Time-delocalized quantum subsystems and operations: on the existence of processes with indefinite causal structure in quantum mechanics

Ognyan Oreshkov

doi:10.22331/q-2019-12-02-206

Time-delocalized quantum subsystems and operations: on the existence of processes with indefinite causal structure in quantum mechanics

QuIC, Ecole polytechnique de Bruxelles, C.P. 165, Université libre de Bruxelles, 1050 Brussels, Belgium

Published:	2019-12-02, volume 3, page 206
Eprint:	arXiv:1801.07594v4
Doi:	https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-12-02-206
Citation:	Quantum 3, 206 (2019).

Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.

Abstract

It has been shown that it is theoretically possible for there to exist higher-order quantum processes in which the operations performed by separate parties cannot be ascribed a definite causal order. Some of these processes are believed to have a physical realization in standard quantum mechanics via coherent control of the times of the operations. A prominent example is the quantum SWITCH, which was recently demonstrated experimentally. However, the interpretation of such experiments as realizations of a process with indefinite causal structure as opposed to some form of simulation of such a process has remained controversial. Where exactly are the local operations of the parties in such an experiment? On what spaces do they act given that their times are indefinite? Can we probe them directly rather than assume what they ought to be based on heuristic considerations? How can we reconcile the claim that these operations really take place, each once as required, with the fact that the structure of the presumed process implies that they cannot be part of any acyclic circuit? Here, I offer a precise answer to these questions: the input and output systems of the operations in such a process are generally nontrivial subsystems of Hilbert spaces that are tensor products of Hilbert spaces associated with systems at different times---a fact that is directly experimentally verifiable. With respect to these time-delocalized subsystems, the structure of the process is one of a circuit with a causal cycle. This provides a rigorous sense in which processes with indefinite causal structure can be said to exist within the known quantum mechanics. I also identify a whole class of isometric processes, of which the quantum SWITCH is a special case, that admit a physical realization on time-delocalized subsystems. These results unveil a novel structure within quantum mechanics, which may have important implications for physics and information processing.

► BibTeX data

@article{Oreshkov2019timedelocalized,
  doi = {10.22331/q-2019-12-02-206},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-12-02-206},
  title = {Time-delocalized quantum subsystems and operations: on the existence of processes with indefinite causal structure in quantum mechanics},
  author = {Oreshkov, Ognyan},
  journal = {{Quantum}},
  issn = {2521-327X},
  publisher = {{Verein zur F{\"{o}}rderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften}},
  volume = {3},
  pages = {206},
  month = dec,
  year = {2019}
}

► References

[1] L. Hardy, Probability Theories with Dynamic Causal Structure: A New Framework for Quantum Gravity, (2005).
arXiv:gr-qc/0509120

[2] L. Hardy, Quantum Gravity Computers: On the Theory of Computation with Indefinite Causal Structure, in Quantum Reality, Relativistic Causality, and Closing the Epistemic Circle, The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol. 73 (Springer, Dordrecht, 2009); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9107-0_21; (2007).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9107-0_21
arXiv:quant-ph/0701019

[3] G. Chiribella, G. M. D'Ariano, P. Perinotti, and B. Valiron, Quantum computations without definite causal structure, Phys. Rev. A 88, 022318 (2013); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.022318; (2009).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.022318

[4] G. Chiribella, G. M. D'Ariano, and P. Perinotti, Transforming quantum operations: quantum supermaps, Europhys. Lett. 83, 30004 (2008); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/83/30004; (2008).
https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/83/30004
arXiv:0804.0180

[5] G. Chiribella, G. M. D'Ariano, and P. Perinotti, Theoretical framework for quantum networks, Phys. Rev. A 80, 022339 (2009); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.80.022339; (2009).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.80.022339
arXiv:0904.4483

[6] The idea of quantum computation beyond causal circuits was notably first considered by Deutsch Deutsch who studied modifications of quantum theory in the vicinity of closed timelike curves, which led to the study of the computational power of such models (see Ref. Aaronson). Although linked to time travel in a different sense Chiribella12, the quantum SWITCH is motivated by the idea of `quantum superpositions of different causal structures' as opposed to classically definite backgrounds with timelike cycles.

[7] D. Deutsch, Quantum mechanics near closed timelike lines, Phys. Rev. D 44, 3197 (1991); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.44.3197.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.44.3197

[8] S. Aaaronson and J. Watrous, Closed timelike curves make quantum and classical computing equivalent, Proc. R. Soc. A 465, 631-647 (2009); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2008.0350; (2008).
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2008.0350
arXiv:0808.2669

[9] O. Oreshkov, F. Costa, and Č. Brukner, Quantum correlations with no causal order, Nat. Commun. 3, 1092 (2012); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2076; (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2076
arXiv:1105.4464

[10] O. Oreshkov and C. Giarmatzi, Causal and causally separable processes, New J. Phys. 18, 093020 (2016); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/9/093020; (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/9/093020
arXiv:1506.05449

[11] M. Araújo, C. Branciard, F. Costa, A. Feix, C. Giarmatzi, and Č. Brukner, Witnessing causal nonseparability, New J. Phys. 17, 102001 (2015); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/17/10/102001; (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/17/10/102001
arXiv:1506.03776

[12] J. Wechs, A. A. Abbott, and C. Branciard, On the definition and characterisation of multipartite causal (non)separability, New J. Phys. 21, 013027 (2019); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aaf352; (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aaf352
arXiv:1807.10557

[13] Ä. Baumeler and S. Wolf, Perfect signaling among three parties violating predefined causal order, Proceedings of International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT) 2014, 526-530, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIT.2014.6874888; (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIT.2014.6874888
arXiv:1312.5916

[14] Ä. Baumeler, A. Feix, and S. Wolf, Maximal incompatibility of locally classical behavior and global causal order in multi-party scenarios, Phys. Rev. A 90, 042106 (2014); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.90.042106; (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.90.042106
arXiv:1403.7333

[15] Ä. Baumeler and S. Wolf, The space of logically consistent classical processes without causal order, New J. Phys. 18, 013036 (2016); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/1/013036; (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/1/013036
arXiv:1507.01714

[16] C. Branciard, M. Araújo, A. Feix, F. Costa, and Č. Brukner, The simplest causal inequalities and their violation, New J. Phys. 18, 013008 (2016); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/1/013008; (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/1/013008
arXiv:1508.01704

[17] S. S. Bhattacharya and M. Banik, Biased Non-Causal Game, (2015).
arXiv:1509.02721

[18] A. Feix, M. Araújo, and Č. Brukner, Causally nonseparable processes admitting a causal model, New J. Phys. 18, 083040 (2016); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/8/083040; (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/8/083040
arXiv:1604.03391

[19] A. A. Abbott, C. Giarmatzi, F. Costa, and C. Branciard, Multipartite Causal Correlations: Polytopes and Inequalities, Phys. Rev. A 94, 032131 (2016); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.032131; (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.032131
arXiv:1608.01528

[20] N. Miklin, A. A. Abbott, C. Branciard, R. Chaves, C. Budroni, The entropic approach to causal correlations, New J. Phys. 19, 113041 (2017); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aa8f9f; (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aa8f9f
arXiv:1706.10270

[21] J. S. Bell, On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox, Physics 1, 3, 195-200 (1964); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195

[22] O. Oreshkov and N. J. Cerf, Operational quantum theory without predefined time, New J. Phys. 18, 073037 (2016); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/7/073037; (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/7/073037
arXiv:1406.3829

[23] R. Silva, Y. Guryanova, A. J. Short, P. Skrzypczyk, N. Brunner, and S. Popescu, Connecting processes with indefinite causal order and multi-time quantum states, New J. Phys. 19 , 103022 (2017); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aa84fe; (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aa84fe
arXiv:1701.08638

[24] M. Araújo, P. A. Guérin, and Ä. Baumeler, Quantum computation with indefinite causal structures, Phys. Rev. A 96, 052315 (2017); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.052315; (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.052315
arXiv:1706.09854

[25] S. Milz, F. A. Pollock, T. P. Le, G. Chiribella, and K. Modi, Entanglement, non-Markovianity, and causal non-separability, New J. Phys. 20, 033033 (2018); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aaafee; (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aaafee
arXiv:1711.04065

[26] G. Chiribella, Perfect discrimination of no-signalling channels via quantum superposition of causal structures, Phys. Rev. A 86, 040301 (2012); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.86.040301; (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.86.040301
arXiv:1109.5154

[27] C. Branciard, Witnesses of causal nonseparability: an introduction and a few case studies, Sci. Rep. 6, 26018 (2016); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26018; (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26018
arXiv:1603.00043

[28] T. Colnaghi, G. M. D'Ariano, P. Perinotti, and S. Facchini, Quantum computation with programmable connections between gates, Phys. Lett. A 376, 2940 - 2943 (2012); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2012.08.028; (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2012.08.028
arXiv:1109.5987

[29] M. Araújo, F. Costa, and Č. Brukner, Computational advantage from quantum-controlled ordering of gates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 250402 (2014); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.250402; (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.250402
arXiv:1401.8127

[30] A. Feix, M. Araújo, and Č. Brukner, Quantum superposition of the order of parties as a communication resource, Phys. Rev. A 92, 052326 (2015); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.052326; (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.052326
arXiv:1508.07840

[31] P. A. Guérin, A. Feix, M. Araújo, and Č. Brukner, Exponential Communication Complexity Advantage from Quantum Superposition of the Direction of Communication, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 100502 (2016); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.100502; (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.100502
arXiv:1605.07372

[32] N. Friis, V. Dunjko, W. Dür, and H. J. Briegel, Implementing quantum control for unknown subroutines, Phys. Rev. A 89, 030303(R) (2014); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.89.030303; (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.89.030303
arXiv:1401.8128

[33] L. M. Procopio et al., Experimental Superposition of Orders of Quantum Gates, Nat. Commun. 6, 7913 (2015); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8913; (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8913
arXiv:1412.4006

[34] N. Friis, A. A. Melnikov, G. Kirchmair, and H. J. Briegel, Coherent controlization using superconducting qubits, Sci. Rep. 5, 18036 (2015); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18036; (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18036
arXiv:1508.00447

[35] G. Rubino, L. A. Rozema, A. Feix, M. Araújo, J. M. Zeuner, L. M. Procopio, Č. Brukner, and P. Walther, Experimental Verification of an Indefinite Causal Order, Sci. Adv. 3, e1602589 (2017); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602589; (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602589
arXiv:1608.01683

[36] G. Rubino, L. A. Rozema, F. Massa, M. Araújo, M. Zych, Č. Brukner, and P. Walther, Experimental Entanglement of Temporal Orders, (2017).
arXiv:1712.06884

[37] K. Goswami, C. Giarmatzi, M. Kewming, F. Costa, C. Branciard, J. Romero, and A. G. White, Indefinite Causal Order in a Quantum Switch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 090503 (2018); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.090503; (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.090503
arXiv:1803.04302

[38] L. Viola, E. Knill, and R. Laflamme, Constructing Qubits in Physical Systems, J. Phys. A 34, 7067 (2001); DOI https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/331; (2001).
https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/331
arXiv:quant-ph/0101090

[39] E. Knill, Protected realizations of quantum information, Phys. Rev. A 74, 042301 (2006); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.74.042301; (2006).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.74.042301
arXiv:quant-ph/0603252

[40] D. W. Kribs and R. W. Spekkens, Quantum Error Correcting Subsystems are Unitarily Recoverable Subsystems, Phys. Rev. A 74, 042329 (2006); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.74.042329; (2006).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.74.042329
arXiv:quant-ph/0608045

[41] P. Zanardi, Virtual Quantum Subsystems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 077901 (2001); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.077901; (2001).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.077901
arXiv:quant-ph/0103030

[42] P. Zanardi, D. Lidar, and S. Lloyd, Quantum Tensor Product Structures are Observable Induced, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 060402 (2004); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.060402; (2003).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.060402
arXiv:quant-ph/0308043

[43] M. Araújo, Adrien Feix, Miguel Navascués, and Časlav Brukner, A purification postulate for quantum mechanics with indefinite causal order, Quantum 1, 10 (2017); DOI: https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2017-04-26-10; (2016).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2017-04-26-10
arXiv:1611.08535

[44] A. Jamiołkowski, Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators, Rep. Math. Phys. 3, 4, 275-278 (1972); DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4877(72)90011-0.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4877(72)90011-0

[45] M.-D. Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices, Lin. Alg. Appl. 10, 285-290 (1975); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3795(75)90075-0.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3795(75)90075-0

[46] O. Oreshkov and N. J. Cerf, Operational formulation of time reversal in quantum theory, Nature Phys. 11, 853-858 (2015); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3414; (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3414
arXiv:1507.07745

[47] P. Perinotti, Causal Structures and the Classification of Higher Order Quantum Computations, in Time in physics, R. Renner and S. Stupar (eds), Tutorials, Schools, and Workshops in the Mathematical Sciences, (Birkhäuser, Cham, 2017); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68655-4_7;.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68655-4_7
arXiv:1612.05099

[48] A. Kissinger and S. Uijlen, A categorical semantics for causal structure, Logical Methods in Computer Science, Volume 15, Issue 3 (August 9, 2019), lmcs:5681; DOI: https://doi.org/10.23638/LMCS-15(3:15)2019; (2017).
https://doi.org/10.23638/LMCS-15(3:15)2019
arXiv:1701.04732

[49] M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum information, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000); DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976667.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976667

[50] E. Castro-Ruiz, F. Giacomini, and Časlav Brukner, Dynamics of Quantum Causal Structures, Phys. Rev. X 8, 011047 (2018); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.011047; (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.011047
arXiv:1710.03139

[51] Strictly speaking, in Ref. Chiribella12 it was shown that if there exists a realization of the quantum SWITCH such that Alice's operation is in the past of Bob's operation so that the output ancilla of Alice could be connected to the input ancilla of Bob, this would allow deterministic transmission of information back in time. In the realization discussed here, this condition is not satisfied—the ancillary systems of Alice and Bob cannot be connected to each other as they occupy space-like separated regions. Nevertheless, the full experiment still has the structure of a circuit with a `timelike' cycle, albeit not permitting deterministic time travel, as any quantum process matrix is equivalent to a channel from the output systems of all parties to their input systems OCB.

[52] More precisely, C-SWAP$^{XYZ} = |0\rangle\langle 0|^{X}\otimes \mathbb{I}^{YZ} + |1\rangle\langle 1|^{X}\otimes$SWAP$^{YZ}$, where SWAP$^{YZ}$ is the SWAP operator on $Y$ and $Z$, which can be defined as follows. Consider two systems $Y$ and $Z$ with Hilbert spaces of the same dimension and a linear isomorphism between the states in these Hilbert spaces. An arbitrary vector in the joint system $YZ$ can be written in the form $|\psi\rangle^{YZ} = \sum_{i,j} \psi_{ij}|i\rangle^Y |j\rangle^Z$, where $\{|i\rangle^Y\}$ are orthonormal bases for $Y$ and $Z$, respectively. The action of the operator SWAP$^{YZ}$ on the vector $|\psi\rangle^{YZ}$ is then given by SWAP$^{YZ} |\psi\rangle^{YZ} = \sum_{i,j} \psi_{ij}|j\rangle^Y |i\rangle^Z$.

[53] Of course, if during the working of the device, an adversary turns on unwanted interactions, such as a Hamiltonian on the control qubit that is not diagonal in the logical basis, this could prevent the device from implementing the correct operation on the systems of interest. But this is the case for any physical device implementing an operation, irrespectively of whether the operation is localized or delocalized in time.

[54] Very recently, after the submission of this paper, the author and colleagues J. Barrett and R. Lorenz showed via different methods that all bipartite processes that are unitarily extendible are causally separable, and hence their unitary extensions are variations of the quantum SWITCH (in preparation). Nevertheless, we believe that the proof of realizability presented here has a particular value since it is based on a different idea that could have wider applications. In particular, it provides the basis for the generalization in Sec. 7, and might be useful in the search for realizations of more complicated unitary processes.

[55] W. F. Stinespring, Positive functions on C*-algebras, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 6, 211 (1955); DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2032342.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2032342

[56] Throughout this paper, when we speak about isomorphic mapping between two Hilbert spaces, we understand isometric isomorphism.

[57] N. Brunner, D. Cavalcanti, S. Pironio, V. Scarani, and S. Wehner, Bell nonlocality, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 419 (2014); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.86.419; (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.86.419
arXiv:1303.2849

[58] After this paper appeared, a subsequent paper AllardGuerin claimed to show that all unitary processes admit a representation on time-delocalized subsystems. However, this claim is based on a misunderstanding of the concept of time-delocalized subsystems. The proof claimed in AllardGuerin amounts to the observation (discussed in this paper) that if we have a unitary process, the unitary maps isomorphically the output system of any one party, say Alice, onto a subsystem of the input systems of the rest of the parties, and similarly maps a subsystem of the output systems of the rest of the parties onto the input system of Alice. This by itself does not imply that we can associate the input and output systems of Alice with time-delocalized subsystems (which are subsystems of tensor products of Hilbert spaces associated with concrete physical systems at concrete times).

[59] P. Allard Guérin and Č. Brukner, Observer-dependent locality of quantum events, New J. Phys. 20, 103031 (2018); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aae742; (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aae742
arXiv:1805.12429

[60] D. Ebler, S. Salek, and G. Chiribella, Enhanced Communication with the Assistance of Indefinite Causal Order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 120502 (2018); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.120502; (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.120502
arXiv:1711.10165

[61] M. Zych, F. Costa, I. Pikovski, and Časlav Brukner, Bell's Theorem for Temporal Order, Nat. Commun. 10, 3772 (2019); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11579-x; (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11579-x
arXiv:1708.00248

[62] A. Dimić, M. Milivojević, D. Gočanin, and Časlav Brukner, Simulating spacetime with indefinite causal order via Rindler observers, (2017).
arXiv:1712.02689

Cited by

[1] Giulia Rubino, Lee A. Rozema, Francesco Massa, Mateus Araújo, Magdalena Zych, Časlav Brukner, and Philip Walther, "Experimental entanglement of temporal order", Quantum 6, 621 (2022).

[2] Christina Giarmatzi, Springer Theses 1 (2019) ISBN:978-3-030-31929-8.

[3] Ladina Hausmann, Alexander Schmidhuber, and Esteban Castro-Ruiz, "Measurement events relative to temporal quantum reference frames", Quantum 9, 1616 (2025).

[4] Ravi Kunjwal and Ämin Baumeler, "Trading Causal Order for Locality", Physical Review Letters 131 12, 120201 (2023).

[5] Nick Ormrod, Augustin Vanrietvelde, and Jonathan Barrett, "Causal structure in the presence of sectorial constraints, with application to the quantum switch", Quantum 7, 1028 (2023).

[6] Zuzana Gavorová, Matan Seidel, and Yonathan Touati, "Topological obstructions to quantum computation with unitary oracles", Physical Review A 109 3, 032625 (2024).

[7] Karl Teodor Alexander Trygve Strömberg, Springer Theses 255 (2026) ISBN:978-3-032-14266-5.

[8] Ämin Baumeler, Amin Shiraz Gilani, and Jibran Rashid, "Unlimited non-causal correlations and their relation to non-locality", Quantum 6, 673 (2022).

[9] Julian Wechs, Cyril Branciard, and Ognyan Oreshkov, "Existence of processes violating causal inequalities on time-delocalised subsystems", Nature Communications 14 1, 1471 (2023).

[10] Salvatore Capozziello and Carmen Ferrara, "The equivalence principle as a Noether symmetry", International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics 21 10, 2440014 (2024).

[11] Anna Steffinlongo and Hippolyte Dourdent, "Simulating noncausality with quantum control of causal orders", Physical Review Research 8 1, 013127 (2026).

[12] Alastair A. Abbott, Julian Wechs, Dominic Horsman, Mehdi Mhalla, and Cyril Branciard, "Communication through coherent control of quantum channels", Quantum 4, 333 (2020).

[13] Esteban Castro-Ruiz, Flaminia Giacomini, Alessio Belenchia, and Časlav Brukner, "Quantum clocks and the temporal localisability of events in the presence of gravitating quantum systems", Nature Communications 11 1, 2672 (2020).

[14] Aaron Z Goldberg and Khabat Heshami, "Breaking the limits of purification: postselection enhances heat-bath algorithmic cooling", Journal of Physics Communications 7 1, 015003 (2023).

[15] Teodor Strömberg, Peter Schiansky, Marco Túlio Quintino, Michael Antesberger, Lee A. Rozema, Iris Agresti, Časlav Brukner, and Philip Walther, "Experimental superposition of a quantum evolution with its time reverse", Physical Review Research 6 2, 023071 (2024).

[16] Ricardo Faleiro, Nikola Paunkovic, and Marko Vojinovic, "Operational interpretation of the vacuum and process matrices for identical particles", Quantum 7, 986 (2023).

[17] Yu Guo, Hao Tang, Bo-Xuan Wang, Min-Yu Lv, Jia-Wen Fan, Xiao-Min Hu, Yun-Feng Huang, Chuan-Feng Li, Guang-Can Guo, Giulio Chiribella, and Bi-Heng Liu, "Experimental violation of a Bell-like inequality for causal order", Science Advances 12 24, eaee2912 (2026).

[18] Lee A. Rozema, Teodor Strömberg, Huan Cao, Yu Guo, Bi-Heng Liu, and Philip Walther, "Experimental aspects of indefinite causal order in quantum mechanics", Nature Reviews Physics 6 8, 483 (2024).

[19] Wen‐Qiang Liu, Zhe Meng, Bo‐Wen Song, Jian Li, Qing‐Yuan Wu, Xiao‐Xiao Chen, Jin‐Yang Hong, An‐Ning Zhang, and Zhang‐Qi Yin, "Experimentally Demonstrating Indefinite Causal Order Algorithms to Solve the Generalized Deutsch's Problem", Advanced Quantum Technologies 7 10, 2400181 (2024).

[20] Fabio Costa, "A no-go theorem for superpositions of causal orders", Quantum 6, 663 (2022).

[21] Alireza Tavanfar, Sahar Alipour, and Ali T. Rezakhani, "Does Quantum Mechanics Breed Larger, More Intricate Quantum Theories? The Case for Experience-Centric Quantum Theory and the Interactome of Quantum Theories", Universe 11 5, 162 (2025).

[22] Nikola Paunković and Marko Vojinović, "Causal orders, quantum circuits and spacetime: distinguishing between definite and superposed causal orders", Quantum 4, 275 (2020).

[23] Giulio Chiribella, Manik Banik, Some Sankar Bhattacharya, Tamal Guha, Mir Alimuddin, Arup Roy, Sutapa Saha, Sristy Agrawal, and Guruprasad Kar, "Indefinite causal order enables perfect quantum communication with zero capacity channels", New Journal of Physics 23 3, 033039 (2021).

[24] David Schmid, John H. Selby, Vinicius P. Rossi, Roberto D. Baldijão, and Ana Belén Sainz, "Shadows and subsystems of generalized probabilistic theories: when tomographic incompleteness is not a loophole for contextuality proofs", Quantum 9, 1880 (2025).

[25] Marco Fellous-Asiani, Raphaël Mothe, Léa Bresque, Hippolyte Dourdent, Patrice A. Camati, Alastair A. Abbott, Alexia Auffèves, and Cyril Branciard, "Comparing the quantum switch and its simulations with energetically constrained operations", Physical Review Research 5 2, 023111 (2023).

[26] Nikola Paunković and Marko Vojinović, "Equivalence Principle in Classical and Quantum Gravity", Universe 8 11, 598 (2022).

[27] Laurie Letertre, "Causal nonseparability and its implications for spatiotemporal relations", Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 95, 64 (2022).

[28] Tein van der Lugt, Jonathan Barrett, and Giulio Chiribella, "Device-independent certification of indefinite causal order in the quantum switch", Nature Communications 14 1, 5811 (2023).

[29] Timothée Hoffreumon and Ognyan Oreshkov, "Projective characterization of higher-order quantum transformations", Quantum 10, 1978 (2026).

[30] Hlér Kristjánsson, Wenxu Mao, and Giulio Chiribella, "Witnessing latent time correlations with a single quantum particle", Physical Review Research 3 4, 043147 (2021).

[31] Jasleen Kaur, Shrobona Bagchi, and Arun K. Pati, "Remote creation of quantum coherence via indefinite causal order", Quantum Information Processing 22 2, 107 (2023).

[32] Augustin Vanrietvelde, Nick Ormrod, Hlér Kristjánsson, and Jonathan Barrett, "Consistent circuits for indefinite causal order", Quantum 9, 1923 (2025).

[33] Yu Guo, Xiao-Min Hu, Zhi-Bo Hou, Huan Cao, Jin-Ming Cui, Bi-Heng Liu, Yun-Feng Huang, Chuan-Feng Li, Guang-Can Guo, and Giulio Chiribella, "Experimental Transmission of Quantum Information Using a Superposition of Causal Orders", Physical Review Letters 124 3, 030502 (2020).

[34] Daryus Chandra, Marcello Caleffi, and Angela Sara Cacciapuoti, "The Entanglement-Assisted Communication Capacity Over Quantum Trajectories", IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 21 6, 3632 (2022).

[35] Natália S. Móller, Bruna Sahdo, and Nelson Yokomizo, "Gravitational quantum switch on a superposition of spherical shells", Quantum 8, 1248 (2024).

[36] Kornikar Sen, Adithi Ajith, Saronath Halder, and Ujjwal Sen, "To share and not share a singlet: control qubit and nonclassicality in teleportation", Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 58 5, 055302 (2025).

[37] Viktoria Kabel, Anne-Catherine de la Hamette, Luca Apadula, Carlo Cepollaro, Henrique Gomes, Jeremy Butterfield, and Časlav Brukner, "Quantum coordinates, localisation of events, and the quantum hole argument", Communications Physics 8 1, 185 (2025).

[38] David Felce, Nicetu Tibau Vidal, Vlatko Vedral, and Eduardo O. Dias, "Indefinite causal orders from superpositions in time", Physical Review A 105 6, 062216 (2022).

[39] Michael Antesberger, Marco Túlio Quintino, Philip Walther, and Lee A. Rozema, "Higher-Order Process Matrix Tomography of a Passively-Stable Quantum Switch", PRX Quantum 5 1, 010325 (2024).

[40] Nicolas Loizeau and Alexei Grinbaum, "Channel capacity enhancement with indefinite causal order", Physical Review A 101 1, 012340 (2020).

[41] Giulio Chiribella and Hlér Kristjánsson, "Quantum Shannon theory with superpositions of trajectories", Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 475 2225, 20180903 (2019).

[42] Anne-Catherine de la Hamette, Viktoria Kabel, Marios Christodoulou, and Časlav Brukner, "Indefinite Causal Order and Quantum Coordinates", Physical Review Letters 135 14, 141402 (2025).

[43] Wataru Yokojima, Marco Túlio Quintino, Akihito Soeda, and Mio Murao, "Consequences of preserving reversibility in quantum superchannels", Quantum 5, 441 (2021).

[44] Pablo Arrighi, Christopher Cedzich, Marin Costes, Ulysse Rémond, and Benoît Valiron, "Addressable Quantum Gates", ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing 4 3, 1 (2023).

[45] V. Vilasini and Renato Renner, "Fundamental Limits for Realizing Quantum Processes in Spacetime", Physical Review Letters 133 8, 080201 (2024).

[46] Sk Sazim, Michal Sedlak, Kratveer Singh, and Arun Kumar Pati, "Classical communication with indefinite causal order for N completely depolarizing channels", Physical Review A 103 6, 062610 (2021).

[47] K. Goswami and J. Romero, "Experiments on quantum causality", AVS Quantum Science 2 3, 037101 (2020).

[48] Huan Cao, Jessica Bavaresco, Ning-Ning Wang, Lee A. Rozema, Chao Zhang, Yun-Feng Huang, Bi-Heng Liu, Chuan-Feng Li, Guang-Can Guo, and Philip Walther, "Semi-device-independent certification of indefinite causal order in a photonic quantum switch", Optica 10 5, 561 (2023).

[49] Otavio A. D. Molitor, André H. A. Malavazi, Roberto Dobal Baldijão, Alexandre C. Orthey, Ismael L. Paiva, and Pedro R. Dieguez, "Quantum switch instabilities with an open control", Communications Physics 7 1, 373 (2024).

[50] Carla M.D. Richter, Michael Antesberger, Huan Cao, Philip Walther, and Lee A. Rozema, "Toward an Experimental Device-Independent Verification of Indefinite Causal Order", PRX Quantum 7 1, 010354 (2026).

[51] Timothée Hoffreumon and Ognyan Oreshkov, "The Multi-round Process Matrix", Quantum 5, 384 (2021).

[52] Jonathan Barrett, Robin Lorenz, and Ognyan Oreshkov, "Cyclic quantum causal models", Nature Communications 12 1, 885 (2021).

[53] Zixuan Liu and Giulio Chiribella, "Tsirelson bounds for quantum correlations with indefinite causal order", Nature Communications 16 1, 3314 (2025).

[54] Guilhem Doat and Augustin Vanrietvelde, "What can we do in a symmetry-constrained perspective? The importance of the total charge's status in quantum reference frame frameworks", Quantum 10, 2126 (2026).

[55] Pedro R. Dieguez, Vinicius F. Lisboa, and Roberto M. Serra, "Thermal devices powered by generalized measurements with indefinite causal order", Physical Review A 107 1, 012423 (2023).

[56] Julian Wechs and Ognyan Oreshkov, "Subsystem Decompositions of Quantum Evolutions and Transformations between Causal Perspectives", Physical Review Letters 135 19, 190201 (2025).

[57] Matthias Salzger and John H. Selby, "A decompositional framework for process theories in spacetime", Quantum 10, 1959 (2026).

[58] V. Vilasini and Renato Renner, "Embedding cyclic information-theoretic structures in acyclic space-times: No-go results for indefinite causality", Physical Review A 110 2, 022227 (2024).

[59] Matthias Salzger and V Vilasini, "Mapping indefinite causal order processes to composable quantum protocols in a spacetime", New Journal of Physics 27 2, 023002 (2025).

[60] Aurélien Drezet, "Indefinite causal order with fixed temporal order for electrons and positrons", Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations 10 1, 101 (2023).

[61] Eduardo A. B. Oliveira and André G. S. Landulfo, "Spacetime-covariant approach to inertial and accelerated quantum clocks in first quantization", Physical Review D 113 4, 045018 (2026).

[62] Julian Wechs, Hippolyte Dourdent, Alastair A. Abbott, and Cyril Branciard, "Quantum Circuits with Classical Versus Quantum Control of Causal Order", PRX Quantum 2 3, 030335 (2021).

[63] Márcio M. Taddei, Jaime Cariñe, Daniel Martínez, Tania García, Nayda Guerrero, Alastair A. Abbott, Mateus Araújo, Cyril Branciard, Esteban S. Gómez, Stephen P. Walborn, Leandro Aolita, and Gustavo Lima, "Computational Advantage from the Quantum Superposition of Multiple Temporal Orders of Photonic Gates", PRX Quantum 2 1, 010320 (2021).

[64] Aaron Z. Goldberg, Khabat Heshami, and L. L. Sánchez-Soto, "Evading noise in multiparameter quantum metrology with indefinite causal order", Physical Review Research 5 3, 033198 (2023).

[65] Giulia Rubino, Lee A. Rozema, Daniel Ebler, Hlér Kristjánsson, Sina Salek, Philippe Allard Guérin, Alastair A. Abbott, Cyril Branciard, Časlav Brukner, Giulio Chiribella, and Philip Walther, "Experimental quantum communication enhancement by superposing trajectories", Physical Review Research 3 1, 013093 (2021).

[66] Nicola Pinzani and Stefano Gogioso, "Giving Operational Meaning to the Superposition of Causal Orders", Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 340, 256 (2021).

[67] Llorenç Escolà-Farràs and Daniel Braun, "Quantifying causal influence in quantum mechanics", Physical Review A 106 6, 062415 (2022).

[68] Kyrylo Simonov, Marcello Caleffi, Jessica Illiano, Jacquiline Romero, and Angela Sara Cacciapuoti, "Universal quantum computation via superposed orders of single-qubit gates", Physical Review Research 8 1, 013239 (2026).

[69] Laurie Letertre, "Temporal nonlocality from indefinite causal orders", The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 734907 (2025).

[70] Robin Lorenz, "Quantum causal models: the merits of the spirit of Reichenbach’s principle for understanding quantum causal structure", Synthese 200 5, 424 (2022).

[71] Nannan Ma, P. Z. Zhao, and Jiangbin Gong, "Quantum machine learning with indefinite causal order", Physical Review A 110 5, 052406 (2024).

[72] Lachlan Parker and Fabio Costa, "Background Independence and Quantum Causal Structure", Quantum 6, 865 (2022).

[73] Daniel Ebler, Sina Salek, and Giulio Chiribella, "Enhanced Communication with the Assistance of Indefinite Causal Order", Physical Review Letters 120 12, 120502 (2018).

[74] Kejin Wei, Nora Tischler, Si-Ran Zhao, Yu-Huai Li, Juan Miguel Arrazola, Yang Liu, Weijun Zhang, Hao Li, Lixing You, Zhen Wang, Yu-Ao Chen, Barry C. Sanders, Qiang Zhang, Geoff J. Pryde, Feihu Xu, and Jian-Wei Pan, "Experimental Quantum Switching for Exponentially Superior Quantum Communication Complexity", Physical Review Letters 122 12, 120504 (2019).

[75] Sina Salek, Daniel Ebler, and Giulio Chiribella, "Quantum communication in a superposition of causal orders", arXiv:1809.06655, (2018).

[76] Philippe Allard Guérin and Časlav Brukner, "Observer-dependent locality of quantum events", New Journal of Physics 20 10, 103031 (2018).

[77] Philippe Allard Guérin, Giulia Rubino, and Časlav Brukner, "Communication through quantum-controlled noise", Physical Review A 99 6, 062317 (2019).

[78] Julian Wechs, Alastair A. Abbott, and Cyril Branciard, "On the definition and characterisation of multipartite causal (non)separability", New Journal of Physics 21 1, 013027 (2019).

[79] Lucien Hardy, "The Construction Interpretation: Conceptual Roads to Quantum Gravity", arXiv:1807.10980, (2018).

[80] Lucien Hardy, "Implementation of the Quantum Equivalence Principle", arXiv:1903.01289, (2019).

[81] Márcio M. Taddei, Jaime Cariñe, Daniel Martínez, Tania García, Nayda Guerrero, Alastair A. Abbott, Mateus Araújo, Cyril Branciard, Esteban S. Gómez, Stephen P. Walborn, Leandro Aolita, and Gustavo Lima, "Computational advantage from quantum superposition of multiple temporal orders of photonic gates", arXiv:2002.07817, (2020).

[82] V. Vilasini, Lin-Qing Chen, Liuhang Ye, and Renato Renner, "Events and their Localisation are Relative to a Lab", arXiv:2505.21797, (2025).

[83] Yu Guo, Xiao-Min Hu, Zhi-Bo Hou, Huan Cao, Jin-Ming Cui, Bi-Heng Liu, Yun-Feng Huang, Chuan-Feng Li, Guang-Can Guo, and Giulio Chiribella, "Experimental transmission of quantum information using a superposition of causal orders", arXiv:1811.07526, (2018).

[84] Philippe Allard Guérin, Marius Krumm, Costantino Budroni, and Časlav Brukner, "Composition rules for quantum processes: a no-go theorem", New Journal of Physics 21 1, 012001 (2019).

[85] Timothée Hoffreumon and Ognyan Oreshkov, "Projective characterization of higher-order quantum transformations", arXiv:2206.06206, (2022).

[86] Hlér Kristjánsson, Tatsuki Odake, Satoshi Yoshida, Philip Taranto, Jessica Bavaresco, Marco Túlio Quintino, and Mio Murao, "Exponential separation in quantum query complexity of the quantum switch with respect to simulations with standard quantum circuits", arXiv:2409.18420, (2024).

[87] Philippe Allard Guérin, Giulia Rubino, and Časlav Brukner, "Communication through quantum-controlled noise", arXiv:1812.06848, (2018).

[88] Yu Guo, Hao Tang, Bo-Xuan Wang, Min-Yu Lv, Jia-Wen, Fan, Xiao-Min Hu, Yun-Feng Huang, Chuan-Feng Liu, Guang-Can Guo, Giulio Chiribella, and Bi-Heng Liu, "Experimental violation of a Bell-like inequality for causal order", arXiv:2506.20516, (2025).

[89] Pablo Arrighi, Christopher Cedzich, Marin Costes, Ulysse Rémond, and Benoît Valiron, "Addressable quantum gates", arXiv:2109.08050, (2021).

[90] Nuriya Nurgalieva and V. Vilasini, "Any theory that admits a Wigner's Friend type multi-agent paradox is logically contextual", arXiv:2502.03874, (2025).

[91] C. T. Marco Ho, Fabio Costa, Christina Giarmatzi, and Timothy C. Ralph, "Violation of a causal inequality in a spacetime with definite causal order", arXiv:1804.05498, (2018).

[92] Augustin Vanrietvelde, Octave Mestoudjian, and Pablo Arrighi, "Partitions in quantum theory", arXiv:2506.22218, (2025).

[93] Julian Wechs and Ognyan Oreshkov, "Subsystem decompositions of quantum evolutions and transformations between causal perspectives", arXiv:2411.16504, (2024).

[94] Sabiha Durucan and Alexei Grinbaum, "Anomalous non-classicality via correlative and entropic Bell inequalities", arXiv:2007.03450, (2020).

[95] Issam Ibnouhsein, "Background-Free Device-Independent Violations of Causal Inequalities", arXiv:2508.17075, (2025).

[96] Augustin Vanrietvelde, "Specifying the operational meaning of quantum reference frames", arXiv:2607.03417, (2026).

The above citations are from Crossref's cited-by service (last updated successfully 2026-08-07 20:22:43) and SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2026-08-07 20:22:45). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.

This Paper is published in Quantum under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. Copyright remains with the original copyright holders such as the authors or their institutions.