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.90.042305

[67] E. Ercolessi, P. Facchi, G. Magnifico, S. Pascazio, and F. V. Pepe, Phys. Rev. D 98, 074503 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.074503

[68] J. B. Kogut, Rev. Mod. Phys. 55, 775 (1983).
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.55.775

[69] J. Stryker and D. Kaplan, PoS LATTICE2018, 227 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.22323/1.334.0227

[70] M. Creutz, Phys. Rev. D 21, 2308 (1980).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2308

[71] J. Kogut and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 11, 395 (1975).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.11.395

[72] O. Raviv, Y. Shamir, and B. Svetitsky, Phys. Rev. D 90, 014512 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.014512

[73] S. D. Drell, H. R. Quinn, B. Svetitsky, and M. Weinstein, Phys. Rev. D 19, 619 (1979).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.19.619

[74] H. R. Fiebig and R. M. Woloshyn, Phys. Rev. D 42, 3520 (1990).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.42.3520

[75] I. F. Herbut and B. H. Seradjeh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 171601 (2003).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.171601

[76] J. C. Halimeh, H. Lang, J. Mildenberger, Z. Jiang, and P. Hauke, arXiv:2007.00668.
arXiv:2007.00668

[77] H. D. Raedt, Comp. Phys. Rep. 7, 1 (1987).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7977(87)90002-5

[78] C. J. Hamer, Z. Weihong, and J. Oitmaa, Phys. Rev. D 56, 55 (1997).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.56.55

[79] C. Muschik, M. Heyl, E. Martinez, T. Monz, P. Schindler, et al., New J. Phys. 19, 103020 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aa89ab

[80] R. M. Reid, SIAM Review 39, 313 (1997).
https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036144595294801

[81] P. Jordan and E. P. Wigner, Z. Phys. 47, 631 (1928).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01331938

[82] C. V. Kraus, N. Schuch, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A 81, 052338 (2010).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.81.052338

[83] E. Zohar and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. B 98, 075119 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.075119

[84] J. Ambjørn and G. Semenoff, Phys. Let. B 226, 107 (1989).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(89)90296-7

[85] D. Banerjee, M. Dalmonte, M. Müller, E. Rico, P. Stebler, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 175302 (2012).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.175302

[86] V. Kasper, F. Hebenstreit, F. Jendrzejewski, M. K. Oberthaler, and J. Berges, 19, 023030 (2017).

[87] L. Barbiero, C. Schweizer, M. Aidelsburger, E. Demler, N. Goldman, and F. Grusdt, Science Advances 5 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav7444

[88] V. Kasper, G. Juzeliūnas, M. Lewenstein, F. Jendrzejewski, and E. Zohar, New Journal of Physics 22, 103027 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/abb961

[89] C. Senko, P. Richerme, J. Smith, A. Lee, I. Cohen, A. Retzker, and C. Monroe, Phys. Rev. X 5, 021026 (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.5.021026

[90] J. Bender, P. Emonts, E. Zohar, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 043145 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043145

[91] C. Laflamme, W. Evans, M. Dalmonte, U. Gerber, H. Mejía-Díaz, et al., Ann. Phys. 370, 117 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2016.03.012

[92] J. Zhang, J. Unmuth-Yockey, J. Zeiher, A. Bazavov, S.-W. Tsai, and Y. Meurice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 223201 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.223201

[93] Y. Meurice, Phys. Rev. D 102, 014506 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.014506

[94] A. Ammon, T. Hartung, K. Jansen, H. Leövey, and J. Volmer, Phys. Rev. D 94, 114508 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.114508

[95] A. Genz, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 157, 187 (2003).
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0427(03)00413-8

[96] A. Alexandru, P. F. Bedaque, S. Harmalkar, H. Lamm, S. Lawrence, and N. C. Warrington (NuQS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 100, 114501 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.114501

[97] H. Lamm, S. Lawrence, and Y. Yamauchi (NuQS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Research 2, 013272 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013272

[98] R. M. Gray, Found. Trends Commun. Inf. Theory 2, 155 (2006).
https://doi.org/10.1561/0100000006

Cited by

[1] Torin F. Stetina, Anthony Ciavarella, Xiaosong Li, and Nathan Wiebe, "Simulating Effective QED on Quantum Computers", Quantum 6, 622 (2022).

[2] M. Sohaib Alam, Stuart Hadfield, Henry Lamm, and Andy C. Y. Li, "Primitive quantum gates for dihedral gauge theories", Physical Review D 105 11, 114501 (2022).

[3] Timo Jakobs, Marco Garofalo, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Paul Ludwig, Johann Ostmeyer, Simone Romiti, and Carsten Urbach, "A comprehensive stress test of truncated Hilbert space bases against Green’s function Monte Carlo in U(1) lattice Gauge theory", The European Physical Journal C 86 6, 637 (2026).

[4] Jacob Bringewatt, Jonathan Kunjummen, and Niklas Mueller, "Randomized measurement protocols for lattice gauge theories", Quantum 8, 1300 (2024).

[5] Christian W. Bauer, "Efficient use of quantum computers for collider physics", Journal of High Energy Physics 2025 11, 108 (2025).

[6] Saurabh V. Kadam, Indrakshi Raychowdhury, and Jesse R. Stryker, "Loop-string-hadron formulation of an SU(3) gauge theory with dynamical quarks", Physical Review D 107 9, 094513 (2023).

[7] Dorota M. Grabowska, Christopher F. Kane, and Christian W. Bauer, "Fully gauge-fixed SU(2) Hamiltonian for quantum simulations", Physical Review D 111 11, 114516 (2025).

[8] Danny Paulson, Luca Dellantonio, Jan F. Haase, Alessio Celi, Angus Kan, Andrew Jena, Christian Kokail, Rick van Bijnen, Karl Jansen, Peter Zoller, and Christine A. Muschik, "Simulating 2D Effects in Lattice Gauge Theories on a Quantum Computer", PRX Quantum 2 3, 030334 (2021).

[9] Zohreh Davoudi, Chung-Chun Hsieh, and Saurabh V. Kadam, "Scattering wave packets of hadrons in gauge theories: Preparation on a quantum computer", Quantum 8, 1520 (2024).

[10] Zohreh Davoudi, Indrakshi Raychowdhury, and Andrew Shaw, "Search for efficient formulations for Hamiltonian simulation of non-Abelian lattice gauge theories", Physical Review D 104 7, 074505 (2021).

[11] Victor Ale, Tommaso Rainaldi, Enrique Rico, Felix Ringer, and George Siopsis, "Simulating quantum electrodynamics in 2+1 dimensions with qubits and qumodes", Journal of High Energy Physics 2026 4, 122 (2026).

[12] Lento Nagano, Alexander Miessen, Tamiya Onodera, Ivano Tavernelli, Francesco Tacchino, and Koji Terashi, "Quantum data learning for quantum simulations in high-energy physics", Physical Review Research 5 4, 043250 (2023).

[13] Yasar Y. Atas, Jan F. Haase, Jinglei Zhang, Victor Wei, Sieglinde M.-L. Pfaendler, Randy Lewis, and Christine A. Muschik, "Simulating one-dimensional quantum chromodynamics on a quantum computer: Real-time evolutions of tetra- and pentaquarks", Physical Review Research 5 3, 033184 (2023).

[14] Anton T. Than, Yasar Y. Atas, Abhijit Chakraborty, Jinglei Zhang, Matthew T. Diaz, Kalea Wen, Xingxin Liu, Randy Lewis, Alaina M. Green, Christine A. Muschik, and Norbert M. Linke, "The phase diagram of quantum chromodynamics in one dimension on a quantum computer", Nature Communications 16 1, 10288 (2025).

[15] Anthony Ciavarella, Natalie Klco, and Martin J. Savage, "Trailhead for quantum simulation of SU(3) Yang-Mills lattice gauge theory in the local multiplet basis", Physical Review D 103 9, 094501 (2021).

[16] Marcela Carena, Henry Lamm, Ying-Ying Li, and Wanqiang Liu, "Quantum error thresholds for gauge-redundant digitizations of lattice field theories", Physical Review D 110 5, 054516 (2024).

[17] Tomohiro Hashizume, Jad Halimeh, Philipp Hauke, and Debasish Banerjee, "Ground-state phase diagram of quantum link electrodynamics in $(2+1)$-d", SciPost Physics 13 2, 017 (2022).

[18] Daniel González-Cuadra, Torsten V. Zache, Jose Carrasco, Barbara Kraus, and Peter Zoller, "Hardware Efficient Quantum Simulation of Non-Abelian Gauge Theories with Qudits on Rydberg Platforms", Physical Review Letters 129 16, 160501 (2022).

[19] Jesse R. Stryker, "Shearing approach to gauge-invariant Trotterization", Physical Review D 112 1, 014508 (2025).

[20] Natalie Klco and D. H. Beck, "Identification of a natural fieldlike entanglement resource in trapped-ion chains", Physical Review A 109 6, 062419 (2024).

[21] Marcela Carena, Henry Lamm, Ying-Ying Li, and Wanqiang Liu, "Improved Hamiltonians for Quantum Simulations of Gauge Theories", Physical Review Letters 129 5, 051601 (2022).

[22] Albie Chan, Zheng Shi, Luca Dellantonio, Wolfgang Dür, and Christine A. Muschik, "Measurement-Based Infused Circuits for Variational Quantum Eigensolvers", Physical Review Letters 132 24, 240601 (2024).

[23] Michael Meth, Jinglei Zhang, Jan F. Haase, Claire Edmunds, Lukas Postler, Andrew J. Jena, Alex Steiner, Luca Dellantonio, Rainer Blatt, Peter Zoller, Thomas Monz, Philipp Schindler, Christine Muschik, and Martin Ringbauer, "Simulating two-dimensional lattice gauge theories on a qudit quantum computer", Nature Physics 21 4, 570 (2025).

[24] Giovanni Cataldi, Graduate Texts in Physics 193 (2026) ISBN:978-3-032-17634-9.

[25] Gabriele Calliari, Robert Ott, Hannes Pichler, and Torsten V. Zache, "Field Digitization Scaling in a ZN⊂U(1) Symmetric Model", Physical Review Letters 136 8, 080403 (2026).

[26] Christian W. Bauer and Dorota M. Grabowska, "Efficient representation for simulating U(1) gauge theories on digital quantum computers at all values of the coupling", Physical Review D 107 3, L031503 (2023).

[27] Erik J. Gustafson, Henry Lamm, Felicity Lovelace, and Damian Musk, "Primitive quantum gates for an SU(2) discrete subgroup: Binary tetrahedral", Physical Review D 106 11, 114501 (2022).

[28] Erik J. Gustafson and Henry Lamm, "Toward quantum simulations ofZ2gauge theory without state preparation", Physical Review D 103 5, 054507 (2021).

[29] Hersh Singh, "Qubit regularized O(N) nonlinear sigma models", Physical Review D 105 11, 114509 (2022).

[30] Anthony N. Ciavarella and Ivan A. Chernyshev, "Preparation of the SU(3) lattice Yang-Mills vacuum with variational quantum methods", Physical Review D 105 7, 074504 (2022).

[31] Yasar Y. Atas, Jinglei Zhang, Randy Lewis, Amin Jahanpour, Jan F. Haase, and Christine A. Muschik, "SU(2) hadrons on a quantum computer via a variational approach", Nature Communications 12 1, 6499 (2021).

[32] Marcela Carena, Henry Lamm, Ying-Ying Li, and Wanqiang Liu, "Lattice renormalization of quantum simulations", Physical Review D 104 9, 094519 (2021).

[33] Yaquan Fang, Christina Gao, Ying-Ying Li, Jing Shu, Yusheng Wu, Hongxi Xing, Bin Xu, Lailin Xu, and Chen Zhou, "Quantum frontiers in high energy physics", Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 68 6, 260301 (2025).

[34] Giuseppe Magnifico, Giovanni Cataldi, Marco Rigobello, Peter Majcen, Daniel Jaschke, Pietro Silvi, and Simone Montangero, "Tensor networks for lattice gauge theories beyond one dimension", Communications Physics 8 1, 322 (2025).

[35] Jiří Minář, Bart van Voorden, and Kareljan Schoutens, "Kink Dynamics and Quantum Simulation of Supersymmetric Lattice Hamiltonians", Physical Review Letters 128 5, 050504 (2022).

[36] Siddharth Hariprakash, Neel S. Modi, Michael Kreshchuk, Christopher F. Kane, and Christian W. Bauer, "Strategies for simulating the time evolution of Hamiltonian lattice field theories", Physical Review A 111 2, 022419 (2025).

[37] Lukas Ebner, Berndt Müller, Andreas Schäfer, Leonhard Schmotzer, Clemens Seidl, and Xiaojun Yao, "Entanglement properties of SU(2) gauge theory", Communications Physics 8 1, 368 (2025).

[38] Erez Zohar, "Quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories in more than one space dimension—requirements, challenges and methods", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 380 2216, 20210069 (2022).

[39] Giovanni Cataldi, Giuseppe Magnifico, Pietro Silvi, and Simone Montangero, "Simulating (2+1)D SU(2) Yang-Mills lattice gauge theory at finite density with tensor networks", Physical Review Research 6 3, 033057 (2024).

[40] Chukwudubem Umeano, Annie E. Paine, Vincent E. Elfving, and Oleksandr Kyriienko, "What can we Learn from Quantum Convolutional Neural Networks?", Advanced Quantum Technologies 8 7, 2400325 (2025).

[41] C. S. Chisholm, A. Frölian, E. Neri, R. Ramos, L. Tarruell, and A. Celi, "Encoding a one-dimensional topological gauge theory in a Raman-coupled Bose-Einstein condensate", Physical Review Research 4 4, 043088 (2022).

[42] Peter J. Ehlers, "Entanglement between valence and sea quarks in hadrons of 1+1 dimensional QCD", Annals of Physics 452, 169290 (2023).

[43] L. Funcke, T. Hartung, K. Jansen, S. Kühn, M. Schneider, P. Stornati, and X. Wang, "Towards quantum simulations in particle physics and beyond on noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 380 2216, 20210062 (2022).

[44] Jorge Miguel-Ramiro, Zheng Shi, Luca Dellantonio, Albie Chan, Christine A. Muschik, and Wolfgang Dür, "Superposed Quantum Error Mitigation", Physical Review Letters 131 23, 230601 (2023).

[45] Hanqing Liu, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Shailesh Chandrasekharan, and Rajan Gupta, "Phases of 2D massless QCD with qubit regularization", Physical Review D 111 9, 094511 (2025).

[46] Christopher F. Kane, Siddharth Hariprakash, Neel S. Modi, Michael Kreshchuk, and Christian W Bauer, "Block encoding bosons by signal processing", Quantum 9, 1747 (2025).

[47] Irian D’Andrea, Christian W. Bauer, Dorota M. Grabowska, and Marat Freytsis, "New basis for Hamiltonian SU(2) simulations", Physical Review D 109 7, 074501 (2024).

[48] Tianyin Li, "Quantum simulations of quantum electrodynamics in Coulomb gauge", Physical Review D 112 5, 054512 (2025).

[49] Emil Mathew and Indrakshi Raychowdhury, "Protecting local and global symmetries in simulating (1+1)D non-Abelian gauge theories", Physical Review D 106 5, 054510 (2022).

[50] Pierpaolo Fontana, Marc Miranda-Riaza, and Alessio Celi, "Efficient Finite-Resource Formulation of Non-Abelian Lattice Gauge Theories beyond One Dimension", Physical Review X 15 3, 031065 (2025).

[51] Alex Kerzner, Vlad Gheorghiu, Michele Mosca, Thomas Guilbaud, Federico Carminati, Fabio Fracas, and Luca Dellantonio, "A square-root speedup for finding the smallest eigenvalue", Quantum Science and Technology 9 4, 045025 (2024).

[52] Emil Mathew and Indrakshi Raychowdhury, "Protecting gauge symmetries in the dynamics of SU(3) lattice gauge theories", Communications Physics 8 1, 313 (2025).

[53] R. Ott, T. V. Zache, F. Jendrzejewski, and J. Berges, "Scalable Cold-Atom Quantum Simulator for Two-Dimensional QED", Physical Review Letters 127 13, 130504 (2021).

[54] Joris Kattemölle and Guido Burkard, "Efficient Quantum Simulation for Translationally Invariant Systems", Physical Review Letters 136 1, 010602 (2026).

[55] Claudio Iacovelli, Josep Cabedo, Leticia Tarruell, and Alessio Celi, "Encoding a topological gauge theory on a ring-shaped Raman-coupled Bose gas", Physical Review Research 8 2, 023242 (2026).

[56] Ariel Shlosberg, Andrew J. Jena, Priyanka Mukhopadhyay, Jan F. Haase, Felix Leditzky, and Luca Dellantonio, "Adaptive estimation of quantum observables", Quantum 7, 906 (2023).

[57] R. R. Ferguson, L. Dellantonio, A. Al Balushi, K. Jansen, W. Dür, and C. A. Muschik, "Measurement-Based Variational Quantum Eigensolver", Physical Review Letters 126 22, 220501 (2021).

[58] Erik J. Gustafson, Yao Ji, Henry Lamm, Edison M. Murairi, Sebastian Osorio Perez, and Shuchen Zhu, "Primitive quantum gates for an SU(3) discrete subgroup: Σ(36×3)", Physical Review D 110 3, 034515 (2024).

[59] Yao Ji, Henry Lamm, and Shuchen Zhu, "Gluon digitization via character expansion for quantum computers", Physical Review D 107 11, 114503 (2023).

[60] Natalie Klco, D. H. Beck, and Martin J. Savage, "Entanglement structures in quantum field theories: Negativity cores and bound entanglement in the vacuum", Physical Review A 107 1, 012415 (2023).

[61] Erik J. Gustafson, Henry Lamm, and Felicity Lovelace, "Primitive quantum gates for an SU(2) discrete subgroup: Binary octahedral", Physical Review D 109 5, 054503 (2024).

[62] Ivan M. Burbano and Christian W. Bauer, "Gauge loop-string-hadron formulation on general graphs and applications to fully gauge fixed Hamiltonian lattice gauge theory", Journal of High Energy Physics 2025 12, 60 (2025).

[63] Francesco Martini, Daniele Lizzio Bosco, Carlo Barbanera, Serena Bernardini, Giacomo Ranieri, Francesca Cibrario, Davide Corbelletto, Giuseppe Bruno, Alessandra Di Pierro, and Luca Dellantonio, "Securities transaction settlement optimization on superconducting quantum devices", Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 190, 105384 (2026).

[64] Erik J. Gustafson, Henry Lamm, and Judah Unmuth-Yockey, "Quantum mean estimation for lattice field theory", Physical Review D 107 11, 114511 (2023).

[65] Natalie Klco and Martin J. Savage, "Hierarchical qubit maps and hierarchically implemented quantum error correction", Physical Review A 104 6, 062425 (2021).

[66] Andrew Hardy, Priyanka Mukhopadhyay, M. Sohaib Alam, Robert Konik, Layla Hormozi, Eleanor Rieffel, Stuart Hadfield, João Barata, Raju Venugopalan, Dmitri E. Kharzeev, and Nathan Wiebe, "Scattering Processes from Quantum Simulation Algorithms for Scalar Field Theories", PRX Quantum 7 1, 010343 (2026).

[67] Kaustubh Roy and Elio J. König, "ZN lattice gauge theories with matter fields", Physical Review B 109 19, 195108 (2024).

[68] Anthony N. Ciavarella, Stephan Caspar, Hersh Singh, Martin J. Savage, and Pavel Lougovski, "Simulating Heisenberg interactions in the Ising model with strong drive fields", Physical Review A 108 4, 042216 (2023).

[69] Roland C. Farrell, Ivan A. Chernyshev, Sarah J. M. Powell, Nikita A. Zemlevskiy, Marc Illa, and Martin J. Savage, "Preparations for quantum simulations of quantum chromodynamics in 1+1 dimensions. I. Axial gauge", Physical Review D 107 5, 054512 (2023).

[70] Julian Bender, Patrick Emonts, and J. Ignacio Cirac, "Variational Monte Carlo algorithm for lattice gauge theories with continuous gauge groups: A study of (2+1) -dimensional compact QED with dynamical fermions at finite density", Physical Review Research 5 4, 043128 (2023).

[71] Benoît Assi and Henry Lamm, "Digitization and subduction of SU(N) gauge theories", Physical Review D 110 7, 074511 (2024).

[72] Alberto Di Meglio, Karl Jansen, Ivano Tavernelli, Constantia Alexandrou, Srinivasan Arunachalam, Christian W. Bauer, Kerstin Borras, Stefano Carrazza, Arianna Crippa, Vincent Croft, Roland de Putter, Andrea Delgado, Vedran Dunjko, Daniel J. Egger, Elias Fernández-Combarro, Elina Fuchs, Lena Funcke, Daniel González-Cuadra, Michele Grossi, Jad C. Halimeh, Zoë Holmes, Stefan Kühn, Denis Lacroix, Randy Lewis, Donatella Lucchesi, Miriam Lucio Martinez, Federico Meloni, Antonio Mezzacapo, Simone Montangero, Lento Nagano, Vincent R. Pascuzzi, Voica Radescu, Enrique Rico Ortega, Alessandro Roggero, Julian Schuhmacher, Joao Seixas, Pietro Silvi, Panagiotis Spentzouris, Francesco Tacchino, Kristan Temme, Koji Terashi, Jordi Tura, Cenk Tüysüz, Sofia Vallecorsa, Uwe-Jens Wiese, Shinjae Yoo, and Jinglei Zhang, "Quantum Computing for High-Energy Physics: State of the Art and Challenges", PRX Quantum 5 3, 037001 (2024).

[73] Mingze Ni, Zhensu Sun, and Wei Liu, "Reversible jump attack to textual classifiers with modification reduction", Machine Learning 113 9, 5907 (2024).

[74] C. F. Groß, S. Romiti, L. Funcke, K. Jansen, A. Kan, S. Kühn, and C. Urbach, "Matching Lagrangian and Hamiltonian simulations in (2+1)-dimensional U(1) gauge theory", The European Physical Journal C 85 11, 1253 (2025).

[75] Giuseppe Clemente, Arianna Crippa, and Karl Jansen, "Strategies for the determination of the running coupling of ( 2+1 )-dimensional QED with quantum computing", Physical Review D 106 11, 114511 (2022).

[76] Saurabh V. Kadam, Aahiri Naskar, Indrakshi Raychowdhury, and Jesse R. Stryker, "Loop-string-hadron approach to SU(3) lattice Yang-Mills theory: Hilbert space of a trivalent vertex", Physical Review D 111 7, 074516 (2025).

[77] Zachary Parks, Arnaud Carignan-Dugas, Erik Gustafson, Yannick Meurice, and Patrick Dreher, "Applying the noiseless extrapolation error mitigation protocol to calculate real-time quantum field theory scattering phase shifts", Physical Review D 109 1, 014505 (2024).

[78] Kevissen Sellapillay, Pablo Arrighi, and Giuseppe Di Molfetta, "A discrete relativistic spacetime formalism for 1 + 1-QED with continuum limits", Scientific Reports 12 1, 2198 (2022).

[79] Timo Jakobs, Marco Garofalo, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Johann Ostmeyer, Dominik Rolfes, Simone Romiti, and Carsten Urbach, "Canonical momenta in digitized Su(2) lattice gauge theory: definition and free theory", The European Physical Journal C 83 7, 669 (2023).

[80] Nathanaël Eon, Giuseppe Di Molfetta, Giuseppe Magnifico, and Pablo Arrighi, "A relativistic discrete spacetime formulation of 3+1 QED", Quantum 7, 1179 (2023).

[81] Pierpaolo Fontana and Andrea Trombettoni, "Mean Field Approaches to Lattice Gauge Theories: A Review", Entropy 27 3, 250 (2025).

[82] Navya Gupta, Christopher David White, and Zohreh Davoudi, "Euclidean-Monte-Carlo-informed ground-state preparation for quantum simulation of scalar field theory", Physical Review D 113 11, 114515 (2026).

[83] Michael Fromm, Owe Philipsen, and Christopher Winterowd, "Dihedral lattice gauge theories on a quantum annealer", EPJ Quantum Technology 10 1, 31 (2023).

[84] Andrei Alexandru, Paulo F. Bedaque, Ruairí Brett, and Henry Lamm, "Spectrum of digitized QCD: Glueballs in a S(1080) gauge theory", Physical Review D 105 11, 114508 (2022).

[85] Lane G. Gunderman, Andrew Jena, and Luca Dellantonio, "Minimal qubit representations of Hamiltonians via conserved charges", Physical Review A 109 2, 022618 (2024).

[86] Mingze Ni, Zhensu Sun, and Wei Liu, "Fraud's Bargain Attack: Generating Adversarial Text Samples via Word Manipulation Process", IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 36 7, 3062 (2024).

[87] Stephan Caspar and Hersh Singh, "From Asymptotic Freedom to θ Vacua: Qubit Embeddings of the O(3) Nonlinear σ Model", Physical Review Letters 129 2, 022003 (2022).

[88] Christian W. Bauer, Zohreh Davoudi, Natalie Klco, and Martin J. Savage, "Quantum simulation of fundamental particles and forces", Nature Reviews Physics 5 7, 420 (2023).

[89] Roland C. Farrell, Ivan A. Chernyshev, Sarah J. M. Powell, Nikita A. Zemlevskiy, Marc Illa, and Martin J. Savage, "Preparations for quantum simulations of quantum chromodynamics in 1+1 dimensions. II. Single-baryon β -decay in real time", Physical Review D 107 5, 054513 (2023).

[90] Christopher F. Kane, Niladri Gomes, and Michael Kreshchuk, "Nearly optimal state preparation for quantum simulations of lattice gauge theories", Physical Review A 110 1, 012455 (2024).

[91] Matteo Turco, Gonçalo Quinta, João Seixas, and Yasser Omar, "Quantum Simulation of Bound State Scattering", PRX Quantum 5 2, 020311 (2024).

[92] Giuseppe Magnifico, Timo Felser, Pietro Silvi, and Simone Montangero, "Lattice quantum electrodynamics in (3+1)-dimensions at finite density with tensor networks", Nature Communications 12 1, 3600 (2021).

[93] Zohreh Davoudi, Norbert M. Linke, and Guido Pagano, "Toward simulating quantum field theories with controlled phonon-ion dynamics: A hybrid analog-digital approach", Physical Review Research 3 4, 043072 (2021).

[94] Anthony N. Ciavarella, Stephan Caspar, Marc Illa, and Martin J. Savage, "State Preparation in the Heisenberg Model through Adiabatic Spiraling", Quantum 7, 970 (2023).

[95] Wibe A. de Jong, Mekena Metcalf, James Mulligan, Mateusz Płoskoń, Felix Ringer, and Xiaojun Yao, "Quantum simulation of open quantum systems in heavy-ion collisions", Physical Review D 104 5, L051501 (2021).

[96] Bin Xu and Wei Xue, "( 3+1 )-dimensional Schwinger pair production with quantum computers", Physical Review D 106 11, 116007 (2022).

[97] Anthony N. Ciavarella and Christian W. Bauer, "Quantum Simulation of SU(3) Lattice Yang-Mills Theory at Leading Order in Large- Nc Expansion", Physical Review Letters 133 11, 111901 (2024).

[98] Jacky Jiang, Natalie Klco, and Olivia Di Matteo, "Non-Abelian dynamics on a cube: Improving quantum compilation through qudit-based simulations", Physical Review D 112 7, 074512 (2025).

[99] Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kuhn, Manuel Schneider, and Paolo Stornati, 2021 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS) 693 (2021) ISBN:978-1-6654-1681-8.

[100] Guy Pardo, Tomer Greenberg, Aryeh Fortinsky, Nadav Katz, and Erez Zohar, "Resource-efficient quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories in arbitrary dimensions: Solving for Gauss's law and fermion elimination", Physical Review Research 5 2, 023077 (2023).

[101] Anthony N. Ciavarella, Stephan Caspar, Hersh Singh, and Martin J. Savage, "Preparation for quantum simulation of the (1+1) -dimensional O(3) nonlinear σ model using cold atoms", Physical Review A 107 4, 042404 (2023).

[102] Zohreh Davoudi, Niklas Mueller, and Connor Powers, "Towards Quantum Computing Phase Diagrams of Gauge Theories with Thermal Pure Quantum States", Physical Review Letters 131 8, 081901 (2023).

[103] Luca Lumia, Pietro Torta, Glen B. Mbeng, Giuseppe E. Santoro, Elisa Ercolessi, Michele Burrello, and Matteo M. Wauters, "Two-Dimensional Z2 Lattice Gauge Theory on a Near-Term Quantum Simulator: Variational Quantum Optimization, Confinement, and Topological Order", PRX Quantum 3 2, 020320 (2022).

[104] Guy Pardo, Julian Bender, Nadav Katz, and Erez Zohar, "Truncation-free quantum simulation of pure-gauge compact QED using Josephson arrays", Quantum Science and Technology 10 3, 035011 (2025).

[105] Torsten V. Zache, Daniel González-Cuadra, and Peter Zoller, "Fermion-qudit quantum processors for simulating lattice gauge theories with matter", Quantum 7, 1140 (2023).

[106] Angus Kan, Lena Funcke, Stefan Kühn, Luca Dellantonio, Jinglei Zhang, Jan F. Haase, Christine A. Muschik, and Karl Jansen, "Investigating a (3+1)D topological θ -term in the Hamiltonian formulation of lattice gauge theories for quantum and classical simulations", Physical Review D 104 3, 034504 (2021).

[107] Shachar Ashkenazi and Erez Zohar, "Duality as a feasible physical transformation for quantum simulation", Physical Review A 105 2, 022431 (2022).

[108] Praveen Balaji, Cianán Conefrey-Shinozaki, Patrick Draper, Jason K. Elhaderi, Drishti Gupta, Luis Hidalgo, and Andrew Lytle, "Perturbation theory, irrep truncations, and state preparation methods for quantum simulations of SU(3) lattice gauge theory", Physical Review D 113 9, 094505 (2026).

[109] Mendel Nguyen and Hersh Singh, "Lattice regularizations of θ vacua: Anomalies and qubit models", Physical Review D 107 1, 014507 (2023).

[110] Marc Miranda-Riaza, Pierpaolo Fontana, and Alessio Celi, "Renormalized dual basis for scalable simulations of 2+1D compact quantum electrodynamics", Physical Review D 113 7, 074518 (2026).

[111] Christian W. Bauer, Benjamin Nachman, and Marat Freytsis, "Simulating Collider Physics on Quantum Computers Using Effective Field Theories", Physical Review Letters 127 21, 212001 (2021).

[112] Nouman Butt, Xiao-Yong Jin, James C. Osborn, and Zain H. Saleem, "Moving from continuous to discrete symmetry in the 2D XY model", Physical Review D 108 7, 074511 (2023).

[113] Zohreh Davoudi, Alexander F. Shaw, and Jesse R. Stryker, "General quantum algorithms for Hamiltonian simulation with applications to a non-Abelian lattice gauge theory", Quantum 7, 1213 (2023).

[114] Paul Ludwig, Timo Jakobs, and Carsten Urbach, "Scaling and Lüscher term in a non-Abelian (2+1)d SU(2) quantum link model", The European Physical Journal C 86 7, 764 (2026).

[115] S. Hasibul Hassan Chowdhury, Talal Ahmed Chowdhury, Salah Nasri, Omar Ibna Nazim, and Shaikh Saad, "Quantum simulation of quantum mechanical system with spatial noncommutativity", International Journal of Quantum Information 21 06, 2350028 (2023).

[116] Jinglei Zhang, Ryan Ferguson, Stefan Kühn, Jan F. Haase, C.M. Wilson, Karl Jansen, and Christine A. Muschik, "Simulating gauge theories with variational quantum eigensolvers in superconducting microwave cavities", Quantum 7, 1148 (2023).

[117] Niklas Mueller, Joseph A. Carolan, Andrew Connelly, Zohreh Davoudi, Eugene F. Dumitrescu, and Kübra Yeter-Aydeniz, "Quantum Computation of Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions and Entanglement Tomography in a Lattice Gauge Theory", PRX Quantum 4 3, 030323 (2023).

[118] Nhung H. Nguyen, Minh C. Tran, Yingyue Zhu, Alaina M. Green, C. Huerta Alderete, Zohreh Davoudi, and Norbert M. Linke, "Digital Quantum Simulation of the Schwinger Model and Symmetry Protection with Trapped Ions", PRX Quantum 3 2, 020324 (2022).

[119] Leon Hostetler, Jin Zhang, Ryo Sakai, Judah Unmuth-Yockey, Alexei Bazavov, and Yannick Meurice, "Clock model interpolation and symmetry breaking in O(2) models", Physical Review D 104 5, 054505 (2021).

[120] Marcela Carena, Erik J. Gustafson, Henry Lamm, Ying-Ying Li, and Wanqiang Liu, "Gauge theory couplings on anisotropic lattices", Physical Review D 106 11, 114504 (2022).

[121] Arianna Crippa, Karl Jansen, and Enrico Rinaldi, "Analysis of the confinement string in (2+1)-dimensional Quantum Electrodynamics with a trapped-ion quantum computer", Communications Physics 9 1, 46 (2026).

[122] Arianna Crippa, Simone Romiti, Lena Funcke, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kühn, Paolo Stornati, and Carsten Urbach, "Towards determining the (2+1)-dimensional quantum electrodynamics running coupling with Monte Carlo and quantum computing methods", Communications Physics 8 1, 367 (2025).

[123] Christian W. Bauer, Zohreh Davoudi, A. Baha Balantekin, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Marcela Carena, Wibe A. de Jong, Patrick Draper, Aida El-Khadra, Nate Gemelke, Masanori Hanada, Dmitri Kharzeev, Henry Lamm, Ying-Ying Li, Junyu Liu, Mikhail Lukin, Yannick Meurice, Christopher Monroe, Benjamin Nachman, Guido Pagano, John Preskill, Enrico Rinaldi, Alessandro Roggero, David I. Santiago, Martin J. Savage, Irfan Siddiqi, George Siopsis, David Van Zanten, Nathan Wiebe, Yukari Yamauchi, Kübra Yeter-Aydeniz, and Silvia Zorzetti, "Quantum Simulation for High-Energy Physics", PRX Quantum 4 2, 027001 (2023).

[124] David B. Kaplan and Jesse R. Stryker, "Gauss's law, duality, and the Hamiltonian formulation of U(1) lattice gauge theory", Physical Review D 102 9, 094515 (2020).

[125] Erik J. Gustafson, "Prospects for simulating a qudit-based model of (1 +1 )D scalar QED", Physical Review D 103 11, 114505 (2021).

[126] Julian Bender and Erez Zohar, "Gauge redundancy-free formulation of compact QED with dynamical matter for quantum and classical computations", Physical Review D 102 11, 114517 (2020).

[127] Doga Murat Kürkçüoglu, Henry Lamm, and Andrea Maestri, "Qudit Gate Decomposition Dependence for Lattice Gauge Theories", arXiv:2410.16414, (2024).

[128] Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kühn, and Paolo Stornati, "Dimensional Expressivity Analysis of Parametric Quantum Circuits", Quantum 5, 422 (2021).

[129] Dorota M. Grabowska, Christopher Kane, Benjamin Nachman, and Christian W. Bauer, "Overcoming exponential scaling with system size in Trotter-Suzuki implementations of constrained Hamiltonians: 2+1 U(1) lattice gauge theories", arXiv:2208.03333, (2022).

[130] Simon Catterall, Roni Harnik, Veronika E. Hubeny, Christian W. Bauer, Asher Berlin, Zohreh Davoudi, Thomas Faulkner, Thomas Hartman, Matthew Headrick, Yonatan F. Kahn, Henry Lamm, Yannick Meurice, Surjeet Rajendran, Mukund Rangamani, and Brian Swingle, "Report of the Snowmass 2021 Theory Frontier Topical Group on Quantum Information Science", arXiv:2209.14839, (2022).

[131] Masanori Hanada, Junyu Liu, Enrico Rinaldi, and Masaki Tezuka, "Estimating truncation effects of quantum bosonic systems using sampling algorithms", Machine Learning: Science and Technology 4 4, 045021 (2023).

[132] Jens Nyhegn, Chia-Min Chung, and Michele Burrello, "Z<SUB>N</SUB> lattice gauge theory in a ladder geometry", Physical Review Research 3 1, 013133 (2021).

[133] Sriram Bharadwaj, Emil Rosanowski, Simran Singh, Alice di Tucci, Changnan Peng, Karl Jansen, Lena Funcke, and Di Luo, "A Path to Quantum Simulations of Topological Phases: (2+1)D Quantum Electrodynamics with Wilson Fermions", arXiv:2504.21828, (2025).

[134] Christopher Kane, Dorota M. Grabowska, Benjamin Nachman, and Christian W. Bauer, "Efficient quantum implementation of 2+1 U(1) lattice gauge theories with Gauss law constraints", arXiv:2211.10497, (2022).

[135] S. V. Kadam, I. Raychowdhury, and J. Stryker, "Loop-string-hadron formulation of an SU(3) gauge theory with dynamical quarks", The 39th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, 373 (2023).

[136] Julian Bender and Erez Zohar, "A gauge redundancy-free formulation of compact QED with dynamical matter for quantum and classical computations", arXiv:2008.01349, (2020).

[137] Marcela Carena, Henry Lamm, Ying-Ying Li, and Wanqiang Liu, "Quantum error thresholds for gauge-redundant digitizations of lattice field theories", arXiv:2402.16780, (2024).

[138] Saurabh V. Kadam, "Theoretical Developments in Lattice Gauge Theory for Applications in Double-beta Decay Processes and Quantum Simulation", arXiv:2312.00780, (2023).

[139] Arata Yamamoto, "Real-time simulation of (2+1)-dimensional lattice gauge theory on qubits", arXiv:2008.11395, (2020).

[140] Giovanni Cataldi, "Hamiltonian Lattice Gauge Theories: emergent properties from Tensor Network methods", arXiv:2501.11115, (2025).

[141] Artur Avkhadiev, Lena Funcke, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kühn, and Phiala E. Shanahan, "Small-scale Hamiltonian optimization of interpolating operators for Lagrangian lattice quantum field theory", arXiv:2411.02185, (2024).

[142] Emanuele Mendicelli, "Investigating how to simulate lattice gauge theories on a quantum computer", arXiv:2308.15421, (2023).

[143] Erik J. Gustafson, "Stout Smearing on a Quantum Computer", arXiv:2211.05607, (2022).

[144] Pierpaolo Fontana, Joao C. Pinto Barros, and Andrea Trombettoni, "Reformulation of gauge theories in terms of gauge invariant fields", arXiv:2008.12973, (2020).

[145] Pierpaolo Fontana, Joao C. Pinto Barros, and Andrea Trombettoni, "Reformulation of gauge theories in terms of gauge invariant fields", Annals of Physics 436, 168683 (2022).

[146] Zachary Parks, Arnaud Carignan-Dugas, Erik Gustafson, Yannick Meurice, and Patrick Dreher, "Applying NOX Error Mitigation Protocols to Calculate Real-time Quantum Field Theory Scattering Phase Shifts", arXiv:2212.05333, (2022).

[147] Ying Chen, Yunheng Ma, and Shun Zhou, "Quantum Simulations of the Non-Unitary Time Evolution and Applications to Neutral-Kaon Oscillations", arXiv:2105.04765, (2021).

[148] Zohreh Davoudi, Chung-Chun Hsieh, and Saurabh V. Kadam, "Quantum computation of hadron scattering in a lattice gauge theory", arXiv:2505.20408, (2025).

[149] Doga Murat Kürkçüoglu, Henry Lamm, Oluwadara Ogunkoya, and Leonardo Pierattelli, "The 2T-quoctit: a two-mode bosonic qudit for high energy physics", arXiv:2509.21941, (2025).

[150] Karunya Shailesh Shirali, Kyle Sherbert, Yanzhu Chen, Adrien Florio, Andreas Weichselbaum, Robert D. Pisarski, and Sophia E. Economou, "To break, or not to break: Symmetries in adaptive quantum simulations, a case study on the Schwinger model", arXiv:2510.03083, (2025).

[151] Christopher F. Kane, Siddharth Hariprakash, and Christian W. Bauer, "Obtaining continuum physics from dynamical simulations of Hamiltonian lattice gauge theories", arXiv:2506.16559, (2025).

[152] Zong-Gang Mou and Bipasha Chakraborty, "Scalable quantum computation of Quantum Electrodynamics beyond one spatial dimension", arXiv:2510.27668, (2025).

[153] Henry Froland, Dorota M. Grabowska, and Zhiyao Li, "Simulating Fully Gauge-Fixed SU(2) Hamiltonian Dynamics on Digital Quantum Computers", arXiv:2512.22782, (2025).

[154] Sebastian Osorio Perez, Edison M. Murairi, Erik J. Gustafson, and Henry Lamm, "Primitive Quantum Gates for an $SU(3)$ Discrete Subgroup: $Σ(72\times3)$", arXiv:2511.17437, (2025).

[155] Saurabh V. Kadam, Aahiri Naskar, Indrakshi Raychowdhury, and Jesse R. Stryker, "Loop-string-hadron approach to SU(3) lattice Yang-Mills theory, II: Operator representation for the trivalent vertex", arXiv:2512.11796, (2025).

[156] Zoë Webb-Mack and Natalie Klco, "Deforming the Trail: Baseline Quantum Circuitry for $\text{SU(2)}_k$ Lattice Gauge Theory", arXiv:2605.15076, (2026).

[157] Paul Ludwig, Timo Jakobs, and Carsten Urbach, "Scaling and Luescher Term in a non-Abelian (2+1)d SU$(2)$ Quantum Link Model", arXiv:2602.23213, (2026).

[158] Luca Spagnoli, Alessandro Roggero, and Nathan Wiebe, "Qudit stabiliser codes for $\mathbb{Z}_N$ lattice gauge theories with matter", arXiv:2602.20661, (2026).

[159] Fran Ilcic and Indrakshi Raychowdhury, "Physicality oracle for SU(3) Loop-String-Hadron dynamics: a digital quantum circuit", arXiv:2512.13035, (2025).

The above citations are from Crossref's cited-by service (last updated successfully 2026-07-17 08:17:26) and SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2026-07-16 20:12:29). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.

Could not fetch ADS cited-by data during last attempt 2026-07-17 08:17:26: Cannot retrieve data from ADS due to rate limitations.

This Paper is published in Quantum under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. Copyright remains with the original copyright holders such as the authors or their institutions.